You are on page 1of 8

J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2013) 295:143–150

DOI 10.1007/s10967-012-1876-x

Toxic element composition of multani mitti clay


for nutritional safety
S. Waheed • Y. Faiz • S. Rahman • N. Siddique

Received: 16 February 2012 / Published online: 12 June 2012


Ó Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012

Abstract Geophagy of multani mitti (MM) clay is very Introduction


common in central Pakistan especially amongst women. It
was therefore mandatory to establish baseline levels of Human beings have been aware of the beneficial health
toxic elements in this clay for its safe dietary consumption effects of clays since prehistoric times. Many ancient
by consumers of different genders, age groups and physical civilizations ingested and used natural clays in small
states. Instrumental neutron activation analysis and atomic amounts for nutritional and therapeutic purposes [1, 2].
absorption spectrometry techniques were used to determine Clays are unique in their mineral composition and help
the nutritional safety of MM clay for oral intake. All strengthen the body and enhance our natural immune
quantified toxic elements were detected at trace levels with system. Clays are also used in pharmaceutical formula-
composition in the descending order; Pb [ Br [ As [ tions. The habit of eating earth components including clay
Sb [ Hg [ Cd. Comparison of these elements in MM clay is commonly termed as geophagy and can counteract the
with other clays shows that As, Cd, and Pb, are lowest in inadequacy of minerals supply from food. Nature has laid
MM clay while its Br and Hg contents are high. Highest down a balanced ratio of different essential trace minerals
weekly dietary intakes of As, Br, Cd, Hg, and Sb were in clays depending on their type and geophysical feature.
found to be 18, 0.05, 1.6, 9.2 and 1.1 % of the respective Clay minerals can adsorb and retain harmful and toxic
recommended provisional tolerable weekly intakes. The substances in human beings. Since ancient times
findings of this study show that As, Br, Cd, Hg and Sb in throughout the world, the beneficial health effects of
MM clay are well below the tolerance levels. However its geophagy were known especially in the remediation of
Pb concentration is very high and may pose health con- gastrointestinal disorders [1]. Ingestion of clay by preg-
cerns. The data presented in this study can be used as nant women has often been recommended to overcome
national base level guideline for geophagy of MM clay by deficiencies of some essential elements (especially Ca,
men, women (normal, pregnant and lactating) and children. Mg, Zn, Fe, Cu, Mn, and Se) [3]. Depending upon the
geological appearance and composition of a particular
Keywords Atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS)  clay it may also contain toxic and heavy metals such as
Clay  Instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA)  As, Cd, Hg, Pb and Sb. Human exposure to toxic elements
Multani mitti (MM)  Provisional tolerable weekly has exponentially increased over the last few decades due
intake (PTWI)  Toxic elements to combustion of fossil fuels, industrial emissions and
waste discharge, use of agricultural fertilizers, insecticides
and pesticides, and domestic processes etc. Therefore the
potential for long-term adverse health effects is obvious
and well documented [4]. These toxic and heavy metals
S. Waheed (&)  Y. Faiz  S. Rahman  N. Siddique enter our body directly through ingestion and inhalation
Chemistry Division, Directorate of Science, Pakistan Institute
and can directly influence behavior causing impairment of
of Nuclear Science and Technology (PINSTECH),
P.O. Nilore, Islamabad, Pakistan mental and neurological functions and altering metabolic
e-mail: swaheed@pinstech.org.pk processes in the body [5].

123
144 S. Waheed et al.

In Pakistan geophagy of multani mitti (MM) clay is very traceability of the results. The same RMs were also used as
common especially amongst the women folk and children. multi-elemental standards for quantification of toxic ele-
People generally use raw MM clay for oral ingestion, as ments in the sample using INAA. Approximately 100 mg
medication, in aesthetic medicine and as body and hair of MM samples in triplicate along with IAEA RMs were
wash. Although therapeutic properties of clays have gained packed and sealed in polyethylene capsules. Taking into
especial attention, it is its toxic contaminants that require consideration the elements to be quantified different suites
scrutiny. It is believed that people who are habitual con- of samples were prepared and packed in reactor rabbits. All
sumers of unprocessed clay may be at risk for several irradiations of these targets were performed adjacent to the
significant health problems due to intake of toxic elements reactor core of the 27 kW tank-in-pool type miniature
over long period of time [6]. Moreover any material to be neutron source reactor. The thermal neutron flux density at
consumed orally or as medication as in pharmaceuticals this site was 1 9 1012 cm-2 s-1. All samples after desired
must not be toxic or have severe side effects. The presence cooling were transferred to pre-cleaned and pre-weighed
of these elements even in minute concentrations can be a polyethylene counting capsules for analysis.
potential threat to the consumer or patient [4]. It is there- High purity germanium detector (Canberra Model AL-
fore necessary to asses its quality through accurate and 30) coupled to a PC-based Intertechnique Pro-286e Mul-
precise characterization of the toxic element contents to tichannel Analyzer (MCA) was used for quantification of
identify varieties of clays which are suitable for direct MM samples in accordance with the optimized radio-assay
consumption. scheme. The system resolution was 1.9 keV at 1332.5 keV
Characterization of toxic elements in MM is imperative peak of 60Co with peak to Compton ratio of 40:1. ‘‘Inter-
to establish baseline of these elements for nutritional gamma, version 5.03’’ software was used for obtaining all
safety. In this study toxic elements have been quantified in spectra. An indigenous computer program was used for the
MM clay using instrumental neutron activation analysis calculations and statistical data treatments [7].
(INAA) together with atomic absorption spectrometry
(AAS). As children and pregnant women are at greater risk AAS methodology
of exposure to toxic elements due to ingestion of MM clay,
this work takes into consideration the intake of MM clay in Approximately 1 g of MM clay sample was taken in
these subjects along with men, women and lactating 100 ml digestion flask with air condenser (30 cm long)
women. attached to it and 10 ml of aqua regia was added to it. For
analysis of soil and clay samples instead of total digestion
usually pseudo total digestion is performed with boiling
Experimental aqua regia under reflux. The contents were heated on a hot
plate at 85 °C for leaching for 2h. After cooling, drop wise
Sampling and sample preparation 1.5 ml of H2O2 was added at 60 °C until completion of
reaction [8]. The leachate was filtered and solution was
MM clay reserves are located 45 km North West of Dera made up to 10 ml in a volumetric flask with de-ionized
Ghazi Khan District in Pakistan. The samples were collected water. The digested samples were analyzed in triplicate.
in clean plastic bags from this site and brought to the Paki- The applied procedure was validated by simultaneous
stan Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology (PINS- processing and analysis of IAEA S-7 and IAEA SD-M-2/
TECH) in Islamabad where sample preparation and analyses TM RMs for Cd and Pb. Quantification of Cd, and Pb, was
were performed. Sample processing and preparation was carried out using a Hitachi model Z-2000 Polarized Zee-
done in a laminar flow fume hood. The samples were cru- man Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (AAS) coupled with
shed and sieved to obtain homogenized powder with particle software based data handling facility.
size of \0.125 mm. The processed samples were stored in
pre-cleaned polyethylene bottles. The homogeneity of the
prepared MM material was checked through analysis of Mn Results and discussion
contents in 100 mg samples. The measurement variation
was found to be \6 % around the mean values confirming MM clay has been studied for its toxic elemental content
the homogeneity of the preparation. using INAA and AAS techniques. For the quantification of
As, Br, Hg and Sb by INAA, two radio-assay protocols
INAA methodology presented in Table 1 were employed. In the first scheme the
targets were irradiated for 1h and after subsequent cooling
Two IAEA reference materials (RMs) (IAEA soil S-7 and for 1–2 days 76As, 82Br and 122Sb were determined. The
IAEA Marine sediment SD-M-2/TM) were used to ensure second scheme quantified 203Hg where the sample was

123
Toxic element composition of multani mitti clay 145

Table 1 Nuclear data and


Isotope used Half life c-ray used (keV) Irradiation Cooling time Counting time
irradiation conditions
time (h)
76
As 21.3 h 559.1 1 1–2 day 30 min
82
Br 35.3 h 554.3 1 1–2 day 30 min
122
Sb 2.70 day 564.1 1 1–2 day 30 min
203
Hg 46.6 day 279.2 1 2–3 weeks 2h
Corte et al. (1986) [40]

Table 2 Quality assurance data for IAEA matrix RMs (values expressed in lg g-1 unless otherwise specified)
Element IAEA S-7 IAEA SD-M-2/TM
Certified value 95 % CI Our value ± Unc. Certified value 95 % CI Our value ± Unc.

As 13.4 12.5–14.2 12.8 ± 1.01 18.3 17.4–19.3 18.9 ± 1.22


Br (7.0) 3–10 7.80 ± 0.62 65.7 57.8–78.0 64.7 ± 3.59
Cda (1.3) 1.1–2.7 1.40 ± 0.17 0.113 0.108–0.149 0.130 ± 0.02
Hg (0.04) 0.003–0.07 0.047 ± 0.006 0.054 0.046–0.064 0.061 ± 0.01
Pba 60.0 55–71 58.0 ± 3.61 22.8 20.1–12.6 23.5 ± 1.51
Sb 1.7 1.4–1.8 1.65 ± 0.14 0.99 0.92–1.25 1.04 ± 0.10
CI confidence interval, () information values
a
Determined by AAS

Table 3 Global comparison of MM clay with other reported clays (values expressed in lg g-1 unless other wise specified)
Clays As Br Cd Hg Pb Sb

MM Clay 2.46 ± 0.16 2.93 ± 0.25 0.101 ± 0.015 0.137 ± 0.017 8.30 ± 0.30 0.423 ± 0.050
WC38 0.6–4.1 1.5–3.0 – – – 0.32–1.90
38
GC 4.1–8.9 0.5–3.3 – 0.031–0.048 – 0.48–1.06
SW-y-2 (SC)39 – – – – 20.63 ± 3.14 0.436 ± 0.076
RC40 14.6 ± 0.6 – – – – 1.39 ± 0.19
NIST-SRM 679 (BC)40 9.7 ± 0.4 – – – – 1.0 ± 0.1
MC41 11.8–26.7 – 0.110–0.250 0.012–0.021 19.2–32.9 52.0–97.1
15
Sikor (BC) 3.8–13.1 – 0.09–0.40 – 21–26.7 –

irradiated for 5 h followed by 2–3 weeks of cooling time. to the fact that Cd in IAEA S-7 is not certified while in
The observed elemental interferences were handled as IAEA SD-M-2/TM the certified concentration of this ele-
mentioned in our earlier works [9, 10]. Cd and Pb in MM ment is low with large reported error. Hg quantified by
samples were determined using AAS. INAA also shows lower precision as in IAEA S-7 only
The quality assurance of the elemental analysis was information value is reported for this element. Moreover
ascertained by comparison of the results of two control high variation coefficient (mc) of Hg in both standards
material, IAEA S-7 and IAEA SD-M-2/TM obtained using could be due to its low concentration and low count rate for
INAA and AAS with the certified data. The accuracy of both standards.
results helps to ensure the trueness and bias of the adopted Toxic elements quantified in MM clay using INAA and
methodology in accordance with ISO-5725 standards [11]. AAS are presented in Table 3. The concentrations of all
Table 2 shows good agreement between the IAEA certified elements (As, Br, Cd, Hg, Pb and Sb) are reported on dry
values and results obtained in the current study using weight basis and are the averages of several determina-
INAA and AAS. The overall precision for the measurement tions. INAA of MM clay shows good precision for As and
of all elements when analyzed through paired difference Br with mc \ 10 % around the mean values. However for
test at 95 % confidence level was found to be acceptable Hg and Sb relatively high mc [ 10 % is observed. Con-
and in range of these RMs [12, 13]. Relatively high error centration of Pb determined by AAS shows very good
was observed for Cd measured by AAS which may be due precision with mc \ 5 % while for Cd mc is high (14.8 %).

123
146 S. Waheed et al.

The composition of toxic elements in MM is quantified in (MML) and children of ages 4–8 (MMC1) and 9–13
the descending order; Pb [ Br [ As [ Sb [ Hg [ Cd (MMC2) with respective estimated body weights of 70, 55,
where all measured toxic elements are present in trace 65, 60, 20 and 40 kg. Weekly contribution to PTWI value,
amounts. in which the percentage numbers are showed as the ratio of
Comparison of our results for toxic elements in MM the intakes by geophagy of the MM clay to the PTWI
clay has been made with other clays. Table 3 presents values for each subject groups are presented in Table 4.
results on these elements from Brazilian white and green The weekly intakes of characterized elements have been
clays (GC) used for pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, SW-y- calculated on the basis of domestic survey with fixed
2 Na rich bentonite from Wyoming, Ohio red clay (RC), amount of MM clay ingested by each category.
NIST-SRM 679-brick clay, Muddy clay (MC) from eastern
Gulf of Finland and Sikor-backed clay from Bangladesh Arsenic (As)
[14–17]. Assessment of this data shows that As
(2.46 lg g-1), Cd (0.101 lg g-1), and Pb (8.30 lg g-1), As is ubiquitous in our environment and is a poison in large
are lowest in MM while its Br (2.93 lg g-1), and Hg amounts. It is the third most prevalent element in the
(0.137 lg g-1) content are high. However As in MM clay earth’s crust. As has been declared as a human carcinogen
falls in the range cited for white clays (WC). RC and MC by the International Agency for Research on Cancer
contain very high levels of As with respective concentra- (IARC) since 1980 [20]. Excessive exposure to this ele-
tions of 14.6 and 11.8 lg g-1. Cd levels in MC are com- ment poses health problems such as various types of can-
parable to MM Clay and Sikor (BC) has relatively high cer, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and neurological
concentration of this element. Pb content in SW-y-2 (SC), disorders as well as dermal effects [20]. According to the
MC, and BC (20.6, 19.2, and 23.2 lg g-1 respectively) are National Research Council excessive As intake may pose
comparable and almost twice the levels of MM clay. Br greater risk for both cancer and non-cancer effects in
levels in some of the GC are the lowest with a range of infants and children. Numerous other disorders are linked
0.5–3.3 lg g-1 and therefore Br levels in MM clay and to this element including respiratory problems, nervous
WC fall in this range. Hg with range of 0.12–0.021 lg g-1 system effects, low IQ and reproductive effects. Pregnancy
and Sb with range of 0.20–0.57 in MC are the lowest. complications have also been related to As intake such as
Concentration of Sb in MM (0.423 lg g-1), GC fetus abnormalities, abortions, stillbirths, premature deliv-
0.48 lg g-1) and SC (0.436 lg g-1) are comparable while eries and reduced birth weight of babies. Even low level
its value in RC (1.38 lg g-1) and BC (1.0 lg g-1) is high. As-exposures have been reported to affect human health
On the whole the composition of MM clay is close to especially in malnourished people [21]. Trace amounts of
Bangladeshi sikor (BC). The variation in elemental con- As were quantified in MM clay with concentration of
centrations in different clays may be attributed to differ- 2.46 lg g-1. The calculated intake values for As in MMM,
ences in mineralogy, depth of the sample site, geographic MMW, MMP, MML, MMC1 and MMC2 presented in
location and its age. Comparison of clays shows that MM Table 4 are 36.9, 73.8, 172, 123, 12.3 and 24.6 lg
clay contains low levels of As, Cd, Pb and Sb while it’s Br respectively. Figure 1 shows that intake of As by each
and Hg levels are higher. category of MM consumer contributes to about 3.6, 9.1, 18,
As toxic elements are reported to accumulate in the 13.9, 4.2 and 4.2 % of the recommended PTWI values
body, the relevance of these elements in MM clay through which is equivalent to 14.7 lg kg-1 body weight per week
dietary intake has also been evaluated and compared with [18, 22]. The estimated dietary exposures of As through
the provisional tolerable weekly intakes (PTWI) set by the intake of MM clay for all the population groups studied are
Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on food additives well below the PTWI and are unlikely to constitute a risk to
(JECFA) [18]. It was important to compare our values with health. However pregnant and lactating women should be
PTWI as in this way regular ingestion of MM clay can be careful in consuming large amounts of MM clay.
scrutinized for its consumption over a long period of time
without appreciable health risk. Geophagy of MM is more Bromine (Br)
popular in children and women, especially in pregnant and
lactating women. It is reported that most of the toxic ele- Bromine is naturally present at very low levels in food
ments in pregnant and lactating women can transfer from articles. Elemental bromine is toxic Once ingested it is very
the mother to the fetus and through milk to newborn slowly excreted from the body causing conditions of
placing the health of the unborns and newly born baby at intoxication called bromism with adverse health effects.
risk [19]. Considering this fact, PTWI values have been This state is characterized by neurological, psychiatric,
used to estimate its values for men (MMM), women dermatological, delirium, psychomotor retardation schizo-
(MMW), pregnant women (MMP), lactating women phrenia and possibly endocrine effects [23]. Consuming

123
Toxic element composition of multani mitti clay 147

contribution
to PTWI
Weekly

0.361

0.252
value

4.18
0.01

2.13

10 g week-1
bw = 40
MMC2

24.6
29.3
1.01
1.37
83.0
4.23
contribution
to PTWI
Weekly

0.361

0.252
value

4.18
0.01

2.13

5 g week-1
Table 4 Weekly intake of toxic elements through consumption of MM clay in Pakistan (All intakes expressed in lg per week unless specified)

bw = 20
MMC1

12.3
14.7
0.51
0.69
41.5
2.12
Fig. 1 Comparison of weekly As intake through ingestion of MM by
different subjects with respective PTWI values
contribution
to PTWI
Weekly

dietary articles with high Br content can increases its con-


0.035

0.839
value

13.9

1.20
7.09

centration in our body which competes with iodine recep-


tors; eventually depleting the iodine of body and introducing


50 g week-1

a deficiency condition of ‘‘brominated thyroid’’ [24]. Apart


bw = 60

from increased risk of thyroid gland iodine deficiency it also


MML

5.05
6.85

21.2
123
147

415

leads to an increased risk of breast, ovary and prostate


cancers. Br can cause headache, fatigue, weight-gain, heart
contribution

and kidney diseases. Trace levels of Br were determined in


to PTWI
Weekly

MM with concentration of 2.93 lg g-1. Weekly dietary


18.02
0.05
1.55
9.16

1.08
value

intakes of 44.0, 87.9, 205, 147, 14.7 and 29.3 lg were cal-
culated for MMM, MMW, MMP, MML, MMC1 and
70 g week-1

MMC2 respectively (Table 4). A comparison is made with


bw = 65

PTWI values that conform to 7,000 lg per kg body weight


MMP

7.07
9.59

29.6
172
205

581

per week. The respective intakes MM by each type of


consumer contribute to a very small fraction of 0.009, 0.023,
contribution

0.045, 0.035, 0.010 and 0.010 % of these estimated PTWI


to PTWI
Weekly

value as presented in Fig. 2. The contribution of Br in MM is


0.023
0.787

0.549
value

9.13

4.64

well below the tolerance levels of this element and hence,


this clay is safe from nutritional safety point of view for all
30 g week-1

types of consumers.
bw = 55
MMW

73.8
87.9
3.03
4.11

12.7
249

Cadmium (Cd)
contribution

Cadmium is considered a toxic element with no biological


to PTWI
Weekly

0.009
0.309

0.216

function in humans. This element is widely present in the


value

3.59

1.82

environment and causes various health problems in the


general and exposed population. Main route of Cd expo-


15 g week-1

sure in humans is through diet. It is transported from the


bw = 70
MMM

gastrointestinal tract by the blood to the liver and finally


36.9
44.0
1.52
2.06

6.35
125

accumulates in the kidneys [25]. Consequently Cd has been


classified as carcinogenic to humans by the IARC [26]. The
lg week-1

major long-term toxic effects of low-level cadmium


PTWI

7,000
14.7

7.00
1.61
25.2
42.0

exposure are renal injury, obstructive pulmonary disease,


osteoporosis, and cardiovascular disease. Cd has been
elements

associated with cancers of the lung, prostate, pancreas, and


Toxic

Hg
Cd
As

Pb
Sb
Br

kidney as it is a strong human carcinogen [27]. High intake

123
148 S. Waheed et al.

Fig. 2 Comparison of weekly Br intake through ingestion of MM by


different subjects with respective PTWI values Fig. 4 Comparison of weekly Hg intake through ingestion of MM by
different subjects with respective PTWI values

estimated intake of Cd through ingestion of MM clay can


be considered fairly undisruptive for its dietary safety by
all consumer categories.

Mercury (Hg)

Mercury, a heavy metal, is widespread and persistent in the


environment. All forms of Hg whether metallic, inorganic or
organic forms are perilous for human health However, Hg
released into the air or water becomes methylated which is
its highly toxic state [23, 28]. Hg is considered cytotoxic,
immunotoxic, neurotoxic, reproductive and developmental
toxin and causes cardiovascular damage and disease.
Fig. 3 Comparison of weekly Cd intake through ingestion of MM by
different subjects with respective PTWI values
Excessive Hg levels can cause permanent neurologic and
kidney impairment [28]. Diverse cognitive, personality,
sensory, and motor disturbances have been reported for this
to Cd causes acute gastrointestinal effects with increased element. Prominent symptoms due to excessive Hg intake
salivation, choking, vomiting, abdominal cramps and include muscle tremors, emotional disturbances, insomnia,
diarrhoea leading to kidney damage [23]. High exposure of memory loss, neuro-muscular changes, swelling of salivary
Cd is considered responsible for a clinical disease termed glands, excessive flow of saliva, loosening of teeth, head-
as Itai-itai disease in Japan. The characteristic symptoms of aches, and performance deficits in tests of cognitive function
this disease are multiple fractures of bones and damaged [29, 30]. This element is also related to immunological
kidneys. Cd in MM clay was quantified as a trace element effects causing nephrotic syndrome. Hg can cause hyper-
with concentration of 0.101 lg g-1 by AAS technique. tension as it affects the hormone metabolism, vasocon-
Table 4 shows the calculated dietary intakes of this ele- striction and renal tubular function [31]. In MM clay Hg is
ment are 1.52, 3.02, 7.07, 5.05, 0.51 and 1.01 lg for present as a trace element (0.137 lg g-1). Table 4 shows
MMM, MMW, MMP, MML, MMC1 and MMC2 respec- that the estimated weekly intakes for MMM, MMW, MMP,
tively. Figure 3 shows that these Cd intakes through MML, MMC1 and MMC2 are 2.06, 4.11, 9.59, 6.85, 0.69
ingestion of MM clay by the studied subjects contribute to and 1.37 lg respectively. These very low amounts of Hg in
a minor fraction of about 0.31, 0.79, 1.55, 1.20, 0.36 and the studied groups were compared to estimated PTWI of
0.36 % respectively to the estimated PTWI values for each 1.61 lg kg-1 body weight per week. Figure 4 shows that
type of subject. These PTWI values have been calculated our intake values for Hg contribute to about 1.8, 4.6, 9.1, 7.1,
considering its recommended value of 7.0 lg kg-1 body 5.3 and 5.7 % respectively to the weekly PTWI. The per-
weight per week. The calculated intake values for MM clay centage intake of Hg through consuming MM clay by all
are far below the weekly tolerance level, therefore the consumers is well within the safe weekly dietary limits.

123
Toxic element composition of multani mitti clay 149

Lead (Pb)

Lead is a toxic metal and its exposure causes numerous


health problems, affecting nearly every system of the body
and hence is considered a cumulative toxicant. It produces
broad range of physiological, biochemical and behavioral
dysfunctions [32]. Severe health effects occur through its
dietary intake as it accumulates in highest concentrations in
liver, kidney and bone. This element is a well-documented
toxin for neurological, haematological, gastrointestinal,
cardiovascular and renal systems. Chronic exposure to Pb
in adults causes anemia, renal dysfunction, peripheral
neuropathy, hypertension, reproductive dysfunction and
Alzheimer’s disease [33]. Neurotoxic behavior is particu-
larly receptive in childhood Pb exposure that influences the Fig. 5 Comparison of weekly Sb intake through ingestion of MM by
development of the central nervous system in young chil- different subjects with respective PTWI values
dren [34]. Pb introduces multiple neurobehavioral and
cognitive defects, including behavioral problems and
decreased intelligence quotient [33]. The Pb concentration through consumption of MM clay by MMM, MMW,
in MM clay was found to be 8.3 lg g-1 using AAS tech- MMP, MML, MMC1 and MMC2 groups as presented in
nique. The estimated weekly intakes of Pb through inges- Table 4 are 6.35, 12.7, 29.6, 21.2, 2.12 and 4.23 lg
tion of MM clay by MMM, MMW, MMP, MML, MMC1 respectively. Figure 5 shows a comparison of Sb intake
and MMC2 are 125, 249, 581, 415, 41.5 and 83 lg values from MM clay with estimated PTWI values. The
respectively (Table 4). These intakes have not been com- calculations have been made with respect to 42 lg kg-1
pared to the Pb PTWI values since JECFA on the basis of body weight per week. These intakes with respect to the
Pb dose response analysis declared that the established estimated PTWI values for each type of subject are 0.22,
PTWI value for this element (25 lg kg-1 week) is no 0.55, 1.08, 0.84, 0.25 and 0.25 % respectively. Our study
longer considered health protective and was withdrawn shows that weekly intake of MM clay contributes to fairly
[35]. It is however important to note that in comparison to safe levels of Sb.
other toxic elements quantified in MM clay, Pb contributes
to a relatively high intake especially for pregnant and
lactating females. Taking into account the Pb intake from Conclusion
all other weekly dietary sources, MM clay contributes to a
fairly larger budget for Pb. It is therefore comprehended Different toxic elements in MM clay were characterized
thought that further work will be carried out to monitor and discussed to ascertain its safe ingestion by consumers
blood Pb levels in regular consumers of MM clay. of all ages and conditions. INAA technique was used to
characterize As, Br, Hg and Sb while Pb and Cd were
Antimony (Sb) determined by AAS. All measured toxic elements were
detected at trace levels with composition in descending
Antimony is a potentially toxic trace element with no order as Pb [ Br [ As [ Sb [ Hg [ Cd. Comparison of
known biological role. However Sb along with other toxic our results with other clays shows that As, Cd, and Pb, are
metals can disturb the cellular defense mechanisms of the lowest in MM clay while Br and Hg contents are highest.
human body including reproductive disorders and chro- To check the nutritional safety of MM clay for ingestion
mosome damage resulting in mutagenic changes [36]. the concentration data for these elements were compared
Specific symptoms of intoxication are generally accompa- with recommended PTWI values. Keeping in mind various
nied by stomach pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, con- consumers it was estimated that weekly contribution of
junctivitis, dermatitis, bronchitis, dry throat headache, As, Br, Cd, Hg, and Sb are \18, 0.05, 1.6, 9.2, and 1.1 %
coughing, anorexia, insomnia and vertigo [37–39]. Con- respectively for their PTWI value. It is assessed from these
tinuous intake may cause more serious health effects such findings that although As, Br, Cd, Hg and Sb in MM clay
as lung diseases, myocardial symptoms, joint or muscle are within the safe and tolerable levels however relatively
pain, stomach pain, diarrhea, severe vomiting, stomach high intake of As and Hg can have toxicological signifi-
ulcers and death. Sb is present in MM clay as a trace cance. Moreover Pb concentration in MM clay is also
element (0.423 lg g-1). Calculated weekly Sb intake fairly high which may cause severe health concerns. It is

123
150 S. Waheed et al.

therefore recommended that regular monitoring of blood 22. Zhang HH, Yuan HX, Hu YG, Wu ZF, Zhu LA, Zhu L, Li FB, LI
Pb levels of all MM clay consumers be carried out on a DQ (2006) China Environ Pollut 144:492–499
23. Waheed S, Rahman S, Gill KP (2009) J Radioanal Nucl Chem
regular basis to check for their dietary exposures to lead. 279:725
24. Pavelka S (2004) Physiol Res 53:S81
25. Subramanian KS, Iyengar GV, Okamoto K (eds) (1991) Biolo-
gical trace element research: multidisciplinary perspectives, ACS
References Symposium Series. American Chemical Society, Washington DC
26. Godt J, Scheidig F, Siestrup CG, Brandenburg VPE, Reich A,
Groneber DA (2006) J Occup Med Toxicol 1:22
1. Bergaya F, Theng BKG, Lagaly G (2006) Development in clay 27. Khansakorn N, Wongwit W, Tharnpoophasiam P, Hengprasith B,
science. In: Handbook of clay science, vol 1, Chapt. 11.5. Else- Suwannathon L, Chanprasertyothin S, Sura T, Kaojarern S,
vier publications, Amsterdam, p 717 Sritara P (2012) J Toxicol. doi:10.1155/2012/356126
2. Finkelman RB (2006) Int J Environ Res Public Health 3:338 28. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2001) MMWR
3. Mascolo N, Summa V, Tateo F (1999) Appl Clay Sci 15:491 50(08): 140–143
4. Quig D (1998) Altern Med Rev 3:262 29. Lopes CB, Coimbra J, Otero M, Pereira E, Duarte AC, Lin Z,
5. Flora SJS, Mehta MM (2008) Ind J Med Res 128:221 Rocha J (2008) Quı́m Nova 31:321
6. Njinga RL, Alf B, Sunday O, Muhammad TA (2011) Adv Appl 30. Samlafo BV, Aidoo A, Sarsah JBK, Quarshie LA, Serfor-Armah
Sci Res 2:370 YE (2011) J Environ Earth Sci 3:541
7. Wasim M (2010) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 285:337 31. Nayak D, Lahiri S (2002) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 254:619–623
8. Sastre J, Sahuquillo A, Vidal M, Rauret G (2002) Anal Chim 32. World Health Organization (2011) Brief guide to analytical
Acta 462:59 methods for measuring lead in paint, the inter-organization pro-
9. Waheed S, Zaidi JH, Ahmad S (2003) J Radioanal Nucl Chem gramme for the sound management of chemicals (IOMC) World
258:73 Health Organization NLM classification: QV 292
10. Waheed S, Ahmad S, Zaidi JH, Rahman A, Qureshi IH, Saleem 33. Ambrose MT, Al-Lozi M, Scott MG (2000) Clin Chem 46:1171
M (2001) Radiochim Acta 89:425 34. Ljung K, Palm B, Grandér M, Vahter M (2011) Food Chem
11. Kane JS (2001) Geostand Newslett 25:7 127:943
12. Pszonicki L, Hanna AN, Suschny O (1984) Report on the inter- 35. WHO Technical Report Series 960 (2011) Evaluation of certain
comaprison run soil-7. Report No. 49: IAEA/Rl/112, IAEA, food additives and contaminants, seventy-third report of the Joint
Vienna FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives, food and agri-
13. Mee LD, Oregioni B (1991) IAEA/MEL, World-wide Inter- culture organization of the United Nations
comparison of trace element measurements in marine sediments 36. Cooper RG, Harrison AP (2009) Ind J Occup Environ Med 13:3
SD-M-2/TM. Report No. 49: IAEA/AL/053, IAEA, Vienna 37. World Health Organization (2003) Antimony in drinking-water,
14. Silva PSC, Oliveira SMB, Farias L, Fávaro DIT, Mazzilli BP background document for development of WHO guidelines for
(2011) Appl Clay Sci 52:145 drinking-water quality (GDWQ). World Health Organization
15. Kogel JE, Lewis SA (2001) Clays Clay Min 49:387 WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/74
16. International Atomic Energy Agency (2003) Nuclear analytical 38. Toghill KE, Lu M, Compton RG (2011) Int J Electrochem Sci
techniques in archaeological investigations. International Atomic 6:3057
Energy Agency, Vienna Technical Reports Series, No. 416: ISSN 39. Office of Pollution Prevention (2002) Fact sheet, persistent,
0074–1914 bioaccumulative and toxic chemical, antimony and antimony
17. Vallius H (2007) Geol Surv Finl 45:63 compounds, vol 102. Office of Pollution Prevention, Columbus
18. Food Standard Agency (2009) Food survey information sheet 40. Corte FD, Simonits A, Wispelaere AD, Hoste J, Moens L,
01/09 Demeter AA (1986) Compilation of K0, Au-factors and related
19. Al-Rmalli SW, Jenkins RO, Watts MJ, Haris PI (2010) Environ nuclear data for 112 radionuclides of interest in NAA, INW/KFKI
Health 9:79 interim report
20. Jomova K, Jenisova Z, Feszterova M, Baros S, Liska J, Hudecova
D, Rhodes CJ, Valko M (2011) J Appl Toxicol 2011(31):95–107
21. Kapaj S, Peterson A, Liber A, hattacharya P (2006) J Environ Sci
Health A 41:2399

123

You might also like