You are on page 1of 3

Determining the real party in interest Plaintiff in environmental cases

ANY REAL PARTY IN INTEREST, GOVERNMENT,


1. Violations of a contract – parties: Acc. To JURIDICAL PERSON AND ENTITIES AUTHORIZED
doctrine of relativity under contracts ( BY LAW MAY FILE
can only bind the parties who entered
into it, and cannot favor third persons GROUND FOR DISMISSAL – FAILURE TO STATE
EXCPTN- in a contract stipulation – POUR CAUSE OF ACTION
AUTRUI (a stipulating benefiting a third
person, he may demand) IF NOT A REAL PARTY IN INTEREST – STATES NO
2. XX A mere agent, who is not an assignee CAUSE OF ACTION
to of a principal.
** When an agent acts in his own name for REPRESENTATIVE PARTIES
the benefit of an undisclosed principal, the
agent may sue or be sued in his own name, PROVIDED, BENEFICIARY IS INCLUDED IN THE
WITHOUT joining the principal EXCPTN- TITLE OF THE CASE AND SHALL ALSO BE DEEMED
when the thing involved belongs to the AS A REAL PARTY IN INTEREST
principal.
CITIZEN SUIT
3. LAWFUL POSSESOR(FORCIBLE ENTRY) – 1) ANY FILIPINO CITIZEN
YES, A PARTY but DAMAGE TO PRO ( 2) IN REPRESENTATION OF OTHERS,
REAL OWNER) INCLUDING MINORS OR GENERTIONS YET
4. Action for EJECTMENT- Any of the co- UNBORN TO ENFORCE RIGHTS OR
owners may bring the action OBLIGATIONS UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL
5. PARTNERSHIP – Sued in its name LAWS.
Rationale: personality separate and Shall contain a:
distinct from each of the partners. a) brief description of the cause of action
6. CRIMINAL CASES – People of the b) brief description of the reliefs prayed for
Philippines, Private offended – CIVIL c) order requiring all interested parties to
ASPECT ONLY manifest their interest to intervene within 15
7. CONDOMINIUM OWNERS- Real party days from notice (may publish in a general
circulation in the newspaper)
DOCTRINE OF LOCUS STANDI
Standing of marine mammals
-A personal and substantial interest in a case
that the party will sustain a direct injury because FACTS:
of the challenged government act. Resident Marine Mammals joined by Ramos and
Eisma-Osorio (as Their guardians to be collectively
known as “The Stewards” – they seek protection of
Example: QUO WARRANTO – Petitioner must the mammals)
show a clear right to the contested office. Not a
mere preferential right. ISSUE: W/O not Resident Marine Mammals have
locus standi or real parties in interest.
a)Tax payers – claim of illegal disbursement of
public funds HELD: POUR AUTRUI (a stipulating benefiting a third
b)Voters- Obvious interest in the validity of the person, he may demand)
law in question Any Filipino citizen can bring a suit to enforce
c) Concerned Citizens- Issues must show environmental laws through a citizen suits
transcendental importance and settled early
d) Legislators – infringes on their prerogatives
as legislators
INDESPENSABLE PARTIES NECESSARY PARTY

- a real party in interest without whom -one who is not indispensable but who ought to be
no final determination can be had of an joined as a party to the case if complete relief is to be
action Sec. 7, Rule 3 accorded as to those already parties, or for a
- one whose interest in the subject matter complete determination or settlement of the claim
of the suit and relief are so inextricably subject of the action. (sec. 8)
intertwined with the other parties that
his legal presence as a party to the If a necessary party is NOT joined, final
proceeding is an absolute necessity. determination is still possible. But he is joined so
those already parties may obtain a complete relief
Examples:
1) Breach of contract – the contracting DISTINCTIONS
parties are the indispensable parties
2) Action for partition of property – co IP- Must be joined
heirs and persons having an interest in NP-Whenever possible only
the prop
IP- Cannot proceed without him, MANDATORY.
COMPOLSARY JOINDER OF INDESPENSABLE NP-NOT MANDATORY AS HIS INTEREST IS
PARTIES SEPERABLE

-MANDATORY and courts cannot proceed CC 1 M CC can go for AA first


without their presence. AA 500
- If there is failure to implead, the judgement will BB 500
have no effectiveness
-The absence renders all subsequent actuations DUTY OF PLEADER
of the court, NULL AND VOID. Also null and void Pleader shall set forth, the name if known and state
for want of jurisdiction why he is omitted.
- Remand to trial court for inclusion
WHEN COURT MAY ORDER joinder of necessary
**FAILURE NOT A GROUND FOR DISMISSAL party
BUT may file a motion to dismiss for “complaint
states no cause of action” If the reason given for the non-joinder of the
necessary party is found by the court ot be
Any stage upon motion of any other party, or on unmeritous, it may order the pleader to join the
its own initiative. (Sec.11) omitted party if jurisdiction over his person may be
obtained. SEC 9
DISMISSED IF IT IS UNHEADED ONLY (Sec.17)
EFFECT OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT
MISJOINDER AND NON-JOINDER OF PARITES
**netiher are grounds for dismissal (just drop or Waiver of the claim against such party SEC 9
add by order of the court. ONLY UPON
PLAINTIFFS REFUSAL TO COMPLY( Sec.11) EFFECT OF JUSTIFIED NON-INCLUSION

MISJOINED- A party is impleaded and he should Doesn’t prevent the court prom proceeding in the
not have been. action and the judgment shall be without prejudice
to the rights of such necessary party
NONJOINDER- He is not joined but he is
supposed to be.

You might also like