Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
The automobile business in India is characterized by extreme competition, dynamism
and business intricacies. With more than 35 players fiercely competing in the industry
locally, it has come a long way since its inception in 1982 1. The technological
advancements, global competition and easy access to market information to customers
have made the scenario more aggressive (Bovet and Sheffi, 1998). Customers’ demands
are rising continuously which has forced automobile companies to change significantly
to deliver the finest model to them. In such an aggressive business scenario prevailing in
the Indian automobile sector, advertising represents an important means of ensuring
not only a company’s success and profitability but also its long-term business growth.
* Assistant Professor, Institute of Business Management in Research (IBMR) – IPS Academy, Indore,
Madhya Pradesh, India. E-mail: prateekm@hotmail.com
** Director – Institute of Applied Sciences and Humanities (IASH), Ganeshi Lal Agrawal University
(GLA), Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India. E-mail: anoop@gla.ac.in
*** Associate Professor, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade (IIFT), New Delhi, India. E-mail: nitinseth@iift.edu
1
“Automobiles”, India Indian Institute of Foreign Trade Brand Equity Foundation, Ministry of
Commerce and Industry, Government of India, 2015.
22
© 2017 IUP. All Rights Reserved. The IUP Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. XVI, No. 3, 2017
Advertising symbolizes an important way through which organizations communicate
with their existing and potential customers worldwide (Bendixen, 1993) and automobile
industry in India is no exception. Advertising is a major element of a company’s
promotional mix in the Indian automobile sector. In 2015, the industry grew by 17.6%
and 2016 assures to be yet another high growth year. It is expected that Indian
advertisement market will grow by 16.8% in the year 2016-17 and Automobile, Telecom
and E-Commerce companies will contribute majorly to overall advertising spending
(Pitch – Madison Advertising Report, 2016).
It is apparent that advertising drives the automobile business in India and has played
a considerable role in its rapid growth in the recent years. As a result, ensuring effective
advertising is of utmost importance so that the organizations can plan their advertising
strategies and allocate their advertising budgets wisely. In this light, the present research
is an attempt to recognize the specific drivers of effective advertising for automobiles in
the context of Indian print media using Delphi technique. Recognition of specific drivers
of effective advertising for the automobile sector will help out advertisers to be more
focused while designing an advertisement copy for an automobile brand which will
create greater impact on buying behavior. The scope of this paper is limited to print
media only as it is expected to grow strongly in India for another decade and a half due
to mounting literacy (Jeffrey, 2012) and is an uncomplicated means of individual
empowerment (Raghunath, 2012) in the Indian society.
Literature Review
The literature for the present study is categorized into two broad group, viz., Automobile
Sector in India: An Overview and Effective Advertising and Its Assessment, as depicted
in Figure 1. The subsequent section provides details of each of the literature category in
the context of present research work.
The Indian automobile industry has travelled a long distance since its commencement.
From being a closed seller’s market with only five players in 1982, it is now a buyer’s
market with more than 35 local and global players competing aggressively to ensure their
Literature Categorization
The automobile market in India is broadly split into four consumer segments, viz.,
two-wheelers (mopeds, scooters, motorcycles and electric two-wheelers), passenger vehicles
(passenger cars, utility vehicles and multipurpose vehicles), commercial vehicles (light,
medium and heavy commercial vehicles) and three-wheelers (passenger carriers and
goods carriers) as illustrated in Figure 2. According to a report by Society of Indian
Automobile Manufacturer, passenger vehicles are expected to grow at a CAGR of 18%
during FY: 2014-21. In addition, commercial vehicles are expected to register a CAGR
of 19% while two and three wheelers are projected to expand at a CAGR of 8% during
the same period6.
Source: “Automobiles”, India Brand Equity Foundation, Ministry of Commerce and Industry,
Government of India (2015)
Automobile firms are spending a major portion of their annual profits on advertising
to make the customers more brand conscious and to create a unique positioning in their
minds to gain differentiated advantage7. Advertising drives the Indian automobile business
and automobile industry in India spends huge on promotional activities with the aim
of creating brand awareness and persuading potential customers 8. The continuously
2
Automobiles, 2015, Op. cit.
3
“Automobile Sector Survey”, Make in India, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, 2015.
4
“Automotive Mission Plan 2006-2016: A Mission for Development of Indian Automotive Industry”,
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises, Government of India, 2006.
5
Automobiles, 2015, Op. cit.
6
“Vision 2020”, Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturer, India, 2013.
7
Automobiles, 2015, Op. cit.
8
“Automotive: Market and Opportunities”, India Brand Equity Foundation, Ministry of Commerce and
Industry, Government of India, 2011.
4. Bendixen The objective of the study Study found that products and
(1993) was to develop a model on services with high consumer
measuring advertising involvement in the purchase
effectiveness and to decision will be characterized by
demonstrate its usefulness current advertising effects while
in practice. those with low consumer
involvement will be characterized
by brand loyalty effects.
5. Spotts et al. Study attempted to examine Results of the study indicated that
(1997) effectiveness of humor current practice for many
element in advertising by advertisers is to employ
using a conceptual incongruity-based humor in a
framework adapted from humor-dominant context and may
speck. not be the most effective in terms
of advertisement performance.
6. Seno and Study attempted to develop Study presented a conceptual
Lukas (2007) a conceptual framework that model in context of celebrity
can be used to organize and endorsement and also found that
guide future research into both the endorser image and the
how celebrity product brand image serve as mediators in
endorsement creates equity the equity creation process of
for both the endorsed celebrity endorsement.
product-brand and the
endorsing celebrity.
7. Gkiozepas and Study aimed to develop and Study demonstrated through the
Hogg (2011) test a conceptual framework developed conceptual framework
for categorizing visual that advertisement visuals which
metaphors in advertising synthesize similar metaphorical
according to whether the objects provoke greater elaboration
pictorial elements in the and elicit more favorable
advertisement are consumer’s attitude towards both
synthesized or juxtaposed. the advertisement and the brand
also.
and Popova and Tanglertpanya, 2011) are carried out in USA, UK and other developed
countries and the subject has not drawn much attention of the researchers in the Indian
scenario especially in the context of print media. Researchers have perceived and
understood the area of effective advertising in different ways which make it more complex
and ambiguous.
It is apparent from the literature that different researchers have arrived at mixed
independent conclusions while exploring the research domain of effective advertising. It
has made the subject highly uncertain and confusing. Further, appreciation of product/
service specific drivers of effective advertising in the context of a particular media is still
not observed especially automobiles.
Movies and Nelson et al. (2004) Australia Apparels Attitude Measurement, Purchase Intention,
Video Games Homer (2009) USA – Believable, Recall, Recognition, Repetition,
Purchase Intention, Perception, Excitability, etc.
Devlin and Combs (2012) USA –
Lee et al. (2011) UK Cigarettes
Yoo and Pena (2011) China Automobiles
Dim. No. Dimension Author (Year) Dim. No. Dimension Author (Year)
D1 Action Score Christian (1965) D17 Memorable Hudson et al. (2002); and
Homer (2009)
D2 Attention Hudson et al. (2002); and D18 No. of Inquiries Hanssens and Weitz (1980)
Wang et al. (2013)
D3 Attitude Hofacker and Murphy (1998); D19 Perception Hofacker and Murphy (1998);
Measurement and Samu and Bhatnagar (2008) and Yoo and Pena (2011)
D4 Behavioral Influence Newstead and Romaniuk, 2009; D20 Persuasion Loken and Pitney (1988); and
and Ranjbarian et al. (2011) Ranjbarian et al. (2011)
D6 Comprehension Robert and Wallace (1974) D22 Purchase Intention Nelson et al. (2004); and
D7 Consumer Preference Patterson and Richards (2000); D23 Rationality Patterson and Richards (2000);
and Samu and Bhatnagar (2008) and Hudson et al. (2002)
D8 Conviction Starch (1964) D24 Readership Starch (1964) and Christian (1965)
29
30
Table 3 (Cont.)
Dim. No. Dimension Author (Year) Dim. No. Dimension Author (Year)
D9 Correct Brand Hudson et al. (2002); and D25 Recall Law and Braun (2000); and
Identification Wang et al. (2013) Keshari et al. (2012)
D10 Credibility Hanssens and Weitz (1980); D26 Recognition Devlin and Combs (2012);
and Keshari et al. (2012) and Wang et al. (2013)
D11 Demand Patterson and Richards (2000) D27 Reinforcement Starch (1964) and Christian (1965)
D12 Excitability Law and Braun (2000); and D28 Relevance Loken and Pitney (1988);
Wang et al. (2013) and Newstead
and Romaniuk (2009)
D13 Impression Hofacker and Murphy (1998); D29 Reminder Hanssen and Weitz (1980);
and Santana and Palacio (2012) and Lees and Healey (2005)
D15 Interest Robert and Wallace (1974); D31 Retention Nelson et al. (2004); and
and Lee et al. (2011) Popova and
Tanglertpanya(2011)
D16 Liking Loken and Pitney (1988); D32 Trustworthiness Keshari et al. (2012); and
and Ching et al. (2013) Wang et al. (2013)
Review of Literature
Delphi Round I
No
Add, Delete, Rename or
Experts’
Modify Drivers of Effective
Consensus
Advertising
Execution of Delphi Rounds
Delphi Round II
MS < 2.5
MS > 2.5
No
Experts’
Execution of Delphi Round IV
Consensus
Yes
Researchers (Linstone et al., 1975) have suggested the panel size ranging from 7 to
30 members. Reid (1988) was also of the opinion that experts numbering more than 30
do not necessarily demonstrate satisfactory knowledge or capability. Diverse groups
with widely varying personalities produce more acceptable results than homogeneous
groups and promise a wide base of knowledge (Delbecq et al., 1975; and Rowe and
Wright, 1996). The Delphi panel for the present study constituted 23 members.
Figure 4 depicts the profile of experts who formed the Delphi panel for the present
study. Attempts were made to take in a wide range of viewpoints in the study which
included, academicians, advertisement practitioners, industry experts, editors, marketing
professionals and customers as Delphi panelists.
Customers, 3
Academicians, 5
Marketing
Professionals, 3
Advertisement
Practitioners, 4
Editors, 3
Industry Experts, 5
Results
Experts were of different opinions towards initial drivers of effective advertising obtained
from literature which resulted in varied responses from the experts. Out of 32 initial
drivers, 2 (i.e., precipitation and impression) were outrightly deleted by more than 70%
of the experts. Many valuable comments and suggestions were also given by the panel
members regarding other drivers of advertisement effectiveness as summarized below:
• A majority of the panel members were of the view that precipitation (D21)
and impression (D13) are nowhere related to print media and hence rejected
both of them out right.
• Drivers readership (D24), no. of enquiries (D18), demand (D11) and action
score (D1) are eliminated by most of the experts as they are closely related
with each other.
• Most of the experts were of the opinion that driver memorable (D17) to assess
advertisement effectiveness is adequate. Hence, retention (D31), reminder
(D29) and correct brand identification (D9) were not considered for the next
Delphi round.
Results
The Delphi Round II led to the refinement of drivers of effective advertising further for
the automobile sector considering the print media. Dimension, viz., ‘reinforcement
(MS = 2.39)’, ‘perception and attitude measurement (MS = 2.39)’, ‘comprehension
(MS = 2.36)’, ‘consumer preference (MS = 2.18)’ and ‘excitability (MS = 2.35)’ were
deleted from the list of advertisement effectiveness drivers for automobiles as they received
less than 2.5 Mean Score (MS) in the Delphi Round II as depicted in Table 4. It is
evident that out of 18 dimensions, only 13 were shortlisted by Delphi panelist as drivers
of effective advertising for the automobile industry in the context of print media.
To obtain convergence of judgment, the mean standard deviation for each of the
measures was also calculated. A decrease in the mean standard deviation value indicated
a greater convergence of opinion among the experts. Measures with higher mean score
and lower standard deviation were considered to be important as there was relative
agreement among experts on their importance. Measures with higher mean score and
higher standard deviation were also considered important measures but there was
relatively less agreement among experts on their importance (Shah and Tillman, 2011).
Delphi Round III
Depending on the panelist’s responses in Round II, different drivers of effective advertising
were refined for Delphi Iteration III. A questionnaire consisting of items related to each
of the drivers of effective advertising for automobiles was developed for Delphi Round
III. Experts were asked to rate the significance of a particular advertisement effectiveness
item on a 5-point Likert scale. The following scheme was pursued to gather the responses
from the experts: 5 = Extremely Significant, 4 = Very Significant, 3 = Significant,
2 = Slightly Significant, 1 = Not Significant at All. Any specific driver was finalized
when at least 80% of the experts agreed on its inclusion.
Results
The Delphi Round III represented the ‘consensus’ opinion of the Delphi panelist as
confirmed in Table 5. None of the driver or item received less than 2.5 MS, though
experts suggested minor changes in the wordings of some of the items. These changes
were incorporated to prepare the final list of advertisement effectiveness drivers for
1. Persuasion Loken and Pitney (1988); and A persuasive advertisement encourages trial, urges 3.89 0.783
Ranjbarian et al. (2011) target audience to use the product and is convincing.
2. Attention Hudson et al. (2002); and An effective advertisement is appealing, catchy, 2.93 1.139
Wang et al. (2013) easily noticed and generates curiosity in the minds
of the target audience.
3. Interest Robert and Wallace (1974); An interesting advertisement is fascinating, alluring 3.45 0.861
and Lee et al. (2011) and holds the attention of its target audience.
4. Memorable Hudson et al. (2002); An effective advertisement is noteworthy, captivating 3.38 1.354
and Homer (2009) and easily remembered and recalled.
5. Response Robert and Wallace (1974); An effective advertisement is result-oriented and 3.57 1.163
and Santana and Palacio (2012) ensures target audience’s action and feedback.
6. Rationality Patterson and Richards (2000); Quality of an advertisement of being 3.32 0.837
and Hudson et al. (2002) rational and logical.
7. Comprehension Robert and Wallace (1974) An effective advertisement is easily understood 2.36 0.962
8. Informative Newstead and Romaniuk (2009); An informative advertisement is factual, detailed and 2.72 1.614
and Keshari et al. (2012) creates awarenes among its target audience about
products and services.
9. Liking Loken and Pitney (1988); and A successful advertisement is enjoyed, highly appreciated 3.57 0.917
Ching et al. (2013) and is strongly attached to its target audience.
35
36
Table 4 (Cont.)
10. Purchase Nelson et al. (2004); and Efficient advertisements create customer desire, 4.24 0.632
Intention Samu and Bhatnagar (2008) aspire customers to purchase and incline its target
audience towards a product or service.
11. Recall Law and Braun (2000); An effective advertisement is impressive, 4.68 0.816
Keshari et al. (2012); and unforgettable and easy to remember and recollect.
Santana et al. (2016)
12. Recognition Devlin and Combs (2012); A successful advertisement is easily noticeable, 4.59 0.745
and Wang et al. (2013) accepted by its target audience and acknowledged
without difficulty.
13. Perception and Hofacker and Murphy (1998); An effective advertisement influences customer 2.39 2.016
Attitude Samu and Bhatnagar (2008); behavior, builds customer’s outlook and viewpoints
Measurement and Yoo and Pena (2011) towards a product or a service.
14. Consumer Patterson and Richards (2000); An effective advertisement compels target audience 2.18 2.107
Preference and Samu and Bhatnagar (2008) to prefer a product or service over other alternatives.
15. Relevance Loken and Pitney (1988); and An effective advertisement appropriates, relates itself 3.56 1.803
Newstead and Romaniuk (2009) and communicates clearly about a product or a service.
16. Reinforcement Starch (1964), Christian (1965) Action or process of strengthening an advertisement. 2.39 1.537
17. Believable Homer (2009); and Quality of an advertisement to be believed, 3.75 0.916
Keshari et al. (2012) credible and realistic.
18. Excitability Law and Braun (2000); Quality of an advertisement to thrill or to give 2.35 1.128
and Wang et al. (2013) rise to a reaction.
Liking Customer’s affinity towards an advertisement ensures its effectiveness. 3.59 0.845
An advertisement that makes target audience more inclined towards 2.89 0.759
a product or a service is successful.
An effective advertisement compels a customer to prefer a product
or service over other. 3.56 1.057
37
38
Table 5 (Cont.)
SD
Dimension Items Mean
An effective advertisement creates customer desire to buy a product or a service. 4.46 3.74 0.682
Purchase
An advertisement that aspire customers to purchase a product or service is effective. 3.35 1.325
Intention
An effective advertisement inclines a customer towards a product or service. 3.42 1.061
A powerful advertisement is one which is easy to remember and recollect. 4.56 4.27 0.634
An effective advertisement is impressive and unforgettable. 4.26 1.109
Recall
An advertisement that is easy to bring back to one’s mind is efficient. 4.32 1.813
An effective advertisement is distinctive, noteworthy and easily remembered. 3.92 0.761
An effective advertisement is easily identifiable and noticeable. 4.45 4.09 0.623
Recognition An effective advertisement is easily accepted by its target audience. 3.92 0.872
For an advertisement to be effective, it should be acknowledged without difficulty. 3.89 0.736
An effective advertisement relates itself well to a product or a service. 2.19 3.01 1.286
Relevance An effective advertisement communicates clearly about a product or a service. 2.86 2.157
For an advertisement to be effective, it should be appropriate to the context 3.97 1.216
of the product or service advertised.
A successful advertisement is trustworthy and reliable. 3.72 3.40 1.370
For an advertisement to be effective, it should be capable of eliciting trust 3.97 1.216
Believable and belief in target audience.
An advertisement that is credible and easily believed is effective. 3.56 1.143
For an advertisement to be effective, it should be reasonable. 3.65 3.31 1.065
Rationality
An effective advertisement is logical. 2.97 0.863
An effective advertisement is always captivating and arresting. 3.25 3.26 0.739
Memorable For an advertisement to be effective, it should be distinctive. 2.89 1.047
An advertisement which is noteworthy is always successful. 3.63 1.973
Discussion
As discussed, the review of literature led to the identification of various drivers of effective
advertising which differed from researcher to researcher for a specific media in context.
No common/generic drivers of effective advertising were available for automobiles specific
to the print media. The execution of Delphi rounds facilitated the reduction and
refinement of varied 32 initial drivers to 13 drivers of effective advertising in the context
of the Indian print media or the automobile sector. Implementation of structured Delphi
approach also helped in the recognition of items related to each of the finalized driver
of effective advertising that aided in defining them in the context of print media.
Table 6 illustrates the list of finalized drivers of effective advertising for the Indian
automobile sector in the context of the print media.
Based on the research gaps as derived from the review of literature, the present study
attempts to understand the area of advertising and to identify the drivers of effective
advertising specific to automobile sector in the context of print media in India. An effort
is made through the present study to provide a meaningful classification of ambiguous,
complex and highly intermingled research literature on advertisement effectiveness.
Implementation of Delphi technique led to the reduction and refinement of diverse
drivers of effective advertising to 13 specific drivers for automobiles in the Indian print
media context. The study also assisted in the recognition of items associated with each
of the finalized driver for the automobiles that resulted in defining these dimensions in
the context of print media.
Implications
This study has several remarkable implications for academicians, future researchers,
advertisement practitioners and practicing managers.
• The research methodology which is adopted for present work is likely to provide
validated support to future researchers to examine the field of effective
advertising further in their own research context.
• The study has explored the subject of effective advertising in the context of
automobile sector for print media only. Researchers should carry out a detailed
content analysis of a specific media to recognize products/services which are
prominently advertised in that particular media.
Conclusion
The present study attempts to investigate the subject of advertising and to identify its
drivers for the automobile sector in the Indian print context using Delphi technique.
The study demonstrated the successful implementation of Delphi technique in order to
build consensus among experts to reduce and refine varied drivers of effective advertising
for automobile sector in the context of Indian print scenario. Delphi panelists have
finalized 13 dimensions out of an initial list of 32 dimensions as drivers of effective
advertising for automobiles in the context of print media. The insights gained through
this work have valuable implications for academia, researchers and advertising industry
as a whole. The systematic approach and developed research scheme is expected to be
beneficial to explore this research area in different media context. However, there is a
need to authenticate the proposed methodical approach using statistical methods such
as factor analysis. It will lead to the development of a separate, more comprehensive
research approach or framework to understand the area of advertisement effectiveness
in detail.
Future Scope: The scope of the present work is limited to identifying the drivers of
effective advertising for the automobile industry in the case of Indian print scenario
only. Future researchers may explore advertising effectiveness in the context of other
product/service category as well as for different media. Further, researchers may use the
presented methodical approach to explore the area of advertisement effectiveness for
other media forms taking services into consideration. A well-established modeling
References
1. Bendixen M T (1993), “Advertising Effects and Effectiveness”, European Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 27, No. 10, pp. 19-32.
2. Bovet D and Sheffi Y (1998), “ The Brave New World of Supply Chain
Management”, Supply Chain Management Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 14-22.
3. Ching R K, Tong P, Chen J S and Chen H Y (2013), “Narrative Online Advertising:
Identification and its Effects on Attitude Toward a Product”, Internet Research,
Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 414-438.
4. Christian R C (1965), “How Much Does an Industrial Logotype Add to the
Effectiveness of an Advertisement?”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 23-36.
5. Corvi E and Bonera M (2010), “The Effectiveness of Advertising: A Literature
Review ”, in 10 th Global Conference on Business and Economics, October,
pp. 15-16.
6. Das M and Sharma S (2016), “Portrayal of Women in Indian TV Advertisements:
A Study of Audience Perception”, IUP Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 15,
No. 3, pp. 57-95.
7. Delbecq A L, Andrew H V and David H G (1975), Group Techniques for Program
Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes, pp. 83-107, Glenview, IL.
8. Devlin M and Combs J (2012), “From Apple to Omega: Brand Placement in 2010
Top-Earning Films”, in American Academy of Advertising Conference Proceedings (Online),
p. 51, American Academy of Advertising.
9. Gabriel S J (2006), “The Impact of Television Advertisements on Youth: A Study”,
The IUP Journal of Marketing Management, pp. 1-10.
10. Gardner D M (1975), “Deception in Advertising: A Conceptual Approach”, The
Journal of Marketing, pp. 40-46.
11. Gkiouzepas L and Hogg M K (2011), “Articulating a New Framework for Visual
Metaphors in Advertising”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 103-120.
14. Homer P M (2009), “Product Placements”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 38, No. 3,
pp. 21-32.
16. Jeffrey R (2012), “Missing from the Indian Newsroom”, The Hindu, April 9, 2012.
18. Landeta J (1999), “El método Delphi. Una técnica de previsión para la incertidumbre”,
Barcelona, Ariel.
19. Law S and Braun K A (2000), “I’ll Have What She’s Having: Gauging the Impact
of Product Placements on Viewers”.
20. Lee J, Park D H and Han I (2011), “The Different Effects of Online Consumer
Reviews on Consumers’ Purchase Intentions Depending on Trust in Online Shopping
Malls: An Advertising Perspective”, Internet Research, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 187-206.
21. Lees G and Healey B (2005), “A Test of the Effectiveness of a Mouse Pointer Image
in Increasing Click Through for a Web Banner Advertisement”, Marketing Bulletin,
Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 6-15.
22. Linstone H A and Turoff M (Eds.) (1975), The Delphi Method: Techniques and
Applications, Vol. 29, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
24. Miller G (2001) “The Development of Indicators for Sustainable Tourism: Results
of a Delphi Survey of Tourism Researchers”, Tourism Management, Vol. 22, No. 4,
pp. 351-362.
28. Poonia A K, Chauhan G S, Sharma M and Das M (2015), “A Study of First Page
Advertising Trends in Select Indian Newspapers”, IUP Journal of Marketing
Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 20-38.
30. Raghunath A S (2012), “5 Reasons Why Print Media Still Relevant in India”,
available at www.mxmindia.com, September 11, 2012.
32. Reid N (1988), “The Delphi Technique: It’s Contribution to the Evaluation of
Professional Practice”, Professional Competence and Quality Assurance in the Caring
Professions, pp. 230-262.
33. Robert G and Wallace H (1974), “Advertising Communication: TV vs. Print”, Journal
of Advertising Research, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 19-32.
34. Rowe G and Wright G (1996), “ The Impact of Task Characteristics on the
Performance of Structured Group Forecasting Techniques”, International Journal of
Forecasting, Vol. 12, pp. 73-89.
36. Santana J D M and Palacio A B (2012), “The Effectiveness of Web Ads: Rectangle
vs. Contextual Banners”, Online Information Review, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 420-441.
38. Seno D and Lukas B A (2007), “The Equity Effect of Product Endorsement by
Celebrities: A Conceptual Framework from a Co-branding Perspective”, European
Journal of Marketing, Vol. 41, No. 1/2, pp. 121-134.
39. Shah H A and Tillman T S (2011), “An International Delphi Study to Build a
Foundation for an Undergraduate Level Lean Manufacturing Curriculum”,
International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management and Applied Sciences and
Technologies, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 521-530.
46. Yoo S C and Pena J (2011), “Do Violent Video Games Impair the Effectiveness of
In-game Advertisements? The Impact of Gaming Environment on Brand Recall,
Brand Attitude and Purchase Intention”, Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social
Networking, Vol. 14, No. 7-8, pp. 439-446.
Reference # 03J-2017-08-02-01