You are on page 1of 3

Dept.

Approved Checked Approved


PROCESS-SPECIFIC WASTE By By By

Section: IDENTIFICATION CHECKLIST

Note - Magnitude of waste (on a scale of 1 to 3)


i. 1: A little waste
ii. 2: Moderate waste
iii. 3: A lot of waste

TYPE CONFIRMATION CAUSES AND


OF DESCRIPTION OF WASTE MAGNITUDE IMPROVEMENT
WASTE YES NO PLANS

1. No production schedule or control


boards

2. No leveling of production schedule

3. Production not in sync with


production schedule
Type 1. Overproduction

4. Items missing

5. Defective goods produced

6. Equipment breakdowns

7. Too much manual assistance

8. Too much capacity

9. Lots grouped into batches

10. Using ”push production“

11. Caravan-style operations

12. Not balanced with next process

1. Lots of inventory on shelves and


floors

2. Shelves and floor storage take up lots


of space

3. Inventory stacks block walkways


Type 2. Inventory

4. In-process inventory accumulates


within individual operations

5. In-process inventory is stacked up


between operators

6. In-process inventory is stacked up


between processes

7. Impossible to visually determine


quantities of in-process inventory
TYPE CONFIRMATION CAUSES AND
OF DESCRIPTION OF WASTE MAGNITUDE IMPROVEMENT
WASTE YES NO PLANS

1. Pile-up during conveyance

2. Change of conveyance devices in


Type 3. Transportation

mid-transfer

3. Previous and/or next process is on


another floor

4. Conveyance requires manual


assistance

5. Conveyance distance too long

Complaints from next process

2. Defect within process

3. Human errors

4. Defective due to missing part(s)


Type 4. Defects, Scrap &

5. Defective due to wrong part(s)

6. Omission in processing
Rework

7. Defect in processing

8. No human autonomotion

9. No poka-yoke

10. No inspection with process

11. Defects not addressed by


improvement activities

1. Process is not required for product


function
Type 5. Over-processing

2. Process includes unnecessary


operations

3. Process can be replaced by


something less wasteful

4. Part of process can be eliminated


without detracting from product
TYPE CONFIRMATION CAUSES AND
OF DESCRIPTION OF WASTE MAGNITUDE IMPROVEMENT
WASTE YES NO PLANS

1. Walking

2. Turning around

3. Leaning sideways

4. Leaning over

5. Wide-arm movements
Type 6. Motion

6. Wrist movements

7. Left or right hand is idle

8. Idle time used for observation

9. Workpiece set-up/removal

10. No standardized repetition of


operations

11. Worker operates using different


motions each time

12. Operations divided up into little


segments

1. Idle time due to workpiece delay from


previous piece

2. Idle time due to machine busy status

3. Idle time due to missing item(s)


Type 7. Waiting

4. Idle time due to lack of balance with


previous process

5. Idle time due to lack of planning

6. Idle time due to lack of standard


operations

7. Idle time due to worker absence

Total

Overall Improvement Comments:

You might also like