Professional Documents
Culture Documents
provided in the Patent Act 1970, which did not provide for product
patents in this area. It may be noted here that it was this simple
like India, the deadline for complying with TRIPS was the year 2000. In
for countries like India, which did not grant product patents. The
provision provided an additional five years (until 2005), from the initial
brought in three set of amendments to the Indian Patent Act, 1970. India
first amended Indian Patent Act (1970) in 1999 and again in 2002. On
March 23, 2005, the Indian Parliament passed the Patent Amendment
Act, 2005. It was the third and final amendment to the Indian Patent
Act, 1970. The amended Patent Act conforms to requirements set forth
pharmaceutical industry.
industry have covered almost all possible aspects, but the studies made
Indian and foreign based studies. It is seen that most of the studies are
FDl inflow, and human rights under new product patent regime. Some
under reference.
Ill
The present study differs from the earlier studies, which covers
almost all the aspects of TRIPs and analyzes its impact on Indian
framework. While many of the studies assumes Post TRIPs era after
signing of TRIPs Agreement, the present study assumes Post TRIPs era
after India actually amended its Patent Act towards TRIPS compliance.
The study makes an earnest attempt to trace out the major impact of
has covered a span of one and half decade, i.e. from 1991-02 to 2005-06
the study into Pre TRIPs period and Post TRIPs period. This span of
period would be more than sufficient to find out the impact of TRIPs
IV
The objectives which have been pursued to study analyze the
study the provisions of Indian Patent Act, 1970 and its amendments
regime.
formulated:
the study (H2) assumes that there is a significant impact of TRIPs regime
the study (H2) assumes that there is a significant impact of the TRIPs
whereas the alternative Hypothesis of the study (H4) assumes that there
Primary data also have been collected from various sources for the
VI
ensure the quality of research study. The secondary data for the study
Economic Survey of India etc are also collected for supporting the
regulatory bodies and institutions, such as. Drug Price Control Order
also taken into reference for holding up the analysis. Altogether the
can be: the personal interviews with the CEO of the pharmaceutical
Vll
The statistical tools which have been used for the analysis and
period of the study has been bifurcated into two periods i.e. Pre TRIPs
Period and Post TRIPs Period. The Pre TRIPs Period (1991-92 to 1998-
by the Indian Patent Act, 1970 which recognized process patent only,
and term of patent was 7 years from date of application of patent and 5
years from date of grant of patent. The Post TRIPs Period (1999-00 to
and finally in 2005 towards TRIPs compliance. During this period the
of patent is 20 years.
Vlll
Further, the Researcher used the Interrupted Time Series Model
industry, the t- static of the time i.e. 4.103, is significant at 0.2 percent
level of significance; i.e. far beyond the level of significance. But in case
the long run. From the coefficients, it is indicative of the fact that TRIPs
regime growth.
IX
From the model summary of second hypothesis of the study
the time i.e. -.081, is significant at any percent level of significance and
long run. From the coefficient, it is indicative that TRIPs Agreement has
On the other hand, under the TRIPs regime the export of Indian
regime growth.
The t- static of the time i.e. 4.103, is significant at any percent level of
Intervention variable X3 i.e. for impact of TRIPs regime in long run the
in short term. From the coefficients, it is indicative of the fact that TRIPs
1999-00.
Intervention variable X3 i.e. for impact of TRIPs regime in long run the
XI
the coefficient it is indicative that R&D expenditure of Indian
Finally, the Researcher has come out with the other findings and
problems. Coping with challenges have also been offered for further
xu