Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Opalec, Ara C.
The benefits that would arise if federalism will be effected; where the
federal states have wide controls to improve their own social, economic, and political
potentials due sharing of powers in a federal system. Also it motivates
local governments to take initiatives and become self-sustained. Additionally, the
adoption of the federal system will enable certain groups a broader chance to uphold
their own identity and culture and their own economic development at their own pace
without the need of seceding or declaring their independence from the republic because
they will be responsible and obliged with taxes of all kinds to assist and sustain the
federal central government and regional governments. To assure economic rents and
accumulate wealth which can be easily abused, ushering in corruption. Also, the
absorption of authority and resources in the president of the Philippines over fiscal
resources and appointments in the bureaucracy can be used. When corruption
encompass unbearable limits, political inharmony accentuate and insecurity arises.
One of the obvious reasons why federalism is not for the Philippines is that it will
be costly to form a multilayer of government structure comprising of central and regional
governments that will create an enlarged and bloated bureaucracy. Federalism involves
massive government spending. First off is the cost of shifting to federalism amounting to
P44-72 billion according to Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS). It
includes the salaries of governors and vice governors of each state, more senators,
more government staff, more offices and their operating expenses. In addition, the cost
of running a federal government could cost the national government an annual P243
billion. This can substantially affect the economic standing of the Philippines by creating
more debt and inevitable disruptions to the economy’s growth momentum and