Title Credibility Summary: Does this Great My Other

of two, three voice quote with Analysis/t

author/org meaty agree/disa appropriat houghts-
anization sentences gree with e signal can be
using an written others? phrase more
appositive. objectively (see TSIS casual.
Rhetorical pp. 39-40).
situation
including
intended
audience.

“Let’s Salman In this video This voice “On that I believe This video
teach for Khan is an Khan does agree test, maybe that this will help
mastery- entrepreneur outlines who and I get a 75 topic of students
not test , who education is correlate percent, testing is the want to
founded mainly with others main source learn for
scores” maybe you
Khan focused on in to my topic. themselves
Ted Talk get a 90
Academy. teaching for expressing It is not not for a
by Sal Khan tests. that testing percent,ma exactly specific
Khan. This Academy is Mastering a should not ybe you get about grade.
Ted Talk an online skill is not a be as a 95 standardized
video was education huge focused on percent. testing but
filmed on platform concern for as it is. And even can correlate
September that a lot of though the very well.
6, 2016. produces people is all test
over 6,500 about what identified
videos number you gaps in our
teaching get on a test. knowledge,
diverse But, if a
I didn't
subjects. student gets
an 80% they know 25
still have not percent of
mastering the
the topic material.
because of Even the A
the other student,
20%. what was
the five
percent
they didn't
know?”

https://www.ted.com/talks/sal_khan_let_s_teach_for_mastery_not_test_scores/transcript?awesm=on.ted.com_i0wK0&utm_medium
=on.ted.com-android-share&utm_campaign=&utm_source=direct-on.ted.com&utm_content=ted-androida
 Title Credibility Summary: Does this Great My Other
of two, three voice quote with Analysis/t
author/org meaty agree/disa appropriat houghts-
anization sentences gree with e signal can be
using an written others? phrase more
appositive. objectively (see TSIS casual.
Rhetorical pp. 39-40).
situation
including
intended
audience.

“Result of Written by Hampshire This voice “In our This will

Removing Jonathan College has does agree admissions, help my
Standardize Lash on removed with others we review research
d Test September standardized when stating an because it
Scores 21, 2015. testing from that applicant’s will allow
Lash is the their college standardized me to have
from whole
president of admissions. test scores proper
College Hampshire This article should not academic research
Admissions College. is the result be used in and lived with
” after one college experience. relevant data
year of admissions. We to support
removing consider an my claim.
these tests. applicant’s
They ability to
believe that present
standardized themselves
test scores in essays
do not
and
predict a
student’s interviews,
success review
because they their
look at the recommend
applicant’s ations from
whole mentors,
academic and assess
experience. factors
such as
their
community
engagemen
t and
entrepreneu
rism.

https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2018/05/college-admissions-gpa-sat-act/561167/
Title Credibility Summary: Does this Great My Other
of two, three voice quote with Analysis/t
author/org meaty agree/disa appropriat houghts-
anization sentences gree with e signal can be
using an written others? phrase more
appositive. objectively (see TSIS casual.
Rhetorical pp. 39-40).
situation
including
intended
audience.

“University Written by University This voice “The I believe this

of Chicago Dawn of Chicago, does agree decision article will
to stop Rhodes on a prestigious with other marks a be very
requiring June 14, university, but is very dramatic helpful for
2018. Dawn has unique as an my research
ACT and shift for the
Rhodes is a announced university. because it
SAT scores South Side
reporter for that they Most higher will allow
for Chicago will no level university me to obtain
prospective Tribune. longer universities and statistics
undergradu Rhodes require require test establishes from a very
ates” covers applicants scores. it as the prestigious
mostly for the first top- university.
Illinois’ undergradua ranked,
public and te college to highly
private submit selective
universities, standardized school to
and test scores. do away
education The
with
policy. undergradua
tes can send requiring
transcripts test
and submit a scores.”
video
introduction.
This will
make it
easier for
first-
generation,
low-income
and minority
students to
apply to
school.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-university-chicago-sat-act-20180614-
story.html

Title Credibility Summary: Does this Great My Other

of two, three voice quote with Analysis/t
author/org meaty agree/disa appropriat houghts-
anization sentences gree with e signal can be
using an written others? phrase more
appositive. objectively (see TSIS casual.
Rhetorical pp. 39-40).
situation
including
intended
audience.

“Study: Written by This article This voice “Colleges I believe

Colleges Claudio is stating does agree that have that this
That Ditch Sanchez on that if with my gone “test topic will be
The SAT April 26, universities claim but optional” very useful
and ACT 2018. became test- also with the enroll-and for my paper
Claudio optional other because it
Can graduate- a
Sanchez is a than the schools who will allow
Enhance former diversity are test- higher me to have
Diversity” elementary rates would optional. proportion valid
and middle increase. of low- research for
school The research income and the increase
teacher. team studied first in diversity.
Currently he 28 public generation-
is an and private students,
education institutions and more
corresponde that no students
nt for NPR. longer from
require test
diverse
scores and
tracked background
about s”
956,000
student
records.
Their
research
showed that
if an
institute
wants to do
a better job
 at serving
underserved
populations,
test-optional
schools
would be
very useful.

https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2018/04/26/604875394/study-colleges-that-ditch-the-sat-and-
act-can-enhance-diversity

Title Credibility Summary: Does this Great My Other

of two, three voice quote with Analysis/t
author/org meaty agree/disa appropriat houghts-
anization sentences gree with e signal can be
using an written others? phrase more
appositive. objectively (see TSIS casual.
Rhetorical pp. 39-40).
situation
including
intended
audience.

“OPINION This article This article This article “The book I think that
: is by Jack is stating agrees with also this article
Standardize Buckley and that some but provides can add to
d tests offer published on standardized does not detailed my essay
‘a neutral April 24, test scores agree with evidence because it
2018. Jack have a lot of my that can allow
yardstick’
Buckley is benefits for perspective. standardized me to add
in college the senior college test scores- the other
admissions vice admissions. especially perspective.
” by Jack president of The author when
Buckley research and of this combined
evaluation at article takes with grades-
the into account have
American both sides of significant
Institutes for the predictive
Research argument. validity for
and a As the college
research article goes performance
associate on they ”
professor of mostly focus
 applied on how test
statistics at scores
New York would help
University. the
professors
predict
success in
college.

https://hechingerreport.org/opinion-standardized-tests-offer-a-neutral-yardstick-in-college-
admissions/

Title Credibility Summary: Does this Great My Other

of two, three voice quote with Analysis/t
author/org meaty agree/disa appropriat houghts-
anization sentences gree with e signal can be
using an written others? phrase more
appositive. objectively (see TSIS casual.
Rhetorical pp. 39-40).
situation
including
intended
audience.

“12 This article This article This article “The This article
advantages is written by strictly considers advantages will allow
and Crystal outlines the both and me to
disadvanta Ayres. advantages perspectives disadvantag consider
ges of Ayres is and of the es of both of the
chief editor disadvantag argument. It standardized perspectives
standardize of the es of outlines testing show of the
d testing” Vittana standardized good things that it can be argument.
 blog. Their testing. about the useful tool
goal is to These tests tests and bad for student
publish high provide a things. evaluation,
quality way to but only
content compare when it is
about some students used
of the knowledge. correctly”
biggest On the other
issues hand, they
around the do not
world. consider all
of the
aspects of a
student.

https://vittana.org/12-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-standardized-testing

Title Credibility Summary: Does this Great My Other

of two, three voice quote with Analysis/t
author/org meaty agree/disa appropriat houghts-
anization sentences gree with e signal can be
using an written others? phrase more
appositive. objectively (see TSIS casual.
Rhetorical pp. 39-40).
situation
including
intended
audience.

“What This This video is This voice “Adeli’s This video

standardize TedTalk about how agrees with argument is will be very
d tests was by standardized my that good for my
don’t Nikki Adeli. testing does perspective Scantrons paper
measure” Adeli is a not measure and also don’t because it
Junior in all the allows me to measure will allow
high school. aspects have higher-order me to have
about a personal thinking. an opinion
student. opinions. They don’t from a
Adeli had measure student who
been given a creativity or is going
national innovation.” through the
 stage to struggle.
propose a
call to action
for herself
and students
like her.
Standardize
d testing do
not measure
creativity or
innovation.

https://www.cmasas.org/what-standardized-tests-dont-measure

https://patch.com/new-jersey/newbrunswick/bp--the-college-board-a-very-profitable-nonprofit
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/14/us/college-admission-cheating-universities-react/index.html
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/12/us/william-rick-singer-and-the-key-profile/index.html
https://news.psu.edu/story/165456/2010/08/23/standardized-tests-not-always-best-indicator-
success