Table 1

Demographic Profile of the respondents

PROFILE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Age
17 and below 23 57.5
17 above 17 42.5
High School
Rural 19 47.5
City 21 52.5
Father’s Educational Attainment
Elementary 2 5.0
High School 13 32.5
College 23 57.5
Master 1 2.5
Doctorate 1 2.5
Mother’s Educational Attainment
Elementary 3 7.5
High School 19 47.5
College 16 40.0
Master 2 5.0
Father’s Occupation
Unemployed 11 27.5
employed 29 72.5
Mother’s Occupation
Unemployed 30 75.0
employed 10 25.0
Family monthly income
5000 and below 7 17.5
5000 to 10000 17 42.5
1000 above 16 40.0
Study Habit Time
1 – 2 hours 34 85.0
2 – 3 hours 4 10.0
Greater than 3 hours 2 5.0
Computer
Yes 15 37.5
No 25 62.5
Computer Hours Use
None 23 57.5
1 – 3 hours 15 37.5
More than 3 hours 2 5.0
Total 40 100.0

Results revealed that in terms of age most of the respondents

were 17 and below which obtained the highest frequency of 23 or equal

to 57.5%; and followed by ages 17 above which obtained the frequency

of 17 or equal to 42.5.

Table 1 further showed the frequency and percentage distribution

of the respondents’ demographic profile according to high school

graduated. Result revealed that most of the respondents were from city

which obtained the highest frequency of 21 or 52.5%; while rural

respondents obtained the lowest frequency of 19 or 47.5%.

Table 1 further showed the frequency and percentage distribution

of the respondents’ demographic profile according to father highest

educational attainment. Results revealed that most father highest

educational attainment were college which obtained a highest frequency

of 23 or equal to 57.5% while master and doctorate got the lowest

frequency of 1 or equal to 2.5%.

Table 1 further showed the frequency and percentage distribution

of the respondents’ demographic profile according to mother highest

educational attainment. Results revealed that most mother highest

educational attainment were high school which obtained a highest

frequency of 19 or equal to 47.5% while master got the lowest

frequency of 2 or equal to 5.0%.

Table 1 further showed the frequency and percentage

distribution of the respondents’ demographic profile according to

father occupation. Results revealed that most father occupation were

employed which obtained a highest frequency of 29 or equal to 72.5%

while unemployed got the lowest frequency of 11 or equal to 27.5%.

Table 1 further showed the frequency and percentage distribution

of the respondents’ demographic profile according to mother

occupation. Results revealed that most mother occupation were

unemployed which obtained a highest frequency of 30 or equal to 75.0%

while employed got the lowest frequency of 10 or equal to 25.0%.

Table 1 further showed the frequency and percentage distribution

of the respondents’ demographic profile according to family income.

Results revealed that most family income were 5000 to 10000 Pesos

which obtained a highest frequency of 17 or equal to 42.5% while

earning income of 5000 and below got the lowest frequency of 7 or

equal to 17.5%.

Table 1 further showed the frequency and percentage distribution

of the respondents’ demographic profile according to study habit time.

Result revealed that most of respondent study habit time was from 1 to

2 hours which obtained the highest frequency of 34 or 85.0%; while

greater than 3 hours obtained the lowest frequency of 2 or 5.0%.

Table 1 further showed the frequency and percentage distribution

of the respondents’ demographic profile according to computer. Result

revealed that most of the respondents respond was no which obtained

the highest frequency of 25 or 62.5%; while those respondents answered

yes obtained the lowest frequency of 15 or 37.5%.

Lastly, table 1 further showed the frequency and percentage

distribution of the respondents’ demographic profile according to

number of hours in computer. Result revealed that most of the

respondents respond was none which obtained the highest frequency of

23 or 57.5%; while those respondents answered more than 3 hours which

obtained the lowest frequency of 2 or 5.0%.

 Table 2

Level of Grades of the respondents

STANDARD
GRADES MEAN INTERPRETATION
DEVIATION
Grades in High School 85.70 4.44 Passed
Grades in Entrance 85.50 3.57 Passed
Grades in Subject 85.80 5.18 Passed

Table 2 showed the result as to respondents’ level of

grades, the highest mean was grades in subject which got 85.70

with standard deviation of 5.18 interpreted as passed, followed

by grades in high school which got a mean of 85.70 with standard

deviation of 4.44 interpreted as passed. Lastly, grades in

entrance got the lowest mean which 85.50 with standard deviation

of 3.57 interpreted as passed.

Table 3

Difference analysis on grade in high school, entrance and

subject when group according to demographic profile.

Table 3.1

Difference analysis on grade in high school, entrance and

subject when group according to age.

Grade in High
AGE Grade Entrance Grade in Subject
School
17 and below 85.35 84.47 86.00
17 above 86.18 86.88 85.53
T-test Not Significant Not Significant Not Significant
Scaling:
Sig – p-value is lesser than 0.05
Not Sig. - p-value is greater than 0.05
 Results revealed that as to their age, there was no

significant difference in their grades. This implied that age of

the respondent does not conforms to the grades of the

respondents.

Table 3.2

Difference analysis on grade in high school, entrance and

subject when group according to high school graduated.

Grade in High Grade Grade in

High School Graduated
School Entrance Subject
Rural 85.74 84.58 86.21
City 85.67 86.33 85.43
Not Not
T-test Significant
Significant Significant
Scaling:
Sig – p-value is lesser than 0.05
Not Sig. - p-value is greater than 0.05

Results revealed that as to their high school graduated,

there was significant difference in their grades in high school

while there is no significant difference in the respondent

grades in entrance and subject. This implied that rural and city

students differ their grades of where they graduated.

Table 3.3

Difference analysis on grade in high school, entrance and

subject when group according to occupation of the Father.

 Occupation Grade in High
Grade Entrance Grade in Subject
Father School
Unemployed 87.64 86.73 88.82
Employed 84.97 85.03 84.66
T-test Not Significant Not Significant Not Significant
Scaling:
Sig – p-value is lesser than 0.05
Not Sig. - p-value is greater than 0.05

Results revealed that as to their Father’s occupation,

there was no significant difference in their grades. This

implied that Father’s occupation of the respondent does not

conforms to the grades of the respondents.

Table 3.4

Difference analysis on grade in high school, entrance and

subject when group according to occupation of the Mother.

Grade in High Grade in

Occupation Mother Grade Entrance
School Subject
Unemployed 86.40 86.27 86.27
Employed 83.60 83.20 84.40
T-test Not Significant Not Significant Not Significant
Scaling:
Sig – p-value is lesser than 0.05
Not Sig. - p-value is greater than 0.05

Results revealed that as to their Mother’s occupation,

there was no significant difference in their grades. This

implied that Mother’s occupation of the respondent does not

conforms to the grades of the respondents.

 Table 3.5

Difference analysis on grade in high school, entrance and

subject when group according to educational Father.

Educational Grade in High Grade in

Grade Entrance
Father School Subject
Elementary 82.00 82.50 81.00
High School 85.85 85.15 86.54
College 85.82 85.91 85.74
Master 95.00 91.00 95.00
Doctor 79.00 81.00 78.00
F-test Not Sig. Not Sig. Not Sig.
Scaling:
Sig – p-value is lesser than 0.05
Not Sig. - p-value is greater than 0.05

Results revealed that as to their Father’s educational

attainment, there was no significant difference in their grades.

This implied that their Father’s educational attainment of the

respondent does not conforms to the grades of the students.

Table 3.6

Difference analysis on grade in high school, entrance and

subject when group according to educational mother.

Educational Grade in High Grade in

Grade Entrance
Mother School Subject
Elementary 86.67 84.67 88.33
High School 85.05 85.53 85.68
College 87.00 86.06 86.06
Master 80.00 82.00 81.00
Doctor 85.70 85.50 85.80
F-test Not Sig. Not Sig. Not Sig.
Scaling:
Sig – p-value is lesser than 0.05
Not Sig. - p-value is greater than 0.05
 Results revealed that as to their Mother’s educational

attainment, there was no significant difference in their grades.

This implied that their Mother’s educational attainment of the

respondent does not conforms to the grades of the students.

Table 3.7

Difference analysis on grade in high school, entrance and

subject when group according to income.

Grade in High Grade in

Income Grade Entrance
School Subject
Low 85.20 84.40 88.00
Average 84.89 84.84 83.37
High 86.81 86.63 68.00
F-test Not Sig. Not Sig. Significant
Scaling:
Sig – p-value is lesser than 0.05
Not Sig. - p-value is greater than 0.05

Results revealed that as to their Family income, there was

significant difference in their grades in subject while grades

in high school and entrance was no significant difference in

their grades. This implied that their Family income of the

respondent conforms only to the grades in subject of the

students.

Table 3.8

Difference analysis on grade in high school, entrance and

subject when group according to study habits.

 Grade in High Grade in
Study Habits Grade Entrance
School Subject
1 – 2 hours 85.88 84.63 86.75
2 – 3 hours 84.72 85.72 84.61
More than 3
90.25 89.75 88.75
hours
None 84.00 82.00 83.00
F-test Not Sig. Significant Not Sig.
Scaling:
Sig – p-value is lesser than 0.05
Not Sig. - p-value is greater than 0.05

Results revealed that as to their study habits, there was

significant difference in their grades in entrance while grades

in high school and subject was no significant difference in

their grades. This implied that their study habits of the

respondent conforms only to the grades in entrance of the

students.

Table 3.9

Difference analysis on grade in high school, entrance and

subject when group according to Computer in home.

Grade in High Grade

Computer in home Grade in Subject
School Entrance
Yes 86.13 85.13 85.60
No 85.44 85.72 85.92
Not
T-test Not Significant Not Significant
Significant
Scaling:
Sig – p-value is lesser than 0.05
Not Sig. - p-value is greater than 0.05

Results revealed that as to their computer in home, there

was no significant difference in their grades. This implied that

their computer in home of the respondent does not conforms to

the grades of the students.

Table 3.10

Difference analysis on grade in high school, entrance and

subject when group according to computer hours use.

Computer Hours Grade in High Grade in

Grade Entrance
Use School Subject
None 85.48 85.35 85.48
1 – 3 hours 85.27 85.47 85.47
Greater than 3
91.50 87.50 92.00
hours
F-test Not Sig. Not Sig. Not Sig.
Scaling:
Sig – p-value is lesser than 0.05
Not Sig. - p-value is greater than 0.05

Results revealed that as to their computer hours use, there

was no significant difference in their grades. This implied that

their computer hours use of the respondent does not conforms to

the grades of the students.

Table 4

Difference association between the grades in high school, entrance,

and subject.

Grades Statistics High School Entrance Subject

High Pearson 1 .784** .723**
School Correlation
P - value .000 .000
Decision for Ho Accept Accept
Conclusion Significant Significant
 Entrance Pearson .784** 1 .513**
Correlation
P - value .000 .001
Decision for Ho Accept Accept
Conclusion Significant Significant
Subject Pearson .723** .513** 1
Correlation
P - value .000 .001
Decision for Ho Accept Accept
Conclusion Significant Significant

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Scaling:
Sig – p-value is lesser than 0.01
Not Sig. - p-value is greater than 0.01

Table 4 showed the result in the difference association between

the grades in high school, entrance, and subject. Results revealed

that as to high school and entrance grades of the respondent there was

a strong positive association which got a .784**. Next, in the grades

of high school and subject it revealed that there was a strong

positive association which got a .723**. Lastly, in respondents grade

in entrance and subject it revealed that there was a moderate positive

association.
RECODE AGE (Lowest thru 17=1) (17.01 thru Highest=2) INTO R_AGE.
VARIABLE LABELS R_AGE 'AGE2'.
EXECUTE.

RECODE INCOME (Lowest thru 5000=1) (5000.01 thru 10000.00=2) (10000.01

thru Highest=3) INTO R_INCOME.
VARIABLE LABELS R_INCOME 'INCOME2'.
EXECUTE.

RECODE STUD_HAB (Lowest thru 0.99=1) (1 thru 2=2) (2.01 thru 3.00=3)
(3.01 thru Highest=4) INTO R_ST.
VARIABLE LABELS R_ST 'STUDHABS'.
EXECUTE.

RECODE HUSE (Lowest thru 0.99=0) (1 thru 3=1) (3.01 thru Highest=2)
INTO R_HUSE.
VARIABLE LABELS R_HUSE 'HUSE'.
EXECUTE.

Table 1 Demographic Profile of the Respondents

AGE2
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid 1.00 23 57.5 57.5 57.5
2.00 17 42.5 42.5 100.0
Total 40 100.0 100.0

HS
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid RURAL 19 47.5 47.5 47.5
CITY 21 52.5 52.5 100.0
Total 40 100.0 100.0

ED_FA
 Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid ELEM 2 5.0 5.0 5.0
HS 13 32.5 32.5 37.5
COL 23 57.5 57.5 95.0
MASTER 1 2.5 2.5 97.5
DOCTOR 1 2.5 2.5 100.0
Total 40 100.0 100.0

ED_MO
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid ELEM 3 7.5 7.5 7.5
HS 19 47.5 47.5 55.0
COL 16 40.0 40.0 95.0
MASTER 2 5.0 5.0 100.0
Total 40 100.0 100.0

OCC_FA
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid UNEMPLOYED 11 27.5 27.5 27.5
EMPLOYED 29 72.5 72.5 100.0
Total 40 100.0 100.0

OOC_MA
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid UNEMPLOYED 30 75.0 75.0 75.0
 EMPLOYED 10 25.0 25.0 100.0
Total 40 100.0 100.0

INCOME2
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid 1.00 7 17.5 17.5 17.5
2.00 17 42.5 42.5 60.0
3.00 16 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 40 100.0 100.0

STUDHABS
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid 2.00 34 85.0 85.0 85.0
3.00 4 10.0 10.0 95.0
4.00 2 5.0 5.0 100.0
Total 40 100.0 100.0

CHOME
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid YES 15 37.5 37.5 37.5
NO 25 62.5 62.5 100.0
Total 40 100.0 100.0

HUSE
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid .00 23 57.5 57.5 57.5
1.00 15 37.5 37.5 95.0
2.00 2 5.0 5.0 100.0
Total 40 100.0 100.0

Table 2 mean of the Grades

Statistics
GR_HS GR_EN GR_SUB
N Valid 40 40 40
Missin 0 0 0
g
Mean 85.7000 85.5000 85.8000

Group Statistics
Std. Std. Error
AGE2 N Mean Deviation Mean
GR_HS 1.00 23 85.3478 4.14080 .86342
2.00 17 86.1765 4.73333 1.14800
GR_EN 1.00 23 84.4783 3.27344 .68256
2.00 17 86.8824 3.87108 .93888
GR_SUB 1.00 23 86.0000 4.10100 .85512
2.00 17 85.5294 6.25617 1.51734

Table 3

Independent Samples Test

 Levene'
s Test
for
Equalit
y of
Varianc
es t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Confidence
Interval of
the
Difference
Sig. Std.
(2- Mean Error
Sig taile Differen Differen
F . t df d) ce ce Lower Upper
GR_H Equal .694 .41 - 38 .559 -.82864 1.40733 - 2.020
S varianc 0 .589 3.677 35
es 64
assumed
Equal - 31.8 .568 -.82864 1.43645 - 2.097
varianc .577 17 3.755 97
es not 26
assumed
GR_E Equal .535 .46 - 38 .040 -2.40409 1.13143 - -
N varianc 9 2.12 4.694 .1136
es 5 55 4
assumed
Equal - 31.0 .047 -2.40409 1.16077 - -
varianc 2.07 70 4.771 .0369
es not 1 27 1
assumed
GR_S Equal 4.09 .05 .287 38 .775 .47059 1.63769 - 3.785
UB varianc 8 0 2.844 91
es 73
assumed
 Independent Samples Test
Levene'
s Test
for
Equalit
y of
Varianc
es t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Confidence
Interval of
the
Difference
Sig. Std.
(2- Mean Error
Sig taile Differen Differen
F . t df d) ce ce Lower Upper
GR_H Equal .694 .41 - 38 .559 -.82864 1.40733 - 2.020
S varianc 0 .589 3.677 35
es 64
assumed
Equal - 31.8 .568 -.82864 1.43645 - 2.097
varianc .577 17 3.755 97
es not 26
assumed
GR_E Equal .535 .46 - 38 .040 -2.40409 1.13143 - -
N varianc 9 2.12 4.694 .1136
es 5 55 4
assumed
Equal - 31.0 .047 -2.40409 1.16077 - -
varianc 2.07 70 4.771 .0369
es not 1 27 1
assumed
GR_S Equal 4.09 .05 .287 38 .775 .47059 1.63769 - 3.785
UB varianc 8 0 2.844 91
es 73
assumed
Equal .270 25.8 .789 .47059 1.74171 - 4.051
varianc 79 3.110 55
es not 37
assumed
 Group Statistics
Std. Std. Error
HS N Mean Deviation Mean
GR_HS RURAL 19 85.7368 5.12989 1.17688
CITY 21 85.6667 3.66515 .79980
GR_EN RURAL 19 84.5789 4.03204 .92501
CITY 21 86.3333 3.23007 .70486
GR_SUB RURAL 19 86.2105 5.65272 1.29682
CITY 21 85.4286 4.56696 .99659

Independent Samples Test

Levene's
Test for
Equality
of
Variance
s t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Confidence
Interval of
the
Difference
Sig. Std.
(2- Mean Error
Sig tailed Differen Differen
F . t df ) ce ce Lower Upper
GR_HS Equal 1.35 .25 .050 38 .960 .07018 1.39945 - 2.9032
varianc 2 2 2.7628 1
es 6
assumed
 Equal .049 32.27 .961 .07018 1.42293 - 2.9676
varianc 1 2.8272 3
es not 8
assumed
GR_EN Equal .360 .55 - 38 .135 -1.75439 1.15001 - .57368
varianc 2 1.52 4.0824
es 6 5
assumed
Equal - 34.50 .141 -1.75439 1.16296 - .60776
varianc 1.50 3 4.1165
es not 9 4
assumed
GR_SU Equal .614 .43 .483 38 .632 .78195 1.61798 - 4.0573
B varianc 8 2.4934 9
es 8
assumed
Equal .478 34.65 .636 .78195 1.63553 - 4.1034
varianc 9 2.5395 2
es not 1
assumed

Group Statistics
Std. Std. Error
OCC_FA N Mean Deviation Mean
GR_HS UNEMPLOYED 11 87.6364 5.14340 1.55079
EMPLOYED 29 84.9655 3.87743 .72002
GR_EN UNEMPLOYED 11 86.7273 3.82337 1.15279
EMPLOYED 29 85.0345 3.60042 .66858
GR_SUB UNEMPLOYED 11 88.8182 3.12468 .94213
EMPLOYED 29 84.6552 5.21862 .96907

Independent Samples Test

 Levene's
Test for
Equality
of
Variance
s t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Confidence
Interval of
the
Difference
Sig. Std.
(2- Mean Error
Sig tailed Differen Differen
F . t df ) ce ce Lower Upper
GR_HS Equal 1.46 .23 1.77 38 .084 2.67085 1.50401 - 5.7155
varianc 3 4 6 .37386 5
es
assumed
Equal 1.56 14.53 .140 2.67085 1.70979 - 6.3253
varianc 2 5 .98367 7
es not
assumed
GR_EN Equal .961 .33 1.30 38 .199 1.69279 1.29618 - 4.3167
varianc 3 6 .93118 6
es
assumed
Equal 1.27 17.16 .221 1.69279 1.33264 - 4.5023
varianc 0 5 1.1167 5
es not 7
assumed
GR_SU Equal 7.06 .01 2.47 38 .018 4.16301 1.68477 .75238 7.5736
B varianc 1 1 1 4
es
assumed
 Independent Samples Test
Levene's
Test for
Equality
of
Variance
s t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Confidence
Interval of
the
Difference
Sig. Std.
(2- Mean Error
Sig tailed Differen Differen
F . t df ) ce ce Lower Upper
GR_HS Equal 1.46 .23 1.77 38 .084 2.67085 1.50401 - 5.7155
varianc 3 4 6 .37386 5
es
assumed
Equal 1.56 14.53 .140 2.67085 1.70979 - 6.3253
varianc 2 5 .98367 7
es not
assumed
GR_EN Equal .961 .33 1.30 38 .199 1.69279 1.29618 - 4.3167
varianc 3 6 .93118 6
es
assumed
Equal 1.27 17.16 .221 1.69279 1.33264 - 4.5023
varianc 0 5 1.1167 5
es not 7
assumed
GR_SU Equal 7.06 .01 2.47 38 .018 4.16301 1.68477 .75238 7.5736
B varianc 1 1 1 4
es
assumed
Equal 3.08 30.25 .004 4.16301 1.35156 1.4037 6.9222
varianc 0 8 5 7
es not
assumed
 Group Statistics
Std. Std. Error
OOC_MA N Mean Deviation Mean
GR_HS UNEMPLOYED 30 86.4000 4.56070 .83267
EMPLOYED 10 83.6000 2.98887 .94516
GR_EN UNEMPLOYED 30 86.2667 3.71329 .67795
EMPLOYED 10 83.2000 2.61619 .82731
GR_SUB UNEMPLOYED 30 86.2667 5.33003 .97313
EMPLOYED 10 84.4000 4.06065 1.28409

Independent Samples Test

Levene's
Test for
Equality
of
Variance
s t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Confidence
Interval of
the
Difference
Sig. Std.
(2- Mean Error
Sig tailed Differen Differen
F . t df ) ce ce Lower Upper
GR_HS Equal 1.10 .30 1.80 38 .079 2.80000 1.54874 - 5.9352
varianc 1 1 8 .33526 6
es
assumed
 Equal 2.22 23.92 .036 2.80000 1.25963 .19979 5.4002
varianc 3 0 1
es not
assumed
GR_EN Equal 2.44 .12 2.41 38 .021 3.06667 1.27247 .49068 5.6426
varianc 3 6 0 5
es
assumed
Equal 2.86 22.05 .009 3.06667 1.06961 .84878 5.2845
varianc 7 9 6
es not
assumed
GR_SU Equal 1.30 .26 1.01 38 .319 1.86667 1.84701 - 5.6057
B varianc 6 0 1 1.8724 5
es 2
assumed
Equal 1.15 20.23 .260 1.86667 1.61117 - 5.2250
varianc 9 5 1.4916 1
es not 7
assumed

Group Statistics
Std. Std. Error
CHOME N Mean Deviation Mean
GR_HS YES 15 86.1333 6.11633 1.57923
NO 25 85.4400 2.98719 .59744
GR_EN YES 15 85.1333 4.48596 1.15827
NO 25 85.7200 3.20832 .64166
GR_SUB YES 15 85.6000 6.21978 1.60594
NO 25 85.9200 4.35813 .87163

Independent Samples Test

 Levene's
Test for
Equality
of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Confidence
Interval of
the
Difference
Sig. Std.
(2- Mean Error
Sig tailed Differen Differen
F . t df ) ce ce Lower Upper
GR_HS Equal 12.69 .00 .48 38 .633 .69333 1.43919 - 3.6068
varianc 0 1 2 2.2201 3
es 6
assumed
Equal .41 18.07 .686 .69333 1.68846 - 4.2395
varianc 1 8 2.8528 6
es not 9
assumed
GR_EN Equal 3.119 .08 - 38 .633 -.58667 1.21831 - 1.8796
varianc 5 .48 3.0530 7
es 2 0
assumed
Equal - 22.66 .662 -.58667 1.32413 - 2.1547
varianc .44 6 3.3280 4
es not 3 7
assumed
GR_SU Equal 2.759 .10 - 38 .849 -.32000 1.67327 - 3.0673
B varianc 5 .19 3.7073 6
es 1 6
assumed
 Independent Samples Test
Levene's
Test for
Equality
of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Confidence
Interval of
the
Difference
Sig. Std.
(2- Mean Error
Sig tailed Differen Differen
F . t df ) ce ce Lower Upper
GR_HS Equal 12.69 .00 .48 38 .633 .69333 1.43919 - 3.6068
varianc 0 1 2 2.2201 3
es 6
assumed
Equal .41 18.07 .686 .69333 1.68846 - 4.2395
varianc 1 8 2.8528 6
es not 9
assumed
GR_EN Equal 3.119 .08 - 38 .633 -.58667 1.21831 - 1.8796
varianc 5 .48 3.0530 7
es 2 0
assumed
Equal - 22.66 .662 -.58667 1.32413 - 2.1547
varianc .44 6 3.3280 4
es not 3 7
assumed
GR_SU Equal 2.759 .10 - 38 .849 -.32000 1.67327 - 3.0673
B varianc 5 .19 3.7073 6
es 1 6
assumed
Equal - 22.33 .863 -.32000 1.82723 - 3.4661
varianc .17 3 4.1061 8
es not 5 8
assumed
 GR_HS GR_EN GR_SUB * ED_FA
ED_FA GR_HS GR_EN GR_SUB
ELEM Mean 82.0000 82.5000 81.0000
N 2 2 2
Std. 2.82843 2.12132 1.41421
Deviation
HS Mean 85.8462 85.1538 86.5385
N 13 13 13
Std. 3.48440 2.79422 3.97105
Deviation
COL Mean 85.8261 85.9130 85.7391
N 23 23 23
Std. 4.41745 4.04422 5.25891
Deviation
MASTER Mean 95.0000 91.0000 95.0000
N 1 1 1
Std. . . .
Deviation
DOCTOR Mean 79.0000 81.0000 78.0000
N 1 1 1
Std. . . .
Deviation
Total Mean 85.7000 85.5000 85.8000
N 40 40 40
 GR_HS GR_EN GR_SUB * ED_FA
ED_FA GR_HS GR_EN GR_SUB
ELEM Mean 82.0000 82.5000 81.0000
N 2 2 2
Std. 2.82843 2.12132 1.41421
Deviation
HS Mean 85.8462 85.1538 86.5385
N 13 13 13
Std. 3.48440 2.79422 3.97105
Deviation
COL Mean 85.8261 85.9130 85.7391
N 23 23 23
Std. 4.41745 4.04422 5.25891
Deviation
MASTER Mean 95.0000 91.0000 95.0000
N 1 1 1
Std. . . .
Deviation
DOCTOR Mean 79.0000 81.0000 78.0000
N 1 1 1
Std. . . .
Deviation
Total Mean 85.7000 85.5000 85.8000
N 40 40 40
Std. 4.36301 3.69338 5.05964
Deviation

Report
incomeF GR_HS GR_EN GR_SUB
1.00 Mean 85.2000 84.4000 88.0000
N 5 5 5
 Std. 2.94958 .54772 2.44949
Deviation
2.00 Mean 84.8947 84.8421 83.3684
N 19 19 19
Std. 3.58848 3.23631 5.05756
Deviation
3.00 Mean 86.8125 86.6250 88.0000
N 16 16 16
Std. 5.43101 4.52953 4.47214
Deviation
Total Mean 85.7000 85.5000 85.8000
N 40 40 40
Std. 4.36301 3.69338 5.05964
Deviation

ANOVA
Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.
GR_HS Between 33.373 2 16.687 .871 .427
Groups
Within 709.027 37 19.163
Groups
Total 742.400 39
GR_EN Between 34.524 2 17.262 1.284 .289
Groups
Within 497.476 37 13.445
Groups
Total 532.000 39
GR_SUB Between 213.979 2 106.989 5.047 .012
Groups
Within 784.421 37 21.201
Groups
Total 998.400 39
 GR_HS GR_EN GR_SUB * STUD_HAB
STUD_HAB GR_HS GR_EN GR_SUB
1 TO 2 HOURS Mean 85.8750 84.6250 86.7500
N 16 16 16
Std. 4.54423 3.24294 3.53082
Deviation
2 TO 3 HOURS Mean 84.7222 85.7222 84.6111
N 18 18 18
Std. 3.98240 3.70700 6.09859
Deviation
MORE THAN 3 Mean 90.2500 89.7500 88.7500
HOURS N 4 4 4
Std. 4.03113 2.75379 4.85627
Deviation
NONE Mean 84.0000 82.0000 83.0000
N 2 2 2
Std. 2.82843 2.82843 4.24264
Deviation
Total Mean 85.7000 85.5000 85.8000
N 40 40 40
Std. 4.36301 3.69338 5.05964
Deviation

ANOVA
Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.
GR_HS Between 95.032 2 47.516 2.716 .079
Groups
Within 647.368 37 17.496
Groups
Total 742.400 39
GR_EN Between 99.691 2 49.846 4.266 .022
Groups
Within 432.309 37 11.684
Groups
Total 532.000 39
GR_SUB Between 51.621 2 25.810 1.009 .375
Groups
Within 946.779 37 25.589
Groups
Total 998.400 39

GR_HS GR_EN GR_SUB * HUSE

HUSE GR_HS GR_EN GR_SUB
.00 Mean 85.4783 85.3478 85.4783
N 23 23 23
Std. 3.11696 3.06903 4.26262
Deviation
1.00 Mean 85.2667 85.4667 85.4667
N 15 15 15
Std. 5.56092 4.56488 5.97455
Deviation
2.00 Mean 91.5000 87.5000 92.0000
N 2 2 2
Std. 4.94975 4.94975 4.24264
Deviation
Total Mean 85.7000 85.5000 85.8000
N 40 40 40
Std. 4.36301 3.69338 5.05964
Deviation

ANOVA
 Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.
GR_HS Between 71.228 2 35.614 1.963 .155
Groups
Within 671.172 37 18.140
Groups
Total 742.400 39
GR_EN Between 8.549 2 4.275 .302 .741
Groups
Within 523.451 37 14.147
Groups
Total 532.000 39
GR_SUB Between 80.928 2 40.464 1.632 .209
Groups
Within 917.472 37 24.797
Groups
Total 998.400 39

Correlations
GR_HS GR_EN GR_SUB
GR_HS Pearson 1 .784** .723**
Correlation
Sig. (2- .000 .000
tailed)
N 40 40 40
GR_EN Pearson .784** 1 .513**
Correlation
Sig. (2- .000 .001
tailed)
N 40 40 40
GR_SUB Pearson .723** .513** 1
Correlation
Sig. (2- .000 .001
tailed)
 N 40 40 40
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01
level (2-tailed).