Professional Documents
Culture Documents
B. Classification of corporation
C. Nationality of Corporation
1. Control test
2. Grandfather rule
Cases: Wilson Gamboa v. Sec. Margarito Teves, G.R. No. 176579, June 28,
2011
Cases: CIR v. Norton and Harrison Co., G.R. No. 17618, Aug. 31, 1964
Mcleod v. NLRC, G.R. No. 146667, Jan. 23, 2007
Cases: Albert v. University Publishing, Inc. G.R. No. 10118, June 16, 1965
5. Libel
Cases: Filipina Broadcasting v. Ago Medical Center, GR. No. 141994, Jan. 17,
2005
Cases: PNB v. CA, G.R. No. GR No. 27155, May 18, 1978
Cases: Professional Services Inc. v. CA, G.R. No. 126297, Feb. 2, 2010
BAR 2002: List the documents that you must submit to Securities and Exchange
Commission to obtain a Certificate of Incorporation of a corporation.
Cases: Kukan International Corp v. Reyes, G.R. No. 182729, Sept. 29, 2010
2. Subscription contract
Cases: Jaka Investment Corp v. CIR, G.R. No. 147629, July 28, 2010
Ong Yong v. Tiu, G.R. No. 144476, April 8, 2003
1. Contents
2. Non-amenable items
3. Doctrine of substantial compliance
G. Corporate name
H. Commencement of corporate existence
1. Genossenschaft Theory
2. Theory of Concession
3. Theory of corporate enterprise or Economic unit
I. De facto corporation
1. Fiduciary duties
1. Methods of voting
a. Straight voting
b. Cumulative voting
2. In a non-stock corporation
Cases: Valle Verde Country Club, Inc. v. Africa, G.R.No. 151969, September
4, 2009
Tan v. Sycip, G.R. No. 153468, August 17, 2006
BAR 2001: May a corporation provide in its By-Laws that “the directors be
relieved from all liability for any contract entered into by the corporation”?
A. Classification of Shares
1. Express powers
2. Implied powers
3. Incidental or inherent powers
Cases: Cebu Bionic Builders Supply v. DBP, G.R. 154366, Nov. 17, 2010
Shipside Inc. v. CA, G.R. No. 143377, Feb. 20, 2001
b.1. Limitation
b.2. Necessity
BAR 2001: What are two ways by which the authorized capital stock of a
Corporation be increased?
BAR 2001: What does the law require regarding earnings of the
corporation in excess of 100% of the corporation’s paid-in capital?
i.3 Ratification
PART V - BY LAWS
b) Binding effects
Cases: PMI Colleges v. NLRC, G.R. No. 121466, Aug. 15, 1997
PART VI –MEETINGS
Cases: Expert Travel & Tours v. CA, G.R. No. 152392, May 26, 2005
B. Derivative Suit
C. Liabilities of Stockholders
F. Certificate of Stock
1. Nature of the certificate
2. Uncertified Shares
3. Negotiability
4. Requirement for valid transfer of stocks
BAR 2001
5. Issuance
6. Full Payment
7. Payment pro-rata
8. Stock and Transfer Book
9. Lost or destroyed cerficates
10. Situs of the shares of stock
A. Contents
A. Educational Corporation
B. Religious Corporations
PART XV – DISSOLUTION
BAR 2001: “X” Corporation shortened its corporate life by amending its articles of
incorporation. It has no debts but owns a prime property located in Quezon City.
How would the said property be liquidated among the five stockholders of said
corporation? Discuss two methods of liquidation.
BAR 2002: Name three (3) methods by which a stock corporation may be
voluntarily dissolved. Explain each method.
BAR 2002:
A. What is the legal test for determining if an unlicensed foreign corporation is
doing business in the Philippines?
B. Give at least three (3) examples of the acts or activities that are specifically
identified under our foreign investment laws as constituting “doing business
in the Philippines.
GOOD LUCK!
2. Compared with conditions in 1983, where the study of law was limited to
textbooks, library resources like the SCRA, and lectures, today has a lot of study aids
and facilities, particularly the internet and CDs. I prepared the syllabus while
vacationing in the U.S.A. and it was not a problem having no law library or
Philippine law references. All I needed was to open the internet. You have a
question in your mind, google it and it’s there. So let’s take advantage of all the
facilities provided. Having been a judge, I know that there is a regularly updated CD
on cases starting 1990. So request or borrow a copy from a friendly judge, if any,
and you do not need to go to the library for case digest. For case digests, you also
google.
3. Having been a law professor in St. Louis University, College of Law, for many
years, I have known intelligent law students who did not make it in their first take
of the Bar. One big factor, I theorized, had something to do with penmanship. There
is one good advice to improve penmanship. Start by making your letters “big and
round.” A good friend of mine took the Bar 4 times. Before the 4th take, we advised
him not review anymore. He would spend all his time improving his handwriting.
And he made it. He has been a councilor of Baguio City for several terms.
4. As student, and soon as a Bar examinee, consider a serious focus on the following:
a) of course a mastery of the subjects, b) review your grammar, humbly asking
comment from friends, c) understand what a logical presentation means, and d)
improve your handwriting.
5. I prepared a syllabus for this course. I am passing around a piece of paper where
you will write your name, cell phone number, and email address (2x). I will email
you a copy of the syllabus.
6. Lets budget our time: You have two exams, midterms and finals. We have 16
parts and thus, we should be able to study 8 parts before midterm, and the other 8
parts before finals.