Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
Dental caries, a progressive bacterial damage to teeth, is one of the most common diseases that
affects 95% of the population and is still a major cause of tooth loss. Unfortunately, there is
currently no highly sensitive and specific clinical means for its detection in its early stages. The
accurate detection of early caries in enamel would be of significant clinical value. Since, it is
possible to reverse the process of decay therapeutically at this stage, i.e. operative intervention might
be avoided. Caries diagnosis continues to be a challenging task for the dental practitioners.
Researchers are developing tools that are sensitive and specific enough for the current presentation
of caries. These tools are being tested both in vitro and in vivo; however, no single method will
allow detection of caries on all tooth surfaces. Therefore, the purpose of the present review was to
evaluate different caries diagnostic methods.
Keyword: Dental Caries, Diagnosis, Radiography
should feel comfortable using the dental allows instantaneous images to be made and
(5)
explorer to probe suspected carious lesions. projected, and images taken during different
FIBER OPTIC TRANSILLUMINATION examination can be compared for clinical
METHODS changes among several images of the same
Fiber optic transillumination (FOTI) tooth over time. (1)
allows for the detection of carious lesion However, Caution must be taken, when
because of the changes in the scattering and interpreting a proximal DIFOTI image that is
absorption of light photons resulting from a taken at a view similar to that of a
local decrease of transillumination due to the conventional bitewing radiograph. Although,
(6)
characteristics of the carious lesion. the images may look similar, proximal
Enamel lesions appear as gray shadows and lesions can be detected using DIFOTI only
dentin lesions appear as orange-brown or by careful angulation, remembering that the
(7)
bluish shadows. In an in vitro study, FOTI, resulting image is that of a surface or what is
performed along with visual examination, near the surface. This also may explain why
had higher specificity both for enamel and the DEJ is not always seen with conventional
dentinal lesions and had a better correlation radiography, when the incident beam is
(8)
with histology. Rousseau reported on the transmitted through the entire tooth, often
development of a fiber-optics-based confocal masking early changes in the surface.
imaging system for the detection and However, this method is much better for
potential diagnosis of early dental caries. A evaluating lesion depth at the proximal
novel optical instrument, capable of surface. In addition, another possible
recording axial profiles through caries lesions drawback of DIFOTI is the inability to
using single-mode optical fibers has been quantify lesion progression, even though
(10)
developed which may provide additional images can be compared over time. One
diagnostic information for a general in- vitro study indicated that the method has
(9)
practitioner. higher sensitivity than does a radiographic
Digital Imaging Fiber Optic examination for detecting lesions on
Transillumination (DIFOTI) is a relatively interproximal, occlusal and smooth
new methodology that was developed in an surfaces.(11)
attempt to reduce the perceived shortcomings CARIES INDICATOR DYES
of FOTI by combining FOTI and a digital In 1972, it was suggested that caries-
CCD camera. Images captured by the camera detector dyes could help differentiate infected
are sent to a computer for analysis using dentin from affected dentin. However, more
dedicated algorithms. The use of the CCD recent studies have shown that these dyes are
non specific protein dyes that stain with a depth of only 25 m have been
collagen in the organic matrix of less measured in vitro. The restriction of light
mineralized dentin, whether it is infected or scattering for caries diagnosis to smooth
not, rather than being specific for the surfaces is a significant drawback to this
(10)
pathogenic bacteria. technique, although, there is continuing
Al-Sehaibany et al. evaluated the use of research to develop a QLF system to detect
caries detector dye in the diagnosis of occlusal caries. (13)
occlusal carious lesions. The purpose of their Kuhnisch et al. evaluated the in vivo
study was to compare the accuracy of detection of non-cavitated caries lesions on
diagnosis of carious lesions in the occlusal the occlusal surfaces by visual inspection and
pit, fissure, and groove system of lower quantitative light-induced fluorescence. It
molars examined by two methods: the caries was concluded that QLF detects more non-
detector dye versus traditional tactile cavitated occlusal lesions and smaller lesions
examination using a dental explorer. compared to visual inspection. However,
Histological cross sections confirmed a ratio taking into consideration time-consuming
of 1:1 (100%) accuracy by caries detection image capturing and analysis, we can
dye in diagnosing decay underlying the understand that QLF is not really of practical
occlusal surface. Concurrent examination of use in the dental office. (14)
detection dates back to 1878, while it is both systems used a low- frequency-
believed to have first been proposed by alternating voltage, 25Hz and 400Hz,
Magitot. The basis of the use of ECM is respectively. Moisture and saliva were
observations which show that sound surfaces removed by a continuous stream of air in the
a measurable conductivity that will increase electrical contact and minimize the effect of
with the increase of demineralization. By saliva, the Caries Meter L requires that the
decreasing thickness and increased porosity, pits and fissures be moistened with saline.
the performance of electrical resistance has Electrical conductivity has been shown to
traditional means of diagnosing fissure detecting occlusal caries in vitro and in vivo
The history of dental radiography begins radiography for proximal caries detection in
(21)
with the discovery of the x- ray. The x- ray primary teeth.
revolutionized the methods of practicing Now, for the purpose of carious lesion
medicine and dentistry by making it possible detection, intra oral radiography is a standard
to visualize internal body structures. (17) procedure and is essential for diagnosing
(22, 23)
Radiography is useful for the detection of inter proximal caries.
dental caries because the caries process Extra Oral Radiography (EOR)
causes tooth demineralization. The lesion is Extraoral radiographic techniques for
darker than the unaffected portion and may proximal caries detection have been studied
be detected in radiographs. An early carious and proven to be inferior to intraoral
lesion may not have yet caused sufficient techniques. However, the main focus was on
demineralization to be detected in conventional panoramic radiography.
radiographs. It is often useful to mount Clifton et al. used multidirectional
successive sets of bitewing radiographs in tomography and panoramic radiography as
one film holder to facilitate comparison and well as intra-oral D-speed film for combined
evaluation of evidence of progression. assessment of proximal and occlusal caries. It
Intra oral radiography can reveal carious was concluded that when proximal surfaces
lesions that otherwise might go under were evaluated alone, D-speed film was
detection during a thorough clinical significantly better. For occlusal caries, there
examination. was no statistically significant difference
On the other hand, early carious lesions are between multi directional tomography and
difficult to detect with radiographs, D-speed film. (24)
particularly, when they are small and limited One study has demonstrated that scanogram
to the enamel. Therefore, clinical and x-ray images have the potential to be the first
examinations are necessary in the detection practical extraoral imaging modality for
of dental caries. proximal caries detection. Influencing factors
Posterior bitewing radiographs are the most to be discussed are the sample, exposure
useful x-ray projections for detecting caries techniques, resolution and contrast
in the distal third of a canine and the enhancement. In this study, the performance
interproximal and occlusal surfaces of of screen-film and enhanced digital
(20) scanograms were not statistically different
premolar and molars. However, Virajsilp
V et al. reported that the reliability of from Insight film for proximal caries
Daatselaar et al. described the development mineral content in the lesion area (Delta Z/
of a bench top local CT device which is able Lesd in Vol %), the mineral Vol % and
of producing spatial and contrast resolutions position of the subsurface layer and lesion
necessary for improved detection of body.The accuracy of TMR for enamel and
interproximal caries as well as other dentine in lesion depth is about 200 Vol %.
dentoalveolar conditions. The authors m in deltea Z. With mineral details of
concluded that ‘local CT reconstruction are approximately 2-3 µm can be detected. The
feasible’ and ‘the resolution of the local CT time required for making 5 scans plus
images produced from basis projections that evaluation is 3-4 minutes (which is less than
were acquired using standard dental CCD 1 minute for a scan). The time required for
sensor was diagnostically suitable. This acquiring step wedge data is one minute or
makes local CT a potential technique for the less depending on the number of step wedge
(29)
diagnosis of interproximal caries. steps. Statistical analysis of many scans is
Transverse microadiography(TMR) supported. (30)
make it possible to be inserted into the mouth the TPI system uses only micro-watts of
for in vivo studies, while it is expected that radiation of a type that is non-ionizing.
technological developments will improve the Because the exposure levels from this system
systems to bring them within easy reach of are orders of magnitude smaller than
dentists. The coherent detection scheme of exposure levels that occur naturally, this
system will be safer than those employing X- of TMR depth plus an intercept of micron,
rays. Unlike radiography TPI also delivers a whereas further calculations allowed the
spectrum of different frequencies for each TMR depths to be determined to within 5%
pixel measured. This offers the possibility of using TPI. (36)
using that spectrum for diagnosis that goes These are some caries diagnosis methods
beyond simply measuring mineralization used today. In this era of evidence based
(35)
levels. dentistry, systematic reviews and validation
Pickwell et al. compared terahertz pulsed studies of caries detection methods have been
imaging (TPI) with transmission addressed in some studies but there is still
microradiography (TMR) for depth need for more studies in the future to clearly
measurement of enamel demineralizations. It determine the best and most accurate ways of
was concluded that TPI measured caries diagnosis.
demineralization in the range of 47% of that
REFERENCES 5. Hamilton JC. Should a dental explorer be used
1. Stooky GK, Jackson RD, Ferreira G, Analoui to probe suspected carious lesions? Yes--an
M. Dental caries diagnosis. Dent Clin of North explorer is a time-tested tool for caries detection.
2. Axelsson Per. Diagnosis and risk prediction of 6. Zandoná AF, Zero DT. Diagnostic tools for
dental caries. Chicago, Quintessence 2000; p: early caries detection. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;
3. Ekstrand KR, Ricketts DN, Longbottom C, 7. Pine CM. Fibre-optic transillumination (FOTI)
Pitts NB. Visual and tactile assessment of arrested in caries diagnosis. In: Stookey GK, ed. Early
initial enamel carious lesions: an in vivo pilot detection of dental caries I: Proceedings of the 4th
study. Caries Res. 2005; 39(3):173-7. Annual Indiana Conference. Indianapolis: Indiana
D, Zoitopoulos L. Comparison between visual 8. Côrtes DF, Ellwood RP, Ekstrand KR. An in
examination and a laser fluorescence system for vitro comparison of a combined FOTI/visual
in vivo diagnosis of occlusal caries. Caries Res. examination of occlusal caries with other caries
diagnostic performance. Caries Res 2003; for the detection of occlusal caries in primary
37(1):8–16. teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008; 18(3):197-204.
9. Rousseau C, Poland S, Girkin JM, Hall AF,
17. Rodrigues JA, Diniz MB, Josgrilberg EB,
Whitters CJ. Development of fibre-optic confocal
microscopy for detection and diagnosis of dental Cordeiro RC. In vitro comparison of laser
caries. Caries Res 2007; 41(4):245-51. fluorescence performance with visual
10. Young DA. New caries detection technologies
examination for detection of occlusal caries in
and modern caries management: Merging the
permanent and primary molars. Lasers Med Sci
strategies. Gen Dent 2002; 50(4):320-31.
11. Schneiderman A, Elbaum M, Shultz T, Keem 2009; 24(4):501-6.
S, Greenebaum M, Driller J. Assessment of dental 18. Huth KC, Lussi A, Gygax M, Thum M,
caries with Digital Imaging Fiber-Optic
Crispin A, Paschos E, Hickel R, Neuhaus KW. In
Transillumination (DIFOTI): in vitro study.
vivo performance of a laser fluorescence device
Caries Res 1997; 31(2): 103–10.
12. al-Sehaibany F, White G, Rainey JT. The use for the approximal detection of caries in
of caries detector dye in diagnosis of occlusal permanent molars. J Dent 2010; 38(12):1019-26.
carious lesions. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1996;
19-Stookey G.K., Jackson R.D., Zandona A.G.,
20(4):293-8.
Analoui M.: Dental Caries Diagnosis.
13. Pretty I.A., Smith PW, Edgar WM, Higham
SM. Detection of in- vitro demineralization Dent Clin North Am. 1999 ; 43(4):665-77.
adjacent to restorations using quantative light 20. Bahrami G, Hagstrom C, wenzel A. Bitewing
induced fluorescence. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 368-
examination with four digital receptors.
374.
Dentomaxillo facial Radiol 2003; 32: 317-321.
14. Kühnisch J, Ifland S, Tranaeus S, Hickel R,
Stösser L, Heinrich-Weltzien R. In vivo detection 21. Virajsilp V, Thearmontree A, Aryatawong S,
of non-cavitated caries lesions on occlusal Paiboonwarachat D. Comparison of proximal
surfaces by visual inspection and quantitative
caries detection in primary teeth between laser
light-induced fluorescence. Acta Odontol Scand
fluorescence and bitewing radiography. Pediatr
2007;65(3):183-8.
15. Boston DW. Initial in vitro evaluation of Dent 2005; 27(6):493-9.
Diagnodent for detecting secondary carious 22.Forner L, Lleno MC, Almrich JM, Garcia-
lesions associated with resin composite
Godoy F. Digital radiology and image analysis for
restorations. Quintessence Int. 2003; 34(2):109-
approximal caries diagnosis. Oper Dent 1999;
16.
16. Kavvadia K, Lagouvardos P. Clinical 24:312-315.
performance of a diode laser fluorescence device 23.Haak R, Wicht MJ, Nowak G, Hellmich.
detection of approximal caries. Dentomaxillofac (TACT). Theory and application for three-
24.Clifton TL, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB. Extraoral Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 1997; 26: 53-62.
25.Khan EA, Tyndall DA, Caplan D. Extraoral (TACT) for proximal caries detection. Oral Surg
imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewing Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;
Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 98(6): 730-7. 33. Albrektsson TO, Bratthall D, Glantz JP,
26.Alkurt MT, Peker I, Bala O, Altunkaynak B. In Lindhe JT. Tissue preservation in caries
vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray treatment. London, Quintessence 2001; p: 19.
films and direct digital radiography for proximal 34. Wenzel A. Computer-aided image
caries detection. Oper Dent 2007; 32(5):504-9. manipulation of intraoral radiographs to enhance
27.Daataselaar AN, Tyndall DA, Stelt PF. diagnosis in dental practice: a review. Int Dent J
Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 2003; 32: 235-241. 35. Crawley David A, Longbottom C, Cole
28.Daatselaar AN, Dunn SM Spoelder HJW, Bryan E, Ciesla Craig M, Arnone D, Wallace V,
Germans DM, Renambot L, Bal HE et al. et al. Terahertz pulse imaging: A pilot study of
29. Daatselarr AN Van, Tyndall DA, Stelt PF 36. Pickwell E, Wallace VP, Cole BE, Ali S,
Vander. Detection of caries with local CT. Longbottom C, Lynch RJ, Pepper M. A
31. webber RL, Horton RA, Tyndall DA, Ludlow Caries Res 2007; 41(1):49-55.