Professional Documents
Culture Documents
impact at a 2 day workshop involving members of the team that conducted the Third Party
Project research (Walsh Peru S.A.), the CEA assessment team (IDP) and PERU LNG
personnel. The test of relevance was broadly based but essentially involved an assessment
of the type of project and the potential for interaction with the PERU LNG Projects6. Twenty
two projects were rejected at this stage, leaving 7 for more detailed assessment.
6
Examples of programmes deemed to be not relevant in the context of the CEA included those relating to
education, many health and poverty alleviation initiatives, consolidating pacification in the area following the
political unrest, promoting the return of displaced people, strengthening agricultural productivity, for example the
productive chain for alpaca wool and meat in a subsistence economy.
7
Technical Secretary of the National Agreement (2006): National Agreement: Report on the policies of the State. Note
also that the Departments of Ayacucho and Huancavelica, through which the PERU LNG pipeline crosses, have low
development rates and are considered to be amongst the poorest Departments in Peru (Walsh, 2005)
Page 40 of 134