Professional Documents
Culture Documents
fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/LAWP.2014.2321503, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
1
1536-1225 (c) 2013 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/LAWP.2014.2321503, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
2
U-shaped slots (marked in red) are considered to design and adjacent radiator of the antenna, which is also shown in Fig.1
excite the resonance mode at high frequency. Two smaller (c) and (d). So as to get the center pin of the SMA connector
U-shaped slots (marked in dark blue) which are used to to the feeding line, a circle is etched on the ground plane. The
produce a low resonance mode are loaded at separated ends of ground pin of the SMA connector is connected to the ground
the two larger U-shaped slots. plane. This could also been seen from Fig.1(c) and (d).
Parameters GW GL S V H
x Feed to SMA connector
Value(mm) 160 160 17 16 20
(a) Parameters b c a p L
c L10 Value(mm) 12 1 9.5 5 10
Parameters W W10 W11 L10 L11
W10
Value(mm) 60 12 12 25 25
W W11
p
y L11
x
d
S
L
(b)
z Feed line
y a
Copper plate Fig.2. Prototype of the manufactured antenna.
b
H 0
-5
Ground plane
-10
SMA connector
S11(dB)
(c) -15
z V
-20
-25
Simulated results
x Copper plate Measured results
-30
2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
Frequency(GHz)
Ground plane SMA connector
Fig.3. Simulated and measured results of S11 of the present antenna.
(d)
Fig.1. (a) 3D view. (b) Top view. (c) Front view. (d) Side view of the
proposed antenna. Fig.2 shows the prototype of the manufactured antenna. The
simulated and measured S11 is shown in Fig.3, from which it
To excite this antenna, a Γ-shaped strip line folded by a can been seen that two results have good agreement, though
rectangular copper line with a width of 5mm is applied, which some manufacture and measurement error leads to small shift
turns out to be efficient for good impedance matching [9]. In of measured results. From the measured S11, it is clear that the
order to transfer electromagnetic energy from the coaxial feed proposed antenna works at 2.38GHz with a -10dB bandwidth
to the radiating element, one end of this feeding line connects of 240MHz (2.26-2.5GHz) and works at 3.58GHz with an
to a SMA connector mounted on the ground plane and the impedance of 600MHz (3.28-3.88GHz), which can be well
other end is open-ended which helps to couple energy to the applied to 2.4GHz wireless local area network (WLAN) and
1536-1225 (c) 2013 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/LAWP.2014.2321503, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
3
3.5GHz worldwide interoperability for microwave access corresponding physical parameters of the radiation arms,
(WiMAX) operations. which will be investigated in section IV.
The simulated and measured radiation patterns are shown in
Fig. 4, in which cross polarizations at different working
12
frequencies are also plotted to reveal the radiation
performance of the present antenna. For the front direction of 10
Gain(dBi)
8
working bands is about 24dBi and 30dBi respectively. As for
the front-to-back ratio, a value of near 30dBi for both low 6
band and high band is obtained from the measured results. Simulated gains
Measured gains
Besides, radiation patterns for both E plane and H plane are 4
0
Fig. 5. Simulated (black line) and measured (red line) gain of presented
330 10 30
antenna in two working bands.
0
-10
300 60
-20
-30
-40
270 90
-40
-30
-20
240 120
-10
210 10 150
180
1(a) (b)
(a) (b)
Fig. 6. Current distributions on radiation patches. (a) 2.4 GHz and (b) 5 GHz.
0 0
330 10 30 330 30
10
0 0
300
-10
60 300 -10 60 IV. PARAMETRIC STUDY
-20 -20
-10 120
how some main parameters influence the antenna’s
-10
0 0 performance.
10 10
210 150 210 150 0
180 180
-5
-15
simulated co-pol simulated cross-pol
S11(dB)
-20
measured co-pol measured cross-pol -25
H=15mm
-30
H=20mm
Fig.4. Simulated and measured radiation patterns for co-polarization and -35
H=25mm
cross-polarization. (a) E-plane at 2.4 GHz. (b) H-plane at 2.4GHz. (c) E-plane
at 3.5GHz. (d) H-plane at 3.5GHz. -40
2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
Frequency(GHz)
In Fig.5, the simulated and measured gains with different Fig. 7. S11 versus frequency with different H.
working frequency points are plotted. It can be seen from
measured results that this antenna can provide stable high Firstly, the Fig.7 shows S11 versus frequency with different
gains of near 8.0 dBi and 11.0 dBi at the low and high H. It is noted that if H is too large, take 25mm for example,
working frequencies, respectively. the gamma matching turns bad, especially for low frequency.
The current distributions at different frequencies are shown And when H is too small, the impedance matching between
in Fig.6 to comprehend the radiation mechanism of the present 2.4GHz and 3.5GHz gets close to -10dB which is not for
antenna. As is shown, the smaller U-shaped slots play the dual-band design. Thus, the value of H is chosen as 20mm for
dominant role in the radiation at low frequency 2.4GHz in dual-band antenna design.
Fig.6 (a). From current distributions of Fig.6 (b), the bigger Simulated S11 with a different width (W) of the big
U-shaped slots play the major role of the high resonance mode U-shaped slots case1: W=60mm; case2: W=70mm; case3:
at 3.5GHz. According to above explanations, it is possible to W=80mm are shown in Fig.8. From the results, we can find
effectively control two frequency bands according to that W plays a significant part in tuning the position of high
1536-1225 (c) 2013 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/LAWP.2014.2321503, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
4
working frequency, and has very small influence on the low To conclude, different physical size of U-shaped slots can
working frequency. Basically, a smaller value of W provide effective and flexible control on the positions of the
corresponds to a higher operating frequency, which is due to two working bands of the presented base station antenna,
the increase of resonance current path. which could be as the reference for the adjustment to possible
Fig.9 depicts responses of S11 with different dimensions of practical manufacture error and extension to other possible
small U-shaped slots in the case that the large U-shaped slots communication band.
keep unchanged. These investigated parameters include the As for the use of the proposed antenna, it is our further
length of small arms: L10, and the width of small arms: W10. work to deal with. Taking outdoor coverage as an example,
The three cases are considered to control the position of low the proposed antenna could be used for WLAN and WiMAX
working frequency: case4: L10=25mm, W10=2mm; case5: application. In order to cover different communication areas,
L10=24mm, W10=12mm; case6: L10=20mm, W10=22mm. reasonable arrangement for arrays could be constructed to
As the inner arms of small U-shaped patches may produce accomplish omnidirectional of the base station antennas. For
coupling which may affect the current distribution. Unequal example, linear antennas could be placed in the form of circle,
arms are taken into consideration. Here W11 and L11 are rectangular or hexagon etc, as described in [9]. The proposed
chosen with the value of 12mm and 35mm separately. With antenna could be designed for arrays that compose of multiple
different combinations of W10 and L10, the center frequency antennas to satisfy higher requirement of omnidirectional,
of low band can be flexibly changed. high gain and low back lobe radiation.
V. CONCLUSION
A dual-band unidirectional antenna with high gain is
presented in this research. According to measured results , it is
found that the antenna have a bandwidth and peak gain of
10.0%, 8.0dBi, and 16.7%, 11.0dBi at the working frequencies
of 2.38 GHz and 3.58 GHz, respectively. The positions of two
working bands can also be separately controlled according to
0
some main parameter changes. The good performances make
-5
it better candidate for base antenna design in WLAN/WiMAX
-10
communication system.
-15
S11(dB)
-20
case1(sim.) VI. REFERENCES
-25 case2(sim.)
case3(sim.)
-30
case1(mea.) [1] S. Chaimool, and K. L. Chung, “CPW-fed mirrored-L monopole antenna
-35 case2(mea.) with distinct triple bands for WiFi and WiMAX applications,” Electron.
case3(mea.) Lett., vol.45, no.18, pp. 928-929, 2009.
-40
2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 [2] M. A. Toaha, I. M. Tariqul, M. Norbahiah, “A novel high-gain dual band
Frequency(GHz) antenna for RFID reader applications,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag.
Lett., vol.9, pp.653-656, 2010.
Fig.8. Simulated and measured S11 with a different width (W) of the big [3] S. M. A. Nezhad and H. R. Hassani, “A novel triband E-Shaped printed
U-shaped slots. case1: W=60mm; case2: W=70mm; case3: W=80mm. monopole antenna for MIMO application,” IEEE Antennas Wireless
Propag. Lett., vol.9, pp.576-579, 2010.
[4] W. X. An, H. Wong, K. L. Lau, S. F. Li, and Q. Xue, “Design of
broadband dual-band dipole for base station antenna,” IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag.,vol.60, no.3, pp.1592-1595, 2012.
[5] S. Behera, K. J. Vinoy, “Multi-port network approach for the analysis of
dual band fractal microstrip antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.,
vol.60, no.11, pp.5100-5106, 2012.
[6]H.-M. Chen,Y.-K. Wang,Y.-F. Lin,S.-C. Lin, and S.-C. Pan, “A compact
dual-band dielectric resonator antenna using a parasitic slot,” IEEE
Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol.8, pp.173-176, 2009.
0 [7]M. Hamid, D. Mojgan, M. Pedram, “A dual-band high-gain resonator
-5
antenna with orthogonal polarizations,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag.
Lett., vol.10, pp.1220-1223, 2011.
-10 [8]Y. B. Jung, “Dual-band reconfigurable antenna for base-station
-15 applications,” Electron. Lett., vol.46, no.3, pp.195-196, 2010.
S11(dB)
Frequency(GHz)
Fig.9. Simulated and measured S11of different dimensions of the small
U-shaped slots on S11 against frequency. case4:W10=2mm, L10=25mm.
case5:W10=12mm, L10=24mm. case6:W10=22mm, L10=20mm.
1536-1225 (c) 2013 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.