Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Function of Squares:
• Creates a gathering place for the people
• Freeing them from the tension of rushing through the web of street
Classification of Squares :
• Closed Square – Space self contained
• Dominated Square – Space directed
• Nuclear Square – Space formed around a centre
• Grouped Squares – Space units combined
• Amorphous Square – Space unlimited
• Squares doesn't represent only one pure type, but very often bears the
characteristics of two of these types.
Closed Square:
- It is a complete enclosure interrupted only by the streets leading to it
- Primary element of any closed square is its layout of regular
geometrical form
- The repetition of identical houses or house types, facing the enclosed
area
- Spatial balance of the square will always be achieved by the equation
of horizontal & vertical forces.
Grouped Squares:
- In Grouped Squares, Individual squares may be fused organically and
aesthetically into one comprehensive whole
- Each unit - the individual square, represents an entity, aesthetically
self sufficient and yet part of a comprehensive higher order
- A sequence of squares, different in size and form, develops in only
one direction, thus establishing a straight axis.
- Or, in a non-axial organization, a smaller square opens with one of its
sides upon a larger square, so that the individual axes of each square
meet in a right angle
- Or, a group of three or more squares of different shapes and
proportions surround one dominant building
- Or, two individual squares fall into a coherent pattern although they
are separated from each other by blocks of houses, thoroughfares
- The Amorphous Square:
- Amorphous is formless, unorganized, having no specific shape
- It does not represent aesthetic qualities or artistic possibilities.
- However, if it shares some elements with the previously analyzed
squares it may appear like one of them.
- New York’s Washington square is not a closed square. Its dimensions
are so large.
- Proportions of many of its surrounding structures are so
heterogeneous, so irregular, even contradictory
- Location and size of the small triumph arch are so dissimilar to all the
other given factors
- Unified impression cannot result
- Disproportion in scale destroys all aesthetic possibilities
- Place de l’Opera in Paris could not become a “dominated” Square in
spite of the monumental façade of the imposing opera house
- Width of the Boulevard des Cupucines is running through its off
centre
- Presence of small structures like the entrance to the Metro, scattered
all over the area ruin any special effect
- These examples are “squares” from surveyor’s viewpoint, although
without any artistic impact