You are on page 1of 49

t

11

CHAPTER 1

THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

The financial ratios can be called meters that are calculated from the official

financial statements. These meters are most commonly being used to depict financial

performance of a certain company. From types of financial analysis, it could be said that

the ratio analysis is the most common and popular way to analyze financial statements.

Financial ratios are very useful for businesses as they can concentrate excessive amounts

of data into few numbers (Salmi, 2013).

According to Niskanen J. and Niskanen M. (2012), the name “ratio” is somewhat self-

explanatory, as it measures a relation with one number to another. The ratios are usually

presented as percentages since this is very convenient as two companies of very different

sizes, might still be as profitable, as these ratios are relations of their own account entries

reflected to their own, such as, turnovers or balance sheet totals. If the balance sheet and

income statement are not converted into percentages yet, the ratios are usually multiplied

by a hundred, to get a percentage. This is the case in this thesis, as without converting the

statements, there are more ratio possibilities available.

Baug CARP Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative (BCBMPC) started as Magallanes

Aquaculture Developers Association or MACDA in 1987 with 110 members. It was

converted into a cooperative on February 8, 1995 under CDA Registration CGY-1883

and change its name to Baug CARP Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative. Baug
t
22

CARP Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative offers various services, which include

regular deposits, time deposits, special savings, youth savings, salary loan, pension loan,

livelihood loan, emergency loan, educational loan, appliances loan, micro-finance,

agri/production loan, commercial loan, housing loan, and vehicle loan. Baug CARP

Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative produces their own products too, and sells them

through their consumer store. Products available in the consumer store are sugpo/bangus

fry, lime, fertilizers, tea-seed powder, feeds for sugpo/bangus, and other fishpond inputs.

Baug CARP Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative is also the first cooperative in

Caraga region and it has own ATM machines.

The objective of this research study is to know the financial ratio analysis of Baug

CARP Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative (BCBMPC) .The findings of this study

would be used by Baug CARP Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative (BCBMPC)

management as an aid for the presentation of the financial performance of the cooperative

and to keep it in check for possible lapses.

The results of this study were expected to propose improvements for Baug CARP

Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative (BCBMPC) thus; this prompted the researchers

to conduct this study.


t
33

Conceptual Framework of the Study

This study was anchored on the Performance Report Standards for Cooperatives

Series 2013 by Cooperative Development Authority (2013), which states that financial

statements can be analyzed using financial ratios, which are profitability performance,

institutional strength, structure of assets, and operational strength. Figure 1 shows the

schematic diagram of the study, Financial Ratio Analysis of Baug CARP Beneficiaries

Multi-Purpose Cooperative. The first box contained the needed inputs, which are audited

financial statements – audited balance sheets, audited statement of cash flows and audited

income statement.
t
44

Financial ratio analysis as


required by CDA:
 Profitability Performance:
Audited Financial o Profitability Ratio
Statements of o Earnings per Share Ratio
o Asset Efficiency Rate
BCBMPC for the
o Rate of Interest on Share
year 2016-2017: Capital
 Audited Balance  Institutional Strength :
Sheet o Net Institutional Capital Proposed
 Audited  Structure of Assets: Improvement
Statement of Cash o Percentage of Non- Plan
Flow Earning Assets to Total
 Audited Income Assets
o Members’ Equity to Total
Statement Assets
o Deposit Liabilities to
Total Assets
o External Borrowings
o Receivables to Total
Assets
 Operational Strength :
o Cost per volume of
business
o Solvency
o Volume of business to
total assets
o Administrative efficiency

Figure 1 Schematic Diagram of the Study


t
55

The second box contained the financial ratio analysis in terms of profitability

performance, institutional strength, structure of assets, and operational strength.

Balance Sheets. A balance sheet reports a company's assets, liabilities and

shareholders' equity at a specific point in time, and provides a basis for computing rates of

return and evaluating its capital structure. Balance sheets provides a snapshot of what a

company owns and owes, as well as the amount invested by shareholders.

Income Statements. An income statement is a financial statement that reports a

company's financial performance over a specific accounting period. Financial

performance is assessed by giving a summary of how the business incurs its revenues and

expenses through both operating and non-operating activities. It also shows the net profit

or loss incurred over a specific accounting period.

Statement of Cash Flows. The statement of cash flows as defined by Valix (2013)

is a basic component of the financial statements, which summarizes the operating,

investing, and financing activities of an entity. In simple language, it provides

information about the cash receipts and cash payments of an entity during the period.

Financial Ratio. Financial ratio or accounting ratio is a relative magnitude of two

selected numerical values taken from an enterprise's financial statements.

Financial Ratio Analysis. A ratio analysis is a quantitative analysis of information

contained in a company’s financial statements. Ratio analysis is used to evaluate various


t
66

aspects of a company’s operating and financial performance such as its efficiency,

liquidity, profitability and solvency.

Multi-Purpose Cooperative. The multipurpose cooperative society has large

number of functions to discharge. As the name indicates its responsibility for different

purpose for which it has been set up. It can work for arranging credit, improved seeds,

agricultural implements, fertilizers, sanitation, health etc. for its members. Normally it

discharges the following functions.

Profitability Performance. It measures the company’s ability to generate earnings

relative to sales, assets and equity. This is taken into account because it assesses the

ability of a company to generate earnings, profits, and cash flows relative to some metric,

often the amount of money invested. This ratio also highlights how effectively the

profitability of a company is being managed.

Institutional Strength. Institutional strength may be conceptualized along stability.

By stability, we mean durability. Institutions are stable to the degree that they survive not

only the passage of time but also changes in the condition.

Structure of Assets. This the proportions of various types of asset held by a firm as

shown in the balance sheet. A firm's asset structure helps to determine the way in which

finance is raised, in particular the balance of long-term loans and short-term debt.

Operational Strength. A company's strengths are the tools used to counter threats

and seize opportunities, so thoroughness is important. A company might possess


t
77

innovative technology, facilities located in strategically important areas, low waste and

production capacity.
t
88

Statement of the Problem

This study focused on the financial ratio analysis of a multi-purpose cooperative in

Surigao City. Specifically it sought to answer the following questions:

1. What is the financial ratio analyses as to:


1.1 Profitability Performance;
1.2 Institutional Strength;
1.3 Structure of Assets;
1.4 Operational Strength;
2. Based on the findings of the study, what improvement plan may be proposed?
t
99

Assumption

The financial ratio analysis has a significant bearing to Baug CARP Beneficiaries

Multi-Purpose Cooperative to the proposal improvements.

Significance of the study

The findings of the study will be beneficial and significant to the following:

Multi-Purpose cooperative. The findings of this study will help cooperatives assess their

financial performance.

Investors. It will help the investors determine whether their investments will be returned

with profit.

Future members. In a cooperative, the members are the owners. This study will help

prospect members to decide in considering membership to this cooperative.

Community. Cooperatives are made for and have an impact to the community.

Future Researchers. The findings in this research will serve as basis for future studies.

Scope and Limitations of the Study

The study is focused on the financial ratio analysis of Baug CARP Beneficiaries

Multi-Purpose Cooperative. The setting of the study is located in the city of Surigao. The

independent variables considered in this study are Baug CARP Beneficiaries Multi-

Purpose Cooperative’s audited financial statements – balance sheets, statement of cash

flows and income statements. The dependent variables are the financial ratios in terms of
t
1010

10

profitability performance, institutional strength, structure of assets, and operational

strength.

Definition of Terms

Profitability ratios are financial metrics used by analysts and investors to measure

and evaluate the ability of a company to generate income (profit) relative to revenue,

balance sheet assets, operating costs, and shareholders’ equity during a specific period.

They show how well a company utilizes its assets to produce profit and value to

shareholders.

Earnings per share (EPS) ratio measures how many dollars of net income have

been earned by each share of common stock. It is computed by dividing net income less

preferred dividend by the number of shares of common stock outstanding during the

period. It is a popular measure of overall profitability of the company and is usually

expressed in dollars.

Asset Efficiency Rate is also called asset turnover ratio that measures the

efficiency of a company's assets to generate revenue or sales. It compares the dollar

amount of sales or revenues to its total assets. The asset turnover ratio calculates the net

sales as a percentage of its total assets

Percentage of Non-Earning Assets does not generate income for the owner.

Members’ Equity refers to the net worth of the business, and its allocation to each

partner. The equity equals the total assets of the business minus the total liabilities.
t
1111

11

Certain transactions influence the members’ equity, including additional investments,

profits earned, losses incurred or withdrawals made by the partners. The equity

component often receives the most scrutiny since it directly affects each member’s

ownership interest in the business.

External borrowing is the portion of a country's debt that was borrowed from

foreign lenders including commercial banks, governments or international financial

institutions. These loans, including interest, must usually be paid in the currency in which

the loan was made.

Receivable to total assets is an activity ratio measuring how efficiently a firm uses

its assets. Receivables turnover ratio can be calculated by dividing the net value of credit

sales during a given period by the average accounts receivable during the same period

Deposit liabilities (or liability) .Money that people and companies have put into

banks, and that the banks will have to pay back at some time in the future.

Volume of business to total assets. The number of shares traded on a given

exchange or in a single security or index. High volume is generally regarded as an

indication of investors’ enthusiasm and low volume is taken as a sign of investors’

lethargy. Volume is a component of many technical analysis tools.

Solvency is the ability of a company to meet its long-term financial obligations.

Solvency is essential to staying in business as it demonstrates a company’s ability to

continue its operations into the near future.


t
1212

12

Cost per volume of business. This measures the efficiency in managing the

cooperatives business.

Administrative efficiency. This is the capacity of an organization, institution, or

business to produce desired results with a minimum expenditure of energy, time, money,

personnel, materiel, etc.


t

13

CHAPTER 2

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

The purpose of this study is to review the related literature and studies, which have

direct bearing with the present study. This includes books, articles and internet resources.

Baug CARP Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative (BCBMPC).

It started with more or less 30 individuals from different occupations, became crab

hunters in the damp town site of Magallanes, at the delta of the Agusan River way back

1985. They were developing the swamps into fishpond areas and were paying the land

rental to the Municipal Local Government of Magallanes. Their struggle to own the land

went on for years.

In 1995, the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR), identified 110 association

members as beneficiary to the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP). The

164.7 hectares of swamp, which they patiently developed for years, was awarded through

issuance of a Certificate of Land Ownership Award (CLOA). In the same year, they

registered with the CDA using the ₱39,200.00 cash contribution from its members. The

cooperative is popularly known today as “BAUG”. The term stands for Baug CARP

Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative. The cooperative provides loans to its members

for fishpond development, and shrimp production, which steadily grew in 1995 – 2002.

The profit derived from business was used in the construction of cooperative building.
t
1414

14

During this period, production loan and annual shrimp harvest was good, and the income

of the cooperative, including that of the Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries (ARB) members

improved.

In 2003, the White Spot Syndrome Virus (WSSV) hit the municipality of

Magallanes. The virus wiped out all prawn farms and multi-million cooperatives, and

prawn farm operators got bankrupt but God spared BCBMPC. The cooperative continued

to operate through Bayanihan. The Board of Directors’ honoraria was reduced by 80%.

The cooperative employees agreed to reduce salary by 50%. The affected members were

offered liberalized loan settlement and restructuring program. These strategies are

effective in increasing collection and improving coop cash balance. The members also

helped by bringing in new depositors.

Today, BCBMPC has eight (8) branches operating in the cities of Butuan,

Surigao, Cabadbaran and Bayugan as well as in the municipalities of Magallanes,

Buenavista, Kitcharao and Las Nieves in the Province of Agusan del Norte. BCBMPC

now ranks as one of the top cooperatives of Caraga Region and the only organization with

programs for Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries, the LGU and Community, Environmental

Protection, and Climate Change Adaptation.


t
1515

15

Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP)

The Comprehensive Agrarian Program, more commonly known as CARP, is an

agrarian reform law of the Philippines whose legal basis is the Republic Act No. 6657,

otherwise known as the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law (CARL). It is the

redistribution of private and public agricultural lands to help the beneficiaries survive as

small independent farmers, regardless of the “tenurial” arrangement. Its goals are to

provide landowners equality in terms of income and opportunities, empower landowner

beneficiaries to have an equitable land ownership, enhance the agricultural production

and productivity, provide employment to more agricultural workers, and put an end to

conflicts regarding land ownership.

Financial Ratio Analysis

Financial ratio analysis can provide meaningful information on the company’s

performance to a firm's management as well as outside investors. Calculating the ratios is

relatively easy; understanding and interpreting what they say about a company's financial

status takes a bit more work. Ratios serve as a comparative tool of analysis for liquidity,

profitability, debt, and asset management, among other categories—all useful areas of

financial statement analysis. Companies typically start with industry ratios and data from
t
1616

16

their own historical financial statements to establish a basis for ratio comparison.

Analysts compare the ratios for a given firm to the ratios of other firms in the same

industry and against previous quarters or years of historical data for the firm itself

(Peavley, 2018).

Financial Ratio

Financial ratio is a comparison in fraction, proportion, decimal or percentage form

of two significant figures taken from financial statements. It expresses the direct

relationship between two or more quantities in the statement of financial position and

income statement of a business firm. Through ratio analysis, the financial statements user

comes into possession of measures, which provide insight into the profitability of

operations, the soundness of the firms’ short-term, and long-term financial condition and

the efficiency with which management has utilized the resources entrusted to it (Cabrera,

2017).

The firm needs to make an in depth review and evaluation of its financial

statement with financial tools called ratios. Ratios involve the methods of calculating and

interpreting financial statement to assess the firm’s performance and status. The basis

inputs here are the income statement and the balance sheet for the period to be examined

(Laman, et. al., 2015).

Financial Statement
t
1717

17

Financial Statements are the means by which the financial information is

accumulated and processed. Financial statements are structured financial representation of

the financial performance of an entity. The end product or main output of the financial

accounting are formulated and processed information concerning the financial position,

performance and cash flows of a company used in making sound economic decisions

(Valix, 2014).

Income Statement

Income Statement is a financial report that shows an entity's financial results over

a specific period. The time period covered is usually for a month, quarter, or year, though

partial periods may also be used. This is the most common financial statement, and is the

most likely to be distributed within a business for management review (Accounting

Tools, 2016).

The income statement (sometimes called the profit-and-loss statement or P&L) is

the first financial statement that can be found in the annual report. It shows the revenue,

expenses and profit for the company during the past year. It can be used to figure out cash

flow, profit margins, and other financial metrics for the business. Most importantly,

income statement contains the proverbial bottom line: profits (Investor Guide, 2016).

Expenses decrease in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form

of or depletion of assets or incurrences of liabilities that result in outflows equity, such as


t
1818

18

the following: cost of sales, operating expenses, interest expenses, the decrease in owner's

other than those relating to distribution to equity participants. Expense is an increase in

economic benefit during the accounting period in the form of income inflows or

enhancements of assets or decreases of liabilities that result in increase in equity, other

than those relating contributions from equity participants.

Statement of Cash Flows

The statement of cash flows is a basic component of the financial statements,

which summarizes the operating, investing, and financing activities of an entity. In simple

language, it provides information about the cash receipts and cash payments of an entity

during the period (Valix, 2013).

Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet shows the financial condition or financial position of a company on

a particular date. The statement is a summary of what the firm's own (asset) and what the

firm's owes to outsiders (liabilities) and to internal owners (stockholder's equity). Assets

are valuable resources owned by entity, per framework asset is a resource controlled by

the enterprise because of past events and from which future economic benefits are

expected to flow to the enterprise. Current Assets include cash and these assets are

expected to be converted into cash, used or consumed within one year or one operating
t
1919

19

cycle whichever is longer. Accounts under current assets are cash equivalents, marketable

securities, accounts receivables, inventories, prepaid expense and property, plant and

equipment.

Non-current Assets are assets that are not expected to be consumed within one

year. If a company has a high proportion of noncurrent to current assets, this can be an

indicator of poor liquidity, since a large amount of cash may be needed to support on-

going investments on noncash assets.

Some noncurrent assets, such as land, may theoretically have unlimited useful

lives. A noncurrent asset is recorded as an asset which when incurred, rather than being

charged to expenses at once. Depreciation, depletion, or amortization may be used to

gradually reduce the amount of a noncurrent asset on the balance sheet. Noncurrent assets

are aggregated into several line items on the balance sheet, and are listed after all current

assets, but before liabilities and equity.

Liabilities are obligations of the entity to outside parties who have furnished

resources. Per framework, liability is a present obligation of the enterprise arising from

past event, the settlements of which are expected to result in an outflow from the

enterprise of resources embodying economic benefits.

Current Liabilities are those that must be satisfied in one year or on operating

cycle, whichever is longer. Current liabilities include accounts and notes payable, current

portion of long-term debt, accrued liabilities and deferred taxes.


t
2020

20

Non-current liabilities are obligations with maturities beyond one-year designation

on the balance sheet as non-current liabilities. This category can include bonded

indebtedness, long term payable, mortgages, and obligations under leave, pension

liabilities, long-term warranties and deferred income taxes.

Owners’ Equity is residual interest in assets that remain after deducting liabilities.

Accounts included are share capital, additional paid-in-capital, retained earnings and

other equity account (Cabrera, 2011).

Financial Statement Analysis

Financial Statement Analysis applies analytical tools to general-purpose financial

statement and related data for making business decisions. It involves transforming

accounting data into a more useful information. Financial statement analysis reduces our

reliance on hunches, guesses, and intuition as well as uncertainty in decision-making. It

does not lessen the need for expert judgment; instead, it provides an effective and

systematic basis for making business decisions (Cabrera, 2016).

CDA (Cooperative Development Authority)

CDA is a proactive and responsive lead government agency for the promotion of

sustained growth and full development of Philippine cooperatives for them to become

broad-based instruments of social justice, equity and balanced national progress. The
t
2121

21

Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) is a government agency, which registers all

types of cooperatives in the Philippines. In order to qualify, a cooperative must have at-

least 15 members. The proposed business name, which should include the word

“cooperative”, must be submitted to the CDA office, and all other necessary requirements

such as the economic survey, articles of cooperation and its by-laws and the names of the

cooperative’s directors (Kittelson & Carpo Consulting, 2018).

CDA (Cooperative Development Authority) Performance Report Standards for

Cooperatives

The purposes of Performance Report will serve as a regulatory and supervisory

tool of CDA (Cooperative Development Authority) in programming the roadmap of

developmental intervention for cooperatives; and as management tool of cooperative for

the purpose of identifying problem areas in the operation and determining the state of the

cooperative’s health (Ravanera, 2017).

According to CDA (2015), the standard financial ratios to be used for Profitability

Performance are Profitability Ratio, Earning per Share Ratio, Asset Efficiency Rate and

Rate of Interest on Share Capital. For Institutional Strength the required ratios are Net

Institutional. For the Structure of Assets the ratios would be Percentage of non-earning

Assets to Total Assets, Members’ Equity to Total Assets, Deposit Liabilities to Total

Assets, External Borrowings and Receivables to Total Assets. Lastly for the Operational

Strength of the cooperative the required ratios by the CDA are Volume of Business to
t
2222

22

Total Assets, Solvency Ratio, Liquidity Ratio, Cost per Volume of Business and

Administrative Efficiency. These are all based on the ratios required by CDA.

Profitability Performance

Profitability is the primary goal of all business ventures. Without profitability, the

business will not survive in the long run. Therefore, measuring current and past

profitability and projecting future profitability is very important. Whether you are

recording profitability for the past period or projecting profitability for the coming period,

measuring profitability is the most important measure of the success of the business. A

business that is not profitable cannot survive. Conversely, a highly profitable business has

the ability to reward its owners with a large return on their investment (Hofstrand, 2009).

According to Schmidt (2018), asset structure shows how the firm's asset base is

distributed in different asset categories. For companies in heavy manufacturing, fixed

assets such as buildings and factory machines dominate the asset structure. Assets are

items of value an organization owns or controls. Profit-making firms acquire assets at a

measurable cost and use them for generating earnings. As a result, assets must justify

their place on the Balance sheet by bringing in returns. The firm's asset structure

represents its strategy for earning from its asset base.

Business people use the term structure in several different ways. Most people in

business are familiar with capital and financial structures. These terms refer to the
t
2323

23

"Liabilities and Equities" side of the Balance sheet. These structures show how the firm

uses funds from owners and from creditors to earn income. Similarly, firms acquire assets

in different assets categories, trying to maximize returns from the asset base.

Institutional Strength

A cooperative exists and operates for the benefit of its patron members. At the

same time, since the members are also the owners, they have a financial interest in the

success of the cooperative, which sways them toward giving it their full support and

patronage. Cooperative members also have a voice in the control of the organization, and,

within the limits of majority rule, it therefore supplies the kind of service they want.

These tend to tie the patrons to the organization by making them full partners, help build

an assured volume of business. This in turn is favorable to the efficient operation of the

cooperative (Historians Org, 2017).

Structure of Assets

Assets are items of value an organization owns or controls. Profit-making firms

acquire assets at a measurable cost and use them for generating earnings. As a result,

assets must justify their place on the Balance sheet by bringing in returns. The firm's asset

structure represents its strategy for earning from its asset base (Schmidt, 2018).
t
2424

24

Operational Strength

Every company and every market will experience difficulties. Even the best firms

are subject to lapses and may encounter disasters due to chance or mistake of their own

making. This admittedly is a difficult challenge – to identify fundamental principles of

management that may help managers create competitive advantage and staying power

(Cusumano, 2018).

Synthesis of the Review

The related studies have significant bearing to the present investigation in as much

as they discussed the analysis of the business, which was closely related toward Baug

CARP Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative’s proposed improvements. The

researchers will utilize the formulae given by the Cooperative Development Authority

(CDA) to treat the audited financial statements of BCBMPC. The data were analyzed

using ratio formulae in order to get the profitability performance, institutional strength,

structure of assets, and operational strength of the cooperative. As a whole, the difference

between the reviewed literatures and the present study were the participants involved.
t
2525

25

CHAPTER 3

METHOD

This chapter presents the research design, participants, instrument, data gathering

procedure and data analysis.

Research Design

The researchers utilized the quantitative study using documentary analysis that

involves the collection of business documents such as Balance sheets, income statements,

and statement of cash flows relating to the accounts of BCBMPC that were used for

computing financial ratios such as profitability performance, institutional strength,

structure of assets and operational strength.

Participant

The participant of the study is the branch manager of Baug CARP Beneficiaries

Multi-Purpose Cooperative (BCBMPC) Surigao Branch. Baug CARP Beneficiaries

Multi-Purpose Cooperative is qualified in this study because it is registered in the

Republic of the Philippines Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) and it has been

operating for more than one year.


t
2626

26

Instrument

The study utilized the financial ratio analysis from CDA’s (Cooperative

Development Authority) Performance Report Standards for Cooperatives to analyze the

accounts of Baug CARP Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative.

Data Gathering Procedure

The researchers sent a letter asking permission from the Baug CARP Beneficiaries

Multi-Purpose Cooperative branch manager in Surigao City to obtain the data needed for

the study, specifically documents such as audited balance sheets, audited income

statements, and audited statement of cash flows to gather information as well as the

transactions relating to the accounts of Baug CARP Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose. The

data gathered were computed, analyzed, and interpreted using financial ratio analysis.

Ethical Considerations

The researchers considered the following ethics during the conduct of this research:

 The researchers greeted the respondent first before interviewing.

 The researchers respected each other’s point of view.

 The researchers spoke politely to them.

 Consent from the respondents was taken and appropriate permission was ensured

for the usage of their given data.


t
2727

27

DATA ANALYSIS

The financial statements were analyzed using the following financial ratios and
the performance report standards of cooperative by the CDA (Cooperative Development
Authority).

Profitability Performance. Profitability performance is the overall efficiency of the


company; the ability of the business to earn profit.
 Profitability Ratio. This was used to analyze if a cooperative can generate

profits well from its operations.

Formula: Net Operating Surplus


Gross Revenue/ Gross Margin

 Earnings per Share Ratio. This was used to measure the capacity of

cooperative to provide earnings to member’s capital contribution.

Formula: Net Surplus


Paid-up Capital/Par Value

 Asset Efficiency Rate. This was used to measure the efficient use of assets

to generate surplus.

Formula: Net surplus


Total Assets

 Rate of Interest on Share Capital. This was used to measure the return on

member’s share capital.

Formula: Amount Allocated for Interest on Share Capital


Average Paid up Share Capital
t
2828

28

Institutional Strength.

 Net Institutional Capital. This was used to analyze how strong the

cooperative.

Formula: (Reserves + Allowance for probable losses on loans and or


account receivables) – (Problem receivables assets + past due receivable under
litigation + structured receivables)
Total Assets

Structure of Assets. The firm's asset structure represents its strategy for earning from its
asset base.

 Percentage of Non-earning Assets to Total Assets. This was used to

compare income statement accounts and categories to show a company’s

ability to generate profits from its operations.

Formula: Non-Earning Assets


Total Assets

 Member’s Equity to Total Assets. This was used to measure the degree of

participation of member’s share to total assets.

Formula: Paid-up Share Capital + Deposits for Capital


Subscription
Total Assets

 Deposit Liabilities to Total Assets. This was used to measure the

percentage participation of deposit liabilities to total assets.

Formula: Total Deposit Liabilities


Total Assets
t
2929

29

 External Borrowings. This was used to measure the dependence of

cooperative to external borrowings.

Formula: Total External Borrowings


Total Assets

 Receivables to Total Assets.


Formula: Loans/Accounts Receivables
Total Assets

Operational Strength. A company's strengths are the tools used to counter threats and

seize opportunities

 Volume of Business to Total Assets. This was used to measure the capacity

of assets to generate business.

Formula: Total Volume of Business


Total Assets

 Solvency Ratio. This was used to measure a company’s ability to sustain

operations indefinitely by comparing debt levels with equity, assets, and

earnings.

Formula: (Assets + Allowance for probable losses) – (Total Liabilities – Deposit


Liabilities) + (Past due receivables + restructured receivables + receivables under
litigation)
Deposit Liabilities + Share Capital
t
3030

30

 Cost per Volume of Business. This was used to measure the efficiency in

managing the cooperatives business.

Formula: Operating cost – (members’ benefit expense + social service


expense)
Total Volume of Business

 Administrative Efficiency.
Formula: Administrative Cost - (members’ benefit expense + social service
expense)
Average Total Assets
t
3131

31

CHAPTER 4
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
This chapter presents the result and discussions of the data gathered in this

study.

PROFITABILITY PERFORMANCE

Table 1 shows the result of financial ratios as to profitability performance that will

aid in the presentation of the cooperatives financial performance.

Table 1. Profitability Performance


RATIOS 2016 Standard 2017 Standard
Points Points
Profitability ratio 27.22% 3 23.86% 2
Earnings per share ratio ₱2.25 4 ₱2.33 4
Asset efficiency ratio 4.76% 0 5.27% 1
Rate of interest on share capital 12.64% 4 7.29% 4

Profitability Ratio
Parameter Standard Points Verbal Interpretation
30% and above 4 Excellent
25% to below 30% 3 Very satisfactory
10% to below 25% 2 Satisfactory
5% to below 10% 1 Fair
Below 5% 0 Needs improvement
Earnings per Share Ratio
Parameter Standard Points Verbal Interpretation
₱2.00 to above 4 Excellent
₱1.50 to below ₱2.00 3 Very satisfactory
₱1.00 to below ₱1.50 2 Satisfactory
Below ₱1.00 to ₱0.75 1 Fair
Zero or negative 0 Needs improvement
Asset Efficiency Rate
Parameter Standard Points Verbal Interpretation
20% and above 4 Excellent
15% to below 20% 3 Very satisfactory
t
3232

32

10% to below 15% 2 Satisfactory


5% to below 10% 1 Fair
Below 5% 0 Needs improvement
Rate of Interest on Share Capital
Parameter Standard Points Verbal Interpretation
Higher than the inflation rate 4 Excellent
Within the inflation rate 3 Very satisfactory
2 points below the inflation rate 2 Satisfactory
3 points or more below 1 Fair
Net loss 0 Needs improvement
Source: Cooperative Development Authority (CDA)
As to Profitability Ratio, the year 2016 had the results of 27.22% or three (3)

points according to CDA’s performance report standards for cooperatives which indicates

that the cooperative is able to earn good profit and return on investment. In 2017, a

profitability ratio of 23.86% was recorded, which is two (2) points according to CDA’s

Performance Report Standards for Cooperatives. This means that the cooperative’s

performance in terms of generating surplus was very satisfactory in 2016, and satisfactory

in 2017. According to Peavley (2018), profitability ratios show a company's overall

efficiency and performance. Profitability measures are important to company managers

and owners alike. If a small business has outside investors who have put their own money

into the company, the primary owner certainly has to show profitability to those equity

investors. The cooperative accumulated huge amounts of assets from the donations and

financial assistance that it constantly receives, not to mention that the cooperative also has

few payables to take care of. This resulted to high operating surplus.

As to Earnings Per Share Ratio, the cooperative reported a ratio of ₱2.25 and

₱2.33 in 2016 and 2017, respectively. The cooperative scored four (4) points in both
t
3333

33

years, according to CDA Performance Report Standards for Cooperatives. This means

that the cooperative is excellent in providing earnings to members’ capital contribution.

According to Wet (2014), earnings per share ratio is considered to be the single most

popular, widely used financial performance benchmark of all. Earnings per share ratio is

simple to calculate and easily understood and management is congratulated when there is

positive earnings per share growth.

As to Asset Efficiency rate, the year 2016 and 2017 had a result of 4.76% and

5.27%, respectively, or zero (0) and one (1) point (below 5% and 5% to below 10%)

according to CDA Performance Report Standards for Cooperatives. This indicates that, in

2016, the cooperative needed improvement in terms of efficiency of company’s assets to

generate revenue or sales and had fair performance in the following year. According to

Corporate Finance Institute (CFI™ 2015), a company with a high asset turnover ratio

operates more efficiently compared to competitors with lower ratios. The cooperative is

putting the members' capital contribution to good use.

As to Rate of Interest on share capital, the cooperative reported ratios of 12.64%

in 2016, and 7.29% in 2017. Philippines had the inflation rates of 1.78% and 3.18% in

2016 and 2017, respectively. The cooperative scored four (4) (higher than the inflation

rate), according to CDA standards. This indicates excellent return on members’ share

capital. Having an excellent rate of interest on share capital may indicate that the

cooperative had lots of members buying shares from it.


t
3434

34

INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTH

Table 2 shows the result of financial ratios as to institutional strength that

will aid in the presentation of the cooperatives financial performance.

Table 2. Institutional Strength


RATIOS 2016 Standard 2017 Standard
Points Points
Net institutional capital 11.10% 4 11.69% 4

Net Institutional Capital


Parameter Standard Points Verbal Interpretation
10% and above 4 Excellent
7% to below 10% 3 Very satisfactory
4% to below 7% 2 Satisfactory
1% to below 4% 1 Fair
Below 1% 0 Needs improvement
Source: Cooperative Development Authority (CDA)

As to net Institutional Capital, the cooperative reported ratios of 11.10% in 2016,

and 11.69% in 2017, both scored four (4) in CDA Performance Report Standards for

Cooperatives. This indicates excellent performance in terms of net institutional capital

after subtracting allowance for probable losses in both years. According to Richardson

(2012), institutional capital growth is the best indicator of profitability within credit

unions. Static or declining growth trends in institutional capital usually indicate a problem

with earnings. Having an excellent net institutional capital, it can be inferred that the

cooperative had good earnings in its loan services.


t
3535

35

STRUCTURE OF ASSETS

Table 3 shows the result of financial ratios as to structure of assets that

will aid in the presentation of the cooperatives financial performance.

Table 3. Structure of Assets


RATIOS 2016 Standard 2017 Standard
Points Points
Percentage of nonearning assets to total 13.70% 3 13.93% 3
assets
Members’ equity to total assets 21.10% 2 22.56% 2
Deposits liabilities to total assets 31.11% 4 31.04% 4
External borrowings 31.65% 1 28.81% 2
Receivables to total assets 57.70% 3 55.52% 3
Percentage of Non-earning Assets to Total Assets
Parameter Standard Points Verbal Interpretation
10% and below 4 Excellent
10% to below 25% 3 Very satisfactory
25% to below 50% 2 Satisfactory
50% to below 75% 1 Fair
75% and above 0 Needs improvement
Members’ Equity to Total Assets
Parameter Standard Points Verbal Interpretation
40% to 50% 4 Excellent
30% to 39% & 51% to 60% 3 Very satisfactory
20% to 29% & 61% to 70% 2 Satisfactory
10% to 19% & 71% to 80% 1 Fair
Below 10% & above 80% 0 Needs improvement
Deposits Liabilities to Total Assets
Parameter Standard Points Verbal Interpretation
30% to 40% 4 Excellent
20% to 29% & 41% to 50% 3 Very satisfactory
10% to 19% & 51% to 60% 2 Satisfactory
5% to 9% & 61% to 70% 1 Fair
Below 5% & above 70% 0 Needs improvement
External Borrowings
Parameter Standard Points Verbal Interpretation
No external borrowing 4 Excellent
1% to 20% 3 Very satisfactory
Above 20% to 30% 2 Satisfactory
Above 30% to 40% 1 Fair
t
3636

36

Above 40% 0 Needs improvement


Receivables to Total Assets
Parameter Standard Points Verbal Interpretation
60% to 70% 4 Excellent
55% to below 60% 3 Very satisfactory
50% to below 55% 2 Satisfactory
45% to below 50% 1 Fair
40% to below 45% 0 Needs improvement
Source: Cooperative Development Authority (CDA)

As to Percentage of Non-Earning Assets in 2016 to 2017, the cooperative had a

percentage of non-earning assets of 13.70% and 13.39%, respectively, or three (3) points

(10% to below 25%) according to CDA Performance Report Standards for Cooperatives.

Lesser non-earning assets are a positive indication. The cooperative had very satisfactory

performances in both years. According to Kennon (2018), non-earning assets are things

that do not generate income for the owner. While earning assets are anything that directly

generates income, such as stocks that pay dividends, bonds that pay interest, real estate

properties that generate rents, copyright and patents that bring in licensing fees, and

machinery that allows to produce goods for sale at a profit.

As to Members’ Equity to total assets, in 2016 to 2017, the cooperative had a ratio

of 21.10% and 22.56%, or two (2) points (20% to below 30%) according to CDA

Performance Report Standards for Cooperatives, which means that the degree of

participation of members’ share to total assets is satisfactory. Members’ equity refers to

initial as well as additional money put in by the members to run the business. Lesser

members’ equity means lesser funds to run the business, but according to Wessell (2018),
t
3737

37

too many equity investors in a short period of time will dilute any returns you receive.

Furthermore, Coleman (2016) stated that when it comes to equity, enough is better than

too much.

As to Deposit Liabilities to total assets, in 2016 to 2017, the cooperative had ratios

of 31.11% and 31.04%, respectively, or four (4) points (30% to 40%) in both years

according to the CDA Performance Report Standards for Cooperatives. This means that

the cooperative has excellent percentage participation of deposit liabilities to total assets.

As a cooperative that offers bank-like services such as loans services, this is an indication

that the cooperative caters its services to a large clientele.

As to External Borrowings, the cooperative reported ratios of 31.65% and 28.81%

in 2016 to 2017, respectively, with corresponding scores of one (1) and two (2) according

to the Performance Report Standards for Cooperatives by the CDA. This indicates that the

cooperative has fair to satisfactory performance in terms of dependence to external

borrowings. Normally these types of debts are in the form of tied loans, meaning that

these have to be used for a predefined purpose. This is also an indication that the

cooperative funds its activities mainly from outside sources such as grants, short-term

loans, long-term loan, or trade credit offered by a supplier. Further research revealed that

the cooperative was actually receiving hundreds of millions of donations and financial

assistance from outside sources and the government. This means that the cooperative did

not suffer indebtedness, because donations are not supposed to be payed.


t
3838

38

As to Receivables to total assets, the cooperative reported receivables to assets

ratio of 57.70% and 55.52% in 2016 and 2017, respectively. Those are both three (3)

points (55% to below 60%) according to CDA Performance Report Standards for

Cooperatives. This indicates that the performance of the cooperative was very

satisfactory. According to Kedia (2010), too much receivables mean that the credit policy

of the business may not be sound, because too much money is locked up in the

receivables that could have been invested elsewhere.

OPERATIONAL STRENGTH

Table 4 shows the result of financial ratios as to operational strength that

will aid in the presentation of the cooperatives financial performance.

Table 4. Operational Strength


RATIOS 2016 Standard 2017 Standard
Points Points
Volume of business to total assets 17.49% 1 17.66% 1
Solvency 105.11% 3 98.09% 2
Cost per volume of business 70 cents 0 67 cents 0
Administrative efficiency 19.64% 2 10.46% 3

Volume of Business to Total Assets


Parameter Standard Points Verbal Interpretation
75% and above 4 Excellent
50% to below 75% 3 Very satisfactory
25% to below 75% 2 Satisfactory
5% to below 25% 1 Fair
Less than 5% 0 Needs improvement
Solvency
Parameter Standard Points Verbal Interpretation
110% and above 4 Excellent
100% to below 110% 3 Very satisfactory
85% to below 100% 2 Satisfactory
t
3939

39

75% to below 85% 1 Fair


Less than 75% 0 Needs improvement
Cost per Volume of Business
Parameter Standard Points Verbal Interpretation
25 cents and below 4 Excellent
26 to 32 cents 3 Very satisfactory
33 to 39 cents 2 Satisfactory
40 to 46 cents 1 Fair
47 cents and above 0 Needs improvement
Administrative Efficiency
Parameter Standard Points Verbal Interpretation
10% and below 4 Excellent
Above 10% to below 15% 3 Very satisfactory
Above 15% to below 20% 2 Satisfactory
Above 20% to below 25% 1 Fair
Above 25% 0 Needs improvement
Source: Cooperative Development Authority (CDA)

As to Volume of Business to total assets in 2016 to 2017, the cooperative had a

percentage of 17.49% and 17.66%, respectively, or one (1) point (5% to below 25%)

according to the CDA Performance Report Standards for Cooperatives. This means that

the cooperative has fair performance in terms of the capacity of cooperative’s assets to

generate business.

As to Solvency, the cooperative had ratios of 105.11% in 2016 and 98.09% in


2017.
These had scores of three (3) and two (2), respectively. This indicates that the cooperative

had very satisfactory performance in dealing with its long-term obligations in 2016, and

satisfactory performance in the following year. According to Gaist (2009), solvency can

be described as the ability of a firm to meet its long-term fixed expenses and to

accomplish long-term expansion and growth.


t
4040

40

As to Cost per volume of business, the cooperative reported ratios of 70 cents of

2016, and 67 cents of 2017. According to CDA Performance Report Standards for

Cooperatives, these ratios both scored zero (0). This indicates that the cooperative needed

improvements in terms of managing its businesses.

As to Administrative Efficiency, the cooperative reported a ratio of 19.64% and

10.46% in 2016 and 2017, respectively. The cooperative scored two (2) and three (3),

according to CDA Performance Report Standards for Cooperatives. This indicates that the

cooperative had satisfactory and very satisfactory performances in terms of producing

desired results with a minimum expenditure on energy, time, money, personnel, and

materials among many others.


t
4141

41

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Rationale
The objective of this study is to know the financial ratio analysis of Baug CARP

Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative (BCBMPC) .The findings of this study may be

used by Baug CARP Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative (BCBMPC) management

as an aid for the presentation of the financial performance of the cooperative and to keep

it in check for possible lapses.

Table 5. Proposed Improvement Plan

Area of Concern Problems Possible Actions


Profitability
Performance The cooperative was inefficient The cooperative may
Asset efficiency in converting revenue from utilize their assets in
assets. But this is because the advertising or marketing
cooperative receives lots of their products and
donations and financial services. The cooperative
assistance from outside sources, may also consider
thus increasing the asset expansion by creating new
drastically. The cooperative has branches.
too much assets and less
payables, and not utilizing much
of these to generate revenue
makes the asset efficiency rate
low.
t
4242

42

Structure of Assets
External borrowings The cooperative had high In terms of structure of
dependence to external assets, the cooperative
borrowings. Further research may need not to tackle this
revealed that the main factor concern, for the Central
were the huge amounts of Bank of the Philippines
donations and financial and the Rehabilitation
assistance from outside sources. Finance Corporation are
willing to lend or provide
financial assistance to
cooperatives.
Operational Strength
Volume of business to The cooperative’s assets that do The cooperative may
total assets generate business did not have increase the volume by
the satisfactory capacity. utilizing its assets in
marketing their products
As discussed earlier, the volume and services, and by
of business was low because the considering expansion of
Cost per volume of cooperative was not utilizing business.
business much of its assets to generate
business. Despite of it, the The cooperative may
cooperative still has to spend for improve cost per volume
the costs of operation, making it of business by increasing
look like the cost management is the volume of business.
poor.
t
4343

43

CHAPTER 5

SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter presents the summary, findings, conclusion and recommendation of

the study.

Summary

This study focused on the financial ratio analysis of Baug CARP Beneficiaries

Multi-Purpose Cooperative for the year 2016-2017.

The Audited financial statement of Baug CARP Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose

Cooperative for the year 2016-2017 included the income statement, balance sheet and

statement of cash flows. The financial ratios were profitability performance, structure of

assets, and operational strength.

The study used the descriptive design using documentary analysis in the form of

their audited financial statements which were the income statement, balance sheet and

statement of cash flow of 2016 and 2017. The data were analysed and interpreted using

the financial ratios from the Performance Report Standards for Cooperatives provided by

the Cooperative Development Authority.


t
4444

44

Findings

The findings of the study were summarized as follows:

1. As to profitability performance, asset efficiency rates in 2016 to 2017 were 4.76% and

5.27%, respectively. These scored zero (0) and one (1), which means that the cooperative

was having difficulties in generating revenue and sales from its assets.

2. As to structure of assets, external borrowings were 31.65% in 2016 and 28.81% in 2017,

which scored one (1) and two (2). The cooperative had high dependence to borrowing

from external sources rather than from its own assets when it comes to funding its

activities.

3. In terms of operational strength, the volume of business to total assets ratios were 17.49%

in 2016 and 17.66% in 2017. These garnered scores of on (1) and one (1), respectively. It

can be inferred that the volume of cooperative’s assets that do generate sales or revenue

were less compared to assets that do not generate revenue. The cooperatives cost per

volume of business ratios in 2016 and 2017 were 70 cents and 67 cents, respectively.

Both scored zero (0). These costs were too high and not beneficial to the cooperative. It

can be inferred that the cooperative’s businesses may have been managed inefficiently.
t
4545

45

Conclusions

Based on the findings of the study, the researchers concluded that Baug CARP

Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative has concerns in areas of asset efficiency rate,

external borrowings, and cost per volume of business.

It was also found out that the reasons for the abovementioned concerns were the

huge amount of assets resulted from donations and financial assistance from outside

sources, not to mention that the cooperative also has very minimal payables. The

cooperative has excellent earnings per share ratio and rate of interest on share capital,

which sums up that they treat their members' contributions with high regards. Net

institutional capital and deposit liabilities are both excellent, making the cooperative an

exemplary credit union.

Recommendations

In the view of the findings and conclusions of the study, the researchers

recommended that the proposed improvement plan for Baug CARP Beneficiaries Multi-

Purpose Cooperative may be implemented.

For further studies, future researchers are suggested to propose titles such as:

(1) Overall Performance of Selected Cooperatives in Surigao City

(2) Assessment of Non-Financial Performance of Cooperatives in Surigao City

(3) Cost Management of Cooperatives in Surigao City


t
4646

46

REFERENCES

Besley, S. & Brigham, E. (2015). Basic Finance Philippine Edition. Retrieved from:
CENGAGE Learning®
Cabrera, Ma. E. B. (2012). Financial Management: Principles and Applications.
Philippines: GIC Enterprises & Co., Inc
Cabrera, Ma. E. B. (2017). Financial Management: Principles and Applications.
Philippines: GIC Enterprises & Co., Inc
Valix, C.,et. al (2016). Financial Accounting Vol.1 Philippines: GIC Enterprises &
Co., Inc
Gaist, Paul A (2009). Igniting the Power of Community: The Role of CBOs and NGOs in
Global Public Health. Springer
Electronic Sources

Audit IT (2012). Ready Ratios. Retrieved from:


http://www.readyratios.com/reference/analysis/financial_ratio.html
C.C.D Consultants, (2009). Financial Ratios. Retrieved from:
http://www.ccdconsultants.com/documentation/financial-ratios/current-ratio-
interpretation.html
Cooperative Development Authority (CDA).Retrieved from:
http://gwhs-stg01.i.gov.ph/~s1cdagovph/images/Issuances/MCs/MC2013-15-
performance-report-standards-for-cooperatives.pdf
Clausen, J. (2009) Scrutinize Financial Proficiency and Profitability Spotlight of Beximco
Pharmaceutical Ltd. in Bangladesh. Retrieved from:
https://www.coursehero.com/file/p335eljh/James-Clausen-2009-He-state-that-
the-Profitability-Ratio-Analysis-of-Income/
Hammersmith, R. (2012). Business Ratio. Retrieved from:
http://www.hammersmithaccountant.com/small-business/ratio-analysis-decision-
making/
Hutchinson, J. (2010) Risk and Financial Performance Evaluation of Heitech Padu
Berhad. Retrieved from:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315843919_RISK_AND_FINANCIAL_
PERFORMANCE_EVALUATION_OF_HEITECH_PADU_BERHAD
International Accounting Standards (IAS 1). Retrieved from:
http://businesstips.ph/what-is-a-statement-of-changes-in-equty-and-its-purpose/
Mindtools Ltd.,(2012). Ratios. Retrieved from:
http://www.mindtools.com/php/Permissions.php?erdqpermissionshelpdesk
t
4747

47

Niskanen, J. & Niskanen, M. (2012) Financial Ratio Analysis. Retrieved from:


https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/134053/Paakko_Roope.pdf?sequ
ence=1&isAllowed=y
Peavley, R. (2018). Financial Ratio Analysis Offers Valuable Business Insights.
Retrieved from:
https://www.thebalance.com/what-is-financial-ratio-analysis-393186
Salmi, Timo (2013). Financial ratio variability and industry classification. Retrieved
from:
https://www.univaasa.fi/materiaali/pdf/isbn_951-683-354-3.pdf
Small Business Administration. Working Capital. Retrieved from:
http://www.sba.gov/content/working-capital
Thachappilly, G. (2009). Performance evaluation and ratio analysis of Pharmaceutical
Company in Bangladesh. Retrieved from:
https://dl.icdst.org/pdfs/files/1888408a05351bd0de6040ecfbfab4de.pdf``
Vancity Community Foundation (2012). Demonstrating Value. Retrieved from:
http://www.demonstratingvalue.org/resources/financal-ratio-analysis/Liquidity
t
4848

48

Appendix A
Letter to Conduct the Study
ST. PAUL UNIVERSITY SURIGAO
Surigao City

ATTY. LEONARDO L. DEL CARMEN JR., CPA


Dean, College of Business and Technology
Saint Paul University Surigao
Surigao City

Dear Sir:

Pauline Peace to You!

The researchers are conducting a research study entitled,” Financial Ratio Analysis of
Baug CARP Beneficiaries Multi-purpose Cooperative in Year 2016-2017.” as a
requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Accountancy and Accounting
Technology.

In this connection, we respectfully ask your kind approval from your good office to allow
us to gather information from the concerned participants.

We would gladly appreciate your kind approval to thus request.

Thank you very much and God bless.

Respectfully yours, Noted by:

EARL CHRISTIAN A. BORJA DR. ERLITA C. GUERRA


Adviser

NIEL A. SECHICO

DIANNA ROSE S. TERCIÑO KAREN T. PLAZA, MSIT

Researchers Professor
t
4949

49

Appendix B
Letter to the Participants
ST. PAUL UNIVERSITY SURIGAO
Surigao City

______________
MR. ERNANDO L. LAZARITO
Branch Manager
Baug CARP Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative
Brgy. Taft, Surigao City
Thru: MS. GLERILYN J. YAMILO
BCBMPC Member
Dear Ms. Yamilo:
Greetings of peace!

We, the undersigned Bachelor of Science in Accountancy and Accounting Technology


students presently conducting a study entitled “Financial Ratio Analysis of Baug CARP
Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative.”

In this connection, we humbly ask permission from you to allow us to gather information,
which will be needed for the fulfillment of the study. Any information obtained during
this study that could identify you will be kept strictly confidential.
We are hoping that our request will meet your high consideration and grant us the support
all throughout the completion of our study.
Thank you and God bless!

Respectfully Yours,

TERCIÑO, DIANNA ROSE Noted by:


DR. ERLITA GUERRA
BORJA, EARL CHRISTIAN Thesis Adviser

SECHICO, NEIL
Researchers

You might also like