Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Template
You will be completing this portion of the STEP document using the following
link:
STEP Standard 1, Part I
After completing the e-doc portion, submit the PDF you receive into the Learning
Management System (LMS).
You will be completing this portion of the STEP document using the following
link:
STEP Standard 1, Part II
After completing the e-doc portion, submit the PDF you receive into the Learning
Management System (LMS).
CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.HSG.SRT.C.6
Understand that by similarity, side ratios in right triangles are properties of the angles in the
triangle, leading to definitions of trigonometric ratios for acute angles.
CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.HSG.SRT.C.7
Explain and use the relationship between the sine and cosine of complementary angles.
CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.HSG.SRT.C.8
Use trigonometric ratios and the Pythagorean Theorem to solve right triangles in applied
problems.*
CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.HSG.SRT.D.9
(+) Derive the formula A = 1/2 ab sin(C) for the area of a triangle by drawing an auxiliary
line from a vertex perpendicular to the opposite side.
CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.HSG.SRT.D.10
(+) Prove the Laws of Sines and Cosines and use them to solve problems.
CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.HSG.SRT.D.11
(+) Understand and apply the Law of Sines and the Law of Cosines to find unknown
measurements in right and non-right triangles (e.g., surveying problems, resultant forces).
CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.HSG.C.B.5
Derive using similarity the fact that the length of the arc intercepted by an angle is
proportional to the radius, and define the radian measure of the angle as the constant of
proportionality; derive the formula for the area of a sector.
Learning Goal
Students will be able to state the formulas and find areas of 2-dimensional shapes, including
parallelograms, trapezoids, kites, and a variety of polygons using a variety of methods from
previous lessons, including areas for regular parallelograms, rules for special right triangles, and
the Laws of Sines and Cosines.
Measurable Objectives
Students should be able to partition irregular shapes to create several regular shapes. They will
display knowledge of the formulas for areas of these regular shapes and trigonometric operations
to find sides of triangles. These will be measured with formative assessment daily before, during,
and after the lesson, and it will be summative assessments in the form of a quiz and test.
Number of Students
Partially Proficient
(70%-79%) 20
Minimally Proficient
(69% and below) 87
Based on my findings, I decided not to change much about the concepts that are covered in the
pre-assessment. The content standards are exactly where the students are and should be by the end of the
unit. Very few students were able to figure out the new concept on the last question. They have never
seen this type of problem before, so that is understandable.
The unit is heavy on memorization of formulas, so each lesson should focus on repetition and
memorization of these formulas. There are a few options I am considering changing to the assessment
process. There is a concern for the retention of information regarding these formulas for the exam. One
option would be to have a formula quiz before the test that will not negatively affect the students’ grades.
This will be an opportunity for them to test their knowledge of the formulas. Another option would be to
add the formulas in a random order to the top of the test for the students to see. These will not be labeled,
so they will still need to recognize the correct formula to use.
Only 5 students out of 130 correctly answered the new concept at the end of the pre-assessment. I
will make sure to move a bit slower with the content during the lesson that introduces this concept. I will
consider checking for understanding after every example we go over rather than periodically like I
normally do.
Post-Assessment – Copy and paste the post-assessment you plan to use to assess the students’ knowledge
of the topic after implementing the unit lessons. The post-assessment can be the same as the pre-
assessment, a modified version, or something comparable that measures the same concepts. Include the
scoring criteria used to determine whether the student Exceeds, Meets, Approaches, or Falls Far Below the
learning goal and measurable objectives.
Academic parallelogram, trapezoid, rhombus, center, vertex, scale factor, ratio, Click here to enter
Language and rectangle, triangle, kite, perpendicular, perpendicular, side, perimeter, area, text.
Vocabulary area, sides, base, bases, diagonals, radius, apothem, similar polygons
height, altitude, height congruent,
perpendicular, half perimeter, central
angle
Summary of The teacher will Using a document The teacher will This lesson will be Click here to enter
Instruction and introduce the unit projector, the quickly verbally mostly review of text.
Activities for the and what they will teacher will begin review the formulas previous concepts
Lesson be learning about. the lesson by using for the areas the involving similar
There will be a a cut out of a class has gone over figures. The teacher
short pre- trapezoid to show so far in the unit. will remind
assessment after the relationship The teacher will let students about scale
this regarding the between the area of students know that factors and ratios
content. This lesson a trapezoid and a they will be dealing with
is review of past parallelogram. The introduced to a new perimeters of
formulas that will teacher will then go concept during this similar figures.
be used and built through the guided lesson. Then, the Then the class will
upon in the next lesson iPad notes. teacher will go explore how areas
Differentiation -Students with -Students with -Students with -Students with -Students with
preferred seating preferred seating preferred seating preferred seating preferred seating
stated in and IEP or stated in and IEP or stated in and IEP or stated in and IEP or stated in and IEP or
504 plan are placed 504 plan are placed 504 plan are placed 504 plan are placed 504 plan are placed
Required iPads, stylists, iPads, stylists, iPads, stylists, iPads, stylists, iPads, stylists,
Materials, pencil, paper, pencil, paper, pencil, paper, pencil, paper, pencil, paper,
Handouts, Text, projector, Apple projector, Apple projector, Apple projector, Apple projector, Apple
Slides, and TV TV TV, Worksheet TV TV
Technology
Formative During individual, During individual, During individual, During individual, During individual,
Assessments partner, and group partner, and group partner, and group partner, and group partner, and group
practice, the teacher practice, the teacher practice, the teacher practice, the teacher practice, the teacher
will ask students will ask students will ask students will ask students will ask students
about how they feel about how they feel about how they feel about how they feel about how they feel
about the previous about the previous about the previous about the previous about the previous
example and example and example and example and example and
concept. concept. concept. concept. concept.
Summative, Post- -There will be a homework assignment from the textbook for this lesson. The answers will reviewed the next
Assessment day, and students will be able to ask for clarification on problems. The teacher will go over any problems on
the board as a class. There will be a group quiz (groups of four), and a formal exam at the end of the unit.
Post-Test Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ learning on the topic, collect and
analyze the post-test data to determine the effectiveness of your instruction and assessment.
Number of Students Number of Students
Pre-Test Post-Test
Highly Proficient
(90%-100%) 5 114
Proficient
(80%-89%) 18 16
Partially
Proficient
20 2
(70%-79%)
Minimally
Proficient
87 0
(69% and below)
The entire class has improved greatly over the unit. They reviewed previous content and were introduced
to new content that was present on the pre assessment and post assessment. In the pre assessment, the
students were virtually unsure of how to find the area of the hexagon. There were only a few students that
found the answer using triangles. However, the topic is covered in the unit. Therefore, the students were
knowledgeable of this area formula going into the post assessment. This greatly improved their scores
when compared to the pre assessment. Furthermore, the students were given the formulas on the pre
assessment, and the formulas were omitted from the post assessment. The students performed better
without the formulas as aid.
Each lesson in the unit covered no more than two new formulas for the students to practice. This helped
them focus on these newer formulas without an overload of information. Also, as the lessons progressed,
the formulas built upon themselves in a logical way. Towards the end of the unit, the students studied for a
formula quiz. This was a simple quiz where they just write down the formulas for area of the shapes that
were covered in the unit. It counted as a quiz grade and seemed to help the students better recite the
formulas for the post assessment.
Analysis of subgroups is beneficial for teachers that want to better differentiate instruction. I chose to
analyze the students with 504 plans. I have worked with students in the past that have special needs with
IEPs and 504 plans and would like to see their specific progression over the unit.
Post-Assessment Data: Subgroup (Gender, ELL population, Gifted, students on IEPs or 504s, etc.)
Proficient
(80%-89%) 1 2
Partially
Proficient
2 0
(70%-79%)
Minimally
Proficient
5 0
(69% and below)
I was very pleased with the outcome of the post assessment data for the 504-plan subgroup of students. I
decided to remove the post assessment as I did with the remainder of the class. This was to show a clear
understanding on their part and to create a clearer comparison to the reminder of the students. The post
assessment is only five questions, so if they miss one it brings the percent to 80%, which is proficient. The
two students that missed one question only made clerical errors in their work that led them to incorrect
answers. They all used the correct formulas.
Throughout the unit, I attempted to differentiate the lessons in a few ways. I continued the differentiation
that the classroom teacher has put in place. This provides continuity and stability in the classroom. Some
of the students in this subgroup have a tendency to miss some notes in the lessons, so made sure that they
were given a complete copy of the notes for their records. I also believe the formula quiz helped them
memorize the formulas. I witnessed several of them studying up to the point of the quiz.
Proficient
(80%-89%) 17 14
Partially
Proficient
18 2
(70%-79%)
The subgroup is a very small number of students, so it is difficult to draw any conclusions based on the
data I received. We can see that the subgroup tested at 75% highly proficient, and the remainder of the
class tested at about 87% highly proficient. Both are considerably higher, and at a similar rate, when
compared to the pre assessment at the beginning of the unit. The numbers are almost identical when
comparing proficient or higher: 100% versus 98%, subgroup and remainder, respectively. This shows that
the teaching strategies and differentiation where successful in helping the class and the subgroup reach the
goals of the class.
I would like to keep the option available for students to receive completed notes from the lesson in case
they miss something. There are students in the remainder part of the class that struggle with keeping up in
class, so this will assist them if they miss a section. I am pleased with the outcome of the student learning.
Although the post assessment is simple, it shows a great improvement across the class. In the next unit, I
would like to tie in the importance of the area formulas the students learned in this unit. They will be using
these formulas to find volumes of different solids. Beginning with the objectives that tie in previous
information will help the students transitional well into the next unit.
2. Become more fluent with the content I will recite the information ahead of time for
before presenting things like homework for review and lesson
3. Execute lessons with better time I will need to write notes in my lessons about
management time limits on certain concepts, so I can
master beating the clock at the end of the
lesson. For the time being, I will also plan
out every minute of class and try to stick to
the plan during implementation.