 4 phases in a student: proposal, data collection, analyses and presentation

 Types of qual study: consider your skills

 NEEDED TO HAVE A VERY CLEAR CONTEXT-DEFINE THE BOUNDARIES
 Grounded theory,
 Differentiate the types of QUal study
 Differentiate single vs multiple CS
 Research design: consider the verb/purpose: investigate, explore, explain
 Units of analysis: answers what and who-justify why you choose the categories
 You can add level for measurement
 International, regional, contextual setting
 Significance-what benefits and who can be the beneficiaries
 Proposal: the link between Background>Problem Statement>RO>RQ>unit of
analysis>Literature>significance
 Contradictory findings: Report all also highlight in your limitation of study
 Denzin: triangulation
o Methodological--multiple instruments (ways to capture data)
o Data
o Researcher
o Theoretical-your area and your setting
 3 wavesof the literature review
 Do not put the gap under chapter 2; any gap you find can be presented in chapter 5
 Data analysis preparation:
o Each unit of analysis is like a tree and the RQs as the branches
o Prominent leadership style
 Sub QR
 What-PLSwhat
 Who-PLSwho
 Why
 Where
 SOME DATA MAYBE COOCCURANCE THUS MAY INDICATE A NEW RELATIONSHIP
 GROUP OF DOCUMENTS, CODES
 OPEN NETWORK VIEW
 CREATE LINKS ANMOG NETWORK
 VIDEOS PICTURES
 CODING (NOUN VERB: PLSWHAT:PRINCIPALISAUTOCRATIC
 OPEN, AXIAL, SELECTIVE CODING-DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE CODING
 YOU ARE COOKING FROM SOMETHING BUT YOU ARE COOKING MORE-QUALITATIVE
 HOW MANY RESPONDENTS YOU NEED-DATA SATURATION
o WALKING IN PASAR MALAM
o EVERY STALLS SELLING THE SAME THING
o FIRST-INDIVIDUAL-HAS GIVEN NOTHING NEW ON THE SAME QUESTION
o SECOND-GROUP-HOMOGENEOUS
o THIRD-ORGANIZATIONAL
FOREST (THEORETHICAL FRAMEWORK)

TREES (CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK)

BRANCHES & LEAVES (DATA AND RELATIONS-CODING

Iv and Dv determination

IV-about the variables

DV-variables that changes

Moderator, mediator

Inter coder reliability test, Lincoln Guba (Credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability)