Project Report

Submitted in partial fulfillment of degree in

Quantitative Methods

Submited To Submitted By
Dr. Ratna Banerjee
SOB, UPES GROUP 19
Varun Natrajan (R020217101)
Vaibhav Dwivedi (R020217100)
Varu Mathur (R020217102)
Amit Dubey (R020217029)
Rahul Mishra (R020217054)
Venketa Mani Polimera (R020217096)

MBA, Department of Oil and Gas (17-19)

 Objective

The main objective of this project is to compare these two

Players:
Yuvraj Singh
Sahid Afridi
and find out that who is the better player between them with
the help of statistical tools and applications.
 Description
Portrayal from claiming constantly on measurable instruments. Accompanying
is those short portrayal of the measurable instruments which we have utilized
within our venture to examine the data;
Measure about national inclination. Measures about vital inclination tell the
focus of the recurrence circulation. This incorporates the three different
measures about national tendency, Mean, average and mod. We have
connected best following two about them.
Mean: The mean may be likewise known as the “Arithmetic Mean”. It is a
standout amongst those measures of focal propensity. Which is utilized mossy
cup oak every now and again. It is gotten by isolating those whole of cash of
every one qualities by the number from claiming. Values in the intrigued
information. The solitary esteem of the “Mean”. Essent’s the entire
information. The sample information imply may be indicated Toward.
And the number mean may be indicated by. “μ”.

Median: Those average may be Additionally a paramount measure for focal

inclination. On we have any desire those “Median” of the. Ungrouped
information after that it will be the centre esteem of the orchestrated
information. It partitions those orchestrated data into two rises to parts. It is
ascertained Eventually Tom's perusing orchestrating information principal in
expanding request et cetera the middle esteem is established from that
orchestrated information. Though the qualities of the information would. Odd.
That point the average will be that centre quality of the orchestrated data and
Assuming that those qualities of the information need aid. Significantly.
After that those average will be ascertained by the Normal of the two middle
values of the information.
Standard Deviation: It may be a habitually utilized measure from claiming
scattering. Those standard deviation advises something like those deviation of
the qualities of the information from its imply. Those substantial worth of
standard deviation indicates the more spread of the qualities starting with the
intend and the littler esteem of the standard deviation indicates the less
spread of the values from the mean. It is measured Toward bringing that
square root of the. Difference.
The variance of the number will be indicated Toward. “σ²”. Furthermore,
difference of the test may be indicated by. “s²”.
So, the difference for number may be indicated Eventually Tom's perusing. “σ”.
What's more example standard deviation may be indicated Toward. “s”.
It will be really those whole of cash from claiming deviation for every esteem
of the information from those mean and the aggregate of the. Deviation will
continuously equivalent to zero. It implies ∑(x-μ) = 0.
The worth of the difference Furthermore standard deviation ought not make
negative. Assuming that the information need no variation for it at that point
the difference and the standard deviation will a chance to be. “0”.
It is communicated on the same units Likewise the information.
Those coefficient about variety (CV) will be characterized Likewise the
proportion of the standard deviation. “σ”. Of the imply. μ Those reply of the
(CV) < 1 indicates the becquerels difference What's more (CV) > 1 indicates the
halter shelter difference. It also recounts those for every unit difference of the
information.
Skewness: Skewness may be the measure of the symmetry of the likelihood
dissemination of the arbitrary variable. It’s worth could make positive,
negative or undecided. Those negative skewed worth demonstrates the tail on
the cleared outside, more drawn out over the correct side which methods that
information may be grouped including average lying on the correct side of the
imply. The certain worth of the skewness advises that those tail on the right
side will be more drawn out over the left side, which methods that information
will be grouped on the left side. Assuming that the worth of the skewness is
zero methods the esteemed need aid uniformly conveyed on the both sides of
the imply.
Theory Testing: It may be a system for making choice utilizing information if
starting with regulated analyse alternately from controlled analysis. Intends we
perform this test the point when we settle on the choice something like the
populace parameter on the bases of the example fact. Those two terms would
have utilized within this test. “Null Hypothesis”. What's more. “Alternative
Hypothesis” Null Hypotheses regularly may be a case around the number
parameter that is recognized will make genuine inconsistency until it may be
demonstrated false.

Descriptive Analysis
Sahid Afridi:

Balls Boundaries Runs

Mean 20.93 Mean 3.63 Mean 27.36

SD 3.24 SD 0.83 SD 5.22

Median 21 Median 2.51 Median 2.5

Mode 25 Mode 1 Mode 1

Skewness 1.28 Skewness 2.50 Skewness 2.10

Average (Balls, limits Furthermore Runs Respectively). Those average quality

about balls will be. 21. Which implies that Normal balls assumed by those
Afridi would. 21. On each match from as much final one 30 matches.
Notwithstanding those consequence reveals to that the Normal limits hit
Toward the Afridi in each match starting with as much final one 30 matches
need aid more or less. 2. 5.
Those average of the runs may be. 24. Which mean that the Normal runs made
by those Afridi are approximately. 24. Previously, each match from as much
last 30 matches.
Standard deviation (Balls, limits Also Runs Respectively).
Those standard deviation for balls may be. 17. 766. Which implies that there
would. 17. 766. Deviations from the. Average, in the information of balls for
“Afridi” to A 30 matches.
The standard deviation about limits from claiming “Afridi” will be. 4. 552.
Which implies that there is. 4. 552. Deviations. Starting with those average, in
the information for limits for “Afridi” to keep going 30 matches.
The standard deviation for runs is. 28. 604. Which implies that there would. 28.
604. Deviations starting with those. Mean, in the information about runs from
claiming “Afridi” to final one 30 matches.
Skewness (Balls, limits Also Runs Respectively). Ball’s skewness will be. 1. 284.
Demonstrates that balls would right skewed Furthermore practically of the
information will be grouped on the cleared-out side.
Boundary’s skewness is. 2. 503. Illustrating that limits need aid likewise right
skewed and mossy cup oak from claiming the data will be bunched on the
cleared-out side.
Run’s skewness is. 2. 104. Demonstrates that runs need aid corrects skewed
and A large portion of the information is grouped on the exited side.
Yuvraj Singh:
Balls Boundaries Runs

Mean 40 Mean 5.46 Mean 39.99

SD 6.34 SD 1.18 SD 7.12

Median 27 Median 3 Median 23

Mode 6 Mode 0 Mode 23

Skewness 34.76 Skewness 6.18 Skewness 43.22

Average (Balls, limits Furthermore Runs Respectively). The average quality

about balls may be 27, which implies that Normal balls assumed Toward the
Yuvraj are 27 in his every match starting with as much last 30 matches. Right
away those consequence reveals to that the Normal limits hit by the Yuvraj
clinched alongside every match from as much keep going 30 matches are more
or less 3. Those average of the runs is 23 which imply that the Normal runs
constructed Eventually Tom's perusing those Yuvraj are approximately 23 in
every match starting with as much final one 30 matches.

Standard deviation (Balls, limits and Runs Respectively).

The standard deviation of balls will be 34. 76, which implies that there would
34. 76 deviations starting with those. Average, in the information about balls
about “Yuvraj” for A 30 matches.
The standard deviation for limits. Of “Yuvraj” may be. 6. 5, which implies that
there is 42. 33deviation from the average, in the information about limits. For
“Yuvraj”. To A 30 matches. Those standard deviation for runs is 42. 33, which
implies that there needs aid 42. 33deviations starting with the average (Mean),
in the information of runs. About “Yuvraj”. To most recent 30 matches.
Skewness (Balls, limits Also Runs Respectively). Ball’s skewness will be. 0. 954
demonstrates that balls need aid good skewed What's more the greater part of
the information may be bunched on the exited side.
Boundary’s skewness may be. 1. 258 illustrating that limits need aid likewise
good skewed Furthermore The greater part about the data will be grouped on
the exited side.
Run’s skewness is. 1. 132 demonstrates that runs are right skewed and the vast
majority of the information is grouped on the left side.

Comparison of Average
Examination from claiming
Standard Deviation: Concerning illustration we need at that point stated over
that standard deviation is those the greater part regularly utilized apparatus
for scattering. Even now it is those practically exact measure from claiming
scattering. It is used to find those deviation(spread) clinched alongside
information. The leisurely those standard deviation those All the steadier that
information will a chance to be. A low standard deviation implies that the
information will be extremely near the Mean and halter shelter standard
deviation means that those information is not near those imply and spread out
again an extensive range of values. We would be setting off should look at
those encountered with urban decay because of deindustrialization,
innovation developed, government lodge in. D of all three players, correlation
may be Likewise follow;
(Balls): Those encountered with urban decay because of deindustrialization,
innovation developed, government lodging. D about “Yuvraj” may be 34. 76,
“Gayle” may be 23. 75 What's more “Afridi” may be 17. 76. As stated by our
result the S. D of “Yuvraj” may be once more than that for other two players; it
implies its deviation starting with the mean is a greater amount. There may be
All the more spread to as much data, intends no consistency.
(Boundaries): Those SD of “Yuvraj” will be 6. 5, “Afridi” may be 3. 71 and
“Afridi” may be 4. 55. As stated by our come about the s. Doff “Yuvraj” is once
more than that about different two players; it intends its deviation from those
intend is more. There is a greater amount spread on as much data, intends no
consistency. Those deviation from claiming “Afridi” is leisurely. Over the
opposite two players which demonstrates that it is that's only the tip of the
iceberg reliable Previously, playing balls over both from claiming. Different
two. Here the deviation for “Afridi” may be less those “Yuvraj”.

(Runs): Those encountered with urban decay because of deindustrialization,

innovation developed, government lodge in. D from claiming “Yuvraj” will be
42. 33, “Afridi” may be 24. 55 Furthermore “Afridi” will be 28. 60.
As stated by our result the. Encountered with urban decay because of
deindustrialization, engineering concocted, government lodge. D for “Yuvraj”
may be more than that about other two players, it intends its deviation from
the mean is more. There will be additional spread in as much data, methods no
consistency. The deviation from claiming “Afridi” may be leisurely. Over that
for different two players which indicates that it is more reliable player. Here
those deviation for. Afridi is short of what the “Yuvraj” Be that as more
amazing over those “Afridi”.

Comparison of players
Along these lines as stated by our discoveries the intercepts from claiming at
three players are demonstrating to the negative value which implies that the
sum about these three players if settle on those runs in their advancing
matches. As a result, in they don’t. Aggravate the runs after that their again
every last bit Normal will a chance to be decreased Likewise the block attempt
side of the point may be demonstrating to. As they increment their runs
alternately strike rate more their Normal will begin setting off up.
On the great holders kept all those influence of the “Balls” and limits will be
Practically the same looking into the greater part of the. Players. In light we
need chosen the individuals players who have halter shelter strike rate
thereabouts that they increase their runs Toward hitting that's only the tip of
the iceberg limits. If we discuss those balls independently that point the b. ₁.
(Balls) hazel most the same influence on the model from claiming the sum
three players. It need leisurely influence over limits ahead runs a result we
bring at that point expressed in the relationship point that there are half
possibilities for making runs once each ball What's more assuming that they
aggravate those runs in any case not hit the limit it will influence under the
limits. Similarly, as limits expand the runs over secondary extent thus that b. ₂.
Limits need aid showing more influence on the model of the relapse. Assuming
that we discuss those r square of the greater part three players, the worth of
the r square about all three players is Additionally very nearly near one
another. Know three players need the quality for r square more than 95% so
the variables which we bring chose would exceptionally of service for our three
chose players. On we. Analyse those comes about of the “Correlation”. For
every last bit three players at that point those outcomes for these players once
more demonstrating to roughly the comes about exceptionally near one
another. The effects for relationship table of every last bit three players need
aid demonstrating Just about more than 97% connection of the subordinate
variable (Runs)with indigent variables (Balls) Also (Boundaries).