Professional Documents
Culture Documents
15 OCTOBER 2018
2. TURPITUDE: depravity
Synonyms: corruption, criminality
Antonyms: decency, morality
3. PEPSINATE: ferment
Synonyms: lighten, raise
Antonyms: darken, depress
4. UNCTUOUS: ingratiating
Synonyms: buttery, smarmy
Antonyms: blunt, genuine
5. HOOK: catch
Synonyms: clasp, lock
Antonyms: release, unhitch
1
THE CAREER EMPIRE-RAJOURI GARDEN
2
HEADLINES TODAY
1.Victim of crime should have a say in
punishment: SC
2.SC upholds State’s VAT provision
3.SC has been wanting in its duties in
Ram Temple case’
4,HC upholds life term for man who
killed wife’s lover
5.2013 report wanted changes to sexual
harassment law
6.Pandian seeks release of Rajiv case
convicts
7.India,China launch their first joint
programme for Afghanistan to train its
diplomats
3
A Bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur. S. Abdul Nazeer and Deepak
Gupta held that punishment should be “meaningful” to the victim
also.
For this, “it is necessary to seriously consider giving a hearing to
the victim while awarding the sentence to a convict”, the Bench
said.
In criminal prosecution, the State takes the front seat while the
victim becomes a prosecution witness. The crime is primarily
considered a wrong against society and the punishment, a
deterrent for prospective offenders.
With its order, the Supreme Court has made it clear that the victim
or her family — who has suffered the crime — should have an
equal say in the punishment of the perpetrator.
“A victim impact statement or a victim impact assessment must be
given due recognition so that an appropriate punishment is
awarded to the convict,” Justice Lokur observed.
What may be ‘justice’ in the rule book may not serve the victim.
Taking another step further, Justice Lokur said even taking a
statement from the victim on the sentence of the convict may not
mean relief to the victim.
4
3.SC has been wanting in its duties in
Ram Temple case’
The pendency of appeals in the Ram Temple-Babri Masjid case
has created uncertainty and kindled animosity between Hindus and
Muslims, says the Vishwa Hindu Parishad’s working president,
Alok Kumar , underlining the need for a law to enable the
construction of a temple.
The Supreme Court seems to be heading towards a judgment
in the issue. Doesn’t this demand for a new law for the
construction of a Ram Temple in Ayodhya seem somewhat
pre-emptive?
5
It may or may not affect the electoral outcome. We haven’t done it
with an eye on the electoral battle.
How do you see recent judgments by the Supreme Court
striking down Section 377 of the IPC on gay sex and 497 on
adultery and the Sabarimala temple entry issue?
I feel that equally there were many issues, for instance polygamy,
also pending before the courts that could have been decided. It’s a
feeling I have, that whenever any government or a court wants to
go down in history for its judgments, then it chooses the Hindu
causes to beat. Sabarimala is one such cause.
But the courts have allowed women pilgrims to enter Haji Ali
Dargah as well?
Yes, that may be so. We are not casting blame on the Supreme
Court, we have faith in it. But, let’s leave this — now things just
deteriorate into allegations and counter-allegations, when I raise
this point.
What is your considered opinion then on the Sabarimala
judgment?
The Supreme Court has interfered in things that were in the domain
of saints, seers and society. Therefore, the agitation in Kerala is
being led by women in whose favour this judgment was supposedly
in.
What about the petitioners who went to court?
I read in [Justice] Indu Malhotra’s judgment that the petitioners had
no locus because they did not allege that they had faith in the
temple; they were outsiders. There was, and still is, no demand
from a sizeable number of people who say that they are the
devotees of the lord [Ayyappa] and would seek this right.
What about the striking down of Sections 377 and 497?
I feel laws are not static, times are not static. The morality of
Victorian times is not relevant; therefore, I have no issues with the
striking down of 377.
The judgment on 497, when you strike it down, then a vacuum is
created and the Supreme Court has, in the past, after striking down
6
a particular statute, said that Parliament should legislate. And till it
does so, it mandates a certain course. They did not strike down this
law, in my understanding, because they approved of such
behaviour [adultery]. Their reasons had to do with equality of the
sexes. Then they could have — till Parliament enacted a framework
that bestowed equality and did not validate illegitimate relationships
— said something to fill this vacuum.
How can law punish intimate relationships unless there is a
pecuniary exchange?
You have to balance the two sides — the sanctity of marriage and
the freedom to have relationships. As of today, any consenting
relationship between two people was not a crime, unless one
partner was somebody’s wife. But there is a sanctity to marriage,
there is a family involved. Do we have some fear of the law, of
repercussion, to prevent people from breaching these bounds?
Isn’t that the domain of social sanction rather than statute
books?
When a social issue becomes a churning issue in society and there
is a demand for reforms that is when, if the law intervenes, it helps.
There should be a law that discourages adultery by any party.
The VHP has had an eventful year that saw the exit of Pravin
Togadia; how did that come about?
Since I have been a part of the RSS from 1962, I have seen it from
the inside. The RSS has had regular elections since its inception,
but in none of these elections there had been a contest — we have
learnt to do elections via unanimity. At some point of time, the VHP
was the first case — there was a contest at the top. Do you hush it
up? Do you put pressure on them to withdraw, do you fake an
election? There is a constitution, it provides for elections. So we
went through the electoral process; Mr Togadia had a candidate
and he himself was the counting agent. He lost, signed the election
result. He went straight to the pressmen waiting and resigned.
7
I would imagine if he hadn’t quit, what would have happened? He
would have continued as one of our top leader, but he made a
choice, and he does his own thing, we do ours.
“In the light of the aforesaid, we are of the considered view that the
prosecution was able to establish the existence of motive for the
commission of the crime by [convict] Virender” the Bench said.
A trial court had sentenced the man and another accused to life
imprisonment for the crime.
The High Court upheld the verdict and sent Virender and the co-
accused to life imprisonment.
“The deceased, who was himself a young man, would have
resisted the attempt to throttle him. However, it is evident that he
was overpowered by the two accused and they continued to throttle
him till he died,” the Bench remarked.
2010 case
8
When he peeped through the gap between the doors he saw
Yogesh lying on the takht . He also noticed an orange welding wire
tied around his neck.
A boy, who also worked in the factory, told the owner that Yogesh
had an altercation with his uncle’s son around a week before.
When he had asked Yogesh, he had told him that his cousin
Virender had seen him with his wife in a compromising position,
and had beaten him up.
Yogesh told the boy that he was caught with Virender’s wife, and
that he used to go to her and that the two were having an illicit
affair.
The court also relied on the testimony of a co-worker of the
deceased, who claimed to have seen the two accused with the
deceased between 8.45 p.m. and 9.00 p.m. on the day of the
murder.
9
The panel was formed in the aftermath of the December 16
Nirbhaya gangrape in 2012 and the ensuing nationwide protests,
and submitted its report on January 23, 2013.
At that time of the submission of the report, the Sexual Harassment
at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Bill had
already been passed by the Lok Sabha and was awaiting the Rajya
Sabha's nod. The Bill was passed unchanged by the Upper House
a month later.
Onus on employer
10
as fails to forward a complaint to the tribunal. The company would
also be liable to pay compensation to the complainant
11
INTERNATIONAL RELATION
1.India,China launch their first joint
programme for Afghanistan to train its
diplomats
India and China have launched their first joint programme for
Afghanistan to train its diplomats. According to a tweet put out by
the Indian Embassy in Beijing yesterday, Indian Ambassador to
Afghanistan, Vinay Kumar hosted 10 Afghan Diplomats who will be
travelling to India for the 1st India-China joint training programme
for Afghan diplomats under the aegis of the Trilateral Cooperation
between India, China and Afghanistan.
12
which was attended by Union Minister of Commerce & Industry and
Civil Aviation, Suresh Prabhu. They welcomed the intensification of
market negotiations. While appreciating some narrowing of gaps,
the Ministers urged all RECP Participating Countries to continue to
exert all efforts towards meeting the targets set in the Package of
Year End Deliverables.
2.Inaugurates 46th edition of IHGF-Delhi
Fair Autumn-2018
• Union Minister of State for Textiles, Ajay Tamta, inaugurated the
46th edition of world’s largest IHGF-Delhi Fair at India Expo Centre
& Mart at Greater Noida today. Speaking on the occasion, he said
that this Fair has played a vital role in increasing exports of
handicrafts from the country and has acquired a special
• effective sourcing medium for their requirements and that the
Indian exporting community considers this as the most effective
marketing medium for their merchandise.
• Participation by over 3200 exhibitors in this fair and visit of
overseas buyers from over 110 countries shows its popularity
amongst Indian handicrafts exporters and importers.
• Ajay Tamta urged the handicrafts exporters to take care of the
artisans and craftsmen who are the backbone of this sector.
13
• The Vice President of India, Shri M. Venkaiah Naidu has said that
the language used in the courts should be understood by the
petitioners who are seeking justice.
• He has addressed the gathering after inaugurating the new
building for Allahabad High Court, in Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh
today.
• The Vice President told the judges and members of the Bar
Association that while our Constitution envisages independence
of judiciary from the executive, the Legislature and Judiciary
should share healthy mutual respect and should complement
each other.
14
• T h e s i l k i n d u s t r y i s a g r i c u l t u r e b a s e d a n d l a b o u r
intensive and provides gainful employment to around 8 million
artisans and weavers in
rural areas.
• Over 108 exhibitors of
silk and blended silk
products manufactured
in different parts of the
country will display their
produce during the
three-day event,
organised by the Indian
Silk Export Promotion
Council (ISEPC) at
Pragati Maidan.
• Over 218 buyers from
various countries will
participate in the fair.
15