The petitioner, a union, filed a petition for certification election to represent messengers, janitors, and other workers at Republic Planters Bank as the sole bargaining agent. However, the bank argued these workers were contractual and not regular employees. The Med-Arbiter dismissed the petition, finding another union already represented the appropriate bargaining unit. On appeal, the court upheld the dismissal, citing precedent that if the union members are not actually employees, they have no right to organize for bargaining or certification. Since the workers were contractual, they were not entitled to constitutional rights for collective bargaining.
Original Description:
Republic Planters v. Laguesma case digest.
Original Title
26. Republic Planters Bank v. Laguesma, Nov. 21, 1996
The petitioner, a union, filed a petition for certification election to represent messengers, janitors, and other workers at Republic Planters Bank as the sole bargaining agent. However, the bank argued these workers were contractual and not regular employees. The Med-Arbiter dismissed the petition, finding another union already represented the appropriate bargaining unit. On appeal, the court upheld the dismissal, citing precedent that if the union members are not actually employees, they have no right to organize for bargaining or certification. Since the workers were contractual, they were not entitled to constitutional rights for collective bargaining.
The petitioner, a union, filed a petition for certification election to represent messengers, janitors, and other workers at Republic Planters Bank as the sole bargaining agent. However, the bank argued these workers were contractual and not regular employees. The Med-Arbiter dismissed the petition, finding another union already represented the appropriate bargaining unit. On appeal, the court upheld the dismissal, citing precedent that if the union members are not actually employees, they have no right to organize for bargaining or certification. Since the workers were contractual, they were not entitled to constitutional rights for collective bargaining.
Case Name: Republic Planters Bank v. Laguesma, Nov.
21, 1996 documents submitted by petitioner, including those
G.R. Number: 119675 appended to its present motion, which purportedly are the Topic: Author: Lauredo, Caleb L. job descriptions of the subject workers, may not be given Doctrine: If the union members are not employees, no right to weight for being self-serving. organize for purposes of bargaining, nor to be certified as Issue: - WON the messengers and other members of the bargaining agent can be recognized. petitioner should be part of the certification election. Facts: Held/Ratio: - Petitioner Republic Planters Bank General Services - In Singer Sewing Machine Company vs. Drilon, et al., it was Employees Union-National Association of Trade Unions filed ruled that if the union members are not employees, no right a petition for certification election to determine the sole to organize for purposes of bargaining, nor to be certified as and exclusive bargaining representative of all regular bargaining agent can be recognized. Since the persons employees outside the bargaining unit of Republic Planters involved are not employees of the company, it was held Bank. These employees include messengers, janitors, etc. that they are not entitled to the constitutional right to join that are treated as contruactual workers by the bank or form a labor organization for purposes of collective - Private respondent moved to dismiss the petition for bargaining. certification election contending other employees in the proposed bargaining unit are employed on "contractual basis" and are not members of petitioner. It also alleged that the petition failed to state the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and there is no prior determination that the members of petitioner are employees of private respondent. - Med-Arbiter dismissed the petition for certification election on the ground that there is already a certified bargaining agent representing the appropriate bargaining unit within private respondent - Petitioner sought a ruling that the other workers in the proposed bargaining unit should also be considered regular employees of private respondent since they perform duties necessary to the bank's business operations. - Petitioner submitted additional documents containing the job descriptions of 11)employees assigned at private respondent, most of whom were performing messengerial services. Private respondent reiterated its objection to the admissibility of the new evidence. - Labor undersecretary issued a resolution indicating that
San Miguel Corporation Employees Union-Philippine Transport and General Workers Organization v. San Miguel Packaging Products Employees UnionPambansang Diwa NG Manggagawang Pilipino