RUBRICS FOR TECHNICAL DESIGN/PROJECT

Group Members/Title of Project: Caῆete, Cenarillos, Deguinion, Dolotina - REFRIGERATED TRUCK

Level of Achievement
WEIGH
Elements Excellent Good Adequate Inadequate SCORE
T
4 Points 3 Points 2 Points 1 Point
Clear and complete Overall sound Some understanding Little or no grasp of
understanding of understanding of the of the problem. Incapable of
Design Problem and design goal and problems and problem. Major producing a successful
10%
Boundaries constraints. constraints. Does not deficiencies that will solution.
significantly impair impair the quality of
solution. solution.
Final design achieved Alternative approaches Serious deficiencies in Only one design presented or
after review of identified to some exploring and clearly unfeasible alternative
Alternative Design 10%
reasonable alternatives. degree. identifying alternative given.
design.
Computer-aided tools Computer-aided tools Minimal application Serious deficiencies in
Use of Computer Aided are used effectively to used with moderate and use of understanding the correct
20%
Tools develop and analyze effectiveness to appropriate tools. selection and / or use of
designs. develop designs. tools.
Critical selection and Effective application of Serious deficiencies No or erroneous application
application of engineering principles in proper selection of engineering principles
Application of
20% engineering principles resulting in reasonable and use of yielding unreasonable
Engineering Principles
ensuring reasonable solution. engineering solution.
results. principles.
Design meets or Design meets Barely capable of Not capable of achieving
exceeds desired desired objectives. achieving desired desired objectives. No
objectives. Effective Moderately effective objectives. Minimal implementation of resource
Final Design 30% implementation of utilization of resources utilization of conservation and recycle
resource conservation conservation and resources strategies.
and recycle strategies. recycle potentials. conservation and
recycle potentials.

Process Economics
Interpretation of Results
Printed Name and Signature:
Remarks:
Effective use of Reasonable Reasonable cost No or totally erroneous cost
profitability analysis profitability analysis estimates presented, estimates presented.
5% leading to presented, but no but no profitability
improvement interpretation of the analysis included.
recommendations. results.
Insightful supported Sound conclusions Serious deficiencies in No or erroneous conclusion
5% conclusions and reached based on support for stated based on achieved results.
recommendations. achieved results. conclusions.
TOTAL