Draft DOH 03

Doc. Ref.
:
Design Organisation Handbook Issue:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
Design Organization Handbook (DOH)
Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 1 of 91
This document is proprietary of Beriev Irkut Seaplane SAS. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
TABLE OF CONTENT
1 GENERAL ............................................................................................................8
1.1 Distribution List / DOH Holders.......................................................................... 8
1.2 List of effective chapters ........................................................................................ 9
1.3 Manual management ........................................................................................... 10
1.3.1 Manuel Updated................................................................................................ 10
1.4 Amendment record table ................................................................................... 12
1.5 Definitions ............................................................................................................... 13
1.6 Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 16
1.7 Reference documents ............................................................................................ 18
1.8 Other referred documents ................................................................................... 19
2 BERIEV IRKUT SEAPLANE DESIGN ORGANIZATION ............................21
2.1 General..................................................................................................................... 21
2.2 Organization of the Authorities ......................................................................... 21
2.3 Applicant ................................................................................................................. 22
2.3.1 Purpose of this Manuel ...................................................................................... 22
2.3.2 Basic rules.......................................................................................................... 22
2.4 Organization Undertaking .................................................................................. 23
2.4.1 Statement of undertaking by the Accountable Manager.................................... 23
2.4.2 Statement of Undertaking by Head of Design Organization ............................. 24
2.5 BISP .......................................................................................................................... 25
2.6 Terms of Approval ................................................................................................ 25
2.6.1 Scope of work .................................................................................................... 25
2.6.2 Type of products ................................................................................................ 25
2.6.3 Types of technologies ........................................................................................ 25
2.6.4 Beriev Irkut Seaplane Product covered by BISP DOA ..................................... 25
2.7 Organization ........................................................................................................... 26
2.7.1 General............................................................................................................... 26
2.7.2 Beriev Irkut Seaplane Flow Chart 1................................................................... 26
2.7.3 Organization Chart 2 of Beriev Irkut Seaplane.................................................. 27
2.7.4 BISP Organization Chart 3 ............................................................................... 28
2.7.5 Beriev Organization Chart 4 ............................................................................ 29
2.7.6 Ivchenko Progresss Organization Chart 5........................................................ 30
2.7.7 Design Organization .......................................................................................... 31
2.8 Facilities and Means.............................................................................................. 33
2.8.1 Facilities............................................................................................................. 33
2.8.2 Human Resources .............................................................................................. 34
2.8.3 Means................................................................................................................. 34
3 FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES........................................................36
3.1 Airworthiness Certification Committee (ACC) .............................................. 36
3.2 Functions ................................................................................................................. 36
3.2.1 Head of Design Organization (HDO) ................................................................ 36
3.2.2 Head of Design Office (Chief Engineer) .......................................................... 37
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
3.2.3 Head of Airworthiness Office (Chief Airworthiness Engineer ) ..................... 37

3.2.4 Certification Coordinator (Deputy Chief Airworthiness Engineer)................... 37
3.2.5 Compliance Verification Engineer (CVE)......................................................... 38
3.3 Design Assurance Office ...................................................................................... 39
3.3.1 Head of Design Assurance ( DOA Manager ) .................................................. 39
3.3.2 Design Organization Approval Representative ................................................. 39
3.4 Resolution of conflicts........................................................................................... 40
4 AIRWORTHINESS ............................................................................................43
4.1 General..................................................................................................................... 43
4.2 Type Certification Process .................................................................................. 43
4.2.1 Concurrent Type Certification Process scheme ................................................. 43
4.2.2 Type Certification .............................................................................................. 44
4.3 Flow Chart of the TC-Process ................................................................................ 45
4.4 Aircraft Type Certification Documentation ................................................... 47
4.4.1 Operational Documentation ............................................................................... 47
4.4.2 Maintenance Documentation ............................................................................. 47
4.5 Certification Documentation................................................................................... 49
4.5.1 Compliance Record............................................................................................ 49
4.5.2 Certification Summary for Aircraft Model ........................................................ 49
4.5.3 Means of Compliance ........................................................................................ 50
4.6 Change to Approved Type Design ..................................................................... 51
4.6.1 General principle................................................................................................ 51
4.6.2 Approval of change............................................................................................ 52
4.6.3 Responsibilities .................................................................................................. 52
4.6.4 Post approval...................................................................................................... 52
4.7 Service Bulletin Process ....................................................................................... 53
4.7.1 General............................................................................................................... 53
4.7.2 Service Bulletin approval Statement.................................................................. 53
4.7.3 Flowchart: SB Process Overview ...................................................................... 54
4.7.4 Vendor SB.......................................................................................................... 55
4.8 Structural Repair ................................................................................................. 55
4.8.1 General............................................................................................................... 55
4.8.2 Repair Approval Sheet (RAS) ........................................................................... 55
4.9 Concession ............................................................................................................... 58
4.9.1 General............................................................................................................... 58
4.9.2 Classification...................................................................................................... 58
4.9.3 Responsibilities .................................................................................................. 58
4.10 Continued Airworthiness ................................................................................. 58
4.10.1 General........................................................................................................... 58
4.10.2 Manufacturer responsibilities........................................................................ 59
4.10.3 Continued Airworthiness System .................................................................. 59
4.10.4 Identification of Potential Unsafe Conditions............................................... 59
4.10.5 Corrective actions implementation ................................................................ 59
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4.10.6 Airworthiness Review Meetings/ Progress meetings .................................... 60

4.10.7 Information to Operators................................................................................ 60
4.10.8 Responsibilities .............................................................................................. 60
4.11 Flight Tests .......................................................................................................... 61
4.11.1 Organization................................................................................................... 61
4.11.2 Responsibility ................................................................................................ 61
4.11.3 Aircraft configuration .................................................................................... 61
4.11.4 Flight test and development ........................................................................... 62
4.11.5 Certification ................................................................................................... 62
4.11.6 Flight clearance.............................................................................................. 62
4.11.7 Pre-flight Test ................................................................................................ 62
4.11.8 Certification of flight tests results.................................................................. 63
5 CO-ORDINATION BETWEEN DESIGN AND PRODUCTION ....................65
5.1 General..................................................................................................................... 65
5.2 Responsibility ......................................................................................................... 65
6 DOA MONITORING SYSTEM .........................................................................67
6.1 General..................................................................................................................... 67
6.2 Organization ........................................................................................................... 67
6.3 Monitoring program ............................................................................................. 68
6.3.1 Audits ................................................................................................................ 68
6.3.2 Classification Level of finding........................................................................... 69
6.3.3 Corrective actions follow-up.............................................................................. 70
6.3.4 Training.............................................................................................................. 70
6.3.5 Qualification and Experience............................................................................. 70
6.4 Yearly report .......................................................................................................... 70
6.4.1 Yearly review..................................................................................................... 71
6.5 Change to Design assurance System ................................................................. 72
6.6 Authorized Signatories ......................................................................................... 73
6.6.1 General............................................................................................................... 73
6.6.2 Nomination and qualification of authorized signatories.................................... 73
6.6.3 Authorized signatories files ............................................................................... 73
6.7 List of Authorized Signature .............................................................................. 74
6.7.1 DOA Functions .................................................................................................. 74
6.7.2 CVE Authorized signatories .............................................................................. 75
6.7.3 Office of Airworthiness Authorized Signatories ............................................... 76
7 DOCUMENTATION RETENTION ...................................................................78
7.1 General..................................................................................................................... 78
7.2 Handling of DOA Archives ................................................................................. 78
7.3 Sites Archives ........................................................................................................... 80
7.4 Documentation ....................................................................................................... 80
7.4.1 Certification Documents format and approval process...................................... 80
8 SUPPLIERS ........................................................................................................82
8.1 General..................................................................................................................... 82
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
8.2 Airworthiness Participation ................................................................................ 82

8.3 Content and Structure of Interface Documents and Quality Plan............. 82
9 APPENDIX to paragraph 6.3 AUDIT MATRIX ............................................85
10 APPENDIX to paragraph 6.3.1 AUDIT REPORT & INVESTIG. SHEET
86
11 APPENDIX to paragraph 6.4 YEARLY REPORT ....................................88
12 APPENDIX to paragraph 6.5 DOA/DOH CHANGE REQUEST .............91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
1 GENERAL
1.1 Distribution List / DOH Holders
Registration
Organization Name
N°
EASA P. MARCOUX B01
EASA H. WILDEGANS B02
BISP A. YAVKIN B03
BISP A. MOUSSONGO B04
BISP I. YARKOVOY B05
BISP S. SHEPELEV B06
BISP N. TISHCHENKO B07
BISP NN B08
RESERVED NN B09
RESERVED NN B10
RESERVED NN B11
BISP
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
1.2 List of effective chapters
Chapter Pages Issue N° Date
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
1.3 Manual management
The Design Organization Handbook is prepared, updated and issue by BISP in Toulouse, on
behalf of the Head of Design Organization.
Each copy of this manual is numerically registered, BISP Office of Airworthiness manages the
distribution and the verification of the application of this manual.
1.3.1 Manuel Updated
The evolution of the Design Organization are two different types which are described as
follows:
• DOH amendment
• DOH revision
DOH revisions are issued in case of changes to the Design Assurance System that are
significant to the showing of compliance or to the airworthiness of the product as defined
in Part 21.A247.
DOH amendments are intended to include all other changes. The DOH is updated by
amendments when necessary.
1.3.1.1 Significant Change
The Significant changes in the Design Assurance System are defined as follows :
a) Changes in organization:
- Change in ownership;
- Relocation to new premises;
- Change in the industrial organization (partnership, suppliers, design worksharing) unless it
can be shown that the independent checking function of the showing of compliance is not
affected;
- Change in the parts of the organization that contribute directly to the airworthiness
(independent checking function, office of airworthiness [or equivalent]);
- Change to the independent monitoring principles.
b) Changes of responsibilities:
Change of:
- Chief Executive
- Head of the Design Organization
- Head of Airworthiness Office
- Heads of main departments
- Manager of the independent monitoring function of the Design Assurance System
- New distribution of responsibilities affecting airworthiness.
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
c) Changes in procedures
Change in the principles of procedures related to:

- The Type certification;
- The classification of changes as "major" or "minor";
- The treatment of major changes;
- The approval of minor changes;
- Continued airworthiness;
- The configuration control, when airworthiness is affected;
- The issue of information and instructions under the privilege of Part 21;
- The acceptance of design tasks undertaken by partners or subcontractors.
d) Changes in resources:
- Substantial reduction in number and/or experience of staff. Approval is materialized by

entry of AA acceptance letter reference and date on amendment pages in the "approval ref"
column.
The Head of Design Office signs DOH revisions for DOH amendments.
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
1.4 Amendment record table
Amdt N° Date Delete Add Reason Approval

Page Page Reference
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
1.5 Definitions
For the aim of this Document, the following terms listed below shall have the following
meanings:
TERMS MEANINGS
BISP( Beriev Irkut A subsidiary company of Beriev and Irkut Corporation, has been
Seaplane) formed to assume all obligations of applicant and future Type
Certificate holder of Be-200 in Europe; European aircraft
manufacturer partnership constituted as a SAS in order to lead and
coordinate the work related to the Beriev 200 programs.
EISP (EADS-IRKUT Joint Venture in charge of Marketing, sales and Support of the Be-
Seaplane) 200E amphibian aircraft for Western customers and monitors the
certification activities
Airworthiness Means the acceptable safety standard of an aircraft designed and

built according to applicable requirements, when operated within its
intended environment and within its quantified and declared
limitations, and maintained in accordance with procedures
acceptable to the responsible Authority.
Agency Designates the European Aviation Safety Agency: EASA
Applicant Designates the person or organization applying for Design

Organization Approval (DOA) under the procedures defined in the
.JAA Administrative and Guidance Material Section Three:
Certification. document
Certification basis The airworthiness standards that the Aircraft Type Design is required
to meet in order to satisfy the applicable Aviation Requirements for
Type (or Supplemental Type) Certificate.
Certification A Certification Maintenance Requirement is a Maintenance task
Maintenance arising from the certification process necessary to achieve
Requirements certification objectives given by the Airworthiness requirements (in
(CMR) particular Part25.571, Part 25.1309, and Part 25.671).
Certification Process Means of finding of compliance with the certification basis and
environmental requirements by the certification authorities, based on
the satisfactory completion of the agreed certification compliance
program.
Certification Review Identifies a certification subject which requires clarification of

Item interpretation or represents a major technical or administrative
problem is identified as Certification Review Item..
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
Continued Means of control of the airworthiness of an Aircraft (including

Airworthiness modifications) subsequent to the Type Design certification.
Design Means all work including the preparation of manufacturing drawings,

stressing, weight control and drawing issue handling procedure
necessary for the manufacture of components or systems including
analysis of test results and support of the certification process
DOA Holder Organization applying for, and then holding, the DOA accepting
responsibilities specified by the Authority according part 21 for the
whole product so far as Type Certification is concerned
Equivalent Safety Means of acceptance by the responsible Authority of an indirect
compliance with an airworthiness requirement on the basis that
relevant compensating airworthiness features will provide an
equivalent level of safety.
Industrial Partners An Industrial Partners ensures the design, management of the

configuration, industrialization, manufacturing, control and delivery of
Aircraft elements. BISP, being responsible for Airworthiness,
ensures the general responsibility for the definition.
Special Condition Special airworthiness requirements established where the applicable

airworthiness code does not contain adequate or appropriate
airworthiness standards; because the product has novel or unusual
design features or is intended for an unconventional use (Part 21-
16).
Subcontractor Entity or person to whom the holder of obligations under contract

has delegated part or all of such obligations
Subsidiary Company (involved in BISP matters) the shares of which are held by
BISP and/or one or several of its members and/or another subsidiary
of BISP Industry or of its members:
Beriev in Taganrog, Russia
IRKUT in Moscow, Russia
Supplier An organization that sells products for use by the air transport
industry. The products may include spare parts, information and
Electronic Data Processing.
Type certification Organization applying for, and then holding, the Type Certificate and
Holder accepting responsibilities specified by the Authority according part
21 for the whole product so far as Type Certification is concerned.
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
Type Design Specifications, drawings and listing of those drawings and

specifications necessary to define the configuration and the design
features of the product shown to comply with the applicable
requirements. Information on materials and processes and on
methods of manufacture and assembly of the product necessary to
ensure the conformity of the product.
Airworthiness limitations sections of the instructions for continued
airworthiness as required by the applicable requirements. Other data
necessary to allow, by comparison, the determination of the
airworthiness of later products of the same type.
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
1.6 Abbreviations
A/C Aircraft
ACD Airframe Certification Document
ACMR Aircraft Configuration Management Rules
AD Airworthiness Directive
AFM Aircraft Flight Manual
AMM Aircraft Maintenance Manual
ARL Action Record List
ARM Airworthiness Review Meeting
ARS Airworthiness Review Sheet
ASB Alert Service Bulletin
ATA Air Transport Association of America
BISP Beriev Irkut Seaplane
CAA Civil Aviation Authority
CAE Chief Airworthiness Engineer
CC Certification Coordinator
CEO Chief Executive Officer
CE Chief Engineer
CG Center of Gravity
CMR Certification Maintenance Requirements
CN Consigne de Navigabilité
COM Company Organization Manual
CRI Certification Review Item
CVE Compliance Verification Engineer
DAID Design Assurance Interface Document
DAR Design Assurance Review
DAS Design Assurance System
DAT Design Assurance Team
DCR DOH Change Request
DDP Declaration of Design and Performance
DOA Design Organization Approval
DOAM Design Organization Approval Manager
DOAT Design Organization Approval Team
DOID Design Organization Interface Document
DOH Design Organization Handbook
DPM Design Progress Meeting
DT Damage Tolerance
EADS European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company
EASA European Aviation Safety Agency
EIS Entry Into Service
FC Flight Cycle
FCOM Flight Crew Operating Manual
FOM Flight Operations Manual
HAO Head of Airworthiness Office
HDO Head of Design Organization
IAC Interstate Aviation Committee
IAC AR Interstate Aviation Committee Aviation Register
ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization
ISB Inspection Service Bulletin
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
ISO International Organization for Standardization

JAA Joint Aviation Authorities
JAR Joint Aviation Requirements
JV Joint Venture
LEP List of Effective Pages
MAS Modification Approval Sheet
MMEL Master Minimum Equipment List
MOA Maintenance Organization Approval
MOC Means of Compliance
MRB Maintenance Review Board
MRBD Maintenance Review Board Document
MSN Manufacturer Serial Number
NECTAR New Enhanced Certification Tools and Rulemaking
OEB Operations Evaluation Board
PCM Project Certification Manager
POA Production Organization Approval
RAD Repair Approval Designed
RAS Repair Approval Sheet
RFC Request For Change
RTC Restricted Type Certification
SAS Société par Actions Simplifiée
SB Service Bulletin
SP Seaplane Procedure
SRM Structure Repair Manual
TBM Type Board Meeting
TC Type Certificate
TCDS Type Certificate Data Sheet
TD Technical Dossier
WBM Weight and Balance Manual
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
1.7 Reference documents

The following documents are the DOA related documents that are referenced in the table of
reference documents (See. Below)
Documentation Title / Application sections
European Commission Implementing rules for the airworthiness and environmental

Regulation (EC) certification of aircraft and related products, parts and
n°1702/2003 appliance, as well as for the certification of design and
production organizations
PART 21 Annex to EC Certification of aircraft and related products, parts and

n°1702/2003 appliances, and of design and production organizations
JAR-25/CS-25 JAA/EASA Certification Specifications for large aeroplanes
JAR-E/CS-E JAA/EASA Certification Specifications for Engines
CS-34 EASA Certification Specifications for Aircraft Engine

Emissions and Fuel Venting
CS-36 EASA Certification Specifications for Aircraft noise
AMC& GM Part21 Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance Material for

the airworthiness and environmental certification of aircraft
and related products, parts and appliances, as well as for the
certification of design and production organizations.
ICAO Annex 13 Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation
ICAO Annex 16 Environmental protection . Aircraft Noise and fuel venting
ISO 10011 Guidelines for auditing quality systems
ISO 9001 Quality Management System
Table of reference documents 1.7
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
1.8 Other referred documents
Reference Documentation
SP0010 Aircraft Configuration Management Rules
(ACMR)
SP0011 Procedure for Change to Type Design
SP0012 Individual Aircraft Procedure
SP0014 Creation and Revision of the Service Bulletin
(Including vendors SB)
SP0015 Repair procedure
SP0016 Flight Test Procedure
SP0017 Procedure for non conformities covered by
concessions
SP0018 Continued Airworthiness Procedure
SP0020 Procedure for Operational Manuals(
AFM,MMEL..)
SP0021 Creation and Revision of the Structure Repair
Manuel(SRM)
SP0022 Procedure for Airworthiness Limitation Section
(ALS)
SP0023 Procedure for Maintenance Review Board
(MRB)
SP0024 WBM Approval Procedure
SP0025 Procedure for Aircraft Maintenance Manual
(AMM)
SP0030 Procedure for Suppliers
SP0070 Type Certification Procedure
SP0071 Procedure for Certification Actions Management
SP0072 Procedure for establishing Certification
Documents
SP0073 Procedure for Logistic & communication
between parties
SP0074 Procedure for Documents Archiving
SP0075 Procedure for Establishing Certification Plan
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
CHAPTER 2
BERIEV IRKUT SEAPLANE DESIGN

ORGANIZATION
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
2 BERIEV IRKUT SEAPLANE DESIGN ORGANIZATION
2.1 General
Within IRKUT organization, Beriev Irkut Seaplane SAS located in Toulouse (France) has been
formed to assume all the obligations of Applicant and future Type Certificate holder for Be-
200E in Europe.
Beriev Irkut Seaplane SAS will use the means and resources of several companies to perform
the necessary activities, which share the work according to an agreed Work-sharing
Document. Accountability is ensured through the consortium as prescribed by IR 21.
The BISP Design Organization is manned by personnel from Beriev Aircraft Company,
Ivchenko Progress and BISP placed under the authority of the Accountable Manager of Beriev
Irkut Seaplane SAS in charge of Design, Certification , Airworthiness and Design Assurance.
The BISP Office of Airworthiness is formed to lead the Certification assessment process and
ensure the final compliance of the aircraft Type Design with applicable airworthiness
requirements.
EADS and IRKUT have formed a Joint Venture named EADS-IRKUT Seaplane ( EISP) to run
the Sales and Product Support of the Be-200E and to supervise the Certification process
carried out by BISP.
The Beriev Irkut Seaplane SAS Arrangement Document complemented by Service Contracts
between Beriev Irkut Seaplane SAS, IRKUT Corporation, Beriev Aircraft Company, and
Ivchenko Progress constitute the legal basis for the delegation of activities and responsibilities
to the BISP Design Organization. Involved personnel hold Mission Letters ( contract, job
description…) signed by the BISP Accountable Manager.
2.2 Organization of the Authorities
For the Be-200E Certification Process, IAC AR and EASA will coordinate their action and
agree on a common certification basis, assessment process and findings. Working
Arrangement and Implementation Procedure agreement between the two Authorities cover the
organization and procedures of the Concurrent Certification. A Joint Be-200ES-E/Be-200E
Certification team is formed by IAC AR and EASA. IAC AR and EASA experts will conduct the
assessment as a single team. The PCMs will manage this process.
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
2.3 Applicant
The applicant for the Design Organization Approval is Beriev Irkut Seaplane S.A.S (“Societé par
Actions Simplifiée”: simplified joint stock company) located in Toulouse (France). Its offices are
registered at:
1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte

Immeuble Socrate EA1 –
31707 Blagnac Cedex
France
2.3.1 Purpose of this Manuel
The purpose of this Manual is to define the organization, procedures, manpower and
facilities for design, certification, continuous airworthiness and design assurance system.
This Manual meets the requirements of paragraph Part 21A.243 and is prepared in
compliance with the recommendations of associated Acceptable Means of Compliance and
Guidance material.
The procedures are approved by the undersigned and shall be adhered to by all personnel
involved in this manual.
2.3.2 Basic rules
This manual is prepared according with the following rules:
- BISP ensure technical control of its products in front of the Authorities. This covers
responsibilities as defined in the Design and Certification work sharing arrangements
- BISP and its industrial partners have set up a Design Assurance System (DAS) which is
based on general and detailed instructions and procedures specified in binding full
partners contracts
- Industrial Partners provide BISP with all the necessary means to demonstrate initial
compliance and upkeep of the Design Assurance System.
The DOH will allow the BISP Staff to identify how the organization complies through day-to-
day activities with the Part 21 requirements, and this document shall comply with Part 21.243.
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
2.4 Organization Undertaking
2.4.1 Statement of undertaking by the Accountable Manager

By signing this statement, Mr. Christophe BRIAND acting as BISP President, acknowledge
that the Design Organisation is having and will continue to have the required competence,
means, resources and authority necessary to perform its obligations.
Christophe BRIAND
President
Beriev Irkut Seaplane
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
2.4.2 Statement of Undertaking by Head of Design Organization
The undersigned who holds the utmost design responsibility of Beriev Irkut Seaplane,
hereby agrees to strictly comply with the relevant procedures contained in the BISP Design
Organisation Handbook(DOH).
The undersigned will ensure that all involved personnel shall adhere to the procedures
described in this document.
The undersigned will take all necessary actions enabling the EASA to carry out monitoring
both within BISP and its Partners, Subcontractors and Suppliers premises.
Alexander YAVKIN
Head of Design Organisation

Beriev Irkut Seaplane
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
2.5 BISP
Irkut Seaplane S.A.S was created in 2003 in Toulouse. Company name change to Beriev Irkut
Seaplane (BISP) in Dec 2005.
Beriev Irkut Seaplane S.A.S (“Société par Actions Simplifiée” simplified joint stock company),
a subsidiary company of Beriev Aircraft Company and IRKUT Corporation, has been formed
to assume all obligations of applicant and future Type Certificate holder of Be-200E in Europe.
BISP purpose is to manage the Be-200E program, a twin turbofan engine firefighter Aircraft
and related derivative versions.
2.6 Terms of Approval
2.6.1 Scope of work
BISP Design Organisation Approval has been implemented to enable the following activities for
the large aeroplanes:
• Type design and Certification

• Change the type design
• Continued airworthiness including repair schemes
2.6.2 Type of products
Products covered by the approval are:
• Large transport aircraft (MTOW greater than 7,500Kg) powered by high bypass ratio
turbofan engines.
2.6.3 Types of technologies

Technologies covered are:
• Design of aeronautical parts, appliances and products

• Complex metallic and non metallic airframe structure
• Fly by Wire technology
• Advanced aeronautical systems
• Advanced aircraft avionics
• Integration of high bypass ration turbo fan engine
These types of technologies cover all ATA chapters.
2.6.4 Beriev Irkut Seaplane Product covered by BISP DOA
The products covered by BISP DOA are Be-200E all Models and derivative versions.
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
2.7 Organization
2.7.1 General
Beriev Irkut Seaplane S.A.S (“Société par Actions Simplifiée”: simplified joint stock company),
is a subsidiary of Beriev and IRKUT Corporation, shared as followed:
• IRKUT Corporation owned 50 % of BISP

• Beriev Aircraft Company owned 50 % of BISP
Upon request of EADS and IRKUT, Airbus provides certification staff and service to the Beriev
Irkut Seaplane Office of Airworthiness located in Toulouse/France
The Joint Venture EADS-IRKUT SEAPLANE is in charge of Marketing, Sales and Support of
the Be-200E amphibian aircraft for Western customers and supervise the Certification
activities
2.7.2 Beriev Irkut Seaplane Flow Chart 1
30% 70%
EADS IRKUT
Joint Venture
AIRBUS 50%
Supervise
Certification
activities
Subcontract
people
50%
BERIEV
Beriev Irkut
Seaplane S.A.S
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
2.7.3 Organization Chart 2 of Beriev Irkut Seaplane

BERIEV IRKUT Joint Venture EADS
Share holders Level EADS-IRKUT Seaplane
Airworthiness Board
Beriev A. Yavkin / Airbus A. Quet
Beriev Irkut Seaplane BISP Level BISP

CEO
C. Briand
Design office Head of Design

Organization
Beriev A. Yavkin
Head of Progress Head of Beriev Head of Airworthiness Certification Head of Design

Design Office/Chief Design Office/Chief Office Coordinator Assurance
Engineer Engineer G. Meurey O. Demyanenko A. Moussongo
A. Shcholok
Progress Design Beriev Design Airworthiness Office

Office Office -List of Staff DOA Representative DOA Representative
refer to Chapt. 6.7.3 Progress Beriev I. Yarkovoy
-List of CVEs -List of CVEs S. Shepelev
refer to Chapt. 6.7.2.2 refer to Chapt. 6.7.2.1 -List of CVEs
refer to Chapt. 6.7.2.1
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
CEO
2.7.4 BISP Organization Chart 3 BISP
Airworthiness Board
Airbus Airworthiness VP
Head of Design Beriev Airworthiness VP
Organisation
Airworthiness Office
Assurance
Head of Design Office / Head of Design Office / Head of Head of Design
Design Office
Design
Chief Engineer Chief Engineer Airworthiness Office Assurance
Progress Beriev
Certification Coordinator
Progress CVEs Beriev CVEs Beriev Progress

Organization Organization
Approval Approval
Representative Representative
Airworthiness Office staff
Flight, Handling Qualities

Flight, Performance
Operational Integration
Flight Controls / Fly-by-Wire
Hydro mechanical Systems
Structures
Maintenance Integration
Manuals
Engines
Noise
Avionics, Software
Electrical Systems
Fuel & Propulsion Systems
Cockpit & Interior Systems
Oxygen Systems
Continued Airworthiness Manager *
Individual A/C Certification Manager * * Position Post RTC
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
2.7.5 Beriev Organization Chart 4 Director General

V. Kobzev
Deputy Director General Deputy Director General for

Deputy Director General – First Deputy Director
Chief Designer certification and quality
development plant director General for engineering and
A.Yavkin V.Grigoriev
technology
Project control group Flight Test Facility Quality department
Certification and
Division for advanced quality department
Strength department Division for power
plants, ECS and development
anti-icing system
Standardization and
Strength tests Mechanical systems unification department
department Airframe division division
Technical inspection
Maintainability Electrical equipment department
department Avionics division department
QUALITY &
New technology DESIGN STAFF CERTIFICATION
department

STAFF
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
2.7.6 Ivchenko Progresss Organization Chart 5

Designer General
F.M. MURAVCHENKO
Program Chief First Deputy Deputy

Designer Designer General Designer General
A. SHCHOLOK
Design Assurance
Project Designer Chief Designer G. S. SHEPELEV
P. BELASCHOV KRITSYN
Compressor Combustion Turbine Deputy Head of Office of IT Support

V.ARCHIPOV Chamber V.MERCULOV K. Airworthiness A.DASHKOVSKY
V. GUSEV CHUPRINA N. TISHCHENKO
Power Plant Control Stress

V. BUGRIN V. SEDRISTIY A.SHEREMETY
EV
D1 D2 D3
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
2.7.7 Design Organization

2.7.7.1 Design Office activities
The Design Offices of Beriev Aircraft Company and Ivchenko Progress contribute to the
Certification process as Members of the Be-200E industrial partnership.
They participate in:
• Defining the overall certification policy

• Presenting the design to the Authorities
• Negotiating applicable requirements and their interpretation
• Continued Airworthiness process
For their domains of responsibility as defined in the “Certification Work sharing” document they:
• Ensure the compliance with applicable requirements

• Coordinate all activities leading to proof of compliance
• Present the proof of compliance against applicable requirements
• Prepare and present the Certification Documents according to the agreed Certification
Program.
2.7.7.2 Office of Airworthiness activities
The BISP Office of Airworthiness ensures the coordination and supervision of the tasks leading
to certification of Be-200E in cooperation with the certification experts within Beriev Aircraft
Company, Ivchenko Progress and Airbus seconded Staff, who contribute to the certification
process as Members of the Be-200E industrial partnership :
• Certification organization
• Certification procedures and policies
• Certification management at aircraft and engine level
• Programs and schedules
• Preparation of the certification basis
• Coordination of the compliance program and demonstrations
• Documentation management and archiving
The BISP Office of Airworthiness is the focal point for certification matters at aircraft level.
The BISP Office of Airworthiness reports to and acts under the authority of Beriev Irkut Seaplane
SAS acting Program Director for all matters of its responsibility. For all design and technical
matters the Beriev Irkut Seaplane Office of Airworthiness will report to HDO.
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
This Office will work jointly with the IAC AR and EASA Program Certification Managers to
manage the Be-200ES-E/Be-200E Concurrent Certification process according implementation
procedure ref :XXXXX.
2.7.7.3 Design Assurance Office activities
The staff is accountable for ensuring that the Design Organization Approval for the Company is
maintained in compliance with the Part 21 requirements. The staff is accountable for the
management of all activities within BISP for all subjects dealing with approval of the design
organization.
The staff is also providing expertise for all organizational and procedural matters connected to
provision Part 21 subpart JA.
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
2.8 Facilities and Means
2.8.1 Facilities
BISP facilities are located in three countries at the main partners facilities as following:
Beriev Irkut Seaplane Headquarter

1 Rond point Maurice Bellonte Certification
Immeuble Socrate EA1 Airworthiness
31707 Blagnac (France) Design Assurance
Beriev Aircraft Company Design Office

1 Aviator Square Certification
347923 Taganrog ( Russia) Airworthiness
Design Assurance
Static and Fatigue Test
Bench test ( Aircraft systems and
equipment
Flight Test
Hydroaviation training center
Production of the Aircraft Prototype
Beriev Aircraft Company Design Office
Irkutsk
Ivchenko Progress Design Office

2 Ivanova street Certification
69068 Zaporozhje (Ukraine) Airworthiness
Design Assurance
Static and Fatigue Test
Bench test
Production of the Engine Prototype
IRKUT Cooporation Program management

68, Bldg. 1, Leningradsky prospekt,
Moscow, 125315 (Russia)
IRKUT Aircraft Production

Irkutsk
Motorsich Engine production

15 Vos'mogo marta street Support
69068 Zaporozhje (Ukraine)
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
2.8.2 Human Resources
BISP staff consists of :
• Personnel directly hired by BISP

• Beriev nominated personnel
• Ivchenko Progress nominated personnel
• Airbus seconded personnel
• Major suppliers staff
The total BISP workforce is approximately 139 (at the end of 2006). The breakdown of the
Workforce is shown below.
Company Name Nb pers
BISP Airworthiness Office (France) 9

Beriev Aircraft Company 70
Ivchenko-Progress 40
Irkut Corporation 20
Total 139
2.8.3 Means
BISP use the means of its main partners.
BISP DOA personnel is supported by internal tools in his specific activities, such as:
• Configuration management electronic tools, such as AMCS (Aircraft Modification

Configuration System (TBC in Beriev)
• Personal computer and associated standard software
• Access to internal collaborative tool (eRoom).
The Design Office is equipped with:
• Workstations
• Computer Aided Design , Computer Aided Engineering, Computer Aided Manufacturing and
Product Data Management
- Unigraphic,
- AutoCAD
- Patran/Nastran
• Computerized documentation management tools such as (TBD)- Standard Doc to gain
access to the Directives or procedures to follow
• Direct link (via Internet or through intranet system) to National and international Authorithies
• Technical software for flight physics
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
CHAPTER 3
FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 35 of

91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
3 FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
3.1 Airworthiness Certification Committee (ACC)
The ACC is a forum to review matters of airworthiness and organization, independent

from the design activities with the following people:
• JV airworthiness Board members

• Head of Airworthiness Office
• Certification Coordinator
3.2 Functions
The functions of the Design Organization staff are described as follows:
3.2.1 Head of Design Organization (HDO)
The CEO of BISP nominates the BISP Head of Design Organization. In accordance
with Part 21 he has the direct or functional responsibility for all departments having a
responsibility for the design and development of the product, including the continued
design support to the aircraft in service and the implementation of the Design
Assurance system. Therefore in this position he acts on behalf of the company:
• To organize and manage the Design Organization to fulfill AA requirements and

company objectives
• To ensure that all instructions of the handbook are adhered to
• To nominate staff as "Compliance Verification Engineers" responsible to approve
compliance documents as defined in Part 21.A239 (b)
• To nominate personnel belonging to the office of Airworthiness responsible as
defined in Part 21.A239 (a)
• To perform a yearly review of the design assurance system
• To establish and send out to the Authority a yearly activity report
• To implement a Design Assurance System intended to ensure that his
responsibilities are properly discharged in accordance with Part 21.A239 (a) :
(i) the appropriate regulations of this Part 21; and

(ii) the terms of Approval issued under Part 21.A251.
• To independently monitor the compliance with, and adequacy of, the

documented procedures of the system. This monitoring must include a feed-back
system to a person or a group of persons having the responsibility to ensure
corrective actions
• To sign declaration of compliance (Part 21.97 (a)) with the applicable
airworthiness regulations and the environmental protection requirements after
Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 36
of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
verification of satisfactory completion of the Type Investigation and to caution that

procedures as specified in handbook have been followed.
3.2.2 Head of Design Office (Chief Engineer)
The Be-200E Head of Design Office (Chief Engineer) leads the design process. He is
responsible for the overall compliance of the design against applicable regulations.
He’s accountable to the following tasks:
• Define the BISP standards

• Define the Aircraft design specification
• Define the tools & processes
• Identify deliverables versus time
• Organize the technical work covering the Design, Certification and Flight test
• Ensure compatibility with work share
• Ensure follow-up of work to program
• Define solutions, proving them and delivering them
• Ensure that the Top Level Aircraft specification are met
• Participe to Continued Airworthiness.
3.2.3 Head of Airworthiness Office (Chief Airworthiness Engineer )
The Head of Airworthiness Office leads all certification and airworthiness activities in
view of obtaining EASA Type Certification; he is accountable for the management of:
• Type and change approval
• Individual aircraft certification
• Continued airworthiness
The Head of Airworthiness Office prepares the Application for Type Certification and
produce the final statement of compliance at aircraft level and the TCDS proposal.
The Head of Airworthiness Office is the direct correspondent of the Chief of the
Engineering department on all certification issues. The Airworthiness function’s
resources at the sites report on airworthiness and certification matters to the Chief
Airworthiness Engineer (CAE).
3.2.4 Certification Coordinator (Deputy Chief Airworthiness Engineer)
The Certification Coordinator (Deputy Chief Airworthiness Engineer) is nominated to

manage and coordinate the airworthiness activities within his scope of responsibility,
relative to the site design activities as defined by the work sharing. He pertains to the
CAE team and acts locally on behalf of CAE.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
He provide airworthiness support to the design office and also coordinate the activities
of the relevant CVEs for Be-200ES-E/Be-200E concurrent certification and organizes
appropriate involvement of the site CVEs.
The main functions of the Certification Coordinator are as follows:
• Provide advice on airworthiness matters to designers,

• Participate to the selection of CVEs,
• Ensure appropriate involvement and coordination of the site CVEs for each
airworthiness process under his responsibility,
• Communicate CAE and Program objectives to all involved personnel on the
site,
• Participate to Change approval process:
- Identify changes to be approved,
- Manage changes compliance demonstration activities with appropriate
CVEs and /or design office specialists
- Acts as Major Change coordinator when designated by the CAE
• Participate to Continued Airworthiness:
- Manage In Service Reporting Occurrences
- Coordinate Airworthiness Review Meeting (ARM) preparation with CVEs
and design offices specialists
- Participate to ARM
3.2.5 Compliance Verification Engineer (CVE)
This function is also known as “independent verification” or “compliance verification” as

required by Part 21A.239 b).
Staff having the necessary technical certification background and competence in the
subject perform the Independent Checking signature.
They shall be involved in the corresponding showing of compliance process, but they
are sufficiently independent from the task/subject performed by the Showing
Compliance Engineer( Originator ).
This signature assumes in particular that the following check have been performed:
− Certification Document overall quality

− Certification Document identification, scope, applicability, … in compliance with
NECTAR tool data
− Certification Document completeness
− Certification Document conclusions clearly showing compliance with referenced
codes, and properly reflected in the Compliance Statement
− Design characteristics considered in accordance with those resulting from the
Type Design Definition and Certification objectives (in particular: Flight envelope,
Weight/CG envelope, kind of operation, etc.)

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
− Possible identified interface issues (with other technical areas, other

Departments) are either already addressed an other Certification Plan, or are to be
reported for resolution.
- Distribution list is in accordance with the nature of the Document

− Confidentiality Statements are properly included
• The CVE prepare and participate to Certification Meetings with Airworthiness

Authorities Specialists. He reports to the Chief Engineer for technical matter and to
CAE (or local Certification Coordinator) for certification issues.
3.3 Design Assurance Office
3.3.1 Head of Design Assurance ( DOA Manager )
He ensures the proper deployment and functioning of the Design Assurance System in
any BISP sites.
He ensures the following main tasks :
• Define and implement the System Monitoring

• Identify specific sites procedures that needs to be maintained
• Deploy DOA training and awareness including notification of DOH changes
• Coordinate related DOA contractual arrangement for design suppliers including
assessment and surveillance
• Report to HDO of BISP any deficiency identified during day to day work
• Perform surveillance Audit and a posteriori investigations
• Perform corrective actions follow-up
3.3.2 Design Organization Approval Representative

Beriev Aircraft Company and Ivchenko Progress have appointed Design Organization
Approval Representatives (DOAR assigned to the Design Assurance System for each
of their sites (Taganrog, Russia / Zaporozhje, Ukraine). They perform the DOA tasks and
assume responsibilities belonging to DOA Representatives described below:
They ensure the proper deployment and functioning of the Design Assurance System in
their sites.
They ensure the following main tasks at site level :
• Implement the System Monitoring

• Identify specific sites procedures that needs to be maintained
• Deploy DOA training and awareness including notification of DOH changes

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
• Coordinate related DOA contractual arrangement for design suppliers including

assessment and surveillance
• Report to Head of Design assurance of BISP any deficiency identified during day
to day work
• Perform surveillance Audit and a posteriori investigations
• Perform corrective actions follow-up
3.4 Resolution of conflicts

If specialists cannot agree at a technical level, they should try to resolve the problem by
appropriate consultation within their Site Certification Coordinator (Beriev in Taganrog
and Ivchenko Progress In Zaporozhje) and BISP office of Airworthiness in Toulouse.
The Head of Airworthiness Office shall be consulted to try to resolve the problem. He will
ensure appropriate coordination within BISP and the partners Sites Certification
Coordinator.
When design is involved, the issue will be raised at the appropriate Design Progress
Meeting. When found necessary, the Head of Airworthiness Office may raise the issue at
the ACC.
When design is directly involved, the BISP Head of Airworthiness Office (CAE) will bring
the issue to the HDO. If resolution cannot be reached there, the JV Airworthiness Board
will make the final decision.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
CHAPTER 4
AIRWORTHINESS AND
CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4 AIRWORTHINESS
4.1 General
Certification procedures ensure a structured and traceable certification process covering

all activities from detailed work to final compliance demonstration. These procedures are
defined, established and issued by the Head of Airworthiness Office.
4.2 Type Certification Process

4.2.1 Concurrent Type Certification Process scheme
Due to concurrent certification process by IAC AR and EASA, BISP is also applicant to
IAC AR for Validation and initiates the Validation process by sending via EASA an
application for Be-200E validation.
Two Airworthiness Authorities with equal involvement

Two Applicants
Two Aircraft Types
Two Certification Projects
BUT
One Single Certification Process
Concurrent Certification / Validation
IAC AR EASA
Be-200ES-E Primary RTC Be-200ES-E RTC Validation

Be-200E RTC Validation Be-200E Primary RTC
One Common Certification Basis

One Concurrent Airworthiness Authorities Assessment
One Official Meeting Planning
One Common Agenda For each meeting

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
Refer to IP…..TBD
4.2.2 Type Certification
4.2.2.1 General
BISP is applicant and future TC holder of Be-200E series Type Certificate and also
applicant for EASA DOA as required by Part21.
Refer to Procedure SP0070.
4.2.2.2 Responsibilities
Compliance Verification
The Compliance Verification of all compliance documents and manuals to be

submitted to EASA for approval is ensured by the Checking Compliance Engineer(
CVE).
Refer to paragraph 6.7.2.1 to 6.7.2.2 for authorized signatories.
Office of Airworthiness
The checking of all compliance documents as necessary to show compliance with the
Type Certification applicable airworthiness and environmental protection requirements
is performed by BISP Office of Airworthiness staff according EASA GM N° 1
21.A239(a) 3.1.4(n).
The Office of Airworthiness Staff ensure the checking of required Type Design
definition documents described in Part 21A31 and ensure that they are provided to
EASA for approval when required according to EASA GM N°1 21.A239(a) 3.1.4(o).
Refer to paragraph 6.2.3 for authorized signatories.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4.3 Flow Chart of the TC-Process
The following flow chart shows the aforementioned certification phases in relation to the
Milestones for the development of a new A/C type (M0 to M12), certification process
objectives and typical EASA activities as primary authority.
Milestones/Pre-Conditions Certification Process Deliverables EASA Activities
M0- Program Idea Established Top Level Requirements Phase 0:

Feasibility
M1-Market Opportunities Identified General a/c Configuration
M2- Standards and Requirements Established General a/c Characteristics
M3- A/C Concept Selected General Certification

Objectives and Schedule
TC Application
acceptance
M4- Configuration Baselined
Nomination of BISP Phase 1: Nomination of:

Worksharing Certification. Team Application & Project • EASA PCM
Organization • EASA Team
Establishment
Certification Procedures
Nomination of CVE Document EASA
Familiarization Mtg
BISP initial TC Basis

EASA Preparation
of PID
M5- Detailed A/C Concept Validated
Phase 2: EASA Team

Panel/Specialists Familiarization & Familiarization
Familiarized TC-basis Preparation Meeting
M6- Structure Systems Specification
Completed Non-EASA/JAA
EASA Initial
CRIs Certification NECTAR Setup National
Basis Coordinators
Meeting
CRIs with Different MOCs NECTAR Update
EASA Type Board

Meeting
SCs with First AA Position
Agreed Certif. Milestones
M7- Component Level Design

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Completed Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 45
of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
Flow Chart of the TC-Process Continued
Milestones/Pre-Conditions Certification Process Deliverables EASA Activities
M8- Major Component Assembly Started

Closure of all CRIs
Phase 3: EASA Panel
Means of Compliance Meetings
AA Acceptance of Cert & Certification Plans
AA Delegation to BISP
EASA Type Board
NECTAR Update Meeting
Intitial Type Design
M9- Begin of Final Assembly
M10-Power ON
Agreed
Certification EASA Review of Non-
Type Design Documents NECTAR Phase 4: Delegated
Definition Freeze Update Compliance Compliance
Demonstration Demonstrations,
Final Type Inspections, Test
Deign Agreed
M11- First Flight

• Compliance Record Sheets
Approved • Statement Record Book
Manuals • Compliance Checklist
TCDS Agreed • Compliance Statements

• Statement of Final Compliance EASA Final TBM
• Declaration of Compliance
M12- Type Certification
Issue of EASA Type

Certificate

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4.4 Aircraft Type Certification Documentation
4.4.1 Operational Documentation

4.4.1.1 Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM)
BISP has the responsibility to establish AFM proposal and to obtain EASA approval. The
Be-200E AFM is produced by Beriev and reviewed by BISP office of Airworthiness prior
to submission for approval by EASA for TC and Major changes.
Refer to Procedure SP0020.
4.4.1.2 Master Minimum Equipment List (MMEL)
BISP has the responsibility to establish the MMEL proposal and to obtain EASA
approval. A simplified Operations Evaluation Board (OEB) process is instituted jointly
by EASA and IAC to review the MMEL of Be-200E.
The Manager in charge of Operational Integration is responsible for presenting to the

OEB the process and methods used to define the Be-200 MMEL and show how they
relate with the policies of the Authorities.
Refer to the procedure SP0020.
4.4.1.3 Weight and balance Manual
BISP has the responsibility to establish the Be-200E WBM proposal and obtain EASA
approval. The chapter 1.10 of the WBM defines the loading limitations which must be
approved by EASA.
Refer to procedure SP0024.
4.4.2 Maintenance Documentation

4.4.2.1 Airworthiness Limitation Section (ALS)
In accordance with JAR/CS 25.1529, Appendix H, paragraph 25.4, the ALS provides to
the operators with a single Manual for maintenance tasks, inspection intervals and life
limits originating from the Type Certification requirements (Airworthiness Limitations
Section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness). It is referenced in TCDS and
approved by EASA. It comprises :
Refer to procedure SP0022

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
a) Life Limits / Monitored Parts
The Life Limits / Monitored Parts provides each mandatory replacement time determined
as necessary for compliance with JAR/CS 25.571.
Sub-section limitations is applicable to components that are designed as ‘safe life’

concept.
Sub-section demonstrated fatigue life parts provides traceability and monitoring records
of parts for which life limit may need to be declared in the future (at end of fatigue test ).
b) Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALI)
The ALI document provides mandatory structural inspection, thresholds/intervals and the
related structural inspection procedure as required for compliance with JAR/CS 25.571.
The ALI of Be-200E is prepared under the responsibility of the Manager in charge of
Maintenance Integration.
c) Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMR)
The CMR provides mandatory system inspections thresholds /intervals and the related
system inspection procedure as required for compliance with JAR/CS 25.1309 . Most of
the tasks in the CMR originate from the System Safety Assessments.
4.4.2.2 Aircraft Maintenance Manual ( AMM )
According to IAC AR procedure the AMM is an approved document for Be-200ES-E.

Containing ALS in sections 4 and 5 . Consequently the Be-200E AMM will contain the
Be-200E ALS and section ( TBD ) and BISP has the responsibility to establish the
AMM / ALS proposal and obtain EASA approval.
4.4.2.3 Structural Repair Manual (SRM)
BISP has the responsibility to establish the SRM proposal and to obtain EASA approval
The manager in charge for SRM needs to define :
- Required identification of Structural parts,

- Allowable damages limits,
- Repairs to be included in the SRM.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4.4.2.4 Maintenance Review Board (MRB)
The MRB Report defines the initial minimum scheduled maintenance tasks and their
thresholds/ intervals. Operators may escalate the thresholds and intervals of tasks
appearing in these sections subject to approval by their Aviation Authority, based on their
own service experience.
An Industry Steering Committee (ISC) using the ATA Maintenance Steering Guide Issue
3 (MSG 3) analysis method normally defines the technical content of the MRB Report.
The ISC also determines the need for revisions to address in-service experience and
new/modified configurations.
A simplified Maintenance Review Board (MRB) process is instituted jointly by EASA and
IAC to review and validate relevant items for inclusion in Be-200E MRB Report. No ISC
is formed for this initial process. The IAC and EASA experts, working with the Applicant’s
experts, conduct the necessary assessments.
4.5 Certification Documentation

Certification Documents and associated Supporting Documents are used by BISP
Office of Airworthiness to show Be-200E compliance to applicable requirements.
4.5.1 Compliance Record

A Compliance Record covering all applicable certification requirements for each
domain (ATA Chapter) is produced for the first aircraft model of a new Type.
The Compliance Record contains all applicable requirements divided into paragraphs
and subparagraphs with corresponding Means of Compliance, the Certification
Documents and Compliance Statements for concerned ATA Chapter.
The Compliance Record is established by the person in the Airworthiness Office

responsible for the domain (ATA Chapter) in coordination with the CVE and is
submitted to concerned Authorities Specialists for agreement.
At the end of the Certification Process all Compliance Records are compiled to form
the aircraft Compliance Record Book called “Grand Livre”.
4.5.2 Certification Summary for Aircraft Model
The Final Report will summarize the activities of the EASA Team and the main issues
raised during Be-200E Type Certification.
of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4.5.3 Means of Compliance
Means of Compliance are categorized in 9 types, defined in the following MOC table with
associated Compliance Documents.
Compliance task Associated Compliance

Means of Compliance
Documents
MC0 : Compliance
Statement
-reference to Type Design Type Design Documents
documents Recorded Statements
Engineering -election of methods, factors, ect
Evaluation -definitions
MC1 : Design Review Description, Drawings
MC2 : Calculation /Analysis Substantiation Reports
MC3 : Safety assessment Safety Analysis
MC4 : Laboratory Tests
Test Programs
Test Reports
MC5 : Ground Test of A/C
Tests Test Interpretations
MC6 : Flight Tests
MC8 : Simulation
MC7 : Design Inspection Reports of the inspection
Inspection by the Agency Specialists Visits
(on mock-up or A/C, ect.)
Equipment
MC9 : Equipment Qualification See note
Qualification
Note : TSO (or ETSO) equipment is typically qualified against the requirements of TSO or ETSO. The
Declaration of Design and Performance is endorsed by the BISP Design Office, including limitations, or
deviations from the specification if acceptable (Reasons justifying the acceptance of the deviations need
to be appended to the DDP).
TABLE Means of Compliance

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4.6 Change to Approved Type Design
4.6.1 General principle
Each change to the Type Design has to be approved in accordance with Part 21
section A subpart D, each change is identified by a Change number or by a group of
Modification numbers.
The overview of the process is given below :
Need for change
Opening Change
Technical Dossier
Classification
Major Change Minor Change
proposal against
Part 21 criteria
Change Justified Change Justified
Compliance Compliance
verified verified
Approved By
Approved By BISP Office of
EASA Airworthiness

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4.6.2 Approval of change
- Minor change is approved by BISP Office of Airworthiness under DOA privilege, by

the authorized signatories,
- Major change is approved by the EASA.
After satisfactory verification of compliance, the signatory, authorized on behalf of

BISP Office of Airworthiness, will stamp and sign the Modification Approval Sheet
(MAS).
This signature shall not be the same person who has signed the “Compliance
Checked” box on the MAS.
4.6.3 Responsibilities
The Compliance Verification of MAS is ensured by the CVE : refer paragraph 6.7.2.1
to 6.7.2.2 list Authorized Signatories .
The MAS approval statement is done by nominated persons from the Office of
Airworthiness except for the major changes signed by EASA ( see. GM N°1 to
21.A239(a) 3.1.4(r) ). The name of the nominated representatives and scope of their
responsibilities are given in the list of Authorized Signatories in accordance with the
paragraph 6.2.3
4.6.4 Post approval
After approval of minor and major changes to Type Design , the following actions will
be performed by BISP Office of Airworthiness.
• AMCS (Aircraft Modification configuration System” electronic data base” ), will be

updated,
The completed MAS is signed by the authorized signatories of BISP Office of

Airworthiness and the original shall be held at the Partner Airworthiness Office in
accordance with the DOH (See. Chapter 6).

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4.7 Service Bulletin Process
4.7.1 General
The SB is the document used to provide the Airlines with instructions and information
on Approved technical and commercial data governing the embodiment of
modifications or the performing of inspections on in service Aircraft. The SB is
prepared according to a specific from compliant with ATA 2200 specification.
The complete SB process is controlled by the procedures specified in the procedure

SP0014.
4.7.2 Service Bulletin approval Statement
a) Responsibilities
The Compliance Verification of SB is ensured by the CVE : refer paragraph 6.7.21 to

6.7.2.2 list of Authorized Signatories.
ISBs and MSBs approval statement is done by nominated persons from the
Airworthiness Office except for mandatory ISBs signed by EASA. The names of these
nominated representatives and the scope of their responsibilities are given in the list of
Authorized Signatories in accordance with EASA (see. GM N°1 to 21.A239(a) 3.1.4(t) )
- The Authorized Signatories approves the SB by signing the following

statement:
The technical content of this document (Rev xx) is approved under the authority
of DOA n° EASA.21J.313
- In case of a mandatory MSB or ISB, BISP submit them to EASA, together

with the relevant design data. BISP Office of Airworthiness keeps a copy of the
signed ISB approval sheet.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4.7.3 Flowchart: SB Process Overview
Airworthiness
Repercussions Improvement Customer Vendor Service Reconfiguration
(ARM) Request Bulletin
Information return to
SB preparation
origin request
SB Leader signature
CVE signature
Office of Airworthiness
Authority Signature
(Mandatory ISB and MSB) MSB,ISB
SB Approved
SB released

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4.7.4 Vendor SB
Service Bulletins prepared by vendors shall be issued containing the following

statement « The technical content of this document is approved under the authority of
DOA n° EASA.21J.313>>.
The BISP Design Office gives this agreement through procedure SP0019.
For Mandatory VSB the Vendor remains responsible for EASA approval process.
4.8 Structural Repair
4.8.1 General
The purpose of this section is to describe the BISP repair procedure. A structural
damage found on an in-service aircraft must be corrected through the application of an
appropriate repair. This repair must be designed with the purpose to restore an
acceptable safety level, at least identical to the one at time of the initial Type Design, in
compliance with Part21A.433.
4.8.2 Repair Approval Sheet (RAS)
The RAS dossier consists of the RAS form, the damage identification and reporting
source, the repair drawings and/or repair dispositions and the justification documents.
4.8.2.1 Repair Classification / Approval
Minor repair
For minor repair, the Repair Approval Designee (RAD) endorses the RAS by signing
the statement:
Approved under DOA n° EASA. 21J.313.
A copy of approved RAS is sent to the EASA for information.
Major repair
For major structure repair the RAS and substantiation dossier is sent to EASA for
approval.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4.8.2.2 Responsibilities
The Compliance Verification of RAS is ensured by the CVE : refer paragraph 6.7.2.1 t
6.7.2.2 list of Authorized Signatories.
The Office of Airworthiness endorse the RAS for minor repair and provide RAS for
major repair to EASA approval, refer paragraph 6.2.3 list of Authorized Signatories.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4.8.2.3 Flowchart : RAS Process Overview

Operator Support BISP Design/ BISP Office of
engineering Stress Office Airworthiness
(1) Damage identification

1
(2) Is any previous approved existing
applicable (SRM)?
3 2
(3) reception of the repair information
(4) forward damage/ repair detail,
(5) Repair establishment/confirmation: 4 5

- Repair scheme, drawings,
- Classification, RAS,
- Interim approval period when required
- Justification data. 6 5’
-
7
(5’) Signature of the repair solution.
(6) Repair file compilation including Not approved

recording of the RAS
9 8
(7) Verification of the RAS
(8) Statement of approval: not approved, definitive

interim, definitive. 12 11 10
(9) Launch appropriate action to get

approval.
archiving
Interim
(10) Definitive approval with reference to 10’
12’ 11’
DOA EASA.21J.313
(11) Technical dossier file
(12) Receive the RAS
(10’) Interim approval with reference to

DOA EASA.21J.313
(11’) Technical dossier file
(12’) Receive the RAS

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4.9 Concession
4.9.1 General
The concessions are non conformity to Type Design or change to Type Design.
4.9.2 Classification
Non recordable concessions part of general aircraft design configuration: refer to

SP0010.
Recordable concessions having impact of aircraft airworthiness and requiring approval

by BISP Office of Airworthiness designated staff
The Compliance Verification of recordable concessions is ensured by the CVE : refer

paragraph 6.7.2.1 to 6.7.2.2 list of Authorized Signatories.
The Office of Airworthiness designated staff endorse the recordable concessions

Sheet according to paragraph 6.2.3 list of Authorized Signatories.
4.10 Continued Airworthiness
4.10.1 General
The BISP obligation is to keep an acceptable level of safety of the Be-200E ( a

derivative of Be-200 and Be-200ES/ES-E aircraft).
The objective for BISP is to design, produce and verify aircraft to the highest possible
level of safety.
Consequently, each firm involved in the design, production, operation and/or

maintenance of commercial transport aircraft considers having an internal aircraft
safety organization to provide additional assurance of airworthiness to company
management, and to the relevant Authorities.
It is a collective responsibility between Operators and BISP to accomplish the duty of

ensuring the airworthiness of aircraft.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
It is the responsibility of BISP, as a Type Certificate Holder, to develop a system for

safety engineering in the design, development, test, production, and support of its
product during its operational life.
To achieve this objective, BISP has developed a "Continued Airworthiness System".
4.10.2 Manufacturer responsibilities

BISP, as a type Certification Holder, has the following responsibilities:
• to notify to the National authorities reported failures, malfunctions or defects that

could result in a hazard to safety, as defined in Part 21.3 (b) and (c),
• to maintain an adequate level of safety for the fleet, taking any appropriate
corrective actions.
4.10.3 Continued Airworthiness System

The BISP Airworthiness system as follows:
- Identification of safety items and unsafe conditions

- Analysis and decision making
- Criteria for BISP to report to AA
- Definition of corrective actions
- Information to Operators.
4.10.4 Identification of Potential Unsafe Conditions

In accordance with Part 21A.3(b) the type certificate holder report to the Authorities.
BISP Office of Airworthiness informs EASA about identified reportable occurrences.
For those events which have safety impact and those for which an urgent action is
required, the information report will be forwarded to the EASA not later than three days
after identification of the failure, malfunction or defect, unless exceptional
circumstances. Identification and classification of safety items and unsafe conditions
BISP opens an Airworthiness Review sheet for each significant occurrence to be

reported to Authority.
4.10.5 Corrective actions implementation
Corrective actions are implemented in accordance with the severity of the reported
occurrence.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4.10.6 Airworthiness Review Meetings/ Progress meetings

Airworthiness Review Meetings (ARM) are held between BISP and EASA on regular
basis to cover routine issues.
ARM meetings are organized to cover:

- Structure,
- Systems,
- Engine.
4.10.7 Information to Operators.

BISP must inform all Operators about occurrences and any associated corrective
actions that could affect the fleet safety level. BISP operators report to BISP any
problem deriving from the implementation of the corrective actions.
The Office of Airworthiness designated staff ensure initiation of activities as response

to failure evaluation and provide information to EASA according EASA GM N°1 to
21A.239(a)3.1.4(u).
Refer to paragraph 6.2.3 list of Authorized Signatories

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4.11 Flight Tests
4.11.1 Organization
The Flight Testing embraces those aspects of flight development and certification for
Be-200E series assigned to Taganrog facilities. BISP organization, to perform all
activities related to flight test, is described in BISP Flight Operational Manual (FOM) .
Production aircraft are handled in accordance with FOM. The Acceptance Manual
(AM) gives the program of the customer acceptance flight.
4.11.2 Responsibility
All flight test crewmembers belong to Beriev flight test department. In matters relating
to flight discipline and flight safety they are under accountability to the Chief Test Pilot.
Flight Tests department (refer to Beriev Organization chart No 4) is responsible to

manage tests and production Aircraft acceptance flights and to organize and carry out
the flight tests required for development and certification of Be-200 series.
An integrated team is responsible for co-ordination of all actions necessary to ensure

that different materials (drawing, hardware pieces, computers at the right standard,
etc) are available to achieve the required configuration and is responsible to follow-up
the technical problems and the results of the tests.
BISP Partner Beriev flight test department has overall responsibility for flight test
installation.
4.11.3 Aircraft configuration
During certification testing the Aircraft is in a condition representative of the type

Design in all-relevant aspects.
The Aircraft configuration is handled by procedure SP0016.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4.11.4 Flight test and development
Under the overall technical responsibility of the BISP Chief Engineer, the Flight Tests
department in conjunction with the integrated BISP formally defines the Aircraft
configuration to meet each flight of flight program phase. The Flight Test
Instrumentation is defined by the Flight Test Installation Team, flight test department
and specialist engineers.
4.11.5 Certification
The Certification Flight Test Program will include all the flight tests necessary to
demonstrate compliance with applicable requirement and is submit to EASA for
approval. The Program will contain details of the proposed flight tests and will identify
those tests that the Authority requires to perform or witness.
Before certification flight tests, BISP Office of Airworthiness submit to the Authorities
the Flight-test program in order to obtain the Authorities approval of the Certification
Flight Testing program.
4.11.6 Flight clearance

The development aircraft, which have not yet obtained their type certificate from
EASA, are authorized to fly with a "permit to fly" delivered by the local AA. The
application for “permit to fly” is made in accordance with Part 21A174.
A permit to fly has to be requested from any foreign country being over flown or flown
to by the Aircraft manufacturer, when flights have to be performed for test or
demonstration purposes.
4.11.7 Pre-flight Test
Pre-flight actions are performed in accordance with the FOM. Before flight of a new
prototype the complete flight order and associated limitations is signed by Head of
Design Organization and attached to the Flight Clearance certificate being presented
to the flight crew of the Aircraft. This is signed by the Captain and Flight Test Engineer
to indicate the acceptance.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
4.11.8 Certification of flight tests results
Flight Test Department is responsible to endorse the flight crew reports or flight test
results and analysis ( refer to SP0016), including an additional independent verification
performed by the relevant CVE in accordance with the list of Authorized signatures (
see paragraph 6.7.2.1 to 6.7.2.2).
BISP Office of Airworthiness provides EASA with the complete documentation

according to procedure SP0070 or SP0011.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
CHAPTER 5
CO-ORDINATION BETWEEN DESIGN

AND PRODUCTION

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
5 CO-ORDINATION BETWEEN DESIGN AND PRODUCTION
5.1 General
The BISP Design Organization as necessary collaborates with the programme of the
Production Organization to ensure:
- Satisfactory co-ordination of design and production; and

- Proper support of the continuing airworthiness of the product.
The BISP Aircraft Configuration Management Rules (ACMR) manual describes:
- how the Aircraft configurations shall be managed by the Design Organization and the
Production Organization ; and
- the transfer of up to date approved design data from Design Organization to the
Production and Maintenance Organizations.
5.2 Responsibilities
BISP Chief Engineer Aircraft Be-200E and Chief Engineer Engine D-436TP ensure
coordination between their respective Design Organizations and Productions
Organizations.
Refer to chapter 6.7.1 for list of signatories.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
CHAPTER 6
DOA MONITORING SYSTEM

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
6 DOA MONITORING SYSTEM
6.1 General
Part 21.A239 (a)(3) requires to independently monitoring the compliance with, and
adequacy of, the documented procedures of the system (usually done by means of
surveillance programs). This monitoring (system) must include a feedback system to the
responsible managers in charge of the corrective actions.
Monitoring at BISP is the complete activity purposing at checking proper functioning of

the Design Assurance System. It shall enable identification, reporting and resolution of
DOA deficiencies.
6.2 Organization
The DOAM reports directly to the HDO. He collaborates with the responsible managers
of the Design Organization in the development and implementation of the Design
Assurance procedures and practices.
He remains independent from the monitored functions, in the day-to-day operation.
Coordination between technical departments and the persons in charge of the

monitoring system has been established:
• To ensure quick and efficient reporting on resolution of difficulties encountered

using the handbook and associated procedures
• To maintain the design assurance system
• To optimize auditing activities.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
6.3 Monitoring program

The DOAM establishes an annual surveillance program in order to review the whole
Design Organization and procedures within a period of three years (see. Appendix 9).
Sample checks, inquiries, any kind of investigations process, as well as products,
system, human factor audits can be performed according to events or business and
management needs.
6.3.1 Audits
The audits is used to allow the surveillance in order to check on regular basis that the
procedures and the activities described in DOH are correctly applied and implemented
in the system an audit are described as follows:
a) Preparation
For each planned audit, the selected lead auditor(s) will define main items described in
the DOH to be reviewed according to the program and associated required working
documents.
b) Performance
Audits are carried out by qualified auditor(s), with if necessary the participation of
specialists of the audited activity.
c) Debriefing and reporting
The auditor(s) shall perform the following tasks:
• Debriefing to the auditees and their management on the discrepancies,

• Acceptance of the audit results by the auditees and their manager,
• Corrective actions and target date for implementation shall be discussed and
agreed described on Non conformance sheet (see. Appendix 10).
• Distribution of the report to the auditee(s), and to the HDO.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
6.3.2 Classification Level of finding
When evidence of non-compliance to the Part 21 and DOH procedures is detected by

the EASA it shall be classified according Part 21A.258 criteria: (i.e. Level 1, 2 or 3).
After receipt of the notification of finding by the Authority, BISP will proceed as follows:
Level 1 finding:
In case of level one the holder of DOA will demonstrate corrective action to the
satisfaction of the Agency within a period of no more than 21 working days after written
confirmation of the finding
Level 2 finding:
In case of level two findings, the correction action period granted by the Agency shall
be appropriate to the nature of the finding but in any case initially shall not be more
than six months. In certain circumstances and subject to the nature of the finding the
Agency may extend the six-month period subject to a satisfactory corrective action
plan agreed by the Agency.
Level 3 finding:
The DAS responsible will demonstrate corrective action to the satisfaction of the
Agency within the period defined by BISP.
In case of level 1 or 2 findings, the BISP DOA may be subject to a partial or full
suspension or revocation. Head of Design, CAE and Design assurance Manager, will
confirm reception of the notice of suspension or revocation of the BISP DOA in a
timely manner. A presentation of the monitoring activity result (audits) is performed on
yearly basis by Design Assurance System responsible to the Authority.
BISP allows Airworthiness Authority to perform any investigations including

investigation to BISP Industrial Sub-Contractors and Suppliers.
The DAS responsible also provides the necessary arrangement to allow the Authority
to make any investigations including investigations of subcontractors, necessary to
determine compliance with the applicable regulations of Part 21 section A subpart J.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
6.3.3 Corrective actions follow-up

The Design Assurance Manager ensures that agreed corrective actions (see above
paragraph) are implemented in due time, by reviewing periodically the Non-
Conformance Sheets. Non-fulfillment of agreed actions and target dates is
systematically reported to the HDO by the DOAM.
The DOAM performs an assessment of the auditees response and either, closes the
corrective action or launches further additional investigation until the results of his
assessment are satisfactory
6.3.4 Training
The staff of the Design Assurance System shall be trained on the basic principles of
the Design Organization and specific subjects related to their function.
It is set-up by modules covering the following subjects:
• Design Organization Approval, Basic Principles, Documentation

• “Airworthiness Regulations”
• “Basic procedures” for Type Certification, Individual A/C Certification,
Continued Airworthiness.
The level of details will be adapted to the training degree required.
6.3.5 Qualification and Experience
BISP is stating the Qualifications and Experience of the management staff and other
persons responsible for making decisions affecting airworthiness by issuance of a
EASA form 4. The qualification of certifying staff is based on their knowledge,
background and experience and a specific training is established by the organization
to ensure that it is appropriate to the product, part, or appliance to be released.
The staff in all technical departments is due to their special qualifications and
experience, able to provide assurance of the design or changes of a part or appliance
as well as the compilation of all data needed to meet the applicable airworthiness
requirements while taking into account the present state of the art and new
experience.
6.4 Yearly report

The BISP Design Organization Approval Manager, establishes a yearly activity report by
compiling the data issued by the DOAM, this report includes a synthesis of the
monitoring activities. It is submitted to the HDO for validation and issue to the EASA
(see. Appendix_11).

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
6.4.1 Yearly review
Once a year the Design Organization Approval Manager organizes a meeting with the
HDO, CAE and the responsible staff of the Design Organization, aimed to review the
Design Assurance System are described as follows:
- Design Organization activity (including, suppliers),

- Monitoring program and its status,
- Training,
- Perspective,
- If necessary, procedures and organization arrangements.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
6.5 Change to Design assurance System
The Design Assurance system is subject to continuous modifications. This section

covers those modifications, the assessment of the significance of the changes and the
manner in which changes are managed and documented up until approval and
implementation (see. Appendix_12).
Changes to Design organization system surveillance are within the following domains:
- Responsibilities
- Resources
- Procedures
Change to the Design Organization System Monitoring is classified as significant when

affects:
- Terms of reference
- DOA holder
- Relocation of new premises
- Industrial organization (partnership, suppliers, design worksharing)
- CVE
- Independent monitoring principles
- Procedures directly reported in the DOH
- Substantial reduction in number and/or experience of the staff.
As consequence of a significant change, a new issue of the DOH will be sent by DAS
responsible to the EASA for approval. All other changes to DAS that are not in the above
list will be classified as not significant.
A non-significant change will originate a new issue of the DOH that will be directly
approved by DAS manager. Copy of the new issue will be sent by DAS responsible to
the Authority.
All DOH new issues, originated by significant or not significant changes, will be
distributed inside the Design Organisation.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
6.6 Authorized Signatories
6.6.1 General
An authorized signatory is a person authorized to attest validity of the content of

Certification Documents (justifications documents) by signing them.
The design assurance authorized signature is covered by the List of authorized

signatories in paragraph 6.7.
6.6.2 Nomination and qualification of authorized signatories
6.6.2.1 General
All authorized signatories are nominated according to written procedures with due
regard to their qualification and experience. The signatories may sign as soon as they
are nominated in writing. Notification of nomination of design assurance signatories
are kept on file by DOAM.
DOAM shall be informed of any signatory change between two DOH issues. In case of
unsatisfactory performance of a signatory, the Airworthiness and Certification
Committee will request appropriate action to be taken.
6.6.3 Authorized signatories files
For each authorized signatory identified in the list of authorized signatories paragraph
6.7 the following information is kept, on paper form:
- Name; and
- Date of birth; and
- Identification number of the authorization; and
- Job located in; and
- Position; and
- Qualification relevant to the position; and
- Date of first issue of the authorization.
The DOA Manager controls these files. The personnel get access to his/her own file.
Access to the certifying personnel files is given to the Authority representative when
investigating the record system for initial and continued approval or when the Authority
has cause to doubt the competence of a particular certifying person.
The Design Organization keeps the record for at least two years after the certifying
personnel has ceased employment with the organization or at withdrawal of the
authorization whichever is the sooner.
of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
6.7 List of Authorized Signature
6.7.1 DOA Functions
NAME FUNCTION SITE
Alexander Yavkin Head of Design Organization BISP Russia
Gerard Meurey CAE BE-200E / D-436TP BISP France
Oleg Demyanenko Certification Coordinator BISP Russia
Serguey Fursov Chief Engineer Be-200E BISP Russia
TBD Deputy Chief Engineer Be-200E BISP Russia
Anatoly Shchyolok Chief Engineer Engine D-436TP BISP Ukraine
Gennady Kritsyn Deputy CE Engine D-436TP BISP Ukraine
Andre Moussongo DOA Manager BISP France
Igor Yarkovoy DOA Representative BISP Russia
Sergey Shepelev DOA Representative BISP Ukraine

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
6.7.2 CVE Authorized signatories
Authorized signatories Signing as Compliance Verification Engineers ( CVE) for Type

Certification document, MAS, RAS, SB and Concessions for their respective ATAs
6.7.2.1 Compliance Verification Engineer Be-200E

BISP in Taganrog, Russia and BISP Toulouse, France
Deputy
ATA Subject CVE CVE
General Airworthiness requirements Anatolij Sasin German Kobyzev
FHA,SSA
Structures Victor Nikulin Nickolay Sidirov
Landing Gear Victor Kubrak Ivan Gavrilov
Flight Control System Victor Khandigo NN
Autopilot Victor Khandigo NN
Radiocom Vladimir Gozulov NN
Indication /Recording Sytem Sergej Ganin Anatolij Sasin
Navigation Igor Goncharov
Oxygene Equipment Victor Belenovsky Ivan Gavrilov
Icing protection Victor Belenovsky NN
Performance Victor Belida NN
Fly by Wire Sergei Kreerenko Ivan Gavrilov
Fuel System Leonid Babaev Igor Kovalev
Electrical System Peter Belov NN
Design Structural Peter Bagrych Nickolay Sidirov
Aircraft Flight Manual Oleg Volkoderov Valeri Strekoz
Hydraulic /Pneumatic System Oleg Lusinov Ivan Gavrilov
Power Plant Fire Protection system Nickolay Igor Kovalev
Kulinichev
Operating Limitations Igor Zabaluev NN
Power Plant Igor Putin Igor Kovalev
Engine Indication, Ignition A. Yurchenko Igor Kovalev
Noise Yuri Ledovskih Igor Kovalev
ARIA-200M Complex Igor Goncharov NN
Fire Protection Igor Dida NN
Flight Recorders Anatoly NN
Nadolinsky
Lightning Protection Victor Putin NN
HIRF Protection Yuri Dolgosheev NN
Software Peter Teichert Alexei Yavkin
Lights Yuri Gulyaev NN
Controllability and Stability Yuri Ogolev NN
of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
6.7.2.2 Engine D-436TP Compliance Verification Engineer (CVE)
BISP Zaporozhje, Ukraine
Deputy
ATA Subject CVE CVE
Compressor Vladimir Archipov Vyacheslav Merkulov
Combustion Chamber Vladimir Gusev Alexander Sheremetyev
Turbine Vyacheslav Merkulov Vladimir Archipov
Control Vladimir Sedristiy Nickolay Tishchenko
Power Plant Vladimir Bugrin Nickolay Tishchenko
Stress Alexander Sheremetyev Nickolay Tishchenko
Engine D-436TP Nickolay Tishchenko Konstantin Chuprina
6.7.3 Office of Airworthiness Authorized Signatories
BISP Taganrog, Russia, BISP Zaporozhje, Ukraine and BISP Toulouse, France
ATA Subject Name
CAE BE-200E / D-436TP Gerard Meurey

Certification Coordinator Oleg Demyanenko
Engine D-436TP Nickolay Tishchenko
Deputy Engine D-436TP Konstantin Chuprina
HydroMechanical Systems,
Ivan Gavrilov
Cabine Safety/ECS
Manuals Valeri Strekoz
Electrical Systems Alexander Stadnik
Structures Nickolay Sidorov
Flight Test Engineer Dymitri Shkondin
Flight Test Pilot Constantin. Babich
Powerplant & Fuel Systems Igor Kovalev
Performance & AFM Vladimir Kozachenko
Flight Controls /Flight by Wire NN
Performance, AFM, Cabine German Kobyzev
Safety /ECS Noise
Avionics/Software Peter Teichert
Maintenance Integration Olivier Avezou
Operational Integration Norbert. Guitard

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
CHAPTER 7
DOCUMENT RETENTION

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
7 DOCUMENTATION RETENTION
7.1 General
Each partners, subcontractor and BISP directorate is responsible to maintain their own
archives and keep them available on request from the Authorities. They shall provide
visibility of archive content to BISP Office of Airworthiness in Toulouse.
7.2 Handling of DOA Archives

Archives for existing documentation are located in the Partners facilities.
a) General:
- Relevant correspondence between Authorities and BISP (official letters),

- Minutes of meetings between Authorities and BISP written by BISP: ARM, Type
Board Meetings, Certification Meetings, Interface Issue Meetings,
b) Type Certification and Major Changes:
- Application letter or equivalent,

- Approval Letter,
- Declaration of Compliance,
- Type Definition,
- Modification Approval Sheets,
- Certification Documents,
- Supporting Documents,
- Compliance Record Book,
- Compliance Check List,
- Certification Review Items,
- Compliance Summary Report,
- Certification Summary Report,
- Flight Clearance Certificates,
- Originals of Type Certificates.
c) Minor Changes:
- Modification Approval Sheet,

- Modification Register through AMCS (Modification Data base).

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
d) Individual Aircraft Certification:
- Application for (Export) Certificate of Airworthiness, Noise Certificates and

Registration,
- Aircraft Design Declaration, Copy of Aircraft Certificates including Export
Certificate of Airworthiness, Noise Certificates and Non Registration Certificate,
- SB approval Sheet.
e) Repair:
- Repair Approval Sheets,

- Justification Documents.
f) Continued Airworthiness/ Limitations:
- Airworthiness Review Sheet and Supporting Data,

- Inspection and Mandatory Service Bulletin Release Sheets,
- ALS.
g) DOA documents:
- DOA Certificates,
- Design Organization Handbook (DOH),
- DOH Change Requests,
- Design Organisation Interface Document (DOID)
- Surveillance Plan,
- DOA Annual Report and Attachments,
- Design Assurance Review,
- DAT Minutes and Attachments,
- Surveillance Reports from DOAT,
- BISP DOA Audit Reports,
- Authorities correspondence (in),
- BISP correspondence with Authorities (out),
- JAR 21 Amendments,
- Form 4’s,
- BISP DOA related documents referenced in the DOH,
- Notification of nomination of signatories as per chapter Authorized signatories.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
7.3 Sites Archives
BISP relies on its main Partners Airworthiness Archive Department for organization of
legal archives:
Beriev Aircraft Company in Taganrog, archives the following documents
• Originals of Certification Document

• Originals of Supporting Documents for Certification Documents,
• Design information and drawing,
• Reports and correspondence with the Authorities Specialists, originating from the
sites, for compliance issues,
• Complete modifications technical dossiers and originals of the justification
documents and MAS,
• Originals of Be-200 Loads Manuals.
Ivchenko Progress in Zaporozhje, archives the following documents:
• Originals of Certification Document

• Originals of Supporting Documents for Certification Documents,
• Design information and drawing,
• Reports and correspondence with the Authorities Specialists, originating from the
sites, for compliance issues,
• Complete modifications technical dossiers and originals of the justification
documents and MAS.
BISP in Toulouse, Archives the following documents:
• Original of minutes of meetings with the Authorities Specialists written by the

sites
•  All Be-200E series Certification Documents in electronic format.
7.4 Documentation
7.4.1 Certification Documents format and approval process
Original paper documents are scanned in electronic format as often as it is possible in

order to avoid delay in paper transmission and to reduce number of travels. The use of
advanced e-business tools has to be maximized for the same reasons.
The creation of BISP industrial and AAs e-Rooms to manage communication between
Industry and Airworthiness Authorities allows exchanging documents made in
electronic format refer to the procedure SP0073. Documents are treated thought an
internal validation process by industrials partners into “Industrial eRoom” before their
submission to Airworthiness Authorities through the “AAs e-Room”/NECTAR.
of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
CHAPTER 8
SUPPLIERS

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
8 SUPPLIERS
8.1 General
BISP will evaluate and select all news suppliers on the basis of their ability to meet
contract requirements including quality management system and specific quality
assurance requirements.
The compliance with EASA Part21A.239(c) “The design organization shall specify the
manner in which the design assurance system accounts for the acceptability of the parts
or appliances designed or the tasks performed by partners or sub-contractor according
to methods which are subject of written procedures” is demonstrated throughout the
application of that policy.
8.2 Airworthiness Participation
For the specific case of supplier (partner/ subcontractors) organizations that have been
given a level of authority in the process of the Airworthiness approval of design data,
BISP Design Organization Approval has carried up the following work position:
• To establish to its own satisfaction and the satisfaction of the Aviation Authorities, the
adequacy of that supplier’s Design Assurance System in accordance with Part21A.243
(b). For that aim a set of supplementary questions has been developed by DAOM ( refer
to SP0030). It shall be used as a basis for assessment of a new supplier where a
delegation of Airworthiness approval is envisaged.
• BISP has to ensure that for these suppliers an Interface Document is established with
a statement of the assurance of compliance required by Part 21A.239 (b) and directly or
by cross-reference, descriptions and organization of the design and Airworthiness
activities of those suppliers, to establish this statement.
8.3 Content and Structure of Interface Documents and Quality Plan
The Interface document is a means retained to comply with Part21 for the supplier or
partner that has been given a level of authority for the Airworthiness approval of the design
data. A supplier must demonstrate during assessment compliance with certain basic
requirements that are fundamental to the effective control and assurance of design that
cover as follows:
• Product qualification
• Process qualification (compliance to ISO and additional requirements specific to
Airworthiness matters)

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
• Description, functioning and procedures for Design, Design Assurance,

Certification and Airworthiness Organizations
• Communication and Liaison with BISP
• Development and Test Program
• Design and Documentation Change Control
• Management of the second level subcontractors
• Transfer of design data to BISP
• Transfer of design data to manufacturing
• Product support
• Defect and accident investigation
• Records and archiving
• Security and safe keeping
• BISP acceptance of the document
• Supplier statement of undertaking (to ensure application within organization).
• Scope of design work
• Scope of authorization for approval.
Surveillance of suppliers
Procurement Quality conducts the general Monitoring of all selected suppliers. In

addition, regarding the suppliers for which an Airworthiness approval of design data has
been granted with an Interface Document as part of this DOH, the verification of the
efficiency of their Design Assurance System is done during specific surveillance meeting
(Design Assurance Review) led by BISP with Procurement Quality concurrence. These
are carried out on a regular basis between BISP and the supplier with the assistance of
dedicated Engineering BISP specialists. As a minimum, the surveillance meeting for
DOA shall ensure that:
• BISP DOH, Interface Document are known and applied and made available to all
staff involved with the applicable procedures.
• The Interface Document is reviewed accurately and any need of evolution
accepted by BISP
• Discrepancies raised by Engineering specialists are scrutinized and corrective
actions taken
• The exercise of the delegations is properly carried out
• BISP is aware of any change in the authorised signatories list
• Audits have been done in accordance with audit programme including the sub-
level suppliers; corrective actions have been followed-up until resolution.

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
APPENDICES TO DOH

of 91
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
9 APPENDIX to paragraph 6.3 AUDIT MATRIX

SUPPORTING PROCEDURES Date of Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
MAIN PROCESS PART21 planned Remarks
DOH reference SUBJECT
audit
Type certification and Classification 21.91
Restricted type process
Major change, including 21.20
configuration control 21.31
21.93
21.95
21.113
21.114
21.115
21.A239(a)
Minor change, including 21.93
configuration control 21.95
21.113
21.114
21.A239(a)
Approval of minor Approval of minor changes 21.93
changes
Continuous airworthiness Continuous airworthiness 21.3
Change to approved Change to approved 21.117
changes changes
Records keeping Records and keeping 21.55
Documentation Technical Documentation 21.31
Establisment of 21.57
maintenance and operating 21.61
documentation 21.119
21.120
Repairs Repairs 21.431
Personnel Training personnel files 21A243
Tests Ground and flight tests 21.35
Majors suppliers Technical specification- 21.A239©
contract handling 21.A243
Monitoring Monitoring system 21.A239(a)
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
10 APPENDIX to paragraph 6.3.1 AUDIT REPORT & INVESTIG. SHEET

Internal
AUDIT REPORT
Beriev Irkut Seaplane External
SUBJECT: Main Reference document incl. Issue:

Audit N°. :
Company/site: Report N°.:_ _ _ _/_ _
Date of the Audit:
Issue Date :
Conclusion of the audit

Anomaly Report
Auditor comments
Distribution list:
AUDITEE (S) AUDITOR(S)
• •
• •
• •
Report agreed by Name Date& Signature
Auditee
Audit Team Leader
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
APPENDIX to paragraph 5.3.1 INVESTIGATION SHEET

AUDIT INVESTIGATION SHEET
BERIEV IRKUT SEAPLANE
Title :
Description:
Origin: Open on :
Object : Reference
Responsible: Target:
Action:
Closed on:
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
11 APPENDIX to paragraph 6.4 YEARLY REPORT

MEMO
Date :
Title : BISP DOA YEARLY REPORT
FROM : BISP DOAM REFERENCE : BISP-M00.001/06

TO COPIES
Prepared by: DOAM Approved by: HDO
Signature: Signature:
Date Date
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
MEMO
TABLE OF CONTENT
1. COMPANY EVOLUTION
1.1 Evolutions report

1.2 Evolutions implemented during the period of reference
1.2.1Activities
1.2.2 Company Structure
1.2.3 Staff
1.2.4 Subcontractors
1.2.5 Evolutions planned for next period reference
1.3 Summary of quality assurance system evolutions

1.3.2 Period of reference
1.3.3 Organization
1.3.4 Staff
1.3.5 Missions
1.3.6 Methods
1.3.7 Quality Documentation
1.3.8 Planned evolution for the next period of reference
2. ACTIVITY REPORT
2.1 Changes developed in the period of reference (major and minor)

2.2 Repairs developed in the period of reference (major and minor)
2.3 Comparison with previous period
2.4 Scheduled activity for next period
3. MONITORING PROGRAM
3.1 Internal surveillance program

3.1.1 Scheduled program
3.1.2 Internal surveillance program results synthesis
3.1.3 Internal surveillance program for the next period of reference
3.2 External surveillance program

3.2.1 Scheduled program
3.2.2 External surveillance program results synthesis
3.2.3 External surveillance program for the next period of reference
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
MEMO
3.3 Surveillance performed by customers
4 NON CONFORMITY HANDLING

4.1 Non conformity record list
4.2 Corrective action programme
4.3 Impact on surveillance
5. Conclusions
Doc. Ref.:
(DOH) Page:
BERIEV IRKUT
SEAPLANE
12 APPENDIX to paragraph 6.5 DOA/DOH CHANGE REQUEST
Site Design Assurance Manager:

BISP
Name Tel/Fax/Email Date :
Department
DOH Issue n° Chapter/Section Page Other DOA reference(s):

Subject:
Description( Description of the proposal or summary +detail in attached memo)
Following part to be completed by the DAT
• IS THE CHANGE SUBJECTS Y N • IS ITEM RELATED TO JAR21.A247? Y N

TO DAT APPROVAL ?
If yes :
Ref/Date of application for DOA change

• IS THE CONCERN A DOA ITEM ? Y N DOAT answer Ref/date
• IS TECHNICAL PROPOSAL REQUIRED? Y N

If no
If yes :
Reason to refusal Target
Nominee of the action
Technical proposal
DAT PROGRESS/ DAT N° /Date :
DAT APPROVAL
(CLOSURE DAT FINAL POSITION
DATE)

Draft DOH 03

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Draft DOH 03

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Doc. Ref.

Design Organization Handbook (DOH)

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 1 of 91

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 2 of 91

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 3 of 91

3.2.3 Head of Airworthiness Office (Chief Airworthiness Engineer ) ..................... 37

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 4 of 91

4.10.6 Airworthiness Review Meetings/ Progress meetings .................................... 60

8.2 Airworthiness Participation ................................................................................ 82

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 6 of 91

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 7 of 91

1.1 Distribution List / DOH Holders

EASA H. WILDEGANS B02

BISP A. YAVKIN B03

BISP A. MOUSSONGO B04

BISP I. YARKOVOY B05

BISP S. SHEPELEV B06

BISP N. TISHCHENKO B07

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 8 of 91

1.2 List of effective chapters

Chapter Pages Issue N° Date

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 9 of 91

1.3 Manual management

1.3.1 Manuel Updated

1.3.1.1 Significant Change

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 10 of 91

Change in the principles of procedures related to:

- Substantial reduction in number and/or experience of staff. Approval is materialized by

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 11 of 91

1.4 Amendment record table

Amdt N° Date Delete Add Reason Approval

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 12 of 91

Airworthiness Means the acceptable safety standard of an aircraft designed and

Agency Designates the European Aviation Safety Agency: EASA

Applicant Designates the person or organization applying for Design

Certification Review Identifies a certification subject which requires clarification of

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 13 of 91

Continued Means of control of the airworthiness of an Aircraft (including

Design Means all work including the preparation of manufacturing drawings,

Industrial Partners An Industrial Partners ensures the design, management of the

Special Condition Special airworthiness requirements established where the applicable

Subcontractor Entity or person to whom the holder of obligations under contract

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 14 of 91

Type Design Specifications, drawings and listing of those drawings and

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 15 of 91

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 16 of 91

ISO International Organization for Standardization

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 17 of 91

1.7 Reference documents

Documentation Title / Application sections

European Commission Implementing rules for the airworthiness and environmental

PART 21 Annex to EC Certification of aircraft and related products, parts and

JAR-25/CS-25 JAA/EASA Certification Specifications for large aeroplanes

JAR-E/CS-E JAA/EASA Certification Specifications for Engines

CS-34 EASA Certification Specifications for Aircraft Engine

CS-36 EASA Certification Specifications for Aircraft noise

AMC& GM Part21 Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance Material for

ICAO Annex 16 Environmental protection . Aircraft Noise and fuel venting

ISO 10011 Guidelines for auditing quality systems

ISO 9001 Quality Management System

Table of reference documents 1.7

Ref: XX.xxx/ 06 Draft_DOH_03.doc Page 18 of 91