MID L 007287-17 12/07/2018 Pg 1 of 2 Trans ID: LCV20182157110

FILED
Jeffrey S. Craig, Esquire (003561991)
CRAIG, ANNIN & BAXTER, LLP December 7, 2018
41 Grove Street
Haddonfield, NJ 08033 Hon. Thomas Daniel McCloskey, J.S.C.
(856)795-2220
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Yoel Romero
YOEL ROMERO SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
LAW DIVISION/MIDDLESEX COUNTY
Plaintiffs,
v. DOCKET NO.: MID-L-7287-17

GOLDSTAR PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, Civil Action

a business entity, form unknown, and
JOHN DOES 1-30, ABC CORPORATIONS FINAL JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AS TO
1-30 and XYZ PARTNERSHIPS 1-30, LIABILITY AGAINST DEFENDANT
unidentified individuals, corporations
and partnerships
Defendants

Default having been entered against Defendant Goldstar Performance Products,

a New Jersey corporation (“Defendant Goldstar”) on August 23, 2018 and Plaintiff Yoel

Romero (“Plaintiff”) having applied for entry of final judgment by default as to liability

against Defendant Goldstar and for scheduling of a proof hearing as to damages

pursuant to R. 4:43-2(b), by way of motion on notice to Defendant Goldstar; and

Plaintiff having submitted a Certification of Counsel and Non-Military Service; and for

good cause shown;

IT IS ORDERED, on this 7th day of December, 2018, that JUDGMENT by default

as authorized by R. 4:43-2(b) is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant

Goldstar as to liability; and

 MID L 007287-17 12/07/2018 Pg 2 of 2 Trans ID: LCV20182157110

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that upon the Court’s posting of this Order to the

eCourts case jacket, Plaintiff’s counsel is to contact the Middlesex County Civil

Assignment Office to schedule this Matter for proof hearing as to damages; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that counsel for Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this

Order Granting Final Judgment by Default and notifying Defendant Goldstar of the

proof hearing date by Certified RRR and Regular Mail at least 20 days prior to the proof

hearing.

/s/ Hon. Thomas Daniel McCloskey, J.S.C.

(x) Unopposed
( ) Opposed

“Having reviewed the above motion, I find it

to be meritorious on its face and is unopposed.
Pursuant to R. 1:6-2, it therefore will be granted
Essentially for the reasons set forth in the moving
papers.”