Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=566347
File = DASH_SSRN_FinanceRisk_papers_2018.docx
Jan Dash
Bloomberg LP
Formerly head risk quant
731 Lexington Ave
New York, NY 10022
United States
SCHOLARLY PAPERS
27
DOWNLOADS
Rank 21,984
1,934
Ideas:
“ Contact: jdash9@comcast.net ; J. Dash Consultants
LLC Editor, Encyclopedia of Climate Change and Finance,
Economics, Policy (World Scientific, to be published)
Book: Quantitative Finance and Risk Management - 2nd
Ed. with chapter on Climate Change Risk Management:
http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/900
3 ”
Scholarly Papers (27)
1.
Abstract:
A common scenario risk analysis employs a multiple factor model with assumed changes
in the factors to obtain changes in non-factor variables. This analysis is sometimes
designated as a “predictive stress scenario”.
We choose to designate the factor model as a multifactor “CAPM” model, also related to
APT models. We are not concerned with the details of the factor model. The risks of the
scenarios are evaluated for a portfolio of instruments depending on changes of the
variables.
A systemic problem with this factor model approach is that the empirical correlations
between pairs of non-factor variables are not maintained. We designate “advanced
idiosyncratic risk” or “AI-Risk” as the correction to the risk of a predictive stress CAPM
model scenario that includes a better approximation to the physical correlations. We have
developed a new, effective, and economical AI-Risk formalism. There are two parts to
AI-Risk. The first part, which is actually standard, has independent normal random
variables with no correlations; we designate that as part of the CAPM model to get the
variances correctly reproduced; we believe this is standard practice. The second part
contains the corrections to the correlations; this is new.
We evaluate AI-Risk for some stock portfolios. We find that the AI-Risk can be
important, typically between 10%-50% of the predictive stress risk. The amount depends
on the ratio of long/short (“L/S”) position values, with larger AI-Risk for higher L/S
ratios.
A technical remark is that we use correlations as the metric for model improvement.
Therefore we work with z-scores or “unit” returns with the empirical volatility divided
out.
2.
The contribution of this paper is thus threefold: 1. The paper breaks ground by
emphasizing the desirability of incorporating interdisciplinary explicit interaction
between behavioral finance and securities modeling, 2. The paper provides a definite
model with a quantitative mechanism of how a particular psychological behavior can
influence the prices of some securities, and 3. The paper shows that this model can
facilitate the description of some illustrative option data.
3.
4.
The time dynamics of the origins of crises are commonly pictured by bubbles growing
and collapsing. Our dynamic model, the “CEEC (Critical Exponent Earthquake Crisis)
Model”, has these features , and can provide early warning equity crisis signals to help
prevent losses. The CEEC Model uses concepts of “critical exponents” from physics plus
a qualitative analogy from earthquakes to describe the build-up of bubbles (increase of
“frictional stress”) with subsequent crises from bubble collapses (“earthquakes”) . The
only inputs to the CEEC model for an equity index are equity index returns.
Tests comparing the CEEC model to data yield encouraging results, much better than
chance. Here are results from running the model as the user would have run it in the past:
• In 69% of the tests for which the model indicated a crisis in the short term (within one
year), a crisis was in fact observed within one year.
• 31% of actual crises were missed by the model within one year before the crisis.
We give a summary of the CEEC model in this short paper. A longer companion paper
describing full details of the model will appear.
We also analyze various markets already in crisis (equity, FX, commodities, rates,
bonds). We find behavior numerically consistent with a theoretical result with no free
parameters for the general theory of nonlinear diffusion in physics, generalizing standard
Brownian motion, the Reggeon Field Theory RFT. An anomalous RFT critical exponent
translated into finance language is around 0.3, and this number qualitatively describes the
average behavior of markets in crisis.
This 0.3 RFT anomalous variance exponent is perhaps the first number calculated in
advance since the Gaussian Brownian diffusion variance exponent (1.0) used in standard
finance, without numerically fitting anything.
5.
6.
8.
9.
10.
In another paper (2016) we give details showing that various markets - not just equities -
that are already in crisis are on the average described by a critical exponent of the
nonlinear-diffusion Reggeon Field Theory (RFT), calculated in 1974, with no free
parameters. Nonlinear diffusion naturally extends Brownian motion. Rich/cheap crisis
behavior is suggested as a paradigm. This supplements our previous CEEC crisis paper
(2013).
The CEEC Model crisis predictions use the same scaling form described by the
anomalous exponent as does the RFT. This consistency for crisis predictions and crisis
behavior is significant.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
26.
27.