The document outlines the individual performance commitment of a school head from November 2017 to March 2018. It includes key result areas, performance indicators, major immediate outputs, and time frames. The school head is responsible for instructional leadership, increasing test scores, monitoring programs, ensuring school safety, and engaging parents and teachers. The commitment includes specific targets such as inspecting 100% of lesson plans, conducting meetings and home visits, developing intervention programs, and validating student records.
The document outlines the individual performance commitment of a school head from November 2017 to March 2018. It includes key result areas, performance indicators, major immediate outputs, and time frames. The school head is responsible for instructional leadership, increasing test scores, monitoring programs, ensuring school safety, and engaging parents and teachers. The commitment includes specific targets such as inspecting 100% of lesson plans, conducting meetings and home visits, developing intervention programs, and validating student records.
The document outlines the individual performance commitment of a school head from November 2017 to March 2018. It includes key result areas, performance indicators, major immediate outputs, and time frames. The school head is responsible for instructional leadership, increasing test scores, monitoring programs, ensuring school safety, and engaging parents and teachers. The commitment includes specific targets such as inspecting 100% of lesson plans, conducting meetings and home visits, developing intervention programs, and validating student records.
KRAs Performance Indicators Major Immediate Outputs Time Frame
Instructional 100% of required number of 100% of the required Weekly from Leadership Lesson Plans/ DLLs of each number of DLP/DLL of November 2017 – (20%) teacher inspected and each teacher inspected March 2018 evaluated with at most two and evaluated (2) lapses JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1. Amad, Ana Marie = 213 2. Ampan, Michelle = 182 3. Baguhin, Odeza = 195 4. Bucanegra, Margie = 213 5. Bucar, Jee-Ar = 213 6. Cavan, Jean Reina = 213 7. Cahintong, Hazel = 213 8. Caspiz, Ritchell = 186 9. Cañete, Sheryl = 213 10. Estremos, Ronald Vincent = 142 11. Guillena, Heragene = 142 12. Hefervez, Lyra = 142 13. Heruela, Cherry = 142 14. Juanico, Niebell = 142 15. Limosnero, Jeny = 195 16. Lecera, Leonelyn = 142 17. Mahusay, Laiza = 142 18. Malunes, Benjie = 142 19. Mantilla, Michael = 213 20. Salutan, Shelly = 213 21. Tampipi, Reynante = 213 22. Toledo, Junalyn = 182 23. Tamba, Lyle = 182 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1. Aungon, Aries Roy = 213 2. Belonio, Centhiame = 213 3. Tamala, Agustina = 213 4. Lumacang, Khinet = 213
100% of the regular meetings 5 Faculty regular meetings November 2017 –
conducted within the (1/month) March 2018 semester
100% of the needs based 3/ 25 teachers provided
clinical supervision clinical supervision November 2017 – conducted/provided within March 2018 the semester with two lapses 2% increase in NAT results MPS attained SY 2014-2015 = 43.18 November 2017 – March 2018 MPS SY 2017-2018 = 44.04
100% of the implementation 1. Aungon, Aries Roy = 1
of IM’s monitored within the 2. Ampan, Michelle = 1 November 2017 – semester with two lapses 3. Belonio, Centhiame = 1 March 2018 4. Guillena, Heragene = 1 5. Heruela, Cherry = 1 6. Malunes, Benjie = 1 7. Tamala, Agustina = 1 8. Tampipi, Reynante = 1 9. Toledo, Junalyn = 1 Total = 9 100% of the implementation of teaching strategies 20 Teaching Strategies November 2017 – monitored within the March 2018 semester with two lapses. 1 intervention program / innovation per learning area 24 Intervention Program November 2017 – across grade levels developed developed and implemented March 2018 and implemented within the for JHS semester with two lapses 3 Intervention Program developed and implemented for SHS 100% of the school facilities 100 % of the school facilities November 2017 – are hazard free with two are hazard free March 2018 lapses 1 intervention program / innovation per learning area 32 Intervention Program November 2017 – across grade levels formulated and implemented March 2018 formulated/ implemented for JHS within the semester w/out 8 Intervention Program lapses formulated and implemented for SHS
100% of the needed home
visitations conducted are 30 SARDO’s conducted home November 2017 – supervised within the visitations are supervised March 2018 semester with two lapses 10% increase in sponsorship SY: 2016-2017 = 50 November 2017 – in the Adopt a Child Program SY: 2017-2018 = 55 March 2018 in June 2017 without shortfall 100% parent-teacher 2 Parent- Teacher conferences conducted by the Conferences within the November 2017 – teachers within the semester semester March 2018 monitored without lapses 100% culminating 2 Culminating Performances performances conducted by conducted by teachers November 2017 – teachers within the semester monitored March 2018 monitored without lapses 100% of ADM 100 % of ADM November 2017 – implementation monitored implementation monitored March 2018 within the prescribed period with two lapses 100% of students records November 2017 – checked and validated within 873 students records checked March 2018 the semester without lapses and validated 100 % of teaching personnel 27 teaching personnel November 2017 – supervised and directed supervised and directed March 2018 within the semester without within the semester lapses 100% of the SIP/AIP November 2017 – updated / prepared within the 1 updated SIP/AIP March 2018 planning period with at least 2 revisions
Prepared by:
BERNADETH M. CUSTODIO, EdD Date: November 27, 2017