Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Massinissa
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
All praise be to Allah, the lord of the universe, the Most Merciful, the Most
Beneficent.
We would start with our supervisor, dear teacher Dr. Kheldoun for his help, guidance and
passion through all the steps of our work.
We extend our gratitude to all teachers for their helps and contribution to this work.
We are infinitely grateful to our families, particularly our parents for their patience,
unwavering support, continuous encouragement, and belief in us throughout our whole life.
We would have never made it this far without them beside us, every step of the way.
We would like also to express our greatest thankfulness to our friends who have been there to
support and encourage us.
II |
Page
ABSTRACT
This project presents a tuning approach based on a metaheuristic methods to obtain the
optimal Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller parameters. This PID is used within
a closed loop consisting of an amplifier, exciter, generator and the voltage sensor. The whole
system including the PID is known as the Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR). The objective
of this optimization design is to achieve high performance voltage control of the generator. This
objective must be well coded using a cost function to be optimized by the global search
algorithm. The performance of the PID controlled system is examined by considering the
characteristics of the step response. MATLAB software will be used to carry out the
simulation.
III |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
DEDICATION
I
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS II
ABSTRACT
III
TABLE OF CONTENTS IV
LIST OF FIGURES VII
IV | P a g e
II.3.1. PERSONAL AND GLOBAL BEST .................................................................................... 14
II.3.2. PARTICLE’S VELOCITY ............................................................................................... 14
II.3.3. ACCELERATION FACTORS ........................................................................................... 17
V|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
VI | P a g e
IV.5. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................... 46
GENERAL CONCLUSION ............................................................................................. 47
BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................... IX
VII | P a g e
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
VIII | P a g e
FIGURE 4.3: CONVERGENCE PROFILES OF THE CONDUCTED SIMULATIONS .......................... 43
FIGURE 4.4: OPTIMAL STEP RESPONSE ................................................................................ 44
FIGURE 4.5: ROBUSTNESS TO GENERATOR GAIN VARIATIONS .............................................. 45
FIGURE 4.6: ROBUSTNESS TO GENERATOR TIME CONSTANT VARIATION .............................. 46
IX | P a g e
LIST OF TABLES
X|Page
General Introduction
& Motivation