Reyelds Poifored Conceee Designer’ Handbook * BS 8110 Pile-caps 3.61 Forces in idealized tras system yore Design of reinforcement Bars projecting tartar bars for coker Lins for stare bare erica! Enke bebween bars inte cap trom pissy ‘xenaing tom pies erizontaloks aroune up TL] stansing end of main bare TJ] iotiess man t2mm a ‘komm contre, sy) Main bars designed to recit tonite force obtained from the {able below (A. = 10.87). Bars tobe located within zone that extends no more than 5 x ple Gameter ether side Cotumn permet a Foie ont a Fo vation ‘Shear stance on a vertical plane For 1S 3hy, Fem ve (Qala For I> 3h, He E fa dla ud] + ya (0b) where ‘is overall width of pile-cap at eitical section by is width of zone contsining main bars extading not ‘more than 1.5 x pile dismeter each side of centre of pile ‘eri design concrete shear sess appropriate to wid b; ‘vais design concrete shear stess appropriate to (b-E6,) Punching shear resistance (V< vejax x column perimeter) For /< 3hy, no check required Sent opie wi ienson achvapeoyend conte te | _For/> Sly, ¥e=v. (1a (Al -2.4h i e “Tensile free F betwomn pies a Dimensions of pile-cap en betwno0 i of pies Dimensions of column considered | Simplified 2 fae : w@ g 7 Non ¢ Fuw= Rug = Moar? 6) 3 i NL 3 = x é = eats 82-302 ib Foon Shai +%30 wom so ) N 2. Fuso Fra = = (31? -a”) . aa fe i aa Faw= Fe “ore 9 Feo = Tar) Fray Fi 2g? eres 30id @ ) 5 m : io Fan Rew = “a? -») ——7 axnn+a0 30d Nwtaton: 4 bare column dimensions, pile diameter, cis pile spacing flor (asally etwecn 2 and 3 depending on conditions)(©) Across the full width of the cap Jos 191 PILE CAPS 1400 x10" Z VR 1400 KN, 9 SIO 1.03 Nj 4,= 675-250-225 40.2 450=20, : So 2d/a,=1300/290= 4.48, 1004, _100%3930 bd ~2100%650 0.47 N/mm, Allowable shear stress 4.48 x 0.47 = 2.09 N/mm?, =0.29, 4 Shear ts satisfactory as reinforcement Projects more than 650mm beyond the or horizontal binders itis suggested that 25% of the ‘main tension steel be used, A detail ofthe reinforcement will be as shows’ - + | stses0 oS | ed 3125inecen | direction Alternative design using beam theory RN tslon using beam theory Bending moment at face of column= 1400(0.675 0.25) =595 Nm, M __595x10° te Foo x 650" 067. From tables 2004 0.175, 4,=2389 mm?, 8/209 bars (2510 mm?) will do this, ecole nar te rs theory andthe anchoragelength willbe the face of caea Teena illb ampletoom fr this anda senda Spree nae 2004, _ 100%2510_ . if | Shear, Tr = F70gs e307 0-18 90 %=0.4 Nitmm?, Eabenfpment factor, as beore, ~4.48 so allowable shear stressex 1.8 N/inm?, whichis | satistettory, at the ba manent mst project an eectve depth Beyond te ert section for ep. Shear the bars will have to be turned up the side of therete Pesiin — Mosley Foundations J 2n Figure 10.22 teal sections fr shear checks Punching shear I peaneter 10.7.3 Design for punching shear ___Whete the spacing ofthe ples exceeds thee tics the pile diameter then the ple cap should be checked for punching shear using the method outlined in section 8.2.2 fer ‘imum and minimum steltreas, bar spacings, cover to ieinforcement and anchorage age of th tension sce, The main tension relnfercement should eorsnne past each Hs and should be bent up vertically to provide a full anghorage length beyond the {atten ofeach pile. In othogonal dzetiohs in te top and bottom faces ofthe pile Pa minimum steel arca of .00135h for grade 460 reinforcement or Q00240h for Zite 250 reinforcement should be provided. It is normal to provide fully lapped "Wontal links of size not less than 12 mm and at spacings of no greater than 250 mm, _fownin figure 10.23b. The ites should be ent off so tat they do not extend ino the Gp beyond the lower mat of reinforcing bars otherwise the punching shear strength Ptmining a suitable depth of ple cap table 10.3 may be uscd as guide when there P10 sx piles inthe ple group.