Integrating problem

Samantha Roberts has a job as a pharmacist earning $30, 000 per year, and she is
deciding whether to take another job as the manager of another pharmacy for $40,000
per year or to purchase a pharmacy that generate revenue of $200,000 per year. To
purchase the pharmacy Samantha would have to use her $20,000 savings and borrow
another $80,000 at interest rate of 10 percent per year.
The pharmacy that Samantha is contemplating purchasing has additional expenses of
$80, 000 for supplies, $40,000 for hired help, $10,000 for rent, and $5,000 for utilities.
Assume that income and business taxes are zero and that the repayment of the principal
of the loan does not start before three years.
a. What would be the business and economic profit if Samantha purchased the
pharmacy?
b. Supposed that Samatha expects that another pharmacy will open nearby at the end of
three years and that this will drive the economic profit of the pharmacy to zero. What
would the revenue of the pharmacy be in three years?
c. What theory of profit would account for profits being earned by the pharmacy during
the first 3 years of operation?
d. Suppose that Samatha expects to sell the pharmacy at the end of the 3 years for
$50,000 more than the price she paid for it and that she requires a 15 percents return on
her investment. Should she still purchase the pharmacy?

Answer a)
Business profit = total revenue – total business cost (or explicit cost)
= revenue – supplies – interest on loan – utilities – hired help – rent
= 200000- 80000 - (80000*0.1) – 5000 – 40000 -10000
= $57000
Economic profit = business profit - interest rate forgone on saving amount – opportunity
cost of purchasing pharmacy
= 57000 - (20000*0.1) - 40000= $15000
Samantha should purchase the pharmacy because economic profit is positive
Answer b)
If revenue is equal to economic cost economic profit would be zero.
Economic cost = interest on loan + supplies + rent + utilities + interest rate forgone on
saving amount + hired help + opportunity cost of purchasing pharmacy = $185000
Revenue per year would be $185000
Answer c)
In the given case Samantha Jones is having no competitors in initial three years. She is
operating alone and there is no nearby competitor. It is theory of monopoly in which
Samantha earned handsome business and economic profits.
Answer d)
If Samantha sells the pharmacy after three years she is expected to get
50000+20000*0.15+80000*(Interest to be received - interest to be paid)
= 50000+20000*0.15+80000*(0.15-0.10) = $57000
If Samantha had worked as manager, she could have earned $120000 (40000*3) after 3
years.