40

40

About this survey

Gender
20
20

composition
00

In September 2013, TalentCorp

Diversity in the
Gender composition by management level Gender composition by industry (Top Management)
commissioned PwC to conduct a Diversity
in the Workplace survey to gain a better
understanding of the current diversity Workplace %%
100
100
8% Female
%
100
levels in the Malaysian workforce, with Male 19%
13%
the support of Bursa Malaysia. A survey of Malaysian Public Listed 80
80 24% 80 32% 30% 27% 26% 26% 23% 23%
35% 38%
Companies 60
60 60
We had 122 respondents to this survey,
40
40 40
representing 11 different industries.
20
20 20

Company type Coverage No. of 00 92% 76% 65% 62% 0 68% 70% 73% 74% 74% 77% 77% 81% 87%

Workforce composition
Board Level Top Senior & mid Other

erv il &

ics

te

rs

ing

olo &

y
companies

ert

erg
ice

he
era
s

gy
hn ns
ist
s s eta

r
ice
management management levels

op

ctu
erv

Ot

en
tec tio
log

lom
es , r

Pr

ufa

ica
ls

&
KLCI Top 30 19

sin ale

n&

ng
cia

as
un
an
bu oles
Top management:

Co

l, g
t io
an

mm
lm
rt a
Fin
• CEOs 100100

Oi
Other PLCs 31 and above 103

t ria

Co
W

po
>60
• Executives who report directly to the CEO or members of the >60

us
ns

Ind
management
80 80 committee 50-59 50-59

Tra
Total 122 40-49 40-49
Senior & mid60management:
60
• Executives who report directly to top management
30-39 30-39 Others: Education, Healthcare and Agriculture. These industries were
40 40
20-29 20-29 grouped together as they had less than 5 representatives each.
Board level20data
1
20 was obtained from the PEMANDU-NIEW Women on
Boards Baseline Study (2013), which covered 930 PLCs This graph is sorted by % Males.
63% of KLCI companies participated (19 0 0

out of 30), representing ~47% of Bursa’s

total market cap2 Ethnic
composition
Ethnic composition by management level Ethnic composition by industry (Top Management)
Company type No. of companies
GLC 21 %
%
Other PLCs 101 100 6% 3% 11% 100 7% 3%5% 3%4%
1%
5%
2%
6% 8% Others 10% 7% 11% 11% 5%
7% Indian 11% 8% 8% 4% 11%
Total 122 80 80
15% Chinese
• GLCs are Government Linked Companies Bumiputra
60 34% 60
• Other PLCs constitute PLCs that are not GLCs, 46%
40 54% 40 56% 48%
including MNCs 69%
71% 59%
20 20 69% 79%

The 21 GLCs which responded represent 0 34% 55 % 67 % 0 13% 13% 22% 23% 30% 32% 33% 39% 82%
Top Senior & mid Other levels

te

rs

erv il &

cs

olo &

y
~33% of Bursa’s total market cap2

ert

erg
ice
rin
he
era

gy
hn ns
i
ist
management management

s s eta
ice
ctu

op

erv
Ot

en
tec atio
log
lom

es , r

Pr
ufa

ls

&
sin ale

nic
&
ng

cia

as
an

ion
bu les

mu
Co

l, g
an
lm

ho

tat

m
Fin

Oi
100

tria
2 Bloomberg, October 2013

Co
W

or
>60

sp
us
80 50-59

n
Ind

Tra
40-49
60
30-39 This graph is sorted by % Bumiputra.
40
20-29

Age
20

composition
Age composition by management level Age composition by industry (Top Management)

PwC: TalentCorp: % %
100 2% 100 3% 5% 5%
8% 12% >60 7% 10% 12%
facebook.com/pwcmalaysia facebook.com/TalentCorpMsia
15% 50-59
14% 16% 16%
80 80
http://www.linkedin.com/ http://www.linkedin.com/company/ 19% 40-49 29% 30%
company/pwc-malaysia talent-corporation-malaysia-berhad
60 36% 31%
30-39 60
33%
35%
28%
35%
25%
20-29 54%
twitter.com/PwC_Malaysia twitter.com/TalentCorpMsia 44%
40 32% 40
37% 30%
36% 37%
youtube.com/pwcmalaysia youtube.com/TalentCorpMsia
20 38% 35% 20 50% 46% 37%
39% 22% 20% 16% 30%
0
16% 17% 37% 0 4%
26%
16% 2% 2% 5% 14% 14% 6% 1%9%
2%

erv il &

olo &

ics

rs
© 2014 Copyright Talent Corporation Malaysia Berhad ("TalentCorp"). All rights reserved

erg

ert
ice

rat

rin

he
s

gy
hn ns
Top Senior & mid Other levels

ist
s s eta
ice

op

ctu
me
erv
en

Ot
tec tio

log
management management

es , r

Pr
ica

ufa
ls

o
&

sin ale

l
© 2014 PricewaterhouseCoopers. All rights reserved. “PricewaterhouseCoopers” and/or

n&
ng
cia
as

un

an
bu les

Co
l, g

tio
an
“PwC” refers to the individual members of the PricewaterhouseCoopers organisation in

mm

lm
ho
100

rta
Fin
Oi

tria
>60
Malaysia, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.  Please see www.pwc.

Co
W

po

us
80 50-59

ns
com/structure for further details.

Ind
Tra
40-49
60
30-39 This graph is sorted by >60 year olds.
40
20-29
 Te uni glo
& W chn catio me
bu ho olo n rat
sin les gy s e
es ale
ss ,r & Oil,
er eta en g
vic il erg as
es

0
20
40
y

0
20
40
60
80
100

0
10
20
30
40
50
ma
& il, O F
nu Ind
fac us
en g S ina tur tria Ot Ot
erg as Co ervi ncia he he
y ing l

0
20
40
60
80
100

0
20
40
60
80
100

0
10
20
30
40
50
mm ce l rs ma rs
Fin & un s
Te ic nu nd I Fin
S a ch at Ot fac us Ot Se anc
Co ervi ncia no ion he t he Co rvi ia
m ce l log s m rs Co turin rial rs m ce l

>60
y an I ng g
n

Age compositionMale
& mun s lom Fin & mun s
Te ic Pr S a Te ic

Indian

20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
ufa du n

Others
ch at op ch at

Female
eraC erv ci no ion

Chinese
no ion Tra ert C ctur stria teom ice al
log s log s

38%
n y on ing l m s

44%
y y

54%
by industry
glo

Bumiputera
Pr & spor Fin & Te uni Pr

Ethnic composition by industry

Lo ta me op
op Se anc chn cat & W

Gender composition by industry

gis tio ra o ion
Tra ert
y tic n te rvi ia
ce l log s bu ho ert
y
n s s y sin les

Age composition by industry

& spor Fin es ale
O a Pr Pr

Ethnic composition by industry

Lo ta Se nc op ss ,r
& opeW

Gender composition by industry

gis tio & W & e il, g rvi ia ert er eta
tic n bu ho ne a ce l Tra busrtyhol y Tra vice il
s sin les rgy s s n ine esa n s
& W es ale & & spo s l & spo
& ss ,r

0
0
0
buOi ho

20
40
40
40

60
80
100
60
80
100
60
80
100
bu WPhorop Lo rta s se e, re Lo rta
& W e si l, gle er eta Co gis tio r t gis tio
bu ho nene a sa vic il Tr sine lesearty m ti nT vic ail

No
No
No

No
No
No
No
No
No
Co tic n

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
20Yes
Yes
Yes
20Yes
sin les rgysss le, es an ss le,
s r & sp se re
& mun cs rans es ng s
75%

75%
es ale Te ic & p
measures
s s , r ervi etai lom
ce l Ot C Logorta rvicetail
t & W chn atio Logorta
er eta
vic il s Co
he o
rs mm istic ion s bu ho olo n ti era
te

Agreeableness
Agreeableness
es O sin les gy s Co istic on
& il, ng & un s O es ale ng s
lom Te C ic lom
Ot ener gas c o a
the
rs
ss ,r
er eta & Oil,
he e&rab Wh hnommtio vic il era en g
Co rs gy teusi ole & Tlogunns es te erg as
ng Ot ma ne sa ecy ic ma y
lomCo he nu Ind ss le, hn ati O & Oi nu Ind
em rs fac us se C re olo ons
rviontai gy
& il,
en g en , g l fac us
tur tria tur tria

62
&ratmeun
T ce glol erg as erg as ing l
0
20
40
60
80
100

0
20
40
60
80
100

s m

0
10
20
30
40
50
ec ica ing l yma

46%
ma

%
hn tio

56%
nu Ind era nu Ind
fac us olo ns & Oil,
en g te F fac us

0
20
40
60
80
100
gy

0
20
40
60
80
Agreeableness to disclosure by100
tur tria erg as Se inan tur tria Ot Ot
Co rvi cia he he
ing l Fi y m ce l
ing l rs rs

to disclosure byGender
Se nan & Oil, ma
Ot en g
Male

rvi cia Ot & mun s nu Ind Fin

he ce l he erg as Te ic

Indian

20-29
30-39
40-49
rs s y

Others
rs ch at fac us Se anc
We asked the participants if they

t
Female

Co rvi ia

Chinese
no ion
Ind Pr F Pr
op log s Co turin rial m ce l
Agreeableness to

op ina
Se y

>60
ng g
80 diversity measures in their annual
disclose diversity

Age compositionMale
ert & mun s
y
60 reports, and here’s what they said:

Bumiputera
ctuustr Pr lom Te ic

Indian
Co ertryvi ncia

20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
m c l

Others
rin ial ma op ch at

Female
era
g F

industrycomposition
no ion

>60 Chinese
nu I&nd mu es Tra ert
y te
100 were agreeable to disclose workforce

log s
lom n

Age composition
Ethnic composition
Gender composition

fac Tues nic

c Se inan y
t t a

by industry
r Fi

50-59 Bumiputera
era Tra uri hinal tio Tra rvic cial & spor Pr
te n es Lo ta & W op

industry Age composition

n ng olog ns Se nanc
& spor y & spor gis tio rvi ia bu ho ert
y

Ethnic composition
Fin Lo ta P Lo ta tic n ce l
s sin les

to disclosure by industry Gender composition

Ethnic composition by industry

& W gis tio & W & WP s es ale

by industry
er anci &C Wgist tion rope tic n
bu ho & ss ,r

0
0
0

buOi ho

20
40
20
40
20
40

60
80
100
60
80
100
60
80
Ethnic composition by industry 100

vic al boun ho ics rty ma & W e si l, gle

bu horop
er eta
es sginl les sin les sin leser
100%

100%

oems al es ale nu Ind bu ho nene a sa Tra es alty Tra vice il

Pr
op sers e, r ss ,r fac us sin les rgysss le,
s r n s e, n s
& W aetre et er e&tab W tur tria es ale & spo serv reta & spo
ert bu ho s s , r er&vi beutaWi ho L r

0
0
0

20
40
20
40
20
40
vic ilu ho

60
80
100
60
80
100
60
80
100

y Tra vice ail ing l ce si l le Lo rta

sin les
es ale n s es sin les
es ale
er eta
vic il sn s Co ogis tatio ices il
m ti n
gis tio
Co tic n
po ss ,r & spo ss ,r es O ess ale,
rta L rt & Oil, e & il, se re & mun cs O ng s
gis tio er eta
vic il C ogis ation en g er ta
vic il Ot e n g rvi tai Te C i the lom
tic n ce l rs

No
No
No
es erg as es & W chnomcatio
s s era

Yes
Yes
Yes
on tics y he ergyas bu ho &olom n
nic glo Co rs sin les T gyuns te
& Oil, me Ot & il, O ng Ot Ot es ale ch cae i
no ation en g ra t he en g lomCo heCo he s s , r no io t
log s erg as e Co rs erg as e m rs m rs er Coeta log ns & Oil,
en g
y y ng y &ratmeun m vic ng il y erg as
le, lom Te ic & Te uni es lom y
Ot & Oil, Ot ma c a c c a
ma
er reta
vic il he en g era C
te om he nu Ind hn tio
olo ns C hnol tion & il,O era
te
nu Ind
es Co rs m erg as rs fac us en g fac us
0
20
40
60
80
100

0
10
30
40
50

ng gy on ogy s tur tria

Less

an In y & mun tur tria erg as

lom F Te ic ing l Fi glo
y ing l
75%

Oi
that75%

ufa du
en g l , Se inan ch at Se nan me Fin & Oil,
erg as
era
te
ctu str rvi cia no ion rvi cia ra
te S a en g Ot
rin ial ce l log s ce l Co ervi ncia erg as he
y g
facilities

s y s m ce l y rs

Agreeablenesswork-life
ma
Fin Pr
op S
Fin
a
Pr
op & il, O & mun s Pr
op nu Ind
Se an e e Te ic
>60

to disclosure by industry
Co
Male

ert ert ne ga ch at ert fac us

Percentage

rvi cia rvi ncia

ce l m y ce l y rg s y t
Indian

that offer20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59

no ion
s s y
Others

companies

ma Co turin rial
Female

& mun log s

y F
Chinese

Pr Te ic Pr nu Ind Pr ng g

Male
op ch at op fac us op Se inan lom
of

Pr

Indian
Co t t r c

Others
ert no ion ert ert
l

Female
y y y op Tr vi ia
Bumiputera

o s Tra uri rial era

Chinese
mm te
gy m n ng Tra ert an ce l

Agreeableness to disclosure by industry Age composition

ma
& un nu Ind an In n y & sp s
Age composition by industry

Te ic & spor Fin

Agreeableness to disclosure by industry Ethnic composition

ufa du Lo ta S a Lo orta Fi

Bumiputera
ch at fac us c s & spor
Agreeableness to disclosure by industry Gender composition

g ti

work arrangements
er nc
Ethnic composition by industry

no ion Tra turintrial Tra turi trial Lo ta gis tio Se nanc

log s gis tio tic n

arrangements (34%)
Co istic on Tran vice ial rvi ia
y n g n ng s s

Age composition
ma ng s tic n ma ce l
s

practices
nu Ind & spor & spor lom & spor s nu Ind
Agreeableness to disclosure by industry Ethnic composition

fac us Lo ta Lo ta O Pr
Agreeableness to disclosure by industry Gender composition

fac us
family friendly facilities

gis tio g tio & W

era Log tatio
i s

with future plans to

t tur tria & W op e
surveyed

Tra turintrial & W &&be Wil, g

enhance/implement
tic n
n bu ho
0
0
0

g
20
40
20 than one third 20
40
20
40

tic n Co istics n s bu ho une ho a

60
80
100
60
80
100
60
80
100

s ng mea ing l Tbraus hol rty

arrangements (FWA)

lom sin les nu Ind sin les sinrgyless nin es

& spor & W
Lo ta b h es ale f ac s u es ale es ale & speoss ale,
ss ,r
t t ss ,r ss ,r L r

0
0

20
40
20
era

60
80
100
60
80
100
gis tio us ol ur ria
te
flexible work

er eta er eta erv eta Co ogis tasteiorv reta

m

their work-life benefits (48%)

tic n ine esa vic il ing l vic il ic il ti nic il

No
No
No

le, s ss le es es es
Yes
Yes
Yes

Approximately half of40the

approximately one third have

of the

implement some sort of flexible

Percentage of companies
Percentage of companies
companies

se , re & mun cs es
Less than 35% of companies

Te i
offer family friendly

er reta rvi tai

vic il
offered

es ce l & Oil, Ot & Oil, & W cChn catio Oth

s en g he en g

facilities (37%) and flexible work

plans to introduce family friendly
bu ho oolo n er

and
No
No
No

erg as Co rs erg as sin les mmgy s s

respondents have plans to enhance

Yes
Yes
Yes

Oi Ot y ng y es a&le u
en l, g Co he lom s s T,er nic
erg as m rs Ot
he Coera Othe er cehtan ati
y & mun Co rs mmte rs Cvioce ilolo ons
100%

100%

Te ic &
No
ng ngs gy

No

No
Yes ma

Yes

Yes
Ot ch at
he n i lom nu Ind Tecunic & Oil, lome
rs Co olo ons era fac us hn ati en g ra

Agreeableness to disclosure
ng gy te tur tria olo ons
Design

erg as te

Mother
nic
a
lom ing l gy y

are
no tion era Fin F

s’ R
ated

log s te Se an Se inan & Oil,

y en g

Cen
rvi cia rvi cia
Ca

ce l ce l erg as

oom
Fin s s y

tre
rP

& Oil,
>60

er anc en g Pr Pr Pr
op op op
Work-life practices

vic ia erg as
Indian

20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59

es l y Co
Others

ert ert ert

rk
y y y
Chinese

Pr Pr mm
for
op op & un ma
Te ic nu Ind F
Pre
ert ert
y y
Bumiputera

ch at fac us Se inan
gnan
no ion
t Women
Tra turi trial Tra rvic cial
Ind F log s
y n ng n es
Agreeableness to disclosure by industry Age composition

ma
u
ctu str Se inan nu Ind & spor & spor
Agreeableness to disclosure by industry Ethnic composition

rin ial Tra rvic cial fac us Lo ta Lo ta

n es Tra turintrial g ti gis tio
po g Co istic on tic n
& spor n g s

Childc by industry Ethnic composition

rta Lo ta ng s ma
Agreeableness to disclosure by industry Gender composition

gis tio gis tio & spor & W lom & W nu Ind
tic n tic n Lo ta bu ho bu ho fac u s
0
0

20
40
20
40

era
s s
60
80
100
60
80
100

ma gis tio
Yes

tur tria

63%
nu Ind tic n sin les te sin les ing l
lom
fac us s es ale
ss ,r
es ale
ss ,r
73

era tur tria

te ing l
er eta
vic il
er eta
vic il
%

es es
No
No

16%
Yes
Yes
Yes

33No%

& Oil, & Oil,

en g en g
No

No
No

erg as erg as

childcare subsidyYes
Yes

y y
Flexi Hours
No

No
No

No

No

No
Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes
Ot Co Ot
he he
Co rs m rs
ng & mun
Design

Mother

Childca
Shift Swapping

lom Te ic

Flexible
No

Yes No

No
Yes

Yes

ch at
Yes

era no ion
s’ R

FamilyChil
ated

te

Wo
log s
y
75%

Design
Ca

ent

F F
en
oom

Work-LMothers

rk A
re

Friedcare

Se inan Se inan
a

rra
Agreeableness to disclosure by industry

re C efits
ated

rvi cia rvi cia

ife B ’ Ro

ce l ce l
75%27%

ndl Ce

s s
*Work-life benefits include paternity
Yes arrangement.

* rk
Ca

ng cil
om

y F ntr

Pr Pr
a e

em itie for
rP

op op
s
37%
a

Pre
Co ert ert
ent
m
s
y y
gnan
rk t Women
& mun ma
Te ic nu Ind
for
ch at fac us
t
Pre
no ion Tra turi rial
log s
gnan
y n ng
r P Age composition

t Women
ma
nu Ind & spor
fac us Lo ta
t
Work

t g ti
15%

u
29%

Tra rin rial Co istic on

n g ng s
& spor lom
Lo ta
Time Work

gis tio era

te
66%

tic n
s
Reduced/Part
Project-Based
No
No

82%
Yes
Yes

For futher details on work-life

No

No
Yes

Yes

Flexible
No

No
No

No

No No

No
100%
Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes
75% 100%

FamilyChil

Wo

No

No
Yes

Yes
Family

Yespractices,
Work-L
Work-LMothers

rk A
rra
fits
ed

Frie
18
ife B ’ Ro

Mother
ife B

12
e

*
FlexiDbelesignat
ndl
Ca

ng cil
ene om

y F ntr
%

s’ R
a e

em itie
25%
rP

%y F

s
Friedcare nefit
a

a
ndl Ce s

Wo ed C

ent
s
leave, study/ exam leave,sabbatical leave, family
oom
rk A ar

ng cil * rk
rra Pa

em itie for
s
34%

rk ents Pre
gnan
Telecommuting

for t Women
Pre
gnan
Staggered Hours

t Women
100%

please visit flexWorkLife.my

52%

and support network. For futher details on work-life practices, please visit flexWorkLife.my
94%

12%
25%

No
Seasonal

Job Sharing

No
6
No No

No No

No
Yes
Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes
Flexible
%
FamCilyhild

care leave, extended maternity leave,

e

* Others: Employee choice of days off, compressed work week, weekend work, school holidays work
Wo

Yes Work

Family
Work-L
Friceare

rk A
75%
R

75%

Frie
efi
t

ife B
ndl Ce

rra
s

ndl
Ben oom

y F ntr

ene

*
a e

ng
yF

cil
a
fits

em itie
s
cil
itie * ent
s
s
48%
7%
Others*
20%

From Work
Leaving Early
No

No
Yes

Yes
100%

100%

Agreeableness to disclose diversity measures/ Work-life practices

Flexible
W
e