Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4NUR5 RLE 4
APA: Wendling, S., & Beadle, V. (2015). The relationship between self-efficacy and diabetic foot
self-care. Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology,2(1), 37-41.
doi:10.1016/j.jcte.2015.01.001
Keyterms used for search: Diabetic foot nursing interventions journal science direct
Research Questions:
What is the relationship between self-efficacy and self-care between diabetic patients
How can self-care be improved between diabetic patients
What are the factors affecting self-efficacy in self care
Ferreira, L., Carvalho, A., & Carvalho, R. (2018). Short-term predictors of amputation in
patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research &
Reviews,12(6), 875-879. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2018.05.007
Lever, C. J. (2018). Diagnosis and management of the acute hot diabetic foot. Orthopaedics
and Trauma,32(6), 416-422. doi:10.1016/j.mporth.2018.09.005
Neelambika, G., Balu, V., Rego, M. R., & Kesari, C. (2018). Integrative approach for diabetic
foot management– a case report. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine.
doi:10.1016/j.jaim.2018.06.009
Wendling, S., & Beadle, V. (2015). The relationship between self-efficacy and diabetic foot
self-care. Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology,2(1), 37-41.
doi:10.1016/j.jcte.2015.01.001
e. Assess the available evidence for its appropriateness and applicability in our
practice
Appropriateness of the research questions
Appropriateness of the research design
Adequacy of the sample
Validity and reliability of the instruments, data collection activities, and
measures
Validity of the interventions
Validity and reliability of the instruments
Appropriateness of statistical treatments or analysis measures
Findings and conclusions
The research questions were found to be appropriate to the study and presents a great
contribution to the discovery of new knowledge. The investigators also used a descriptive
correlational design to be able to describe and correlate the two variables being compared which
is self efficacy and self care. The sample size was 223 and all from Michigan, USA. The sample size
would be considered as appropriate since it is a good number, however the locus of the study is
only contained in Michigan and does not really represent all of those who are experiencing the
same condition to be able to fully justify it and considering that they only used a convenience
sample of the adults. For the collection of data an interview and a survey questionnaire was used
and as described it the study, the data gathered was analyzed carefully since experts were
consulted. The interventions mentioned are proven to be valid since they are not new to us
nurses since they are also taught to use and performed during our RLE. The instruments used
were the foot care confidence scale (FCCS) and Nottingham assessment of functional footcare
(NAFF). Findings of the study is that confidence is not the only component of self efficacy and
behavioral change. Motivation must also be given consideration since it influences an individual’s
decision to participate in self care