Professional Documents
Culture Documents
01 1
University of Arizona
We are a group of four University of Arizona College of Nursing, students that are
completing a community as a partner project in Tucson, Arizona, census tract (CT) 22.01. To
assess the community’s strengths and stressors, we observed the community by driving around
based on this community’s needs, presented it to the community, and provided Pima County with
Community Assessment
Community Core
Our CT has a population of 3,515 while Pima County has a population of 1,003,338
people. Our CT consists of 53.6% whites, compared to 80.7 percent of Pima County. Our CT
also is 74.7% Hispanic or Latino, compared to 36.1% Hispanic or Latino. Another contrast in the
data was that our CT had higher instances of Spanish speakers than average when compared to
Pima County. In our CT, 66.3 percent spoke Spanish, and 27.9% were fluent in Spanish and
spoke minimal English; while Pima had 23.6% and 6.8% respectively (Pima County Health
Physical Environment
We found that our CT has significantly less new homes than average for Pima County.
Our CT had 1.7% of its homes built after the year 2000, while Pima County had 21.1% of its
homes built after 2000. Most of our CT’s houses, 65.2%, were built between 1960-1979 while
the average for Pima County is 29% (Pima County Health Department Public Health Nursing
Our CT contained a plethora of health and social services. Nearby hospitals were Banner
University Medical Center South and Southern Arizona VA Health Care System. For long term
care and senior centers, our CT had El Pueblo Senior Center and the Arizona Veteran Home
nearby. In addition to Concentra Urgent Care, multiple pharmacies, and dispose-a-med sites,
there were a wide range of medical offices, dental offices, and integrative care modalities to
choose from as well as mental health services, La Frontera, and social services such as SAAF
Housing Department (Pima County Health Department Public Health Nursing Community
Economy
Despite the local businesses, the median household income is well below the Pima
County average, 42% of the CT lives in poverty as opposed to 19.1% of Pima County (Pima
County Health Department Public Health Nursing Community Profile CT 2201, 2018).
The CT included safety departments such as the Pima County Sheriff’s Office, the
Tucson Police Department Santa Cruz Station, as well as the Tucson Fire Department Station
#10. There were also many transportation systems such as bus stops and sidewalks throughout
the neighborhood (Pima County Health Department Public Health Nursing Community Profile
CT 2201, 2018).
Our CT fell inside the city limits of Tucson and is under Tucson City Council Ward 5,
Pima County District 2, Arizona State Legislative District 2, and US Congressional District 3
(Pima County Health Department Public Health Nursing Community Profile CT 2201, 2018).
Communication
CENSUS TRACT 22.01 4
The Arizona Daily Star was located within our CT as well as a payphone, many
billboards, and free computers and wifi in the library (Pima County Health Department Public
Education
Our CT had a higher percentage of people with less than an 9th grade education (19%)
compared to 4.9% in Pima County . It also had lower high school graduates 61.9% and
bachelor’s degrees 11% when compared to Pima County 87.7% and 30.8% respectively. Our CT
contained a local childcare, elementary, middle school, high school, and library nearby (Pima
County Health Department Public Health Nursing Community Profile CT 2201, 2018).
Recreation
There was limited recreational opportunity in our CT. Some resources included Jet Multi-
Sport Training, Viva Performing Arts Center, and Bravo Park (Pima County Health Department
Our CT’s biggest strengths included its family oriented community, many health services
available, and the police presence. Many key informants commented on how family oriented the
community was including a public health nurse, “I believe that it is a community interested in
family and helping each other through tough times.” The evidence of many health services were
observed during our windshield survey. We observed many different health services including
medical offices, dental offices, integrative care services, and mental health services. The last
strength identified, police presence, was identified in key informant interviews. A journalist at
CENSUS TRACT 22.01 5
The Arizona Daily Star stated, “I think this area is really safe. There are always police patrolling
The three most critical stressors our group found in the community were chronic health
issues such as diabetes and cancer, low income or insufficient income, and substance
abuse/mental health issues. Many key informants stated diabetes was a critical stressor. A public
health nurse at Theresa Lee Public Health Center stated, “Poor nutrition again related to many of
the factors cited above thus increased risk for heart disease and diabetes, etc.” When asked about
the major health issues in the community, the Fire Captain said that there were a lot of
respiratory issues and people dealing with diabetes. Many key informants also mentioned low
income as a critical stressor. “Other concerns include poverty and no access to care,” said the
librarian at El Pueblo Library. A health provider at Alma Medical Inc. stated, “There is also a
big portion of unemployed or uninsured adults. This makes it very hard for our facility to care for
them. Many will come for a few visits but stop because they can’t afford it anymore.” Mental
health issues and substance abuse was also mentioned on different occasions. “Drugs and gangs
are at the top of the problem list. Addicts, prisoners, and people with mental/behavioral disorders
visit the library often to use the phone, the computers, or the wifi,” said the librarian at El Pueblo
LIbrary. A Public Information Officer Deputy of Pima County Sheriff’s Department stated, “I
see two major issues in this community, opiates and mental health. Opiates are the main cause of
drug overdoses and crime. With regards to mental health, a large majority of the calls that the
local police respond to have to do with people who have mental health issues.”
Four significant concerns identified by the community - substance abuse, improper use of
emergency services, diabetes, and mental health - were placed into a Priorities of Care Table for
analysis. This table can be found in Appendix A, and serves as a planning tool that ranks each
CENSUS TRACT 22.01 6
problem in terms of severity, public interest, and the students’ ability to intervene. Of the four,
Nursing Diagnosis
While an individual can develop diabetes at any point in their lifespan, the elderly are
considered to be especially at risk, and potentially limited in their ability to care for themselves
once they have the disease. For this reason, our team chose to focus on the elder population
within CT 22.01, and developed the following nursing diagnosis: At risk for complications of
diabetes among elderly population in and around CT 22.01 related to inadequate diet, poor
exercise, and lack of knowledge about the importance of exercise; as evidenced by key
Good Goal
A healthy diet and adequate exercise are two critical factors that can help prevent or
reduce the negative impact of diabetes. The elderly population have the potential to struggle
with mobility issues, and may not beware of the long-term consequences of a sedentary lifestyle.
In response to this our team developed the goal to increase the knowledge of the elder population
about how exercise can help prevent diabetes and reduce the negative consequences of diabetes.
Evidence-Based Article
Our group came across an article titled: The effects of tai chi on peripheral
somatosensation, balance, and fitness in Hispanic older adults with type 2 diabetes: a pilot and
feasibility study.
CENSUS TRACT 22.01 7
Purpose. Our group intended to hold a gentle exercise session to reduce the negative
impacts of diabetes and promote overall health. The article focused on specific symptoms of
older adults specifically. However, we planned to include all older adults in the activity, not
only those who already have diabetes. The intervention in the article targeted elderly hispanic
Setting. In the article, participants were recruited in person from education classes in the
community and from a waitlist for a university wellness program. Our group planned to perform
an intervention at the local senior center that catered to our CT. All settings were areas that cater
to improving senior health, although unlike in the article our group had no concrete indication of
Strength of Evidence. The article’s level of evidence rating is L3. The evidence is
taken from a controlled trial with a reference group, but the groups are not randomized.
The most relevant overarching goal is the first, to “attain high-quality, longer lives free of
preventable disease, disability, injury, and premature death”. (Office of Disease Prevention and
Health Promotion [ODPHP], 2018) Our education session will outline how exercise can both
prevent diabetes and minimize the negative consequences in those already effected, which can
Healthy People 2020 has a specific topic for diabetes. Its goal is to “reduce the disease
burden of diabetes mellitus (DM) and improve the quality of life for all persons who have, or are
at risk for, DM.” (ODPHP, 2018) This goal is perfectly in line with our intentions.
CENSUS TRACT 22.01 8
The most relevant objective number is D-16.1: “Increase the proportion of persons at
high risk for diabetes with prediabetes who report increasing their levels of physical activity.”
(ODPHP, 2018) This objective does not encompass those who are not yet at risk, who we also
Legislation
In 2015, the Medicare Diabetes Prevention Act was passed, which provided Medicare
coverage for the National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). The National DPP introduces
evidence-based community programs that will help prevent the onset of type 2 diabetes in at-risk
individuals (American Diabetes Association [ADA], 2015). These programs focus on lifestyle
changes, including better nutrition, exercise, and weight loss. Individuals can significantly
reduce their risk of developing diabetes if they commit to these changes, and the results are even
more profound in the senior population (ADA, 2015). The Medicare Diabetes Prevention Act is
a health policy that increases the reach and the impact of the National DPP.
Intervention
For our proposed intervention, we used health teaching from the intervention wheel and
targeted the elder population at El Rio Senior Center. On September 21, 2018, we gave an
educational presentation on the benefits of physical activity and reducing the consequences of
diabetes. The goal of this health education project was to address managing and preventing
diabetes among this population in the community. The nursing students will demonstrate small
and easy exercise routines that will help increase the physical activity in the elder population.
The rationale for exercise intervention was to educate this population the importance of regular
physical activity for effectively preventing diabetes or manage it if they already have it.
CENSUS TRACT 22.01 9
Our group formulated three SMART objectives that reflect the impact of the health
education project. By September 21, 2018, about 25% of senior citizens who attended will reflect
at least three ways they could exercise as demonstrated by the students. By September 21, 2018,
25% of senior citizens will volunteer at least one way that exercise helps to prevent diabetes. By
September 21, 2018, 25% of senior citizens will state how exercise can manage or prevent
diabetes.
Plan for Implementation. The goal of this educational project was to increase exercise
among senior citizens in order to prevent or manage diabetes. Our program activities for this goal
included:
convenience
● By September 21, 2018, the student nurses will give a presentation to the senior
community about how exercise can reduce the risk or help improve diabetes
Plan for Evaluation. Before and immediately following the health education project on
September 21, 2018, the student nurses will administer a verbal 2 question survey to participants
attending the education session. The survey will address both SMART objectives. The complete
Collaboration. Our community partners included Theresa Lee Public Health Department
as well as two experienced public health nurses working at this location. These two nurses
CENSUS TRACT 22.01 10
mentored us and provided us information about the census tract and their experience in the
community. We also collaborated with the coordinator of El Pueblo Senior Center, where we
Level of Prevention. Our intervention can function at all levels of prevention. The
project which addresses exercise may be a primary prevention that aims for the elderly in the
stage of susceptibility. It is a general health promotion intervention that can be applied to healthy
older adults to prevent diabetes from developing (Anderson & McFarlane, 2015). The
presentation may also be a secondary prevention where diabetes may be developing in the early
stages and can be detected and treated (Anderson & McFarlane, 2015). Diabetes in the early
stage of onset may be reversed with exercise. There are several in this population that are already
prevention is to limit further disability and rehabilitate the affected people to their full abilities
Resources. One of the best sources that was available for this health education project
was the El Pueblo Senior Center. This center was a great meeting area for many of the seniors
that live in this area. It was great to see because not only were we able to reach individuals in our
census tract, we were able to talk to other seniors that lived in other areas in the community.
Since the education project revolved around exercise, the largest constraint to our community
was the fact that the residents can not go outside and exercise all the time. The cause of this is
because of the extreme heat that the community deals with living in Southern Arizona, and that
there is the potential for gang violence at night. So, the aim of the project was to teach the
community ways to exercise inside of their own homes with minimal equipment. Another
constraint to the community was that they were not able to come and view the health education
CENSUS TRACT 22.01 11
project because they may not have had adequate transportation to the Senior Center. This limits
their ability to get out of their house and learn about different ways to improve their health.
The health education project worked extremely well. We decided to present to the elderly
at the El Rio Senior Center and talk to them about exercise and diabetes prevention and
management. The community demonstrated interest because the seniors were very interactive
with us and were open to share information about exercise in their personal lives. The seniors
participated when we demonstrated the exercises and were engaged when the topics about
exercise and diabetes were presented to them. In all, 21 seniors were present during the
presentation, 18 were females. Our presentation included a board, which is able to be seen in
Appendix C, that listed different benefits to exercise and pictures of the exercises that we were
teaching. The board was very easy to read and helped our group present our topic.
with a two question survey that reflected our SMART objectives: “Does anybody here know how
exercise can benefit those with diabetes?” and “Who knows three exercises that can help prevent
diabetes?” This was a poor way to evaluate the presentation because the elders were not as prone
to raise their hands. Before the presentation, only a couple of the seniors raised their hands for
either of the questions. After presenting, there were still only a couple people who raised their
hands but almost all of the seniors were nodding their heads and were extremely eager to
participate in the exercises. We concluded that many of the seniors learned something valuable
and useful.
Conclusion
CENSUS TRACT 22.01 12
At the end of this experience, the most important thing that our group learned was how
receptive the elderly population was to learning. The entire group at the Senior Center were very
active in participating in the exercises and sharing their thoughts. If we were to repeat this
education project again, we would definitely change the evaluation method. We all believed that
the instructional section and exercise demonstration went very well but it was difficult to judge
who learned what because the seniors were not very open to raising their hands when asked to.
We thought that a short written survey would be more helpful to compare results. Despite the
poor evaluation, we believed that we did reach both of our SMART objectives because over 50%
of the seniors were actively participating and engaging during the presentation. Through our
observations, we believed that we made a positive impact on these people’s lives and hopefully
they will continue to use these exercises throughout their lives to maintain a healthy lifestyle.
CENSUS TRACT 22.01 13
References
http://www.diabetes.org/advocacy/advocacy-priorities/prevention/preventing-diabetes-
in.html.
Anderson, E. T., & McFarlane, J. (2015). Community as partner: Theory and practice in nursing
Cavegn, E. I., & Riskowski, J. L. (2015). The effects of tai chi on peripheral somatosensation,
balance, and fitness in Hispanic older adults with type 2 diabetes: A pilot and feasibility
http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy2.library.arizona.edu/10.1155/2015/767213.
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/parks/ElPuebloCenter.
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2018). Diabetes. In Healthy People 2020.
Appendix A
Community health Identified Communi Nursin Availabil Severit Applicable Ideas for nursing Total
(stressor, risk factor, County’s expressio student resources outcom Determina (Use Minnesota
m the wheel.
Substance Abuse 2 4 1 1 2 10
Physical Advocacy**:
a legislative
representative
supporting
community
groups proposal
to address
Stressor 1
CENSUS TRACT 22.01 15
Improper use of 1 4 2 1 1 9
Environ Organizing**:
Invite all
stakeholders to
a meeting to
discuss
approach to
Stressor 2
Diabetes 2 4 2 2 2 12
Health Policy
Services Development
and
Enforcement**:
Draft a policy
for agency
addressing
CENSUS TRACT 22.01 16
Stressor 3
Mental health 2 4 1 1 1 9
Biology Health
and Teaching**:
the library
addressing
Stressor 4
Note.1Score 1 point if consistent with report findings as a concern in Pima County. Score 2 points if 1 of Pima
County’s 4 priority areas: Anxiety and Depression; Substance abuse; Injuries and accidents; Diabetes. From “Pima
County Health Needs Assessment Snapshot”. 2Community Expression of Interest (second column) is double
weighted to emphasize its importance. Key: 0 = low, 1 = moderate, 2 = high. Adapted from “Community Health
Diagnosis in Nursing” by M. A. Muecke, 1984, Public Health Nursing, 1, p. 31; and “Community Assessment and
Evaluation” by G.F. Shuster, 2010, in M. Stanhope and J. Lancaster (Eds.) Foundations of Nursing in the
Appendix B
Evaluation Tool
Survey
By a show of hands:
1. Who can share at least one way that exercise can help with diabetes?
2. Who can share some exercises that can help prevent diabetes?
Appendix C
CENSUS TRACT 22.01 18
Visual Aid