Accepted For Value Does It Really Work?

What is meant by “Accepted for Value”?

Accepted for Value, or A4V, is the straightforward process

of paying one’s bills whereby one writes on a remittance
form included in your bills.

All you do is fill in the boxes with the requested amount

along with the date and then write the following across the
form at an angle-

“Accepted for Value, Exemption ID, Exempt from Levy”

and include your National Insurance number on the form,
sign it and print your name. endorse the form on the back
side with your name and current date.

What Works When “Accepted For Value Does Not?

Some people who surf the internet looking for
instructions or stories about the Accepted for Value
Redemption Process get caught behind a brick wall in a
state of information paralysis, or are not able to enforce
discharging of their debt.

Hopefully, you will find the help needed to clear up the

confusion about what is not working and how to get it
working while providing new foundations for your
understanding of the application. Beware, this
information is for your entertainment only!

According to Wikipedia, “Banker’s Acceptance” is another

used for “Accepted for Value”. The definition is
below:Accepted for Value is an example of Language that is
written over a Bill, Invoice, or Statement.

Banker’s Acceptance is a term used for promise of future

payment, time draft so to speak, that is drawn on and
guaranteed by a bank deposit. The Banker’s Acceptance
agreement spells out the amount of money to be paid, the
person who will receive it, and the date on which it will be
paid. Once this is accepted, the draft is then the bank’s
liability on unconditional basis. Draft holders can sell or
exchange it with another buyer at a discounted price if they
are willing to hold off until the draft matures to withdraw
the funds.As Winston Shrout puts it, a maxim of
commercial law states that the one providing the liability is
also the one that must provide the remedy. That means you
must absorb the debt or bill — however, since DEBT IS
Money and backing by precious metals has been eliminated.
As an admiralty system, the commercial world allows
forgiveness of debts.

There is a “hidden” commercial remedy we can use — we

can “accept” invoices, bills, statements or other evidence of
our debts just by signing them — give the instrument life —
and return it “for value” (for the total balance value
indicated on the invoice), and discharge it by returning it to
the instrument’s issuer. Black’s Law Dictionary definition
of Banker’s Acceptance states that this is in accordance with
HJR 192/Public Law 7310 and with Biblical Law (most of
the world, including the U.S. has removed precious metals
as backing for Currency).

Most of us do this very thing every day when we transfer

Federal Reserve Notes “for value”. i.e. “For the Value” of
£1, £20, or £100 which is on currency used to discharge
debts. There is no precious metal backing on assets, but they
are traded in “good faith” and the number printed on it is
“accepted”. We simply “accept” the number on the
instrument’s face as its value. Therefore, a £20 note is
accepted as a Positive Number in our accounting process
and will discharge a debt of £20 as full settlement of that
account.

In the end, banks or creditors expect a form of public

currency, so they simply go along with this remedy without
considering it nonsense. To our way of thinking, something
that doesn’t work is “nonsense”. We do not operate our lives
on THEORY. Nevertheless, there are processes in place to
challenge debts, not with private citizens, but with
corporations and in court and these are proven processes
tested over time. By connecting with us you will be guided
by real life case studies of individuals we have helped and
learn about what truly works. Best of all is that the processes
we use work time after time when worked properly! It is just
a theory that A4V does not work. We hear from people
every week, via 200 calls and emails, telling us they have
not been able to make it work for them. Let’s proceed with
A4V history and “theory” Similar to FRN’s A4V’s are
worthless except for the value printed on them when the
other party has “accepted” that. The difference between
FRN’s and A4V lies in the fact that with a Secured Party
Creditor a lien is placed on your birth certificate estate when
an A4V is involved. There is a value placed on birth
certificate bonds and these are traded so that you could at
one time look up the value using the birth certificate or
cusip number. Birth certificates are used by the government
as collateral for taking out additional loans from
International Creditors such as IMF, Rothschild European
banks and others.What you should remember when sending
an Accepted For Value Endorsement is that it provides
evidence of a debt, and its value is speculative. Any bond,
note or bill attached to it is only as good as its accepted
value. Therefore, when it is sent to your creditor and they do
not send it back to you, this is proof that they have accepted
it and you have successfully discharged your debt and it is
no longer your obligation to pay.

Accepted for Value Goes Viral: As of 2008, the Accepted

For Value craze has gone viral due to a conference
recording by Doug Riddle on talkshoe.com concerning a
number of successful Accepted For Value attempts by niche
students who were desperate to find a sure-fire method of
effortlessly paying their debts. First-hand accounts and
apparent successes caused excitement throughout a
generation of people who have distaste for the IRS,
government and big corporations and who think the world
around them is hopelessly corrupt. Their hope is to find a
hidden hole through which they can escape their planet
prison.The ensuing years included a viral revolution over
Accepted For Value where an insignificant number of
Libertarian, Patriot, and Constitutionalist supporters of Ron
Paul Alex Jones and some Old-School Constitutionalists
were involved. What came of this was a breed within the
niche sect of researchers who wanted desperately to pay
credit card debts and rescue homes from foreclosure. Many
who were once unsuccessful in fighting the IRS changed
directions with the “Acceptance” mindset and have since
found success where others have wound up in U.S. jails
because of fighting with agencies using constitutional
arguments.

The 2008 financial collapse saw a spike in the number of

people attempting to stop or delay foreclosure so they could
stay in their homes. People working on their own or with
lawyers combined efforts with individuals studying the
powerful and popular “How to Win in
Court/Jurisdictionary” course to form a new research
community learn more about how to prepare for defending a
personal lawsuit. They converged on talkshoe.com and other
privately held membership websites and supportive
churches throughout the entire country. Numbers of these
individuals actually embraced the Accepted for Value
methods.In just a few months of the airing of the talkshoe
episode, many were asking, “What do you think about
Accepted for Value?”Four separate posts sprang up on
DailyPaul.com that include the one titled “What is Accepted
for Value?” dated December, 2008. Doug’s talkshoe
instructions were simple: write on the invoice “Accepted for
Value, Return for Value, Exempt From Levy and, Deposit it
to U.S. Treasure and Charge Same to John H. Doe
123-45-6789 Adjust The Balance To Zero, or something
similar.
He goes on to say, Mail the same to Stop 4440 Ogden, Utah
in care of the Internal Revenue Service (Criminal
Investigation Division).

For those afraid to send Accepted for Value notices to the

IRS, particularly when asserting their right by sending
CID… that’s a leap of faith. A number of those hesitant or
fearful, but noticed others received remedy…temporarily.

It wasn’t long till discharged debts through A4V started

failing. The rate for success through this simple method
went to “0” over the next 8 years, but Winston Shrout and
Doug Riddle continue selling coaching and video how-tos
on the subject. What made it work? Was this just a
diversionary tactic involving “smoke and mirrors” intended
to lead people astray? Maybe there were elements in the IRS
that allowed these successes to lead us in the wrong
direction away from a more powerful remedy within reach.

No matter, now those attempting the Doug Riddle method

of A4V are reporting that it does not work. They have called
the IRS and been told they know nothing of their A4V.
Posts have also sprung up on the internet calling A4V a
scam.
Within a few years, teachers and Commerce Coaches such
as Brandon Alexander Adams, who founded Creditors
andCommerce.com compiled the teachings of Doug Riddle
and Winston Shrout of Accepted for Value fame into an
online enforcement team. Along with his partners he began
teaching at private workshops throughout the nation
informing people of their administrative enforcement
process which is often called “Administrative Procedures”
or the “Administrative Process”.

Brandon explained at one of his CIC/MIC seminars that the

intended purpose of this Administrative Process is to create
a record. Furthermore, he teaches the importance of creating
an admissible record that one can then submit into court
evidence for which the judge then takes judicial notice of on
the record. At this point he rules in your favor to have your
Claim that the A4V you sent to your creditor made your
debt null and void. That decision affirms the elimination of
your obligation and now you have a $0 balance and this will
be recognized by the court system and the public.

This powerful and involved process has many fine details

and intricacies and beginners should search for a qualified
coach capable of walking them through the steps. Even so, it
is a longshot that you will ever get the court to enforce an
A4V. What we have noticed is that those who are the most
tenacious and determination are the ones their opponent is
likely to drop all charges or cut a sweet enough deal that it
would be foolish to turn it down. We don’t mean there are
no cases that have won, but that was due to a number of
factors. (We prefer facilitating discussion surrounding
something that when done right works every time fir
specific issues. We discuss this on our private workshop
webinars, telephone communication with members and
emails.)

There are, of course, other processes that are similar to A4V,

such as sending a second promissory note to your creditor or
bank and then enforcing that. Then again, if it takes force to
get the courts to recognize your discharge of debt and
compel the creditor to zero out your account or stop
collection efforts, it is obvious that the A4V process is only
appropriate because a) you have no other options b) you
cannot afford making the payments c) the services are no
longer needed.

The gist of this is that, it won’t work if you continue making

each month’s credit card payment while suing the bank over
a private promissory note, an A4V, or other instrument. If
you think it is worthy of your time, go ahead and do it… if
you have already walked away from something that is. It
may not be worth your time and effort to open a lawsuit
over something as small as a $1,000 credit card debt that
you can no longer make payments on. My recommendation
is that when you a few small bills that you can no longer pay,
walk away, move on, and get involved with something more
constructive such as beginning to work on an online
business that will reap much needed rewards.

You have a high balance, but no longer need the service? In

such cases it may be wise pursue debt verification
procedures and couple that with getting prepared for a
Federal Lawsuit that is based on the FCRA and FDCPA. In
cases like that you have the courts, attorneys, and judges to
help you out. Actually, you can win a lot of money that way
so contact us privately to learn about our strategy. You can
do that as a private member.

According to Brandon, students attempting A4V on their

own to stop foreclosure on their mortgage succeed at an
extremely low rate, and he recommends that people do
everything they can to continue paying the mortgage, get a
job or second job and do things the old-fashioned way. As a
matter of fact, Brandon pays his own mortgage and doesn’t
try to hide that fact. Don’t you think it is insane that some
people jump into theoretical processes and their teachers
continue paying their own bills the regular way? Brandon
thinks so and agrees that public remedies, like Verification
of Debt and FDCPA, work better than all that theoretical
private-side kind of stuff, like A4V and the enforcement of
private promissory notes.
There is something else that people have tried along with
Accepted for Value is Electronic Funds Transfer or EFT for
short. This is being taught and it looks like this may be a
way of using a closed checking account to offset the debt.
The definition in Black’s Law dictionary for a Closed
Account is “used for setoff and adjustments”. What
electronic funds transfer does is transfer, unless you are not
aware of the entire puzzle picture. In all likelihood, instead
of a transfer it will just be reversed in short order and naïve
students who do not understand the methods of rebutting
resumptions may just be faced with criminal charges.

Winston and Brandon both along with those of us at UCL

advise that you completely AVOID this thing called EFT
until you are adept at working your way through it. Yes, we
did it ourselves, but it was necessary to go to court as we
went through our foreclosure case so we could show it to the
judge and get him to admit we had paid the bank. Your best
bet is to be prepared to jump in with both feet or just forget
about it! The way we understand it is that it can be done, but
our hope is that people think hard before doing it and then
make sure you know what you’re doing and be confident in
your abilities. Have you audited the checking account to
ensure (and to gather evidence) that it could be used if you
go through Setoffs and Adjustments? Nobody does it, but
there are many things to consider.
Conclusion

Remember those “simple” Accepted for Value or A4V

successes you keep hearing about online? They actually
account for about 1% of cases and just do not happen any
longer.

If you are in the UK and have over £5000 worth of

unsecured debt, please click below: