Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Telephone: +20-109-000-
compared to 8885;
Fax: +20-86-234-2813
ethanol in
newborns Abstract
Background: Umbilical cord infections contribute to the increased morbidity and
mortality in newborns of developing countries, where infants are exposed to un-
hygienic practices. The best umbilical cord treatment after birth is a controversial
issue. There are limited data examining the effect of topical application of human
milk on newborns’ cord separation and bacterial colonization, which is examined
herein and compared to 70% ethanol.
Methods and Findings: One hundred neonates attending Minia University Hos-
pital were enrolled in a quasi-experimental design (50 neonates in each group).
Cord separation time was recorded. Microbiological examination including total
viable bacterial count (TVC) and identification of the implicated bacterial species
was performed at birth, day 3 and at cord separation time. The mean cord separa-
tion time in the human milk and alcohol groups were 4.3±1.4 (SD) and 8.2±2.2,
respectively (p<0.001). There were significant differences between the two groups
in the TVC (p<0.001). The isolated organisms included Staphylococcus epidermidis,
Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococci, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species, with
higher rates of pathogenic species in the ethanol group.
This article is available from: Key words: bacterial colonization, cord care, cord separation time, ethanol, hu-
www.transbiomedicine.com man breast milk
tion from cord stump infection is a factor that increases the human breast milk topical application on bacterial coloniza-
morbidity and mortality of infants in developing countries [5]. tion of umbilical cord stump. This study examines the effect
Preventive umbilical cord treatments to reduce infection were of breast milk on cord separation time and bacterial coloniza-
introduced in the 1950’s and 60’s [6]. In developed countries, tion and compares it to that of 70% ethanol.
individual cases of umbilical cord infections continue to occur
in aseptic nurseries [7]. Umbilical cord treatment after birth
is a subject of research. A wide variety of cultural practices Subjects and Methods
and beliefs are associated with umbilical cord care, which
include topical application of human milk. Several reports Subjects and design
show that the application of topical antiseptics increases the
time to cord separation compared to dry cord care or non A quasi-experimental design (a design that lacks random as-
antiseptic treatment [8-13]. The hospital cost of umbilical cord signments) was used and samples from 100 newborn infants
treatment varies with the method of application and length were included in this study. The neonates were classified into
of hospital stay. Therefore, it is important to find inexpensive two groups for studying the effect of human breast milk
alternative cord care; e.g. breast milk; in low socio-economic and 70% ethanol application on umbilical cord separation
countries. time, omphalitis and bacterial colonization (50 neonates in
each group). The study protocol was approved by the local
Controversial data about antiseptics and economic concerns institutional review board at Minia University Hospital (MUH).
has prompted a movement towards dry cord care [14-16], An informed consent was obtained from the mothers prior
which is the current recommendation of the WHO for devel- to participation in the study. Inclusion criteria included babies
oping countries under routine circumstances [17]. However, followed immediately after birth with umbilical cord cut and
WHO acknowledges the use of antiseptics when harmful, clips applied according to MUH policy for immediate care of
unhygienic, traditional practices in newborns increase the risk newborns. Summary of inclusion and exclusion criteria are
for omphalitis. Although there is no cost of natural cord dry- shown in Table 1.
ing, costs could be increased due to infections and expensive
bacterial culture examinations. Several agents; including hu- The neonates were assigned to receive one of the two regi-
man breast milk; are used for umbilical cord care and their mens for umbilical cord care, namely breast milk or 70% etha-
effect on cord separation time has been examined [5,18]. nol. Group 1 neonates (n = 50) were treated with 2-3 drops
Breast milk is available, easy to use, and non invasive method of own mother’s milk (study group), while Group 2 neonates
for cord care. There is limited data that examined the effect of
Baseline swab taken within 2-4 hours -ve umbilical cord culture +ve umbilical cord culture
Rooming-in with the mothers Yes No
breast feeding Yes No
(n = 50) were treated with 70% ethanol (control group). variables was done using student’s t-test while Fisher’s exact
Mother’s of each study group applied human milk or etha- test was used for comparison of non parametric data. Prob-
nol topically three times daily (every 8 hours) to the umbili- ability (p-value) less than 0.05 was considered significant and
cal stump until two days after cord separation. In the breast less than 0.01 was considered highly significant.
milk study group, mother was instructed to wash hands and
breasts, and then apply milk on the umbilical stump. This was
applied 2-4 hours after birth (after taking a baseline umbilical Results
cord swab for bacterial examination), thereafter every 8 hours
and when needed. Mothers were instructed to retain milk on
Socio-demographic data of the study subjects
stump until dry and not to wash it out. All mothers were given
a follow up leaflet before being discharged from the hospital
This study was conducted at MUH in the period from August
with details of signs and symptoms of omphalitis, sepsis, cord
2009 to February 2010. Table (2) shows the socio-demo-
separation time, time of breast milk daily application on the
graphic characteristics of the mothers in the human milk and
umbilical cord and time of follow up in the neonatology clinics
alcohol treated groups. The mean age of the mothers in the
at MUH. The observations related gross signs of omphalitis
human milk and alcohol groups was 24.9±5.4 and 26.4±5.4
(inflammation of the umbilical cord region) include redness,
years, respectively. The alcohol group mothers were evenly
swelling, exudates, hotness and odor were examined by na-
split between urban and rural residence while only 42% of
ked eye and recorded three times (at the time of each swab
the mothers in the human milk group were urban residents
collection) as previously described [17,19]. The mothers were
(p=0.5). The majority of both groups were house wives (92%
instructed to record the umbilical cord separation time/date.
and 82% in the human milk and alcohol groups, respectively,
with the remaining mothers being employed (p=0.14). Also,
the differences between both groups in the educational level
Methods of the mothers (p=0.08), mode of delivery (p=1), and gen-
der of the baby ((p=0.4) were all insignificant. On the other
A baseline umbilical cord swab was taken from the base of hand, a significant difference in distribution of parity status
the cord 2-4 hours after birth and immediately sent to the was found between the two groups (p=0.02). Although a sig-
bacteriology laboratory. All specimens were labeled with the nificant difference was found among human milk and alcohol
newborn’s name, code and date. The specimens were col- groups regarding the gestational age (not shown) and birth
lected by a dry sterile swab soaked in Amies transport me- weight (p=0.02), these differences were within the normal
dium (Oxiod, England) for culture within 1-2 hours. Samples ranges (Table 2) as the inclusion criteria include subjects with
were serially diluted and cultured on blood- and MacConkey’s a wide range of gestational age (38-42 weeks) and normal
agar plates and incubated for 24-48 hours at 37oC. Those birth weight (2.5-4.0 kg).
showing no bacterial growth at the baseline swab were mi-
crobiologically followed by two additional cord swabs. The Human breast milk accelerates the umbilical cord
first swab was collected on the 3rd day after birth and the separation compared to 70% ethanol:
second swab was collected at the day of cord separation.
Every sample was cultured on MacConkey’s agar (Oxoid), and Figure (1) shows that cord separation was faster in the hu-
blood agar (Difco, UK) plates at one log serial dilutions of man milk neonates than in the alcohol group. In this regard,
the specimen. Briefly, a 100ml was thoroughly smeared on almost half of human milk group babies had their cord fallen
each plate under aseptic conditions, and then incubated over off at the 3rd-4th day of age and 23 (46%) of them had their
night at 37oC until finally counted using an illuminated Fisher cord fallen off at the 5th-6th day of age. On the other hand,
colony counter (Fisher, USA). The total viable count (TVC) on only 11 (22%) of the babies in the alcohol group had their
MacConkey’s or Blood agar plates was determined by taking cord fallen off at the 5th-6th day of age while the rest of the
the average of two counts on each of the two plates that group had their cord fallen off at the 7th-8th reaching up to
were run at least in duplicates. 10 days after delivery. Only one baby in the ethanol group
had his cord falling at the 3rd day (Figure 1). The mean
Statistical analysis: cord separation time was 4.3±1.4 and 8.16±2.2 in the hu-
Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social man milk and ethanol groups, respectively. These data show
Science (SPSS) version 13 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL) Numerical that the mean cord separation time in the human milk group
data were expressed as the mean and standard deviation was significantly shorter (p <0.001) than in the alcohol group
(SD) while qualitative data were expressed as frequency and neonates.
percentage. For quantitative data, comparison between two
Table 2. Comparison between socio-demographic data of the mothers and neonates among human milk and alcohol groups
(n = 50 each).
Education
Parity
Table 3. Cord inflammation signs and complications were less in the human milk neonates as compared to ethanol group
neonates during the first and second follow up visits.
Body
temperature 37.2 ± 0.4 37.5±0.5 <0.001** 37.1±0.4 37.1±0.4 0.07
(Mean±SD)
Table 4. Comparison between total viable bacterial count on blood and MacCkonkey’s agars among the human milk and
alcohol groups during first and second follow up visits.
TVC = total viable bacterial count; # count x103; * statistically significant; ** statistically highly significant
after separation. A deep gap wound at the cord site, hernia, lower than alcohol group and differences were statistically
and mucoid discharges were found at a frequency of one significant at both the first (p=0.03) and second (p=0.04)
neonate (2%) each (data not shown in Table 3). follow up visits.
Human breast milk neonates had less Human breast milk group neonates had less
colonization of the umbilical cord stump as colonization of the umbilical cord stump with
compared to 70% ethanol treatment neonates: pathogenic organisms as compared to 70%
ethanol treatment neonates at the first and the
Table (4) shows the TVC on blood and MacConkey’s agar. second follow up visits
Neonates in the human milk group had statistically significant
lower TVC when compared to the alcohol group neonates Non pathogenic and pathogenic bacterial species on both
as determined on blood agar in the first and the second blood and MacConkey’s agars in human milk- and alcohol-
follow up visits (p<0.001 at both visits). TVC determined on cord care treatment groups are shown in Table 5. S. epi-
MacConkey’s agar for babies treated with human milk was dermidis populated cord stump of all neonates (100%) by
Table 5. Human breast milk neonates had less colonization of the umbilical cord stump with pathogenic organisms as com-
pared to 70% ethanol treatment neonates at the first and the second follow up visits. Frequency of isolation in
both visits is shown for both groups.
Other Gram negative bacilli 3(6) 9(18) 0.12 2(6.25) 8(16.3) 0.30
# Fisher’s exact test was used for comparison; * statistically significant; ** statistically highly significant.
the end of the second visit with a significant difference at cord [1,5,18] but they were compared with alcohol in only
the first visit. Importantly, S aureus, a pathogenic species; one study with a higher alcohol concentration 96% [5] and
was significantly isolated at more frequency in the alcohol only one study and ours examined the effect of breast milk
group neonates as compared to the breast milk neonates at on colonization of the umbilical cord stump with different
both visits. Isolation of Micrococci, Streptococci, Diphtheria, microorganisms. A similar observation was reported where
Neisseria, Klebsiella species, E. coli, and other Gram negative the mean cord separation time in the human milk group was
bacilli was higher in the alcohol group neonates at both visits significantly shorter than 96% ethanol, an antiseptic silver
sulfadiazine preparation [5] and dry cord care babies [18].
Another study [1], reported that the majority of the human
milk-treated group (74%) had their cord fall off at the 6th-
Discussion 10th day, which was longer than the duration reported in
our study. The difference in cord separation time for human
In this study, we examined the effect of topical application of milk group could be attributed to differences in the number
human breast milk on newborns’ cord separation time, om- of the study subjects and/or the study settings.
phalitis, and bacterial colonization and compared it to 70%
ethanol in a quasi-experimental design at MUH. We found Alcohol has been shown to delay cord separation when
that the mean cord separation time in the human milk neo- compared to other treatments [20]. Isopropanol has consis-
nates was shorter (4.3±1.4 days) than that of alcohol (8.2±2.2 tently been shown to lengthen cord separation time [21].
days). Cord omphalitis signs and complications were less in In addition, cases of acute alcohol toxicity in infants up to
the human milk neonates as compared to ethanol group neo- 21 days old have been reported after alcohol applications
nates. We also found a significant difference between the to the umbilical stump. Therefore, it is recommended that
two groups in TVC of specimens collected from cord stump. physicians and nurse practitioners should limit or avoid the
The isolated organisms included S. epidermidis, S. aureus, use of alcohol for cord care [22-24]. In the current study,
Micrococci, E. coli and Klebsiella species, with higher rates there were highly significant differences in cord omphalitis
of pathogenic species in the ethanol group. There are several signs for both normal vaginal delivery (NVD) and cesarean
reports of using breast milk for topical care of the umbilical section (CS) babies where the majority of babies had redness,
exudates and elevated body temperature, while no statisti- and Gram negative bacilli with significant differences only in
cally significant differences were found in all variables of cord S. aureus. These data are supported by another report [18],
inflammation signs. that showed that colonization rate was statistically significant
in the milk and alcohol groups with pathogenic microorgan-
Our data showed that the babies who had their umbilical isms such as S. aureus, E. coli, K. pneumonia being lower
cord cared with human milk had statistically significant de- in the human milk treatment group. However, they found
crease in the TVC as compared to ethanol group subjects that S. epidermidis was also higher in the breast milk group
during the first and the second follow up visits. This may be compared to dry cord care group [18]. In summary, this study
due to the anti-infective components present in the human showed that human milk treatment of the umbilical cord of
milk. These data are in agreement with that of Paes & Jones the newborn babies compared to treatment with 70% etha-
[25], who reported that with alcohol cord care regimen, um- nol was manifested by shorter cord separation time, lower in-
bilical cord cultures showed a dramatic increase in bacterial flammation signs and lower bacterial colonization; that were
colonization almost immediately after initiating alcohol cord mainly of non pathogenic species.
care regimen. According to WHO, application of human milk
to the cord stump is one of the cultural cord care practices
used in Turkey, that could be beneficial in view of the antibac- Acknowledgment
terial factors present in the breast milk [7]. Human milk has
immunologic,anti-infective agents and colostrums containing
We would like to thank Dr. Ashraf A. Ewis (Associate Prof.
significant quantities of complement components that act as
of Community Medicine and Public Health; Minia Faculty of
natural antimicrobial agents. It, also, contains protective fac-
Medicine) for his help with the statistical analysis of the data.
tors that provide specific and non specific passive immunity
[18]. Human milk also contains IgA, which could contribute
to the better action of human milk compared to ethanol.
Colostrum, the milk produced by mothers in the first few Funding
days after birth, is especially rich in IgA [26]. Colostrum, also,
contains higher amounts of white blood cells and infection- This study is supported by funds from Minia University and
fighting substances than mature milk. personal funds.
References 14. Medves, JM and O’Brien, BA (1997) Cleaning solutions and bacterial
colonization in promoting healing and early separation of the umbilical
cord in healthy newborns. Can J Public Health 88 (6), 380-382.
1. Vural, G and Kisa, S (2006) Umbilical cord care: a pilot study 15. Dore, S, Buchan, D, Coulas, S, Hamber, L, Stewart, M et al. (1998)
comparing topical human milk, povidone-iodine, and dry care. J Alcohol versus natural drying for newborn cord care. J Obstet Gynecol
Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 35 (1), 123-128. Neonatal Nurs 27 (6), 621-627.
2. Mullany, LC, Darmstadt, GL and Tielsch, JM (2003) Role of 16. Ford, LA and Ritchie, JA (1999) Maternal perceptions of newborn
antimicrobial applications to the umbilical cord in neonates to prevent umbilical cord treatments and healing. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs
bacterial colonization and infection: a review of the evidence. Pediatr 28 (5), 501-506.
Infect Dis J 22 (11), 996-1002. 17. WHO. (1998) Care of the Umbilical Cord: A review of the evidence,
3. Jellard, J (2002) Umbilical cord as reservoir of infection in a maternity World Health Organization
hospital. Br Med J 1 (5024), 925-928. 18. Farahani, L, Mohammadzaeh, A, Taffazzoli, M, Esmaeli, H and
4. Sawardekar, KP (2004) Changing spectrum of neonatal omphalitis. Ghazvini, K (2008) Effect of topical application of breast milk and dry
Pediatr Infect Dis J 23 (1), 22-26. cord care on bacterial colonization and umbilical cord separation time
5. Ahmadpour-Kacho, M, Zahedpasha, Y, Hajian, K, Javadi, G and in neonates. Journal of Chinese Clinical Medicine 3 (6), 327-332.
Talebian, H (2006) The effect of topical application of human milk, 19. Nourian, M, Allaii, F and Heidari, A (2009) Comparison of the effect of
ethyl alcohol 96%, and silver sulfadiazine on umbilical cord separation alcohol 70% versus dry cord care on cord bacterial colonization and
time in newborn infants. Arch Iran Med 9 (1), 33-38. cord separation time among newborns. Pak J Med Sci 25 (1), 103-107.
6. Barclay, L, Harrington, A, Conroy, R, Royal, R and Laforgia, J (2002) A 20. Mendenhall, A and Eichenfield, L (2000) Back to basics: Caring for the
comparative study of neonates’ umbilical cord management. Austr J newborn´s skin. Contemp Pediatr 17, 98-114.
Adv Nurs. 11, 34-40. 21. Mullany, LC, Darmstadt, GL, Katz, J, Khatry, SK, LeClerq, SC et al.
7. WHO (2006) Postpartum care of mother and newborn, Care of the (2007) Risk factors for umbilical cord infection among newborns of
umblical cord. southern Nepal. Am J Epidemiol 165 (2), 203-211.
8. Magowan, M, Andrews, A, Pinder, B and Allen, S (1980) The effect of 22. Darmstadt, GL and Dinulos, JG (2000) Neonatal skin care. Pediatr Clin
an antibiotic spray on umbilical cord separation times. Nurs Times 76 North Am 47 (4), 757-782.
(42), 1841. 23. Howard, R (2001) The appropriate use of topical antimicrobials and
9. Smales, O (1988) A comparison of umbilical cord treatment in the antiseptics in children. Pediatr Ann 30 (4), 219-224.
control of superficial infection. N Z Med J 101 (849), 453-455. 24. Spray, A and Siegfried, E (2001) Dermatologic toxicology in children.
10. Arad, I, Eyal, F and Fainmesser, P (1981) Umbilical care and cord Pediatr Ann 30 (4), 197-202.
separation. Arch Dis Child 56 (11), 887-888. 25. Paes, B and Jones, CC (1987) An audit of the effect of two cord-care
11. Rais-Bahrami, K, Schulte, EB and Naqvi, M (1993) Postnatal timing of regimens on bacterial colonization in newborn infants. QRB Qual Rev
spontaneous umbilical cord separation. Am J Perinatol 10 (6), 453- Bull 13 (3), 109-113.
454. 26. Kelly, D and Coutts, AG (2000) Early nutrition and the development of
12. Verber, IG and Pagan, FS (1993) What cord care--if any? Arch Dis Child immune function in the neonate. Proc Nutr Soc 59 (2), 177-185.
68 (5 Spec No), 594-596.
13. Ronchera-Oms, C, Hernandez, C and Jimemez, NV (1994) Antiseptic
cord care reduces bacterial colonization but delays cord detachment.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 71 (1), F70.
Doctors excha nge clinical experiences, review their manuscripts for rapid publication.