Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
n
tio
bu
tri
is
D
or
ision program
on his television pr to discuss a grisly murder in
ot
someone to death
d in the name of Islam. I begged off, partly
because I had no special expertise in the matter. But as a
professional pundit, that doesn’t usually stop me: not only
would I have happily discussed a swing Senate race or cor-
porate tax cuts, but, if invited, I would also have gladly
weighed in on the upcoming NATO military exercises in
Romania or the latest developments in the Canadian–U.S.
softwood lumber dispute. Nevertheless there was some-
thing about being asked to pontificate on this particular
n
born in Bangladesh, detonated a crudely y designe
designed explosive
device in New York’s Port Authority
tioty Bus TTerminal, which
bu
sees more than 230,000 commuters uters every day. Thankfully,
ers eve
ever
tri
n
Why did I find Ullah’s crime so affecting?
ffecting?
fecting? For
F one, he
tio
lived in Kensington, the neighborhood oodd where I grew up, and
bu
he was born in the same countryy as my parents.
p Ullah and I
tri
ard
legally via a green cardd sp
ssponsored
ons by a family member, not
or
cousin, or who mi
might have helped my mother carry an arm-
N
ful of groceries.
After I heard the news, I girded myself for what would
come next. In the Age of Trump, all conversations about im-
migration descend into dueling spasms of culture-war out-
rage. As a poor Muslim immigrant turned lone-wolf terrorist,
he was emblematic of some of the most polarizing aspects of
the president’s immigration agenda. Trump had famously
campaigned on banning Muslim immigrants from the United
States outright, a stance that enjoyed overwhelming support
n
grants, and I sympathized with immigration ation advocates
ration adv who
tio
resented him for it. I am not just the son oof immigrants. I
bu
am the brother, neighbor, and friendiend of
o immigrants, many
tri
rom similar
who suffer from simi failings. But few are, like Akayed
ot
Ullah, intent
ent on mass
m slaughter. Consider that he was mar-
N
n
negative consequences, and an emerging ngg class of
o intellectu-
tio
als I call the bullet-biters: serious, rigorous,
orous, thoughtful im-
bu
migration advocates who recognize ze that if the United States
nize
tri
from the world ld of the 1890s and 1900s, not least because the
number of potential migrants to America will have greatly
increased, and they forthrightly acknowledge that open
borders and domestic equality simply can’t coexist. Their
position, in essence, is that by welcoming millions of low-
skill workers who’d never be in a position to enter the U.S.
middle class, we would greatly reduce global inequality
while enriching native-born citizens, who’d be in a position
to employ vast numbers of low-wage helpers, who could do
n
who want more open immigration policies ies and a more equal
cies
tio
society or, in other words, who want nt to have their cake and
bu
eat it, too—are crushingly naïve.. They haven’t
ha
h really thought
tri
suss out, thatt were more familiar, and that reflect exactly
ot
n
These are familiar struggles for immigrants,
mmigran most of
tio
them as nonviolent as you or me. The w worst-
o off of these
bu
struggling millions live in illegallegal basement
gal ba
bas apartments,
tri
n
proach to immigration, including a greater reater eemphasis on
tio
skills and a lesser one on extended ed family ties. I haven’t
bu
come to this position lightly. Though
hough
ough mmy reasons might be
tri
ily members.
ot
Immigration
ration advocates
ad tell us we have two choices: to be
N
n
forebears were strangers who crossed the Atla Atlantic, or the
tio
Pacific, or the Rio Grande, we aree here only because this
ere on
bu
country welcomed them in, and taught them that to be an
d taugh
tri
One of Obama’
Obama’s great talents was his unsurpassed ability
N
h
to stack the rhetorical deck. Here he was announcing his
executive order for deportation relief in 2014. To disagree
with him was not just to reject his take on the costs and
benefits of a particular policy, it was to oppress a stranger,
which no less an authority than Scripture tells us is a very
bad thing to do. Yet there was a small wrinkle in the former
president’s remarks. While calling on his fellow citizens to
welcome the millions of strangers who make their way to
our country to better their lives, he also insisted that his