You are on page 1of 25

CORPORATION CODE (Batas Pambansa 68)

Course Outline

I. ​DEFINITIONS, THEORIES & CLASSIFICATIONS (Sections 1-9)


1. Definition (Secs. 2; 45)

• Monfort Hermanos Agricultural Dev. Corp. vs. Monfort III (434 SCRA 27
[2004])

a. ​Four Attributes of Corporation (Sec.19)


• PNB vs. Andrada Electric & Engineering Co. (381 SCRA 244 [2002])

2. Theories on Corporate Existence and Powers

a. ​Theory of Concession
• Tayag vs. Benguet Consolidated, Inc. (26 SCRA 242 [1968])

b. ​Theory of Corporate Business Enterprise or Economic Unit


• PSE vs. CA (281 SCRA 232 [1997])

3. Private Corporations Cannot Be Created By Specific Legislative Act

▪ Sec.16, Art.XII, 1987 Constitution


• Feliciano vs. Commission on Audit (419 SCRA 363 [2004])

4. Basic Advantages of Corporate Organizations

a. Strong Separate Juridical Personality

• DBP vs. NLRC (186 SCRA 841 [1990])

❖ Exceptions

b. ​Limited Liability to Investors ​



• Edward A. Keller vs. COB Group Marketing (141 SCRA 86 [1986])

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 1 of 25
​ c. ​Centralized Management (Sec.23)

​ d. ​Free Transferability of Units of Ownership

​5. Main Doctrine on Separate Juridical Personality ​


• Land Bank of the Phils. vs. CA (364 SCRA 375 [2001])

6. Piercing the Veil of Corporate Fiction

a. ​Types of Piercing Application ​


• General Credit Corp. vs. Alsons Dev. & Investment (513 SCRA 225 [2007])

​ b. ​Distinction Between Alter Ego Piercing & Fraud Piercing


• Lipat vs. Pacific Banking Corp. (402 SCRA 339 [2003])

​ c. ​Instances of Application of the Piercing Doctrine


• Sta. Monica Industrial & Dev. Corp. vs. DAR Regional Director for Region
III (555 SCRA 97 [2008])
• Martinez vs. CA (438 SCRA 139 [2004])

d. ​Who Can Invoke Piercing Doctrine


• Secosa vs. Heirs of Erwin Suarez Francisco (433 SCRA 273 [2004])

e. ​Effects of the Application of the Piercing Doctrine

​ f. ​Nature of Piercing Doctrine – General Rule / Qualifications


• Gala vs. Ellice Agro-Industrial Corp. (418 SCRA 431 [2003])
• R & E Transport, Inc. vs. Latag (422 SCRA 698 [2004])
• Enriquez Security Services vs. Cabotaje (496 SCRA 169 [2006])

g. ​Tests Evolved To Determine Applicability of Piercing Doctrine


• ASJ Corp. vs. Evangelista (545 SCRA 300 [2006])

h. ​Fraud Piercing Cases


• Mendoza vs. Banco Real Dev. Bank (470 SCRA 86 [2005])

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 2 of 25
• Lafarge Cement Phils. vs. Continental Cement (443 SCRA 522 [2004])

i. ​Alter-Ego Piercing Cases


• General Credit Corp. vs. Alsons Dev. & Investment Corp. (513 SCRA 225
[2007])
• Sicam vs. Jorge (529 SCRA 443 [2007])
• Jardine Davies, Inc. vs. JRB Realty, Inc. (463 SCRA 555 [2005])

j. ​Parent-Subsidiary Relationships Warranting Piercing ​


• De Leon vs. NLRC (358 SCRA 274 [2001])

k. ​Extent of Legal Effects When Piercing Applied

l. ​Due Process Issues


• PCGG vs. Sandiganbayan (365 SCRA 538 [2001])

7. Nationality of Corporation (Sec.123)

​ ​
a. Exploitation of Natural Resources (Section 2, Article XII, 1987 Constitution)


b. Ownership of Land

• J.G. Summit Holdings, Inc. vs. CA (450 SCRA 169 [2005])

c. ​Public Utilities (Section 11, Article XII, 1987 Constitution)


• People vs. Quasha (93 Phil. 333 [1953])

d. ​War-Time Test

e. ​
Investment Test (Sec.3[a] and [b], Foreign Investment Act of 1991,
R.A. No. 7042)

​ f. ​Anti-Dummy Law

8. Grandfather Rule (DOJ Opinion No. 18, s. 1989) ​

​9. Issues Pertaining to Corporation as “Person” ​

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 3 of 25
​ a. ​Liability for Torts
• PCI Bank vs. CA (350 SCRA 446 [2001])


​ b. ​Liability for Crimes ​
• Ching vs. Secretary of Justice (481 SCRA 602 [2006])

​ c. ​Constitutional Rights ​

​ d. ​Non-Entitlement to Moral Damages


• Meralco vs. T.E.A.M. Electronics Corp. (540 SCRA 62 [2007])

e. ​Practice of Profession
• Acebedo Optical vs. CA (329 SCRA 314 [2000])

10. Classifications of Corporation (Sec. 3) ​


a. Stock Corporation (Sec.3)
b. Non-Stock Corporation
c. Corporation De Jure
d. De Facto Corporation (Rule on De Facto Corporations – Sec.20;
Requisites)

• Sawadjaan vs. CA (459 SCRA 516 [2005])

e. Corporation by Estoppel (Sec.21)

• Lozano vs. De Los Santos (274 SCRA 452 [1997])


• Int’l Express Travel vs. CA (343 SCRA 674 [2000])

f. ​Public Corporation
• Polytechnic University vs. CA (368 SCRA 691 [2001])

g. Private Corporation

• Baluyot vs. Holganza (325 SCRA 248 [2000])

h. Corporation Sole (Sec.110) (Sec.111 [2]) ​

​ i. Domestic Corporation ​

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 4 of 25
​ j. Foreign Corporation (Sec.123) ​

11. ​Corporators (Sec.5) and Incorporators (Sec.10), Stockholders and


Members

​12. ​Shares of Stock (Sec.6)

​a. General Rule on Classification of Shares / Exceptions (Sec.6)

• Castillo vs. Balinghasay (440 SCRA 442 [2004])

b. Common Shares

​c. Preferred Shares

• Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. CA (301 SCRA 152 [1999])

d. Par Value Shares


e. No-Par Value Shares (Sec.62)

f. Redeemable Shares ​ (Sec. 8)


• Republic Planters Bank vs. Agana (269 SCRA 1 [1997])

g. Founders’ Shares (Sec. 7)

• Castillo vs. Balinghasay (440 SCRA 442 [2004])

h. Treasury Stocks (Sec. 9) ​

i. Escrow Shares ​

​13. ​Reclassification vs. Exchange of Shares ​

II. ​ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION: INCORPORATION & ORGANIZATION OF


PRIVATE CORPORATIONS (Sections 10-22)

​1. ​Nature of Articles of Incorporation


• Lanuza vs. CA (454 SCRA 54 [2005])

​2. ​Corporate Name (Secs. 14[1] and 18)

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 5 of 25
a. Guidelines in Use of Corporate Names ​
• Ang Mga Kaanib sa Iglesia ng Dios vs. Iglesia ng Dios Kay Kristo
Hesus (372 SCRA 171 [2001])

b. Change of Corporate Name

c. SEC Still Has Jurisdiction Over Issues Involving Corporate Names ​

​3. ​Purpose Clauses (Sec.14[2]; 42)


• Gala vs. Ellice Agro-Industrial Corp. (418 SCRA 431 [2003])

​4. ​Principal Place of Business


• Hyatt Elevators vs. Goldstar Elevators, Phils. (473 SCRA 705 [2005])

​5. ​Corporate Term (Secs. 11; 19)


• NHA vs. CA (456 SCRA 17 [2005])


​6. ​Incorporators (Sec. 10; 14[5])

​a. When Incorporators Merely Nominee Shareholders

• Nautica Canning Corp. vs. Yumul (473 SCRA 415 [2005])


​7. ​Minimum Capital Stock Required of Stock Corporations (Secs. 12 &
13) ​

​8. ​Incorporating Board of Directors (Secs.14[7]; 14[6])

​a. Concepts of “Capital Stocks” & “Paid-Up Capital Stock”

• Lanuza vs. CA (454 SCRA 54 [2005])

​9. ​Procedure for Amendment of Articles of Incorporation (Secs.81; 16)

​a. When Other Agency Certification Required ​


​b. Grounds When AOI or Amendment May Be Rejected or Disapproved

​ (Sec.17)

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 6 of 25
10. ​
Effects of Non-use of Corporate Charter & Continuous Inoperation of
Corporation (Sec. 22)

​a. Non-User 2 Years ​


​b. Non-User 5 Years ​

III. ​BY-LAWS (Sections 46-48)

​1. ​Nature of By-Laws


• China Banking Corp. vs. CA (270 SCRA 503 [1997])

​2. ​Period of Adoption of By-Laws (Sec.46)


• Sawadjaan vs. CA (459 SCRA 516 [2005])

​3. ​How By-Laws Adopted (Sec. 46)

​4. ​Effectivity of By-Laws (Sec. 46)

​5. ​Contents of By-Laws (Sec. 47)


• Salafranca vs. Philamlife (Pamplona) Village Homeowners Association
(300 SCRA 469 [1998])

​6. ​Binding Effect of By-Laws to Third Parties


• PMI Colleges vs. NLRC (277 SCRA 462 [1997])

​7. ​How By-Laws May Be Repealed or New By-Laws Adopted (Sec. 48)

​a. With stockholders’ or members’ approval ​


​b. By the Board of Directors/Trustees

IV. ​BOARD OF DIRECTORS OR TRUSTEES, CORPORATE OFFICERS


(Sections 23-35)

1. ​“Centralized Management” Doctrine (The Board is the Seat of Corporate


Powers) (Sec.23)

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 7 of 25
• Filipinas Port Services vs. Go (518 SCRA 453 [2007])
• Boyer-Roxas vs. CA (211 SCRA 470 [1992])

a. Board Must Act as a Body ​


• AF Realty & Dev., Inc. vs. Dieselman Freight Services Co. (373 SCRA
385 [2002])

​b. Principle on Delegation of Board Power ​


• San Juan Structural vs. CA (296 SCRA 631 [1998])

​2. ​Business Judgment Rule


• Phil. Associate of Stock Transfer & Registry Agencies, Inc. vs. CA (536
SCRA 61 [2007])

a. Consequences of “Bogus” Board ​


• Islamic Directorate of Phils. vs. CA (272 SCRA 454 [1997])

​b. Remedies in Case of Mismanagement

​c. Qualifications & Disqualifications of Board Members (Sec. 27)

• Lee vs. CA (205 SCRA 752 [1992])

​3. ​Election of Directors or Trustees (Sec. 24) ​

​a. Required Attendance at Meeting for Election

​b. Manner of Election ​

​c. Time to Determine Voting Right

​d. Cumulative Voting

​e. Report of Election of Directors, Trustees and Officers (Sec. 26)

• Premium Marble Resources vs. CA (264 SCRA 11 [1996])

​f. No Permanent Un-elected Seat in the Board of Directors

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 8 of 25
4. ​Removal of Directors or Trustees (Sec. 28)
• Raniel vs. Jochico (517 SCRA 221 [2007]); See SEC Opinion No.21,
s.2003, addressed to Atty. Juan de Ocampo

​a. Vacancy ​

​5. ​Vacancies in Board (Sec. 29)


• Tan vs. Sycip (499 SCRA 216 [2006])

a. Increase in Board Seats ​

​6. ​Meetings of the Board

​a. Types of Board Meetings

​b. Notice

​c. Place of Meetings ​


​d. Quorum of Board (Sec. 25)

​e. Requisites of Board Meetings

​f. Teleconferencing

• Expertravel & Tours vs. CA (459 SCRA 147 [2005])

​7. ​Compensation of Directors (Sec. 30)


• Central Cooperative Exchange vs. Enciso (162 SCRA 706 [1988])

​8. ​Executive Committee (Sec. 35)

​9. ​Corporate Officers (Secs. 25; 92)


a. Coverage of “Corporate Officer” for Purposes of Determining Extent of

Business Judgment of the Board to Hire and Fire ​


• Pamplona Plantation Company vs. Acosta (510 SCRA 249 [2006])

​b. Corporate Officer Privileges

• Kwok vs. Philippine Carpet Mfg. Corp. (457 SCRA 465 [2005])

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 9 of 25
​c. The President

• Secosa vs. Heirs of Erwin Suarez Francisco (433 SCRA 273 [2004])
• Rovels Enterprises vs. Ocampo (392 SCRA 176 [2002])

​d. Vice President

• Ilusorio vs. Ilusorio (540 SCRA 182 [2007])

​e. Corporate Secretary

• Civil Service Commission vs. Javier (546 SCRA 485 [2008])

​f. Corporate Treasurer/Comptroller

• Atrium Management Corp. vs. CA (353 SCRA 23 [2001])

​g. External Auditor

• Bank of P.I. vs. Casa Montessori Internationale (430 SCRA 261


[2004])

​10. ​Duties and Liabilities of Directors, Trustees or Officers

​a. Duty of Obedience (Sec. 26)

​b. Duty of Diligence (Sec. 31)

• Filipinas Post Services, Inc. vs. Go (518 SCRA 453 [2007])


c. Duty of Loyalty (Secs. 31; 34; 46) ​
• Gokongwei vs. SEC (89 SCRA 336 [1979])

​d. Rules on Liability of Directors, Trustees & Officers (Sec. 31)

• Cebu Country Club vs. Elizagague (542 SCRA 65 [2008])


• Malayang Samahan ng Mga Manggagawa sa M. Greenfields vs.
Ramos (326 SCRA 428 [2000])

​e. Liability of Corporation for Acts of Officers ​


• National Power Corp. vs. CA (273 SCRA 419 [1997])

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 10 of 25
​f. JSS Practice in the Banking Industry ​
• Security Bank vs. Cuenca (341 SCRA 781, 804 [2000])

​g. Corporate Officers’ Liability for Labor Claims

• A.C. Ransom Labor Union vs. NLRC (142 SCRA 269 [1986])
• Carag vs. NLRC (520 SCRA 28 [2007]) – contrary ruling to A.C.
Ransom Doctrine

​h. Dealings of Directors, Trustees or Officers with Corporation (Sec.32)


• Yao Ka Sin Trading vs. CA (209 SCRA 763 [1992])

​i. Contracts Between Corporations with Interlocking Directors (Sec. 33)

• DBP vs. CA (363 SCRA 307 [2001])

V. ​POWERS OF CORPORATIONS (Sections 36-45)

​1. ​Underlying Theory on Power of Corporation

​2. ​Express Powers of Corporations (Sec. 36)

a. Power to Sue and be Sued ​


• BPI Leasing Corp. vs. CA (416 SCRA 4 [2003])
• Omictin vs. CA (512 SCRA 70 [2007])

​b. Power to Sell Land ​ ​

​c. Power to Obtain Bank Loans


• China Banking Corp. vs. CA (270 SCRA 503 [1997])

3. ​Ultra Vires Doctrine


• Woodchild Holdings vs. Roxas Electric (436 SCRA 235 [2004])
• Atrium Management Corp. vs. CA (353 SCRA 23 [2001])

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 11 of 25
a. Doctrine of Ratification ​
• Yasuma vs. Heirs of Cecilio S. De Villa (499 SCRA 466 [2006])
• National Power Corp. vs. Alonzo-Legasto (443 SCRA 342 [2004])

​b. Doctrine of Estoppel ​


• Lipat vs. Pacific Banking Corp. (402 SCRA 339 [2003])
• People’s Aircargo vs. CA (297 SCRA 170 [1998])

​c. Doctrine of Apparent Authority

• Lapulapu Foundation vs. CA (421 SCRA 328 [2004])


• Francisco vs. GSIS (7 SCRA 577 [1963])

​d. How Corporation Bound or not Bound by its President ​


• Kwok vs. Phil. Carpet Mfg. Corp. (457 SCRA 465 [2005])
• Nyco Sales Corp. vs. BA Finance Corp. (200 SCRA 637 [1991])

​e. Bank Bound by its Manager and Officer ​


• BPI Family Savings Bank vs. First Metro Investment Corp. (429
SCRA 30 [2004])

​f. Doctrine of Laches or “Stale Demands”

• Rovels Enterprises, Inc. vs. Ocampo (391 SCRA 176 [2002])

​4. ​Power to Extend or Shorten Corporate Term (Sec. 37)


• Alhambra Cigar vs. SEC (24 SCRA 269 [1968])

​5. ​
Power to Increase or Decrease Capital Stock; Incur, Create or Increase
Bonded Indebtedness (Sec. 38)

​6. ​Disposition of All or Substantially All Corporate Assets (Sec. 40)


a. Requirements
b. Effect of Non-Compliance

• Caltex (Phils.), Inc. vs. PNOC Shipping and Transport Corp. (498
SCRA 400 [2006])

​7. ​Power to Acquire Own Shares (Sec. 41)

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 12 of 25
​a. Instances When Corporation May Buy Its Own Stocks

​b. Trust Fund Doctrine

• Ong Yong vs. Tiu (401 SCRA 1 [2003])

8. ​Power to Invest Funds in Another Corporation or Business For Non-Primary


Purpose (Sec. 42)

9. ​Power to Enter into Management Contract (Sec. 44)

VI. ​RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS AND MEMBERS (Sections 49-59, et.al.)


• Asia’s Emerging Dragon Corp. vs. DOTC (549 SCRA 44 [2007])

​1. ​Right to Attend Stockholders’ Meetings (Sec. 50)


• Price and Sulu Dev. Co. vs. Martin (58 Phil. 707 [1933])

a. Types of Meetings (Sec. 49)

​b. Place and Time of Meetings (Sec. 51)

​c. Who May Call Meetings (Sec. 50)

​d. Quorum in Meetings (Sec. 52)

• Tan vs. Sycip (499 SCRA 216 [2006])

​2. ​Right to Vote


a. Nature of the Right to Vote

• Cojuangco Jr. vs. Roxas (195 SCRA 797 [1991])


​b. Limitations That May Be Placed on Right to Vote (Sec. 6)


​c. Right to Vote of Pledgors, Mortgagors and Administrators (Sec.

55) ​
​ ​
• Gochan vs. Young (354 SCRA 207 [2001])

d. Voting in Case of Joint Ownership of Stock (Sec. 56)

e. Voting Right for Treasury Shares (Sec. 57)

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 13 of 25

f. Proxies (Secs. 58; 59)

• Lee vs. CA (205 SCRA 752 [1992])

g. Voting Trusts (Sec. 59) ​


• Everett vs. Asia Banking Corp. (49 Phil. 512 [1927])

3. ​Pre-Emptive Right (Sec. 39)


a. Stock Transactions Covered by Right
b. Pre-emptive Right Not Available

​4. ​Right of First Refusal


• J.G. Summit Holdings vs. CA (450 SCRA 169 [2005])
• Fleischer vs. Botica Nolasco (47 Phil. 583 [1925])

​5. ​Right to Receive Dividends (Sec. 43)

​a. Form of Dividends: Cash, Property or Stock

• Cyanamid Phils. vs. CA (322 SCRA 639 [2000])


• Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Lincoln Phil. Life Insurance Co.
(379 SCRA 423 [2002])

​6. ​Right to Inspect and Copy Corporate Records (Sec. 74)


a. Books Required to be Kept

• NATU vs. Secretary of Labor (109 SCRA 139 [1981])

​b. Rights of Inspection, Examination & Copying

• Veraguth vs. Isabela Sugar Co. (57 Phil. 266 [1932])


• Gokongwei vs. SEC (89 SCRA 336 [1979])

​c. Liability for Refusal to Allow Inspection (Sec. 144)

• Gonzales vs. PNB (122 SCRA 489 [1983])

​d. Right to Financial Statements (Sec. 75)

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 14 of 25
​7. ​Right to File Derivative Suits

​a. Nature and Definition

• R.N. Symaco Trading Corp. vs. Santos (467 SCRA 312 [2005])
• Chua vs. CA (443 SCRA 259 [2004])

​b. Requisites for Filing of Derivative Suit

• Hornilla vs. Salunat (405 SCRA 220 [2003])


• Gochan vs. Young (354 SCRA 207 [2001])
• Lim vs. Lim-Yu (352 SCRA 216 [2001])
• Evangelista vs. Santos (86 Phil. 387 [1950])


c. Corporation’s Retained Counsel Disqualified to Defend the Director ​

​d. Provisions of the Interim Rules on Intra-Corporate Controversies ​

8. ​Appraisal Right

​a. When Right of Appraisal May Be Exercised (Secs.11; 16; 40; 42; 77)

​b. How Right Exercised

​c. Summary of Instances When Right of Appraisal is Lost

​d. Who Shoulders Cost of Appraisal

​9. ​
Right to Receive Proportionately the Net Assets of the Corporation After
Dissolution

​a. Stockholders and Stock Corporations

• President of PDIC vs. Reyes (460 SCRA 473 [2005])


• Ong Yong vs. Tiu (401 SCRA 1 [2003])

​b. Members and Foundations (Secs. 94; 95)


VII. ​SHARES OF STOCK, STOCK CERTIFICATES & SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENTS
(Sections 60-73)

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 15 of 25
​1. Principles on Shares under Code (Sec.12)

• President of PDIC vs. Reyes (460 SCRA 473 [2005])


• Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. CA (301 SCRA 152 [1999])

​2. Subscription Agreement

a. Not Governed by Ordinary Sales Contract Doctrine (Sec. 60)

b. Contractual Nature of a Subscription Agreement

​3. Pre-Incorporation Subscription (Sec. 61)

​4. Consideration for Stocks (Sec. 62)

​5. Issued Price or Par Value (Sec. 62) ​

​a. Shares are Personal Property (Sec. 63)

​6. Certificate of Stock (Sec. 63)

• Bitong vs. CA (292 SCRA 503 [1998])

a. Rule on Issuance of Certificate of Stock (Sec. 64)

• Pacific Basin Securities Co. vs. Oriental Petroleum & Minerals Corp. (531
SCRA 667 [2007])
• Tan vs. SEC (206 SCRA 740 [1992])

​ b. Certificates Only Evidence of the Shares Covered

• Republic vs. Estate of Hans Menzi (475 SCRA 20 [2005])


• Ponce vs. Alsons Cement Corp. (393 SCRA 602 [2002])

​ c. ​Quasi-Negotiable Character of Stock Certificate


• Rural Bank of Lipa City vs. CA (366 SCRA 188 [2001])

​ d. ​Manner of Dealing with Transfer or Assignment of Stock Certificates

​ e. ​Limits of Value of Certificate of Stock on Determining Stockholders

​ f. ​Assignment of Stock Certificate By Way of Security (Equitable


Mortgage)

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 16 of 25
• Asset Privatization Trust vs. Sandiganbayan (341 SCRA 551, 560 [2000])

​7. Transfer of Shares (Sec. 63)

• Batangas Laguna Tayabas Bus Co. vs. Bitanga (362 SCRA 635 [2001])
• Bitong vs. CA (292 SCRA 304 [1998])
• Chua Guan vs. Samahang Magsasaka (62 Phil. 472 [1935])

a. Non-Exclusivity of Sec. 63 on Modes of Registration

• Rural Bank of Lipa City vs. CA (supra.)


• Torres vs. CA (278 SCRA 793 [1997])

​8. Stock and Transfer Book (Sec. 74)

• Provident International Resources Corp. vs. Venus (554 SCRA 540 [2008])
• Lanuza vs. CA (454 SCRA 54 [2005])

9. Shares Held in Trust

• Neugene Marketing vs. CA (303 SCRA 295 [1999])

​10. Liability of Directors for Watered Stocks (Sec. 65)

​11. Liability for Unpaid Subscription (Secs. 66; 67)

​12. Share Delinquency (Sec. 71)

​ a. Delinquency Sale (Secs. 67-70; 73)

​13. Lost or Destroyed Certificates (Sec. 73)

VIII. ​ACQUISITIONS & TRANSFERS, MERGERS & CONSOLIDATIONS


(Sections 76-80)

​1. Acquisitions and Transfers

​ a. General Rule on Obligation of Transferee of Assets for Debts &


Obligations of Transferor

• Edward J. Nell Co. vs. Pacific (15 SCRA 415 [1965])

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 17 of 25
​ b. ​“Assets-Only” Transfers
• Sundowner Devt. Corp. vs. Drilon (180 SCRA 14 [1989])

​ c. Business Enterprise Transfers (Sec. 40)

• Caltex (Phils.), Inc. vs. PNOC Shipping & Transport Corp. (498 SCRA
400 [2006])
• Garcia vs. SSS Legal & Collection (540 SCRA 459 [2007])
• Barayoga vs. Asset Privatization Trust (473 SCRA 690 [2005])

​ d. Equity Transfers


• Phil. Veterans Investment Dev. Corp. vs. CA (181 SCRA 669 [1990])
• Manlimos vs. NLRC (242 SCRA 145 [1995])

2. Mergers and Consolidations ​

​ a. How Done (Secs. 76-79)

• Poliand Industrial Ltd. vs. NDC (467 SCRA 500 [2005])

​ b. Effects of Merger / Consolidation (Sec. 80)

• PNB vs. Andrada Electric & Engineering Co. (381 SCRA 244 [2002])
• Babst vs. CA (350 SCRA 341 [2001])

3. Spin-Offs

• SMC Employees Union-PTGWO vs. Confessor (262 SCRA 81 [1996])

IX. ​NON-STOCK CORPORATIONS (Secs. 87-95)

​1. Definition (Sec. 87)

• Manila Sanitarium vs. Gabuco (7 SCRA 14 [1963])


• Collector of Internal Revenue vs. Club Filipino (5 SCRA 321 [1962])

​2. Eleemosynary Purposes (Sec. 88)

​ a. Eleemosinary Purpose and Non-Distribution of Profits

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 18 of 25
• People vs. Menilu (G.R. Nos. 115054-66, Sep.12, 1999)

​ b. Non-Applicability of the Nationalization Laws

​3. Right to Vote (Sec. 89)

• Republic vs. COCOFED (372 SCRA 462 [2001])

​4. Non-transferability of Membership (Sec. 90)

​5. Termination of Membership (Sec. 91)

• Tan vs. Sycip (499 SCRA 216 [2006])

​6. Election and Term of Trustees (Sec. 92)

​7. Place of Meetings (Sec. 93)

​8. Rules of Distribution of Assets in Case of Dissolution (Sec. 94)

​9. Procedure for Plan of Distribution (Sec. 95)

​10. Conversion of Non-Stock to Stock Corporation

​11. Foundations

X. ​CLOSE CORPORATIONS (Sections 96-105)

​1. Concept of Close Corporation

• Gala vs. Ellice Agro-Industrial Corp. (418 SCRA 431 [2003])


​2. Requirements for Close Corporation (Sec. 96)

• Manuel R. Dulay Ent. vs. CA (225 SCRA 678 [1993])


• San Juan Structural vs. CA (296 SCRA 631 [1998])

​3. Restrictions on Transfers (Secs. 98; 99) ​

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 19 of 25
​4. Pre-emptive Right in Close Corporations (Sec. 102)

​5. Management by Stockholders

• Torres vs. CA (278 SCRA 793 [1997])

​6. Agreements by Stockholders (Sec. 100)

​7. When Board Meeting is Unnecessary (Sec. 101)

​8. Corporate Tort for Close Corporations

• Sergio F. Naguiat vs. NLRC (269 SCRA 564 [1997])

​9. Deadlocks (Secs. 104; 105)

​10. Amendment of Articles of Incorporation (Sec. 103)

XI. ​SPECIAL CORPORATIONS (Sections 106-116)

​1. Educational Corporations (Secs. 106-108)

​2. Religious Corporations (Secs. 109-116)

​ a. Classes of Religious Corporations (Sec. 109) ​


• Long vs. Basa (366 SCRA 113 [2001])

​3. Corporation Sole (Sec. 110)

​ a. Articles of Incorporation (Sec. 111)

​ b. Acquisition and Alienation of Property (Sec. 113)

​ c. Filling of Vacancies (Sec. 114)

​ d. Dissolution (Sec. 115) ​

​4. Religious Societies (Sec. 116)

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 20 of 25
​5. Condominium Corporations

​ a. Condominium Corps. Not Per Se Engaged in For-Profit-Activities ​


• Yamane vs. BA Lepanto Condominium Corp. (474 SCRA 258 [2005])

​ b. Master Deed of Restrictions ​


• Twin Towers Condominium Corp. vs. CA (398 SCRA 203 [2003])

​ c. Association Dues

​ d. Validity of House Rules

​ e. Agency With Proper Jurisdiction Over Condominium Matters

XII. ​CORPORATE DISSOLUTION, LIQUIDATION AND REINCORPORATION


(Sections 117-122)

​1. Corporate Dissolution ​

​ a. Nature of Dissolution

• Republic vs. Tancinco (394 SCRA 386 [2002])

​ b. Methods of Corporate Dissolution (Sec. 117)

​(1) Voluntary dissolution (Secs. 118 & 119)

​(2) Involuntary dissolution (Sec. 121)

​(3) Expiration of corporate term (Sec. 122)


​(4) Shortening of corporate term (Sec. 120)

​(5) Failure to organize and commence business within 2 years from date

​ of issuance of certificate of incorporation; or

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 21 of 25
​(6) Legislative dissolution

• PNB vs. CFI of Rizal, Pasig, Br. XXI (209 SCRA 294 [1992])

​ c. Voluntary Dissolution

(1) Without Debts (Sec. 11) – Administrative Proceedings

​(2) With Debts (Sec. 119) – Quasi-Judicial Proceedings

​(3) Shorten Corporate Term (Sec. 120)

​ d. Final Returns for Dissolving Corporations

• BPI vs. CA (363 SCRA 840 [2001])

​ e. Involuntary Dissolution (Sec. 121)

​2. Corporate Liquidation (Sec. 122)

​ a. Nature of Corporate Liquidation ​


• PVBank Employees Union-N.U.B.E. vs. Vega (360 SCRA 33 [2001])

​ b. Methods of Corporate Liquidation

​ c. Liquidation Effected by the Board of Directors & Officers of the Dissolved


Corporation

• De Guzman vs. NLRC (211 SCRA 723 [1992])


• China Banking Corp. vs. M. Michelin & Cie (58 Phil. 261 [1933])

​ d. ​
Liquidation Effected by Transferring the Corporate Assets to a
Trustee or
Receiver (Sec. 122)

• Pepsi-Cola Products Phils., Inc. vs. CA (443 SCRA 571 [2004])


• Knecht vs. United Cigarette Corp. (384 SCRA 48 [2002])

​ e. ​Escheat to the Government (Sec. 122)

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 22 of 25
​3. Reincorporation ​
• Chung Ka Bio vs. IAC (163 SCRA 534 [1988])

XIII. ​FOREIGN CORPORATIONS (Sections 123-136)

​1. Definition (Sec. 123)

• Avon Insurance PLC vs. CA (278 SCRA 312 [1997])


• European Resources and Technologies, Inc. vs. Ingenieuburo Birkhanh+Nolte
(435 SCRA 246 [2004])

​2. Necessity To Obtain License To Do Business (Sec. 123)

• Agilent Technologies Singapore (PTE) Ltd. vs. Integrated Silicon Technology


Phil. Corp. (427 SCRA 593 [2004])

​3. Suability of Foreign Corporations (Sec. 133)

• B. Van Zuiden Bros., Ltds vs. GTVL Manufacturing Industries (523 SCRA 233
[2007])
• Rimbunan Hijau Group of Companies vs. Oriental Wood Processing Corp.
(470 SCRA 650 [2005])

4. Definition of “Doing Business” (Sec. 3[d] of Foreign Investment Act of 1991,


R.A. No. 7042)


• Mentholatum vs. Mangaliman (72 Phil. 524 [1941])
• Mavest (USA), Inc. vs. Sampaguita Garment Corp. (470 SCRA 440 [2005])

(1) Service Contracts May Not Be “Doing Business”

​ (2) ​
Execution of Assignment Contracts Per Se Does Not Determine Doing
Business


• Far East International vs. Kogyo (6 SCRA 725 [1962])

(3) Reinsurance Does Not Per Se Constitute Doing Business

​5. Issuance of License ​ (Sec. 126)

​6. Grounds for Revocation of License (Sec. 134)

​7. Consequences of Not Obtaining License (Secs. 133-134)

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 23 of 25
​ a. ​
Why Foreign Corporations Not Doing Business Not Required to Obtain
License

​ b. ​Status of Contracts Entered Into Without Requisite License To Do


Business

• Home Insurance Co. vs. Eastern Shipping Lines (123 SCRA 424 [1983])
• Top-Weld Manufacturing vs. ECED, S.A. (138 SCRA 118 [1985])

​ c. ​Doctrine of Estoppel
• Merrill Lynch Futures, Inc. vs. CA (211 SCRA 824 [1992])
• Communication Materials and Design, Inc. vs. CA (260 SCRA 673
[1996])

​ d. ​
Legal Standing of Foreign Corporations to Sue on Corporate Names,
Tradenames and Trademarks

• General Garments vs. Director of Patents (41 SCRA 50 [1971])


• Converse Rubber vs. Universal Rubber Products (147 SCRA 154 [1987])

​ e. ​Allegation in Pleadings Filed By Foreign Corporations


• New York Marine Managers vs. CA (249 SCRA 416 [1995])
• French Oil Mills Machinery vs. CA (295 SCRA 462 [1998])

​ f. ​“Isolated Transactions”
• Lorenzo Shipping vs. Chubb and Sons, Inc. (431 SCRA 266 [2004])

​8. Suits Against Foreign Corporations Not Doing Business ​


• Hahn vs. CA (266 SCRA 537 [1997])
• Signetics Corp. vs. CA (225 SCRA 737 [1993])

​9. Domicile and Residence of Foreign Corporations

• Northwest Orient Airlines vs. CA (241 SCRA 192 [1995])


• FBA Aircraft vs. Zosa (110 SCRA 1 [1981])

​10. Resident Agent (Secs. 127 & 128) ​


• Expertravel & Tours, Inc. vs. CA (459 SCRA 147 [2005])

​11. Laws Applicable to Foreign Corporations (Sec. 129)

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 24 of 25
• Grey vs. Insular Lumber Co. (67 Phil. 139 [1938])

​12. Amendment of Articles of Incorporation (Sec. 130)

​13. Merger and Consolidation (Sec. 132)

​14. Revocation of License To Do Business (Secs. 134 and 135)

​15. Withdrawal (Sec. 136)

-nothing follows-
16

https://cdn.fbsbx.com/v/t59.2708-21/23173715_102104398288…?oh=abcfc6511208ff6c131b8e42df7207b3&oe=5A0BEA77&dl=1 13/11/2017, 7I49 PM


Page 25 of 25

You might also like