Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Minnesota, it shares the same legal structure as Minnesota Public Radio and “MinnPost.”
Keith Ellison has generated significant news coverage as a long-time Congressman from
Minnesota, the current Deputy Chair of the Democratic National Committee, and now as
Article 5 of the Minnesota Constitution of Minnesota. The office Petitioner seeks is the
chief legal officer of the state of Minnesota and is generally regarded as the top law
Information about the candidates of this political race is of great importance to the
voting public. Keith Ellison has been accused of various instances of domestic violence
1
or abuse by former partners. These claims arise in the past and contemporaneously with
his candidacy for Minnesota Attorney General. The examination of these claims is, as of
the date of this motion, greatly in the public interest and hence relevant to media
coverage. Alpha News seeks to intervene in this case for the purpose of obtaining
MOTION TO INTERVENE
The Minnesota Supreme Court interpreted this rule in Minneapolis Star Tribune
Co. v. Schumacher, 392 N.W.2d 197, 207 (Minn. 1986), establishing a four-part test. The
elements of this test are: 1) a timely application for intervention; 2) an interest relating to
demonstrating that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede
the party’s ability to protect that interest; and 4) a showing that the party is not adequately
2
1. Alpha News’ Application is Timely.
Alpha News’ Application to Intervene is timely because at the time of the filing of
this motion there is a statewide election involving on of the parties who is of statewide
and national prominence. Specifically, there have been allegations by former partners of
the Petitioner of domestic and emotional abuse. New outlets of every stripe, locally,
nationally, and even internationally, have covered the current Minnesota Attorney
General race, ostensibly because of the prominence and celebrity of the Petitioner. “The
case law regarding the requirement of timely intervention reveals that such a matter must
be determined on a case-by-case basis.” Engelrup v. Potter, 224 N.W.2d 484, 488 (Minn.
1974). In analyzing this motion, the court should examine several factors, including how
far the case has progressed at the time of intervention, the reason for delay, and the
possible prejudice to existing parties caused by that delay. Schumacher, 392 N.W.2d at
207.
A final judgment and decree was entered six years ago, however, it appears from
the docket that there are motions pending. The record is sealed, but it appears that the
instant motion practice may relate to spousal maintenance. Only the Notice of Hearing is
3
This is a dissolution action without children; the parties and anyone interested are
adults. There is no reason to believe that the timing of Alpha News’ request to intervene in
the case and make the records open to the public and all media would prejudice any of the
for this important office, this Application would be untimely. At the time of this motion,
confirmed that they have ongoing investigations into the conduct of the Petitioner vis-à-vis
The Petitioner’s candidacy for Minnesota Attorney General and position as Deputy
Chair of the Democratic National Committee makes details of his life relevant and
pertinent to the media and the voting public. Even if the file does not contain allegations
of domestic abuse, it may contain other information that would be of interest to the media
1
https://kstp.com/news/state-and-national-democrats-say-ellison-investigation-remains-ongoing/5074250/?cat=1
4
and the public regarding this significant political race.
Practical Matter Impair or Impede the Alpha News’ Ability to Protect Its
Interest.
If Alpha News does not intervene in this matter to unseal these records, the records
in this case would remain sealed, and the media and public interest in viewing these
records would not be vindicated. If Alpha News does not intervene and obtain an order
to unseal the records, potentially newsworthy information would be withheld from the
media, the public, the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, and the Democratic National
Party and the Democratic National Committee could potentially use it in their respective
There is no indication at this time that the existing parties would represent the
interest of the public, the media, and Alpha News in this matter. Specifically, but for the
instant motion of Alpha News, these records would continue to remain sealed. The
Minnesota Court of Appeals has held that Minn. R. Civ. P. 24 should be construed
liberally to allow intervention where possible. Omegon, Inc. v. City of Minnetonka, 346
MOTION TO UNSEAL
5
The right of access to civil court documents has been described by the Minnesota
Courts have discretion with regard to their own records and there is a presumption
weighing in favor of public access. The defeat of this presumption in favor of public
access can only be obtained by a party showing a sufficiently strong interest in denying
The Minnesota Supreme Court has set forth two standards to weigh the interests of
the parties versus the public with regard to access to court records. There is a common
law standard and a constitutional standard. Id. Minnesota courts generally apply the
common law standard which dictates that the court apply a balancing test to the issue.
This test involves balancing the aforementioned interest in the public of access to civil
court records against those seeking to prevent access, specifically concerns about privacy,
safety, a potential for improper use and any other concerns of such parties. Id. at 202.
In this case, Alpha News does not seek the Social Security Numbers or Tax
Returns of the parties, as this could give rise to identity theft concerns. There is nothing
known to Alpha News that would affect the safety of the parties or that information
would be used for an improper use. Alpha News, other media and the public’s interest in
access to civil court filings strongly outweigh any potential concerns of the other parties
to this matter.
In Kasal v. Kasal, 35 N.W.2d 745, 746 (Minn. 1949), the Minnesota Supreme
Court explicitly held that the public has a role in marital dissolution proceedings, stating:
6
“Marriage is a civil contract, to which there are three parties: the husband, the wife, and
the State; and while a suit for divorce upon its face is a mere controversy between the
parties to the record, yet the public occupies the position of a third party.” Id. In the
instant matter, even the order sealing the record is not accessible to the public. These
records belong to the public and should not be kept from them at this time.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the foregoing, Alpha News requests that its motion to intervene and
unseal the records in this case, as set forth in its Notice of Motion and Motion, be
granted. Alpha News further requests that this matter be set for hearing as soon as
2018.