You are on page 1of 1

The court thus held the pollution exclusions did not apply to the carbon ...

In this case, the


policyholder removed debris of “the damaged floor tile, not ... 2004) (holding, under Ohio law, that
PCBs, which were placed in drum of waste materials ...

The insurer argued the asbestos abatement costs were excluded by the pollution exclusion. The
court rejected the insurer’s argument.

The court noted the clause excluded coverage for the clean-up of debris of a pollutant. In this case,
the Insured removed debris of “the damaged floor tile, not the debris of a pollutant”. Thus the
pollution exclusion did not apply.

You might also like