PM1 Copenhagen 25-27" November 2015 (ATTENDED by 4 delegates from Denmark, 2 from Ireland, 3 from Norway, 3 from Portugal, 2 from Lithuania, and an external evaluator from UK) (vi) (wii) (ix) oo) (xi) Gai) Introduction by each partner to themselves, their institutions and their national and regional contexts. Discussion and agreement on the cut backs to proposed activities following limited approval of budget and outcomes by Danish National Agency. Circulation and discussion of proposed guidelines for State of the Art and Case Study reports Discussion and agreement on setting up project management (BASECAMP) and {EUCOURAGE) public websites, and channels of communication between partners Discussion on the project logo in relation to a prior request to one of the partners {( Production High School, Denmark) to work on possibilities with their art and design students. One logo adopted and attached to the minutes Agreement on a format and initial content for the chronological work plan designed to guide partners’ work between meetings - to be reviewed and revised where appropriate at project management meetings. Presentation by project co-ordinators of 3 models for allocating, recording and monitoring. Request agreed after discussion to ask co-ordinators to take final decision on which model to use ~ each has strengths and weaknesses but each would do the job. Subsequent recommendation from project co-ordinators accepted before the end of the meeting Study visits to Albertslund Municipality; Albertsiund Youth Centre; Albertslund Production High School, Welcome Presentations from Albertslund City Manager; Albertsiund’s Head of Youth Services, Schools and Education; and the Principal of Glostrup Production High School Albertsiund. Student-guided tour of Albertslund Youth Centre and the production high school, including discussions with individual staff and students, Briefing and discussion with Adviser from Danish National Agency to clarify targets, budgets, expectations and procedures Clarification of the nature, frequency, and pro forma for returns from each partner to co- ordinators on project expenditure, general progress, and dissemination activities, Discussion within each national group and report back to plenary session on actions to be taken by each partner before the next meeting — formulated by agreement into an action matrix specifying “who does what and when”. On conclusion of the business meeting, a guided evening tour of Copenhagen, including visits to the Opera House and Tivoli.