Innov. Infrastruct. Solut.
(2018) 3:1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-017-0104-5
TECHNICAL PAPER
Lateral capacity of pile with grouted upper soil: field test
and numerical simulation
Guangming Yu1,2 · Weiming Gong1,2 · Yuchen Liu1,2 · Guoliang Dai1,2 · Meihe Chen1,2
Received: 28 July 2017 / Accepted: 25 September 2017 / Published online: 17 October 2017
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
Abstract  Laterally loaded piles may entail large deforma-
tion under some circumstances such as ship impact, earth-
quake and long-term horizontal thrust of arch bridges, etc.
The arch bridges are especially sensitive to horizontal dis-
placement of foundation. Lateral load test was performed
on a full-scale pile in virgin soil and pile with post-grouted
soil around pile. Further numerical simulation analysis was
carried out by PLAXIS3D based on field test result. The
analytical and measured results are found to be in fairly
satisfactory agreement. According to test results of single
pile, lateral response of piles largely depends on profile of
limiting force in shallow soil. Horizontal bearing capacity of
bored piles is improved via grouting technique. For pile with
post-grouted soil around, horizontal displacement of pile top
is significantly reduced. The maximum bending moments of
pile with grouting decrease dramatically. The grouted upper
soil expands range of effective soil around pile, and more
horizontal thrust was shared.
Keywords  Thrustful foundation · Lateral displacement ·
Upper soil grouted · Load sharing
This paper was selected from GeoMEast 2017—Sustainable
Civil Infrastructures: Innovative Infrastructure Geotechnology.
* Weiming Gong
yuguang_ming@163.com
1
School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University,
Nanjing 210096, China
2
Key of Laboratory for RC and PRC Structure of Education
Ministry, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
 
Introduction
At present, drilled grouting pile remains the preferred foun-
dation scheme for super high-rise buildings and large-scale
bridges, which have many advantages of strong bearing
capacity of single pile, little settlement and deformation eas-
ily controlled, and so on. At the same time, post-grouting
technique has been widely applied to drilled grouting pile
foundation engineering construction, etc. This technique
has been used in engineering practice for many years to
develop more perfect construction technology and method
than before. A more profound understanding of its func-
tional mechanism is acquired by engineering personnel. The
cement slurry is pressed into the mud around pile by upper
soil post-grouted technique. That contributes to developing
coarser interface between pile and soil and increase friction
between them.
In reinforced concrete facility such as Highway Bridge,
port and pier, and offshore oil platform, etc, horizontal load
is applied in these infrastructures more frequently. Even
combined load applied which include lateral load, vertical
load, and bending moment. According to a large number
of literatures [1–5], response of pile under lateral load is
mainly in the range of upper soils around piles. Therefore,
this measurement that it is post-grouted only in the upper
soil around piles can satisfy the requirement of practical
engineering. There are significantly applied values to study
horizontal load-bearing properties of piles with soil post-
grouted around.
Project profile
New street across the Luo River bridge connects north with
south of Luo River in Luoyang city. It consists of south,
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 
Page 2 of 9 Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. (2018) 3:1

north, and river channel section of the bridge. Main bridge 100
is designed for arch bridge in river channel section and its 90

Pe rce ntage fine r by we ig ht (%)

topside structure for nine spans arch with a single arch span
of 45–95 m. Substructure is designed for low-cap grouting
pile foundation which adopts rotary digging bored piles
construction technology: bridge floor width of 35.5 m, total
length of 618 m, the north approach span length of 289 m,
the south approach length of 206 m, and the flood control
standard for 100 a.
Arch bridge is a kind of statically indeterminate structure
bearing long-termly horizontal thrust. It is very sensitive to
foundation’s displacement, especially lateral displacement.
In some circumstance, pile group foundation is adopted, and
subgrade just provides part constraints to horizontal dis-
placement. However, lateral displacement of piers is likely
to exceed the allowed limit and change arch axis of the main
arch ring in adjacent cross when arch bridge produces long-
term lateral force to piers. As a result, a large additional
bending moment is produced in the main arch ring, so that
the adjacent cross collapsed. Even bridge collapsed in a row.
Geological conditions and soil parameters
There are nine layers of soil around piles. Soil parameters
which show in Table 1 are used to calculate the response of
piles in PLXIS3D. Figure 1 shows particle size distribution
of sand contained in gravel. By analyzing the sieve analysis
test data, it was found that the gradation of sand was bad,
with even coarse grains with diameters mostly exceeded
0.5 mm.
Grouting scheme
Pile under vertical load ability is stronger, but a lot of
engineering pile top will bear horizontal load; Piles’ ver-
tical bearing capacity is higher than horizontal bearing
capacity. In a vast quantity of engineering, however, pile
foundations have to bear lateral load. Soil post-grouted
technique was used in drilled grouting pile foundation
engineering construction to improve its bearing capacity,
so that safety of arch bridge can be ensured. The piles have
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
    
Particle size (mm)
Fig. 1  Particle size distribution of sand
a diameter of D = 2.0 m and a length of L = 35.0 m (rela-
tive length L/D = 17.5). Figure 2 shows grouting scheme.
The Chinese JGJ design code (JGJ94-2008) recommends
mainly influenced depth under lateral load is 2 (D + 1), so
the depth of grouted soil is 6 m. Grouting pipe’s diffusion
radius is 0.5 m. The range of grouted soil around pile is
half ring with 1.0 m in diameter away from lateral sides
of piles.
Establishment of numerical model
We performed numerical simulation of lateral load test
process employing the FE method, using the geotechni-
cal finite-element analysis software PLAXIS3D. Two pile
models were calculated, general drilled grouting pile and
drilled grouting pile with upper soil grouted, respectively.
The soil model range is 30 m × 30 m, and 60 m in depth,
which is consisted of nine layers of soil. Volume pile from
PLAXIS is chosen to simulate mechanical characteristic of
pile. We modelled soil with tetrahedral continuum finite
elements. We employed the elastoplastic constitutive rela-
tionship: Mohr–coulomb failure criterion. In this test, lat-
eral surface load is applied at the top of pile according to

Table 1  Soil parameters Item Natural unit weight Friction resistance Compression modu- Internal fric-
(KN/m3) (kPa) lus (MPa) tion angle (°)

⑥-2Fine sand 19.2 35 15 23

⑥-3Round Gravel 20 70 22 27
⑥Gravel 21.2 100 30 33
⑨-2Round Gravel 20.8 90 27 30
⑨Gravel 21.6 140 35 35
⑩-2Round Gravel 21 110 30 32
⑩Gravel 22 170 40 38

13
Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. (2018) 3:1 Page 3 of 9  1

Fig. 2  Grouting scheme. a
Structure diagram of grouting
hole. b Structure diagram of
steel flower tube

Fig. 3  Soil model

slowly maintaining load method. It is divided into nine
levels of load with increment of 150 KN. The maximum
load value is 1500 KN. Figure 3 shows the distribution of
soil layers.
Parameters back analysis
Figures 4, 5 illustrate arrangement for two piles under lat-
eral loading and field test pile schematic. In this test pro-
cess, lateral loads vary from 300 to 1500 KN at the incre-
ment of 150 KN, and load divided into nine levels, and
unload divided into five levels. Figure 6 shows piles’ lateral

13
1 
Page 4 of 9 Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. (2018) 3:1

Fig. 4  Arrangement for two

piles under lateral loading. a
Field test, b high-pressure oil
pump

makes up for the deficiency that the particular situation of

piles–soil interaction cannot be observed under the existing
test condition. Residual deformation of pile head is 4.2 mm
for pile in virgin soil after unloading, while it is only 2.5 mm
for pile with upper soil grouted. By parameters back analysis
method, it is suitable that Mohr–coulomb model is used for
grouted soil. Its Young’s modulus is 3.4 times than virgin
soil, and can increase from 0.5 kpa to 19, and internal fric-
tion angle can be changed from 27° to 40°.

Analysis of results

Fig. 5  Field test pile schematic Displacement of piles

Figure  7 shows deformation curve of pile shaft from

12
Test result with virgin soil PLAXIS result for two kinds of pile under different levels of
Displacement at pile top/mm

FE result with virgin soil horizontal load. In loading process, deformation of pile head
10 Test result with grouted soil
FE result with grouted soil
varies from 1.23 to 10.2 mm for pile in virgin soil, while it
8 varies from 0.97 to 7.27 mm for pile with upper soil grouted
under the same levels of lateral load, and increases slowly.
6 The depth of the lateral displacement response is −10.5 m
when load reaches to 1500 KN. It is −10.2 m for pile with
4 upper soil grouted. Therefore, there is no distinct difference
in the depth of the lateral displacement response. Therefore,
2 it is soil grouted around pile that enhances the ability of
resistance to lateral displacement of pile. This method of
0 soil post-grouted around pile can be considered to apply to
0 300 600 900 1200 1500
Lateral Load/kN pile foundation engineering, especially when it is sensitive
to lateral displacement, improving the safety and reliability
Fig. 6  Lateral load vs. displacement curve in engineering.

displacements in loading and unloading processes for pile Moments of piles

in virgin soil and pile with upper soil grouted. It can be
concluded from figure that the finite-element analytical and
measured results are found to be in fairly satisfactory agree-
ment. Therefore, the further analysis of pile–soil interaction
is conducted via PLAXIS on the basis of testing data, which
Figure 8 shows pile-bending moment distribution of pile in
virgin soil and pile with upper soil grouted under different
levels of horizontal load. The bending moments of pile in
virgin soil increase more quickly than pile with grouting.

13
Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. (2018) 3:1 Page 5 of 9  1

Lateral displacement/mm Lateral displacement/mm

-5 0 5 10 15 -2 0 2 4 6 8
0 0

5 5

10 Lateral load 300kN 10 Lateral load 300kN

Lateral load 450kN Lateral load 450kN

Depth/m
Depth/m

15 Lateral load 600kN 15 Lateral load 600kN

Lateral load 750kN Lateral load 750kN
20 20 Lateral load 900kN
Lateral load 900kN
Lateral load 1050kN 25 Lateral load 1050kN
25
Lateral load 1200kN Lateral load 1200kN
30 Lateral load 1350kN 30 Lateral load 1350kN
Lateral load 1500kN Lateral load 1500kN
35 35
(a) (b)

Fig. 7  Pile deformation vs. depth curve. a Pile in virgin soil, b pile with grouted soil

Moment/kN·m Moment/kN·m
-1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 -500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
0 0

5 5

10 10
Lateral load 300kN Lateral load 300kN
Depth/m
Depth/m

15 Lateral load 450kN 15 Lateral load 450kN

Lateral load 600kN
20 Lateral load 750kN
Lateral load 900kN
25 Lateral load 1050kN
Lateral load 1200kN
30 Lateral load 1350kN
Lateral load 1500kN
35
(a)
Lateral load 600kN
20 Lateral load 750kN
Lateral load 900kN
25 Lateral load 1050kN
Lateral load 1200kN
30 Lateral load 1350kN
Lateral load 1500kN
35
(b)

Fig. 8  Bending moments vs. depth curve. a Pile in virgin soil, b pile with grouted soil

Maximum moments of pile in virgin soil vary from 460 to
3437 KN m as different levels of lateral load are applied.
However, maximum moments of pile with grouting vary
from 346 to 2580 KN m as different levels of lateral load are
applied. The maximum moments were decreased by 25%.
Therefore, this treatment method that soil around pile
is post-grouted can make moments of piles to decrease
dramatically and improve the safety of pile greatly. More
horizontal thrusts are shared by soil around pile.
Shear force of pile
Figure 9 shows pile’s shear force distribution of pile in virgin
soil and pile with upper soil grouted under different levels
of horizontal load. Pile’s maximum shear force locates in the
top of pile. From the perspective of shear overall distribution,
shear force of pile with grouting along depth is less than pile in
virgin soil. The maximum shear force of lower part of pile in

13
1 
Page 6 of 9 Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. (2018) 3:1

Shear force/kN Shear force/kN

-500 0 500 1000 1500 -500 0 500 1000 1500
0 0

5 5

10 Lateral load 300kN 10 Lateral load 300kN

Lateral load 450kN Lateral load 450kN
Lateral load 600kN
Depth/m

Depth/m
15 Lateral load 600kN 15
Lateral load 750kN Lateral load 750kN
20 Lateral load 900kN 20 Lateral load 900kN
Lateral load 1050kN Lateral load 1050kN
25 Lateral load 1200kN 25 Lateral load 1200kN
Lateral load 1350kN Lateral load 1350kN
30 Lateral load 1500kN Lateral load 1500kN
30

35 35
(a) (b)

Fig. 9  Shear force vs. depth curve. a Pile in virgin soil, b pile with grouted soil

virgin soil varies from 54 KN to 433 KN m as different levels
of lateral load are applied; while the maximum shear force of
pile with upper soil grouted in the same position varies from
39 to 323 KN with increasing lateral load, it reduces by 25%
under maximum load value.
Nephogram analysis
Planar nephogram analysis
Figure 10 shows lateral displacement nephogram of soil
around pile. The initial phase in Fig. 10a is K0 procedure
that the initial effective stresses, pore pressures, and state
parameters are generated directly. There is no displacement
in this calculation.
Figure 10b–d shows different lateral displacement planar
nephograms at mud surface when loads are applied at the top
of pile from 300, 750, and 1500 KN. Compared with pile in
virgin soil, influence scope of soil subjected lateral load is
larger for pile with upper soil grouted and has smaller defor-
mation. Along the direction of loading, displacement iso-
line of pile with grouting is sparser than pile in virgin soils.
Along the direction perpendicular to the loading, effective
soil resisting lateral load expands dramatically for pile with
grouting. The range of treated soil increases significantly in
terms of lateral displacement.
Profile nephogram analysis
Figure 11 shows lateral displacement profile nephogram of
soil around pile under 1500 KN. In terms of working soil
profile, influence scope of soil subjected lateral load is also
larger for pile with upper soil grouted than for pile in virgin
soil. Expanding soil shares more lateral loads, so that hori-
zontal displacement of pile with grouting becomes smaller.
It can be concluded that increasing strength of grouted soil
results in decreasing displacement field from Fig. 12.
Ashour et al. [6] and Ardalan and Ashour [7] used an
envisaged 3D strain wedge (SW) model to determine pile
reaction under lateral loads. The SW model was able to link
between the more complex 3D soil–pile interaction and a
simpler one-dimensional characterization. Figure 13 shows
that the shape of soil resistance on front of pile is like three-
dimensional wedge.
Conclusion
From this test result and numerical calculation study, several
interesting conclusions can be drawn. These can be used in
practice as a design guideline for the case, where piles are
sensitive to horizontal displacement.
1. The finite-element analytical results coincide well with
the measured results for pile in virgin soil and pile with
upper soil grouted. It meets the requirements of valida-
tion.
2. The key to the response of pile under horizontal load is
profile of limiting force in shallow soil. Resistant ability
of lateral displacement can be effectively enhanced by
this method of upper soil grouted around pile.
3. Compared with un-grouted pile, the value of maximum
bending moments for grouted pile and pile’s shear force
reduces with superior safety of pile.

13
Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. (2018) 3:1 Page 7 of 9  1

Fig. 10  Planar nephogram of soil

13
1 
Page 8 of 9 Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. (2018) 3:1

Fig. 11  Profile nephogram (1500 KN)

Fig. 12  Displacement field of pile and soil (1500 KN)

Fig. 13  Iso-surfaces of lateral displacement (1500 KN)

13
Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. (2018) 3:1 Page 9 of 9  1
4. Soil around pile is treated with post-grouted technique,
and the range of effective soil providing resistance
expands to share more lateral load, reducing displace-
ment of pile head.
5. In terms of reducing lateral displacement, this treatment
method that soil around pile is post-grouted can be con-
sidered to adopt in pile foundation sensitive to lateral
displacement.
Acknowledgements  The research work presented in this paper is sup-
ported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program,
Grant 2013CB036304) and the National Natural Science Foundation
of China (NSFC) (Grant 51478109), for which the authors are grateful.
References
1. Guo WD (2004) On limiting force profile, critical depth, and lat-
eral pile response. Comput Geotech 33(1):47–67
2. Poulos HG (1971) Behavior of laterally loaded piles II. Pile
groups. J Soil Mech Found Div
3. Randolph MF, Jewell RJ, Poulos HG (1988) Evaluation of pile
lateral load performance. Proc Eng calcareous sediments 639–645
4. Randolph MF, Houlsby GT (1984) The limiting pressure on a
circular pile loaded laterally in cohesive soil. Geotechnique
34(4):613–623
5. Wan Z (2015) Horizontal static load test research for pile lateral
friction and tip resistance of grouting technique. Chin J Rock
Mech Eng
6. Ashour M, Norris G, Pilling P (1998) Lateral loading of a pile in
layered soil using the strain wedge model. J Geotech Geoenviron
Eng 124(4):303–315
7. Ardalan H, Ashour M (2013) Application of the strain wedge
model in soil–pile interaction analysis of pile-stabilized slopes.
In: Meehan C, Pradel D, Pando MA, Labuz JF (eds) Geo-congress
2013: stability and performance of slopes and embankments III.
ASCE, Reston, pp 1944–1955
13