WEEK 4

1) Probability of heart rate between 70 to 110 using SPO2.

WEEK 5
1) Mean and standard deviation for HR of SPO2.

µ = 81.94
σ = 15.14

Conclusion: The mean and standard deviation of 56 student is 81.94 and 15.14
respectively.

2) Data visualisation (Bar chart)

Fasr food intake per month

40 37
35
30
Number of student

25
20
14
15
10
5
5
0
Low intake (<3 times) Moderate intake (4 - 6 High intake ( >7 times)
times)
Level of fast food intake per month

Conclusion: 37 students have low fast food intake which is less than 3 times per month,
14 students have moderate fast food intake at 4 to 6 times per month and only 5
students have high fast food intake which is more than 7 times per month.
3) 2 X 2 table

Let
D+ = Normal HR of SPO2 (60 – 100 bpm)
D- = Abnormal HR of SPO2 (X<60 bpm & X>100 bpm)
T+ = Positive Tomophobia
T- = Negative Tomophobia

D+ D-

T+ 20 3

T- 32 1

Conclusion: 20 students have Tomophobia with a normal heart rate and 3 students have
Tomophobia with an abnormal heart rate. 32 does not have Tomophobia with a normal
heart rate and 1 student does not have Tomophobia with an abnormal heart rate.
WEEK 6
1) 95% of confidence interval (CI) of 17 males
a) One-sided
b) Two-sided
2) Probability of type I and type II error associated with 2X2 table.

Let
D+ = Normal HR of SPO2 (60 – 100 bpm)
D- = Abnormal HR of SPO2 (X<60 bpm & X>100 bpm)
T+ = Positive Tomophobia
T- = Negative Tomophobia

D+ D- Total

T+ 20 3 23

T- 32 1 33

Total 52 4 56

Type I error; (3/4) = 0.75

Type II error; (32/52) = 0.62
Conclusion: Probability of type I error is at 0.75 and probability of type II error is at 0.62.
WEEK 7
1) Distribution of mean of samples of size 17 males out 56 students in class.
2) Beta (β) value at cut off of 95%
3) New (n) value when power increases by 20%
WEEK 8
1) Hypothesis testing: T-test
WEEK 9
1) One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)