Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Executive Summary
Demand-supply economics favourable in India
World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC) expects travel and tourism (T&T) demand in
India to grow at 8.2% annually till 2019, the highest growth after China in the big
countries league. Owing to various supply bottlenecks, the 13% CAGR growth till FY12E
in demand of premium category rooms is expected to outpace the 10% CAGR growth in
supply; HVS estimates ongoing construction work on only 60% of the 1,00,000
announced rooms. Demand is expected to remain robust as the Indian economy gathers
pace and with many sporting events lined up in the next 12-18 months.
Edelweiss Research is also available on www.edelresearch.com, Bloomberg EDEL <GO>, Thomson First Call, Reuters and Factset. Edelweiss Securities Limited
Hotels & Tourism
Contents
At a glance ................................................................................................................. 3
Challenges ............................................................................................................... 36
Annexure I ............................................................................................................... 37
Annexure II .............................................................................................................. 38
Companies
EIH .......................................................................................................................... 53
Cox & Kings 488 62.9 30,705 Hold FY07 970 402 297 4.7 53 98 95 175 25.8 89.5
FY08 1,821 730 426 6.8 88 82 115 43 10.6 72.1
FY09 2,869 1,214 628 10.0 58 66 41 47 12.8 48.9
Hotels & Tourism
In 2010, India’s T&T industry is expected to generate INR 5,533 bn (USD 118 bn) of
USD 42 bn is the
economic activity, according to the World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC). This will include
estimated size of direct
INR 1,970 bn (USD 42 bn), equivalent to 3.1% of total GDP, as the direct industry
Indian tourism sector
contribution.
Government
expenditures
1% Business travel
9%
Source: WTTC, Edelweiss research
Personal T&T is expected to contribute 55% to the total industry, followed by capital
investments at 24%. Some related sectors include hotels, airlines, surface transport, basic
infrastructure, and facilitation systems environemnt. Hotels (INR 600 bn in 2007), airlines
(INR 350 bn in 2008), and car rental (INR 10 bn in 2007) are some of the biggest direct
contributors to the industry.
WTTC estimates direct industry GDP in 2020 to increase to INR 6,211 bn, a CAGR of 12%.
Personal T&T, the biggest contributor, is expected to grow 13% over the same period.
The unorganised sector dominates Indian T&T; only hotels, airlines and tour operators are
part of the organised sector. In this report, we have discussed the Indian hotel industry,
vacation ownership industry, and tours and travels industry in detail.
Hotels (INR 650 bn) Airlines (INR 400 bn) Tour operators (INR 150 bn)
- Indian Hotels - Air India & Indian Airlines - Kouni
- ITC - Jet Airways - Thomas Cook
- East India Hotels - Kingfisher Airlines - Cox & Kings
- Hotel Leela - Spicejet
- Bharat Hotels - Indigo
- Asian Hotels - GoAir
- Mahindra Holidays - Paramount Airways
1200 32.0
960 24.0
Revenue (INR bn)
720 16.0
(%)
480 8.0
240 0.0
0 (8.0)
2009-10E
2010-11E
2011-12E
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
Within T&T, the hotels segment is likely to grow the fastest. With an expected 10% jump
in ARRs in FY11 and FY12, we expect the share of hotel industry to increase to 22% in
FY12 against 19% in FY09. Limited supply of rooms, along with healthy demand, is
expected to help hotels to post better performance. Healthy growth in both international
and domestic tourists, along with India’s emergence as one of the fastest economies, is
likely to drive its business tourist traffic substantially.
240 20.0
Revenue (INR)
180 15.0
(%)
120 10.0
60 5.0
0 0.0
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10E
2010-11E
2011-12E
Total mkt size Hotel industry as a % of total T&T demand
4.8 24.0
(FTA, mn)
3.6 16.0
(%)
2.4 8.0
1.2 0.0
0.0 (8.0)
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008P
2009P
We estimate FTAs in India to grow 15% during 2011 and 2012, similar to the 2003-07
levels. We also expect foreign exchange earnings to grow much faster than the overall
FTAs growth as overall fee from tourism earned in 2003-08 grew 25% every year.
Moreover, what has helped improve India’s image on the world tourism map is its
improving infrastructure that has connected the remotest of the places within the
country. Further, low-cost airlines, highway development and better power situation
have buoyed India’s tourism prospects.
600 20.0
480 16.0
360 12.0
(FTA, mn)
(%)
240 8.0
120 4.0
0 0.0
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008P
Domestic tourists % Growth
Given the value proposition seeking habit of Indians, we believe there is likely to be
considerable demand for the three star and four star category hotels. Explosive growth in
the telecom industry and low-cost carriers has proved that at the right price, the
burgeoning Indian middle class is ready to spend. Hence, we believe Indian Hotels’
(IHCL) ‘Ginger’ budget hotel is a step in the right direction which should yield good
results in the long run.
Chart 6: Increasing airline traffic to translate into more business for hotels
500 56.0
400 42.0
(Passengers, lacs)
300 28.0
(%)
200 14.0
100 0.0
0 (14.0)
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10*
Passengers carried by domestic airlines % growth
Another positive trend is the increasing average length of stay of domestic and
international tourists. The average stay of international tourists increased from 3.0 to 3.4
days during 2005-06, while that of domestic tourists stood at 2.6 days. Similarly, there
was a marked increase in the length of stay of business guests from 2.4 days to 2.6 days,
while leisure guests were seen staying around for 2.4 days.
However, given the current demand-supply mismatch, we believe, new room additions
will not be a cause for concern. Many projects announced by real estate developers are
still on the drawing board due to the reasons mentioned above. As per a report by HVS,
of the total 100,000 announced five star deluxe, five star and four star category rooms,
only 60% is under active development with ~47% under the luxury and first class
category. During the same period, demand for these rooms is expected to increase by
12.6% CAGR.
Mumbai (9,771 rooms), Delhi (8,776 rooms) and Bengaluru (6,254 rooms) are expected
to witness the largest absolute addition, whereas Pune (276%), Ahmadabad (271%) and
Chandigarh (229%) could see the largest increase in percentage terms. CRISIL expects
Mumbai, Delhi and addition of ~32,000 rooms in the next five years.
Bengaluru to witness the
largest addition of rooms Limited supply of premium category rooms during FY04-08 had led to ~50% rise in ARRs
during the period. ORs also improved during the period to ~70% from 63%. For business
hotels, occupancies in excess of 70% are considered to be above normal as only five
business days are used for calculations.
Of the expected addition of almost 10,000 five star hotel rooms in FY10-12, more than
85% is likely to get filled which will push ORs to 65% in FY11E and 70% in FY12E. ORs
of more than 70% witnessed by the hotel industry during FY05-08 is indicative of an
even better number for the next few years as business activity in India is rising.
Chart 7: Increased demand with limited supply to push ORs higher till FY12E
45,000 80.0
36,000 64.0
27,000 48.0
(Rooms)
(%)
18,000 32.0
9,000 16.0
0 0.0
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Room availability Room demand ORs
To serve the anticipated demand of hotel rooms due to the upcoming Commonwealth
Games in October 2010 and ICC World Cup in Q4FY11, during FY10-11, supply in the
premium category is expected to rise 20% in the National Capital Region (NCR); we
expect the existing room count to rise 60%, from 7,000 to ~11,000 rooms in the next
Upcoming international five years. Including four star rooms, we expect total addition of 7000-8000 rooms in the
sports events to hold the period.
demand high
We expect ORs to remain strong at 75% in FY11E and decline to 70% in FY12E post the
Commonwealth Games. In our view, considering the supply of hotels in FY11E and FY12E,
we believe the new supply post FY12E to come down for a while as the market will take
time to expand.
Chart 8: Strong ORs till FY12E – Limited supply and robust demand
10,000 100.0
8,000 80.0
6,000 60.0
(Rooms)
(%)
4,000 40.0
2,000 20.0
0 0.0
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Supply Demand ORs
ARRs, after rising at 22% CAGR during FY04-09, are expected to fall 15% in FY10.
Considering the expected demand, we anticipate a conservative 15% increase in ARRs
during FY11 and FY12, though we believe the actual rise could be much higher.
ARRs to remain firm in
anticipation of high
Chart 9: Strong ARRs till FY12
demand
14,000 100.0
11,200 80.0
8,400 60.0
(%)
(INR)
5,600 40.0
2,800 20.0
0 0.0
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Delhi, being the political and cultural capital of India, attracts all kinds of travellers,
Indian and foreign, business and leisure. In FY08, business and leisure travellers were
almost 80% of the total travellers. We expect the percentage of leisure travellers to
increase in the short term, considering the upcoming games. On the long-term basis, the
current mix may hold.
40.0
54.6 50.5 63.2
52
20.0
8,000 80.0
6,000 60.0
(Rooms)
(%)
4,000 40.0
2,000 20.0
0 0.0
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Supply Demand ORs
Till FY13, Shangrila (414 rooms) is the only addition expected in South Mumbai. Owing
Limited supply in South
to shortage of large vacant land parcels in South Mumbai, North Mumbai is expected to
Mumbai to keep ARRs
witness the majority addition. Emergence of Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) as an
firm
alternative business destination is expected to shift a lot of business traffic over a period
of time to North Mumbai from South Mumbai.
We expect ARRs to increase 15% in FY11 and FY12, after declining 20% in FY10E.
Strong economic revival, along with better prospects of sectors like banking, financial
services, IT/ITeS and diamond, gives us confidence to expect better ARRs in future.
Owing to demand-supply mismatch, ARRs increased 20% CAGR during FY04-09.
11,200 80.0
8,400 60.0
(%)
(INR)
5,600 40.0
2,800 20.0
0 0.0
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
20
2,400 80.0
1,800 60.0
(Rooms)
(%)
1,200 40.0
600 20.0
0 0.0
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
After 19% CAGR increase in ARRs over FY04-09, we expect a -12% decline in FY10
followed by increase of 10% in FY11E and FY12E. Chennai’s booming manufacturing and
Back-ended supply to
IT sectors provide it the essential impetus for economic growth.
keep ARRs firm
7,200 80.0
3,600 40.0
1,800 20.0
0 0.0
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Chennai, being one of the main metros, business travellers form two-third of the total
travelers; with its emergence as the main ITes center, the proportion of foreigners has
been rising consistently. As Chennai is also emerging as a hub for almost all auto majors,
we expect this trend to continue, going forward.
60.0
(%)
20.0
1,280 64.0
960 48.0
(Rooms)
(%)
640 32.0
320 16.0
0 0.0
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Supply Demand ORs
Kolkata is expected to witness the least decline in ARRs of just 5% in FY10E due to
consistent rise in demand in the past few years and very limited supply. Taking
advantage of the demand-supply mismatch that is likely to continue till FY12E, we expect
10% increase in ARRs in FY11E and FY12E.
6,400 64.0
Witnessed strong ARRs
during 2010, better rates
going ahead
4,800 48.0
(INR)
(%)
3,200 32.0
1,600 16.0
0 0.0
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
ARRs RevPAR ORs
Source: CRISIL, Edelweiss research
Kolkata being primarily a financial hub, business travellers, along with airline crew, form
the majority demand. We expect this trend to continue in the near future.
60.0
(%)
75.7 65.1
40.0 62.8
66.3
20.0
3,200 72.0
2,400 54.0
(Rooms)
(%)
1,600 36.0
800 18.0
0 0.0
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Supply Demand ORs
Source: CRISIL, Edelweiss research
We expect ARRs to rise 5% in FY11E and FY12E, after declining ~28% in FY10E (decline
due to the IT slowdown and new supply of rooms).
12,800 72.0
ARRs to witness growth
only post FY11
9,600 54.0
(%)
(INR)
6,400 36.0
3,200 18.0
0 0.0
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
ARRs RevPAR ORs
With the emergence of Bengaluru as India’s Silicon Valley, business and foreign
travellers constitute more than three-fourth of the total demand. We expect this trend to
continue in future.
60.0
(%)
76 78.5
76.1
40.0 69.1
20.0
2,400 72.0
1,800 54.0
(Rooms)
(%)
1,200 36.0
600 18.0
0 0.0
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Supply Demand ORs
Source: CRISIL, Edelweiss research
We believe, going forward, the Hyderabad hotel industry will shape up with the number
of conferences happening there. Improved infrastructure already shows the efforts put in
by the state government to make Hyderabad a leading business city in India.
(%)
(INR)
3,600 36.0
1,800 18.0
0 0.0
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Proportion of business travellers and airline crew has been going up consistently. We
expect this trend to continue in future, considering the way Hyderabad has come up on
the world IT map.
40.0
68.4 58.7 62
60.6
20.0
Goa: The city is expected to register 30% jump in supply till FY12E, taking the total
supply close to 3,900 rooms. Tough real estate laws are to be blamed for the slow
development of hotels across the city. Including four star hotels, the total supply
expected in the next five years is 2,178 rooms. We expect Goa to witness continuous
rise in ARRs during FY11-12E, as we expect domestic travellers to replace the gap left by
foreign travellers to some extent. Recent trends show increased demand for hotel rooms
in Goa all year round, reducing the impact of seasonality on the local hotel market. This
is also evident from the fact that ORs, FY04 onwards, have been moving up consistently.
During FY11E and FY12E, we expect ARRs to move up 13% and ORs to improve to 65% and
70% respectively. In FY04-08, 32% increase in room demand outpaced 21% increase in
Improvement in all India supply, resulting in 132% increase in ARRs and more than 70% ORs during the same period.
ARRs and ORs till FY12 We believe that the demand-supply mismatch, coupled with slow development of planned
projects, would be a positive for the hotel industry in the medium term.
Global economic downturn during FY09 impacted the ORs, reducing them to 64% from 72%
in FY08 with flat ARRs. The 26/11 Mumbai attack and swine flu fever in FY10 severely
impacted the already weak numbers. In H1FY10, ARRs tumbled 25% and ORs reduced to just
53%. Improvement in the reported data of past few months and positive body language of
the industry players give us confidence that worst for the industry is behind.
0.6
0.4
(mns)
0.3
0.1
0.0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
CRISIL estimates 44% of the total new supply coming onstream during FY10-15 to become
operational only in FY15, leaving the demand-supply mismatch favourable till FY12-13. We
see geographically concentrated players at a relatively higher risk against those with a wider
footprint. With an increase in the total number of travellers, we expect strong demand across
segments.
9,600 72.0
7,200 54.0
(INR)
(%)
4,800 36.0
2,400 18.0
0 0.0
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
With the growing economy and increasing FDI, several top international hotel chains,
including the likes of Marriott, Four Seasons, Hilton, Accor & Intercontinental, have
announced plans of entering Indian shores either by tying up with an existing domestic hotel
chain or with a real estate player and managing them. As 100% FDI is permitted in hotels
and tourism through the automatic route, there are no obstacles for these companies to
launch operations.
With the global economy now reviving, international hotel companies are revisiting their India
plans and are signing deals with realty players for future developments in the country. For
instance, Carlson recently signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to manage a 160-
key five star deluxe hotel in Gurgaon. Also, Hindustan Construction Company (HCC), for its
township project in Lavasa, has signed four management contracts for the upcoming hotels
there.
We believe with the entry of major international players, not only ARRs in India will increase
over a period of time, but service standards of hotels will also rise substantially. Undoubtedly,
international chains will intensify competition for the leading Indian hotel chains like IHCL,
EIH and Hotel Leela, but in the long run, they will also increase the size of the market.
Vacation Ownership
Vacation ownership (VO) is a part of leisure travel. With rising income levels and improving
lifestyle, more Indians want to enjoy holidays. Better road connectivity and cheaper air
tickets have made more remote places accessible to travellers. With just 4.5% (2006) of
Indian population as holiday takers, India is far behind in comparison with the US (85%) and
the UK (69%).
4.5
4.4
3.9
3.8
Huge untapped potential
(%)
2.0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Source: Travel and Tourism – India: Euromonitor International: Country Market Insights, November 2008,
Edelweiss research
Global timeshare industry: Globally, VO, commonly known as ‘timeshares’, posted sales of
USD 15 bn in 2007, of which, the US accounted for majority. Ernst & Young (E&Y) puts the
US VO industry sales at USD 10.7 bn in 2007, with a membership base of 6.5 mn. In 1990s,
industry growth was led by large, established players such as Marriott, Hilton, and Hyatt.
Their entry was seen as a sign of legitimacy and quality, and their capital strength allowed
them to tap the entire VO value chain, from simple vanilla to high-end products.
Apart from the US and Europe, the VO industry is at an early stage in Australia, Africa and
Asia. South Africa had a membership base of 2,60,000 (Source: RCI South Africa) in 2006,
while Australia 1,25,000 (Source: ATHOC). India, on the other hand, has a membership base
of 2,50,000.
US lead the worldwide VO Worldwide, VO has proved to be a difficult product to sell, where brand equity is the key to
industry growth. VO, as a product, ranks high in terms of value and investment. Consequently, it
assumes a quasi-investment strategy of locking in lifetime vacations in the current period.
Customers’ trust in the company to deliver high quality holiday services over an extended
period of time drives sales. Owing to its high value, the product has been slow to pick up as
investors had less faith in smaller operators.
10.0
7.5
(USD bn)
5.0
2.5
0.0
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Timeshare industry in India: In India, after an initial good response to the VO concept in
1990s, some unscrupulous operators duped investors, which hurt industry prospects. In the
past few years, the industry has, however, regained some momentum with players adding
members at a brisk pace. We expect India to follow the path of the US, where large and
established players are expected to enter the industry at the initial years of growth. As per All
India Resort Development Authority (AIRDA), there are 80 operating resorts, with a total
membership base of 2,50,000.
According to AIRDA, some of the most important things to consider while purchasing
timeshare ownership interest are:
• Flexibility with regards to different locations, unit size and time of the year
Industry players
Mahindra Holidays & Resorts (MHRIL) is the largest VO company in India with more than
1,00,000 members across different schemes. With 28 resorts and ~1,500 rooms, the
company has gained the critical mass to expand on a large scale. As MHRIL entered the
industry little late, it offered a fixed price non-deeded flexible product (customer only has
right to use the property for a specified period and does not own it) against pure VO
product (customer owns a share of the unit, and can use it for the designated holiday
period).
MHRIL offers 25-year 7 nights holidays to its members where membership rates range
from INR 0.15 to INR 1.00 mn. It offers purple, red, white and blue seasons as per the
membership rates. MHRIL charges its members upfront and uses that cash to build its
fixed assets inventory. The company also offers Zest (targeting young urban consumers
seeking short breaks), Club Mahindra Fundays (targeting corporate customers) and
Mahindra Holidays Mahindra Homestays (targeting vacation travellers who prefer to stay with an Indian
dominates the Indian VO family). Further, the company plans to launch more schemes like Mahindra Heritage (for
industry senior citizens), Gypsy (targeting teenagers) and fractional ownership property products
(for high-end customers seeking a holiday home).
MHRIL derives its revenues from membership fee, annual subscription fee, resort income,
securitization income and interest income. As MHRIL charges customers upfront to build
its resorts. The company gains as ownership of the property stays with it and the
member gains over a period of time as the value of membership increases which is
transferable.
Country Club and Sterling Holiday Resorts are some of the competitors in the listed
space, but their scale and operations are no comparison for MHRIL.
T&T is divided into inbound and outbound tourism, where inbound refers to countries
attracting the largest number of tourists and outbound refers to countries from where the
largest number of tourist originate.
Inbound tourism
International tourist arrivals reached 907 mn in 2007, up 6.6% from 2006. The EU and
US continue to attract maximum number of tourists, corning almost 70% of the total
traffic. France (9%), Spain (6.5%) and the US (6.2%) were the top three tourist
destinations worldwide. Asia and the pacific region were able to increase their share to
almost 20% in 2007 against just 15% in 1997.
Africa, 44 mn,
5%
Europe, 484
mn, 54%
In Asia, China attracted almost 6% of the total worldwide inbound traffic. India attracted
~5.6 mn (42nd rank) international tourists in 2007, accounting for just 0.56% of the total
traffic. WTTC expects T&T economies’ GDP to contract 3.6% in 2009, but estimates the
overall T&T economy to grow 4% in real terms in the next 10 years, accounting for
almost 275 mn jobs or 8.4% of the total employment worldwide.
Middle East,
US$34 bn, 4%
Europe, USD
433, 51%
International tourist receipt grew to USD 856 bn in 2007, up 5.6% from 2006. The EU
and US continue to draw the highest amount of total receipt, corning almost 71% of the
total receipt. The US (11.3%), Spain (6.7%) and France (6.3%) were the top three
earners. Asia and the pacific region were able to increase their share to almost 22% in
2007 against just 18.6% in 1997. In Asia, China was the highest earner with almost
4.9% of the total international tourism receipt.
India ranks 65th in the overall inbound traffic and 7th with regards to the number of world
heritage sites. It is 6th in terms of price competitiveness, with very low ticket taxes and
airport charges. With regards to the policy environment, property rights are indeed well
protected and foreign ownership is authorized, although the stringency of visa
requirements places India in a very low 106th position. Also, the tourism infrastructure
in India remains underdeveloped. Furthermore, despite government and industry efforts
to promote the country abroad (India ranked 4th with regards to tourism fair
attendance) and the exposure given to recent promotional campaigns, the assessment of
marketing and branding to attract tourists remains mediocre (ranked 59th) (Source: The
Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2007, World Economic Forum).
Outbound tourism
According to UNWTO, Germany (USD 82.9 bn), the US (USD 76.2 bn), and the UK (USD
72.3 bn) were the top three spenders in 2007. China (ranked 5th) was the highest
spender from Asia, spending almost USD 29.8 bn. India ranked 27th, closely followed by
other emerging countries like Mexico and Brazil. Among the developed countries
Australia, the US and UK are expected to show the highest growth in outbound tourism.
Key Trends
We believe with the resilience shown by the Indian economy since 1997, overall business
environment in the country is changing. Along with this, the Indian hotel industry is also
witnessing emergence of few key trends:
1. Domestic travellers: Despite growing at 12.3% CAGR during 1996 and 2008 compared
with 7.2% growth of FTAs, domestic travellers have long been ignored by the hotels in
India. With lower propensity to spend, they bargain hard. In the past few years, their
perception of money is, however, undergoing a tectonic shift with rise in the educated,
middle class with disposable incomes. This, in turn, is driving domestic tourism. Rise in
VO membership of MHRIL to almost 100,000 in FY09 against 28,500 in FY05 gives us
enough evidence that at right price, domestic travellers are willing to spend. During
H1FY10, many hotel companies have mentioned the important role played by domestic
travellers in many leisure destinations.
2. Sources of revenue: Rising ORs have increased the contribution of room revenues, up
from 57% in FY05 to 60% in FY09. Owing to the demand-supply mismatch witnessed by
the hotel industry during FY04-09, ARRs increased at 20% CAGR. During the same
period, the increase in F&B per occupied room was much less. We believe the current
ratio of room, F&B and other revenue will continue as we expect modest increase in
ARRs in FY11E and FY12E.
80.0
28.0 26.0 25.0 26.0
26.0
60.0
(%)
40.0
0.0
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
3. Visa on arrival: GoI has decided to offer visa-on-arrival to a few countries including
New Zealand, Japan, Luxembourg, Singapore and Finland. It was reluctant to offer this
service earlier due to security reasons. The decision has been taken to promote Indian
tourism and increase the inflow of international tourists, which will directly and positively
affect the Indian hospitality industry.
4. Corporate guest houses: Following the steep rise in hotel tariffs in Bengaluru over the
past 2-3 years, companies like Infosys and Wipro have set up their own guesthouses and
hotels for accommodating their guests. This has been one of the reasons for lower
occupancies in premium hotels in the city. This trend could be a concern if taken up in
other cities as well.
5. Hotel brand growth in India: With the emergence of India as one of the leading T&T
destinations worldwide, more than 25 leading international hotel names are lined up to
have a presence in one of the fastest growing economies. This is a far cry from 2000
when IHCL, EIH, ITC, and ITDC (government owned) used to dominate the hospitality
sector in India. Growth of Indian middle class offers a large consumer base for hotel
chains ranging from luxury to budget. With the lower end of the market still in the hands
of unorganized players, we expect huge scope for the organised sector.
7. Food & beverage (F&B) concepts: With the emergence of standalone eating joints
selling their own USPs, five star hotels are expected to face a tough competition going
ahead. As diners are always ready to test different concepts with fine dining experience,
restaurants like Indigo, Tote, Olives, Tetsuma, Trishna, Zest and Smoke House Grill are
making marks in small pockets. We believe over a period of time, many more individual
restaurants with different concepts and superior interiors will come into India and expand
the market exponentially.
Business Analysis
We have evaluated companies under our coverage on two important parameters: (1)
geographical diversification and (2) asset model. For geographical diversification, IHCL, with
its presence in both India and abroad along with wide coverage of Indian cities is much better
placed in comparison to EIH and Hotel Leela. EIH and Hotel Leela are dependent on the
performance of couple of cities which form majority of their rooms and revenues. On the
asset model as well, IHCL seems to be better placed as 48 out of its 97 properties are with
associates/JV/Management contract. EIH and Hotel Leela perform poorly on this aspect as
well. Going forward, IHCL plans to follow the asset-light model aggressively and intends to
add 4,200 rooms under management contract in FY11E and FY12E.
From the above snapshot, we can see that even though IHCL, EIH and Hotel Leela are
comparable on the ARRs and ORs basis, the geographical spread and asset model of IHCL
makes it a favourable play. Slow expansion of EIH, along with diversification in the unrelated
areas like printing and car rentals, drag down the overall returns. High dependence of Hotel
Leela on its Bengaluru property for above industry level profits and the heavy investment in
the Delhi property makes it one of the most expensive companies in the entire space.
Geographical spread
IHCL, with 80% of its rooms located in India and 25% of total revenues coming from
international properties, is the most geographically diversified company in our coverage.
IHCL has presence across luxury, business leisure and economy segments. IHCL is
present with the ‘Taj’ brand in luxury, ‘Vivanta’ in upper upscale, ‘Gateway’ in upscale
and ‘Ginger’ in the economy segments. IHCL plans to add 60 more properties in the next
2 years, adding 8,458 rooms (including 2000 room abroad). More than 50% of the room
addition is expected to come under the asset light model of management contract.
IHCL’s international portfolio: This includes 16 properties, 2,490 rooms across South
East Asia, Middle East, Africa, UK and US. The entire portfolio consists of luxury rooms,
catering to both business and leisure travellers. IHCL is making its maiden venture into
China with management contracts for two hotels.
Asset model
IHCL is the most diversified asset model company, making use of all available methods
to increase the total rooms. The asset light model, where using the brand the company
managing the property extracts a part of top line and bottom line of the hotel from the
developer of the property, is a world-wide followed formula. Marriott International is a
perfect example, where, of the total 5, 76,000 rooms, the hotel owns only 1,785 rooms.
Worldwide, leading hotel chains leverage their brand by managing properties and
charging a fee for it.
In our coverage, IHCL drives the maximum mileage from its brand image with almost 16
hotels out of 97 under management contract. IHCL is planning to add more than 4,200
rooms through management contract in the next two years, both in India and abroad.
This is more than 50% of the total planned expansion of the company.
EIH also plans to add three properties in Bengaluru and Hyderabad under JV in the next
2-3 years. Hotel Leela added its first property through management contract in 2009
(409 rooms in Gurgaon).
Expansion plans
We believe that the next few years present good business conditions for the Indian
hospitality companies to expand and grow. With the high GDP growth expected for the
Indian economy, business and leisure travel will increase commensurately. Major
international players have also announced their plans to enter the Indian hospitality
space. Considering the good economic environment, we expect IHCL to benefit the most
considering its aggressive expansion plans.
IHCL has the most aggressive plan in our universe of companies. It plans to add
~10,000 rooms in the next 24 months, across luxury, business, leisure and economy
segments. The expansion is planned across the entire asset model.
To hedge against going asset heavy and to leverage the brand image of Taj, for IHCL,
~40% of the total addition is coming in the form of management contract. Also, under
the Ginger brand in the economy segment, IHCL plans to add 3,500 rooms in next 24
months. Investment per room in Ginger is substantially lower than the average costs for
a luxury room. Although in the next 24 months, IHCL plans to double its room inventory,
the total planned expenditure is just INR 20 bn.
IHCL plans to add more than 30 properties in different cities in India and 8 properties
aboard including China, Dubai, Qatar, UAE and Morocco. EIH, on the other hand, plans to
add five properties in India; it also has plans to add properties in Dubai, Oman, Abu
Dhabi and Morocco, but all these properties are expected to come under its wholly
owned subsidiary EIH International where due to its registration status accounts are not
merged with the consolidated entity. Hotel Leela plans to add only two properties in
Delhi and Chennai in the next 18-24 months.
Among the many properties to be added by IHCL in FY10, FY11 and FY12, properties like
Yeshwantpur (Bengaluru), Falaknuma Palace (Hyderabad), Taj Panjim (Goa) Fishcove
expansion (Chennai) and Cape Town (South Africa) are expected to become operational
in FY10 and FY11.
Valuation Methodology
Replacement costs (EV/Room) and EV/EBIDTA are the most followed valuation methods to
evaluate hotel companies worldwide. Replacement cost provides the flexibility to compare
peers across the market. It also acts as a value barometer in case of bad economic scenarios
where earnings are suppressed to a very large extent. Average replacement costs of a luxury
room is INR 25-30 mn compared with average replacement costs of INR 8-12 mn for a four
star hotel.
Chart 33: Replacement costs – IHCL most attractive in the peer group
7.0
5.6
4.2
(INR mn)
2.8
1.4
0.0
Apr-04
Apr-05
Apr-06
Apr-07
Apr-08
Apr-09
Jan-05
Jan-06
Jan-07
Jan-08
Jan-09
Oct-04
Oct-05
Oct-06
Oct-07
Oct-08
Oct-09
Jul-04
Jul-05
Jul-06
Jul-07
Jul-08
Jul-09
EIH Leela IHCL
EIH and Hotel Leela are trading (adjusted for managed rooms) at INR 35 mn per room on the
replacement basis against IHCL that is trading at a significant discount of 60%. Owing to its
portfolio mix across segments, IHCL’s discount is justifiable to some extent, but we believe
given its portfolio diversification, there is value in the stock at the current price.
EV/EBIDTA is another valuation tool for the hotel industry. This tool finds its utilisation during
the periods where there is earnings visibility. Hotel industry, being a cyclical industry where
4-5 good years are followed by 1-2 bad years worldwide, it is very important to have
different valuation parameters.
On EV/EBIDTA basis, IHCL is trading at 10x FY11E and 7x FY12E. EIH, on the other hand, is
trading at 13.5x FY11E and 12x FY12E, and Hotel Leela at 23x FY11E and 17x FY12E. Global
hotel companies are trading at 12x FY11E and 10x FY12E. We believe that at current
valuations, IHCL still has upside left, considering the fact almost 17% of its EBIDTA comes
from management contracts that attract higher valuation worldwide.
30.0
23.0
(x) 16.0
9.0
2.0
FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E
Indian Hotels Hotel Leela EIH
EIH’s slow expansion and heavy dependence on two cities makes us believe that its current
valuations are demanding; the stock price also factors in probability of a corporate action.
We find Hotel Leela’s valuations too demanding, given its expensive expansion plan and
severe pressure on ARRs in Bengaluru.
Key Risks
1. Terrorism acts: Following the event of 26/11, many countries issued travel warnings to
their citizens, advising them against traveling to India. Considering the elasticity of
demand in this industry, such acts of terrorism impact the sentiments and inflow of
tourists into the country.
2. Competition from South Asian countries: Many South Asian countries are now
consciously trying to increase their tourism activities by offering world-class facilities at
highly competitive prices. These destinations pose threat to the Indian leisure hotels. To
counter competition, GoI has, however, started many campaigns like Incredible India to
promote India as a leading travel destination.
3. Employee cost: Employee cost (as a percentage of total income) is as much as 25%,
the largest cost component in the overall cost structure of the hotel industry. With the
estimated supply addition of almost 30,000 rooms in the next five years, we expect a lot
of pressure on hiring and retaining trained manpower. Most leading players are,
therefore, ensuring that the required supply of trained workforce comes through either
their own hotel management institutes or through tie-ups with workforce training
institutes.
4. Cost and time over-runs: In 2007, many hotels and real estate companies had
announced their major plans, encouraged by a buoyant economy. Most of them were,
however, shelved in 2008 and 2009 owing to constrained liquidity scenario following a
financial slowdown. Delays in construction, which ultimately increases the overall project
costs, are common in India.
Company-specific risks
2. EIH: Better-than-expected performance of the Mumbai market, any possible land sale
and open offer by ITC could provide an upside risk to our call.
3. Hotel Leela: Above expected performance of the Bengaluru property and upcoming
Delhi property could help the company to tide over its liquidity constraints, improving the
overall profit margins.
4. MHIL: Below estimated member addition, along with increase in commission payment to
agents, could hit profitability. Also, if the company losses its ongoing case with the IT
department, then it may have to part with a one-time payment of INR 900 mn.
5. Cox & Kings: Further deployment of working capital in the subsidiaries or for corporate
travel business may strain its balance sheet. Integration of acquired companies is
another key challenge for the company.
Challenges
In fact, under Section 10 (23) g of the IT Act, hotels were added to the
infrastructure list so that the interest received by financial institutions and banks for
loans extended to hotels were tax exempted. However, the section itself was
discontinued from April 1, 2007.
2. Luxury tax: Luxury tax, which is a state level tax, is levied on the published rates
without taking into consideration the discount given on the rack rates and
commission paid to agents. Luxury tax in India varies from 5% to 15%. The industry
has been asking for the tax to be reduced to a maximum of 5%.
3. VAT, sales tax, excise duty, custom duty and service taxes are some of the other
issues which the industry has been grappling with.
Infrastructure bottlenecks
Woefully inadequate infrastructure has been one of the biggest problems for India to
emerge as the topmost travel and tourism destination. In comparison to some of the
leading tourist destinations of South East Asia, the infrastructure in India scores poorly.
Inadequate infrastructure is one of the main reasons why many Indian cities with great
potential remain untapped on the world tourism map.
Annexure I
Table 7: Properties and rooms to be added by IHCL till FY12
Date of
Property details No. of rooms Cost
completion
IHCL
Taj Falaknuma Palace, Hyderabad 60 850 Mar-10
Yeshwantpur, Bengaluru 331 160 Dec-10
Taj Lake End, Udaipur 80 250 -
Taj Surya, Coimbatore 184 980 -
Taj Santacruz, Mumbai 175 1300 -
Moti Mahal, Bharatpur 40 400 -
Taj Residency, Noida 450 3150 Sep-10
Taj Group of Companies
Taj Palace, Cape Town 72 2960 Mar-10
Fishcove Expansion, Chennai 64 350 -
Gateway, Gondia 35 110 -
Gateway, Bannerghatta, Bengaluru 225 600 -
Ginger Hotels (different locations) 1,968 1200 -
Total 3,684 12,310 -
Management Contracts
Under Vivanta Brand:
Vivanta by Taj, Bekal 72 - Mar-10
Taj, Gurgaon 208 - -
Taj, Karkumaduma, Delhi 180 - -
Taj, Nagpur 337 - -
Taj, Pondicherry 60 - -
Under Gateway Brand:
OMR, Chennai 159 - -
Hinjewadi 150 - -
Karkumaduma, Delhi 300 - -
Kolkata 205 - -
Raipur 123 - -
Jallunder 123 - -
Kakkanad, Kochi 150 - -
Navi Mumbai 125 - -
International Contracts
Taj Palace temple of Heaven, China 60 - -
Taj Palace , Hainan, China 500 - -
Exotica Resort & Spa, Palm island, Dubai 262 - -
Taj Exotica Resort & Spa, Doha, Qatar 150 - -
Taj Mahal, Yas Island, Abu Dhabi, UAE 500 - -
Taj Hotel, Mina Zayed, Abu Dhabi, UAE 300 - -
Taj Tangiers, Morocco 65 - -
Taj Exotica Resort & Spa, Ras Al Khaimah 180 - -
Total 4,209 - -
Source: Company, Edelweiss research
Annexure II
Annexure III
We expect UK, Japan, Australia, Dubai, and US to account for almost 75-80% of
subsidiaries revenue.
MARKET DATA
Consistent innovation and acquisitions driving revenues 52-week range (INR) : 505 / 304
Share in issue (mn) : 62.9
Innovative product offerings like Duniya Dekho, Bharat Dekho, and FlexiHol are
M cap (INR bn/USD mn) : 30.6 / 683.6
some of CNK’s most popular schemes. To capture the high end tourist outside
Avg. Daily Vol. BSE/NSE (‘000) : 1,734.2
India, the company has made sizable acquisitions in the UK, Australia, and US. To
drive growth further, it has launched a pan-India luxury train in JV with IRCTC
along with an ambitious visa processing project. We expect the luxury train and SHARE HOLDING PATTERN (%)
visa processing initiative to contribute 7% to FY11E revenues. Promoters* : 63.6
MFs, FIs & Banks : 8.5
FIIs : 18.7
Increasing leisure travel to reduce working capital requirement Others : 9.0
We expect the additional working capital deployment to dip going forward as the * Promoters pledged shares : Nil
(% of share in issue)
share of leisure travel increases in the overall portfolio. CNK is likely to generate
approximately INR 3.8 bn of positive operating cash flow in FY11E and FY12E.
With its strong brand equity, the company can negotiate better terms with
RELATIVE PERFORMANCE (%)
corporates and in turn reduce working capital deployed.
Sensex Stock Stock over
Sensex
1 month 5.5 10.8 5.3
Outlook and valuations: Positive; initiating coverage with ‘HOLD’
3 months 0.8 8.7 7.9
CNK, due to its strong brand equity and vast knowledge of various geographies,
has created a niche for itself in the T&T space. Although it is poised to exploit the
high growth expected in the worldwide T&T space, we believe, a lot of these
expectations are already factored in the share price at current levels. We expect
the stock to trade at 25.0x FY11E and 20.0x FY12E P/E. At CMP of INR 488, CNK
is trading at 23.4x and 18.6x consolidated P/E of FY11E and FY12E, respectively.
Using the target P/E, we arrive at a target price of INR 520, and initiate coverage
on the stock with a ‘HOLD’ recommendation.
Financials
Year to March FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Revenues (INR mn) 2,869 3,684 4,708 5,605
Growth (%) 57.5 28.4 27.8 19.1
Manoj Bahety, CFA
EBIDTA (INR mn) 1,214 1,545 1,995 2,381
+91-22- 6623 3362
Net profit (INR mn) 634 845 1,297 1,611
manoj.bahety@edelcap.com
Share outstanding (mn) 28 63 63 63
EPS (INR) 10.0 13.3 20.6 25.6
Manav Vijay
EPS growth (%) 47.4 33.0 55.3 24.2
+91-22- 4063 5413
Diluted P/E (x) 48.9 36.8 23.7 19.1
manav.vijay@edelcap.com
ROAE (%) 32.7 16.5 15.1 16.3
Edelweiss Research is also available on www.edelresearch.com, Bloomberg EDEL <GO>, Thomson First Call, Reuters and Factset. Edelweiss Edelweiss
SecuritiesSecurities
Limited Limited
41
Hotels & Tourism
Investment Rationale
56.0
(Revenue %)
42.0
28.0
14.0
0.0
FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
India Subsidiaries
Considering that T&T is part of discretionary spending and the first to bear the brunt of
any event (terrorist or disease) risk, CNK has diversified its revenue stream across
geographies. Main foreign subsidiaries like UK, Japan, Australia, Dubai, and US handle a
mix of inbound and outbound traffic and generate outbound tour packages for
approximately 55 countries. We discuss CNK’s major revenue generating countries:
1) India: In FY09, India accounted for 55% of revenue and PAT. Indian operations
serve the inbound, outbound, and domestic traffic for leisure and corporate travel.
Duniya Dekho, Bharat Dekho, and FIT are some of the company’s most popular
product offerings. Pan-India luxury train and visa processing facility are expected to
increase the gamut of services further.
2) UK (Cox & Kings Travel and ETN Services): Cox & Kings Travel is an outbound
Foreign subsidiaries reduce
the geographical risk tour operator and caters to only the leisure travel market. It concentrates on the up-
market business. ETN Services is an inbound travel wholesaler / ground handling
service provider in Europe. Both the subsidiaries accounted for 26% and 27% of
FY09 revenues and PAT, respectively.
4) Other subsidiaries: Dubai, Australia, and US act as outbound tour operators and
accounted for 9% and 4% of FY09 revenues and PAT, respectively. The Australian
subsidiary was acquired in November 2008 and is a specialist in outbound tours. The
US subsidiary was acquired in April 2009 and is a boutique travel company offering
private travel and group travel to high net worth clients.
2007 Cox & Kings.,UK (along with its subsidiary Outbound specialist tour operator that caters to leisure travel
Cox & Kings Travel) market of Europe
2007 Cox & Kings (Japan) Dedictated wholesaler of products and services to other tour
operators and offer ground handling capabilities in select
geographies
2008 Quoprro Global Services Visa processing [appovals from Singapore, Athens (Greece)
and Hong Kong] for outsourcing their visa processing
activities to C&K
2008 Tempo Holidays Pty., Australia (along with Significant part of its business is in European countries
its sub Tempo Holidays NZ in NZ)
2009 East India Travel Company Selling upmarket tours and travel packages in the US
To drive growth, the company has launched a pan-India luxury train in JV with IRCTC.
The train will run from September to April and carry 84 passengers per journey for 7-8
nights with fares starting at USD 800 per night and make 16 journeys every year. The
service is aimed at the very high end tourist. We expect the initiative to contribute
approximately 5% to FY11E revenue. The visa processing initiative is another ambitious
project to drive growth. We expect the luxury train and visa processing initiative to
contribute 7% to FY11E revenues.
Meetings, incentives, conferences, and exhibitions (MICE); corporate travel; and forex
are the business segments where the company needs to provide credit period to
customers. CNK has become selective in taking on the corporate travel business and is
ready to forego potential business if the same is coming at an incremental working
capital deployment.
CNK has also loans and advances and debtors worth INR 2.5 bn that have been extended
to various subsidiaries, associates, and group companies. We believe as the subsidiaries
attain reasonable size, future fund deployment will be limited in comparison to the past.
Management is confident of turning around the working capital cycle and aims to report
a positive working capital going forward. One of the stated purposes of IPO proceedings
was to invest INR 625 mn into subsidiaries. We believe future deployment of funds post
this round of investment will be minimal.
The company enhances its global presence through a network of GSAs and PSAs
covering other countries. Taking advantage of its global network, the company offers
outbound travel products to almost 150 countries.
Valuation
PE multiple is the right valuation parameter for a company like CNK which is growing fast,
taking advantage of the industry’s organic growth and using acquistions as an inorganic
growth route.
With its strong brand equity and vast knowledge of various countries/geographies, CNK has
created a niche for itself in the T&T space. Considering the high growth expected in the
worldwide T&T space, the company is in a sweet spot to exploit the opportunity. At CMP of
INR 488, CNK is trading at 23.4x and 18.6x consolidated P/E of FY11E and FY12E,
respectively. We expect the stock to trade at 25.0x FY11E and 20.0x FY12E P/E. Some of the
Asian peers like Hanatours and Huangshan are also trading at similar multiples. Using the
target P/E, we arrive at a target price of INR 520, and initiate coverage on the stock with a
‘HOLD’ recommendation.
Key Risks
CNK has advanced approximately INR 350 mn to two of its loss making group companies
viz., Tulip Star Hotels and V Hotels, in the form of investments and advances. The
amount is part of the overall INR 2.5 bn exposure mentioned above.
Company Description
CNK is one of the largest and widely recognised holiday brands in India and has evolved over
250 years. The company caters to overall travel needs of Indian and international travelers.
It has presence in 19 countries and in India has 255 touch points covering 164 locations.
International operations account for almost 50% of total revenue. CNK’s business can be
broadly categorized as leisure travel, corporate travel, forex and visa processing. It provides
end to end travel solutions including land, air and cruise bookings, hotel bookings, in-transit
arrangements and various other services.
In India, the company caters to travelers coming into India, going out of India, and domestic
travelers within the country. Due to its extensive knowledge of various countries and
geographies, the company also caters to travelers originating from any country other than
India to any other country. Leisure travel dominates the revenue stream and the company
has aggressive plans like the Maharaja Express and visa processing to strengthen it. As the
corporate travel part of the business is capital intensive, the company is looking at measures
to reduce the deployment of working capital without any adverse impact on existing business.
Quorprro Global
- For Visa
Leisure business- Corporate Leisure business Royal Indian Rail processing, yet to
India business - India - Foreign Tours commence
operations
Financial Outlook
5,600 80.0
4,200 60.0
(INR mn)
(%)
2,800 40.0
1,400 20.0
0 0.0
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Given the larger base of FY09, growth numbers of FY11 and FY12 are reasonable and are
not strictly comparable to the company’s growth rate in FY07 and FY08.
39.0
33.0
(%)
27.0
21.0
15.0
FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
We expect margins to remain strong even though more than 50% of the revenue comes
from outside India as CNK primarily caters to the upper end of tourists who are less
sensitive to rates.
1,600
800
(INR mn)
(800)
(1,600)
FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Operating cash flow
Financial Statements
Ratios
Year to March FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
ROAE (%) 36.5 32.7 16.5 15.1 16.3
ROACE (%) 39.4 28.3 23.4 25.9 29.5
Inventory (days) 6 5 5 4 5
Debtors (days) 256 261 220 186 174
Payable (days) 480 400 360 302 285
Cash conversion cycle (219) (134) (135) (111) (106)
Current ratio 1.8 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1
Debt/EBITDA 1.8 2.9 2.1 1.4 0.8
Interest cover (x) 11.3 5.6 4.7 6.9 10.6
Fixed assets turnover (x) 3.4 4.0 4.5 3.5 4.3
Total asset turnover (x) 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.4
Equity turnover(x) 1.7 1.7 0.8 0.6 0.6
Debt/Equity (x) 0.8 1.6 0.4 0.3 0.2
Adjusted debt/Equity 0.9 2.3 0.6 0.5 0.3
Du pont analysis
Year to March FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
NP margin (%) 24.8 22.1 22.9 27.6 28.7
Total assets turnover 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.5
Leverage multiplier 1.8 2.3 1.7 1.4 1.2
ROAE (%) 36.5 32.7 16.5 15.1 16.3
Valuation parameters
Year to March FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Diluted EPS (INR) 6.8 10.0 13.3 20.6 25.6
Y-o-Y growth (%) 43.3 47.4 33.0 55.3 24.2
CEPS (INR) 17.5 25.9 34.1 51.4 63.0
Diluted P/E (x) 72.1 48.9 36.8 23.7 19.1
Price/BV(x) 18.7 13.7 3.8 3.4 2.9
EV/Sales (x) 4.4 5.6 7.9 6.1 4.9
EV/EBITDA (x) 11.0 13.2 18.8 14.4 11.5
EV/EBITDA (x)+1 yr forward 6.4 8.8 15.4 12.9
Dividend yield (%) 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.5
Banking on Mumbai with 60% rooms inventory and 50% FY11E revenue April 1, 2010
With opening of the Trident in Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC), a 436-room property,
Reuters : EIHO.BO Bloomberg : EIH IN
Mumbai will account for 60% of East India Hotels’ (EIH) total owned rooms
inventory and approximately 50% of total FY11E revenues. Although we expect
EDELWEISS RATING
45% and 15% jump in FY11E and FY12E revenues, respectively, much is
Absolute Rating HOLD
dependent on the performance of the Mumbai hotel market. The South Mumbai
market is expected to be robust in FY11 and FY12, whereas the North Mumbai
market is expected to remain challenging due to 20% increase in supply.
MARKET DATA
EIH is curtailing its earnings expansion and not leveraging on its brand image. MFs, FIs & Banks : 13.5
FIIs : 2.7
Others : 37.4
International operations not reflected in financials * Promoters pledged shares : 1.7
(% of share in issue)
Due to British Virgin Islands regulations where EIH’s international subsidiary is
registered, the company reports only miniscule dividend income on the INR 1.8 bn
investment. Also, as the management of properties under the subsidiary is not
RELATIVE PERFORMANCE (%)
with EIH, we believe value of this investment is not reflected in financials. We
Sensex Stock Stock over
expect further capital to flow to this subsidiary due to the current expansion plans Sensex
1 month 5.5 1.8 (3.7)
in Dubai, Oman, and Morocco.
3 months 0.8 (11.1) (11.9)
Financials
Year to March FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Revenues (INR mn) 11,769 9,620 13,877 15,235
Growth (%) (7.1) (18.3) 44.2 9.8
EBIDTA (INR mn) 4,143 2,417 4,463 5,196 Manoj Bahety, CFA
Edelweiss Research is also available on www.edelresearch.com, Bloomberg EDEL <GO>, Thomson First Call, Reuters and Factset. Edelweiss Limited
Edelweiss Securities Securities Limited
53
Hotels & Tourism
Investment Rationale
Banking on Mumbai with 60% rooms inventory and 50% FY11E revenue
With the opening of the Trident, BKC, in December 2009 and the expected reopening of
the Oberoi, Nariman Point, in Q4FY10, we expect Mumbai to account for 60% (1,310
rooms out of 2,192 rooms) of EIH’s total owned room inventory and approximately 50%
of total FY11E revenue. Thus, performance of the Mumbai hotel market is critical for the
company. While limited supply is expected to keep the South Mumbai market robust, the
North Mumbai market is expected to remain soft due to 20% increase in supply in the
next two years.
2,500
60
2,000
160 160
263 263
1,500 160 160 287 287
(Rooms)
263 263
0
Mumbai 2008 Kolkata
NCR 2009
Bengaluru 2010ERanthambore
Udaipur 2011E
Rajgarh
North Mumbai: Banking and financial services are the primary demand generaters for
North Mumbai, but due to ample supply of rooms we expect ARRs and ORs to be soft in
the next 12-18 months. North Mumbai is expected to add 2,000 rooms by 2013, taking
the total to 7,000 rooms. Ample supply is expected to keep ARRs soft, which had jumped
230% to INR 11,000 during FY05-09. We are not including any effect of 4-star hotels
which are coming up in that part of town, although these hotels if not take away the
traffic, will atleast affect sentiments.
11,600 68
10,200 61
(%)
(INR)
8,800 54
7,400 47
6,000 40
Dec-08
Sep-08
Sep-09
Apr-09
Aug-09
Nov-08
Feb-09
May-09
Mar-09
Oct-08
Jan-09
Oct-09
Jun-09
Jul-09
ARRs ORs
3,600
2,700
(Rooms)
1,800
900
0
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E
Owned rooms Total rooms
Slow expansion in rooms has led to revenue CAGR of just 17% from FY04-09 with ARRs
increasing at 15% CAGR during the same period. Had the company aggressively
expanded its rooms inventory, sales growth during the previous good business cycle
would have been much higher. Although we expect 45% and 15% increase in revenues
in FY11E and FY12E, respectively, majority of it accounts from the reopening of the
Oberoi, Nariman Point, and launching of the Trident, BKC.
Till FY12, EIH plans to add approximately 1,000 rooms through MC, increasing its total
rooms to approximately 1,600. In FY11E, although we expect MC to contribute 7% to the
consolidated EBIDTA, its impact on return ratios is not significant.
EIH, through EIH International, has presence in Indonesia, Mauritius, and Egypt and
No income from across four properties has approximately 300 rooms. Due to the registration of this
international operations
subsidiary in the British Virgin Islands, EIH recognises only dividend income from it.
Although the inherent value of these properties is high, due to regulations, the real effect
of this is not visible. Through EIH International, EIH is also planning to increase its
presence internationally by adding properties in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Morocco, and Oman.
We expect further flow of funds to this subsidiary due to the current expansion plans.
As the management of these properties is not with EIH or EIH International, the
company also does not report any MC income from them.
EIH caters to only foreign airlines. Growth in the business has been tepid and the
company is not enthusiastic to pursue the business. In H1FY10, the estimated top line
for the business was INR 860 mn and the company expects similar performance in
H2FY10 as well.
is expected to post marginal profits, both due to improved business conditions and
measures to cut loss making segments.
EIH generated revenue of INR 500 mn from the printing business where approximately
20% of the business is in house. Till 2008, the business operated out of Maiden Hotels in
Delhi. In FY09, the company invested INR 1 bn to expand and shift the business to
Manesar (close to Gurgaon, Haryana). The company has aggressive plans for this
business, but we believe its overall profitability is not more than 10-15%.
Valuation
We have used valuation parameters like EV/EBIDTA, EV/sales, P/B, and DCF to value EIH.
The stock is currently available at 13.4x and 11.3x consolidated EV/EBIDTA of FY11E and
FY12E, respectively, while its global peers are trading at 12.0x and 10.0x their EV/EBIDTA of
FY11E and FY12E, respectively. With a target price of INR 120, we believe the 10-15%
current premium over other comparables is not justified and expect EIH to trade at similar
multiple as peers. As we don’t have any light on the financial details of its overseas company,
we have valued the investments at 2x, which adds another INR 10 to our target price.
At CMP of INR 124, EIH is currently trading at 3.2x FY11E P/B. Although it is less than its
Insufficient expansion to historical P/B of 4.1x over FY06-09, we believe at the current price, the stock fully factors in
affect the earnings growth
better business performance. Disappointment on any of these fronts can adervsely impact
stock sentiments.
Our sensitivty analysis for the main valuation parameters like EV/EBIDTA and EPS also shows
a limited upside to our estimates.
We have assumed 70% ORs and 15% growth in ARRs for calculations. This is considering the
fact that 60% of its owned rooms are located in Mumbai, EIH has better chances of
increasing overall ARRs. The sensivity table clearly demostrates that even with ORs of 70%
and 15% growth in ARRs in FY12E, the company would be trading at EV/EBIDTA of 11.3x,
which is a 10% premium than peers. We initiate coverage on the stock with a ‘HOLD’
recommendation.
Key Risks
Company Description
EIH, the third largest hospitality company in India after Indian Hotels and the ITC Welcome
Group, manages more than 3,000 rooms across 19 properties in India. It is the largest
company in the Oberoi Group. The group, founded in 1934, owns and manages luxury hotels
across five countries under the Oberoi and Trident brands. The group’s portfolio includes
hotels and operations in flight catering, airport restaurants, travel & tour services, car rentals,
project management, and corporate air charters. It manages more than 3,500 rooms across
India and the international market. The company also operates luxury cruisers in India.
Besides hotels, the group also owns a printing press.
In 2003, the group entered into a strategic alliance for Trident hotels with Hilton International
to cover eight hotels with approximately 1,900 rooms across India under the Trident Hilton
brand. In 2007, the company decided to call off the arrangement as Hilton itself was
increasing its presence in India. Post the break up, all eight hotels were re-branded as
Trident.
Mgmt contract/
Owned rooms associate Airport and flight
2,086 rooms services Printing press Car rental
1,071 rooms
9 owned hotels
10 owned hotels
EIH International
- equity of Mashobra Resort -
INR 1.9 bn equity of Mumtaz Resort - EIH Associated
(Owns interest in 4 INR 260 mn; equity of Hotels - equity of
international loans of INR 394 mn INR 596 mn
properties,not INR 1.13 bn (60% interest) (36.1% interest)
clubbed in the (78.79% interest)
con no’s.)
Financial Outlook
14,000 30%
10,500 15%
(INR mn)
(%)
7,000 0%
3,500 -15%
0 -30%
FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
50.0
40.0
30.0
(%)
20.0
10.0
0.0
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
EBIDTA Margin Net Profit Margin
Source: Company, Edelweiss research
25.0
20.0
(%) 15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
ROE ROCE
Financial Statements
Ratios
Year to March FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
ROAE (%) 19.1 12.8 2.6 10.0 12.5
ROACE (%) 21.9 15.1 5.7 11.7 14.0
Inventory (days) 10 11 13 9 9
Debtors (days) 36 37 42 32 35
Payable (days) 91 110 126 100 108
Cash conversion cycle (45) (62) (71) (59) (64)
Current ratio 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3
Debt/EBITDA 1.9 2.8 6.4 3.5 2.7
Interest cover (x) 4.8 3.6 1.2 2.4 3.0
Fixed assets turnover (x) 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.6
Total asset turnover (x) 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.5
Equity turnover(x) 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.9 1.0
Debt/Equity (x) 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.0 0.8
Adjusted debt/Equity 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.0 0.8
Du pont analysis
Year to March FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
NP margin (%) 17.8 14.5 3.9 10.7 13.0
Total assets turnover 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.5
Leverage multiplier 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.0
ROAE (%) 19.1 12.8 2.6 10.0 12.5
Valuation parameters
Year to March FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Diluted EPS (INR) 5.7 4.3 0.9 3.8 5.1
Y-o-Y growth (%) 43.3 (24.5) (78.2) 298.7 34.3
CEPS (INR) 7.4 6.2 3.3 6.7 8.2
Diluted P/E (x) 21.6 28.6 131.3 32.9 24.5
Price/BV(x) 3.9 3.4 3.4 3.2 2.9
EV/Sales (x) 4.3 4.8 6.3 4.3 3.9
EV/EBITDA (x) 11.1 13.7 25.2 13.4 11.3
EV/EBITDA (x)+1 yr forward 13.3 23.5 13.6 11.5 NA
Dividend yield (%) 1.5 1.0 0.4 0.8 1.0
HOTEL LEELAVENTURE
Expensive on all counts
Era of super normal profits a thing of past; 35% margin likely in FY11E April 1, 2010
IT slowdown, ample supply of new rooms, and shifting of the airport to the
outskirts of the city are expected to limit upside on ARRs for Hotel Leelaventure’s Reuters : HTLE.BO Bloomberg : LELA IN
(HLV) Bengaluru property. Post 35% dip in ARRs in H1FY10 over H1FY09, we
expect an overall 25% decline in FY10 over FY09 in this property’s ARR. Although EDELWEISS RATING
we expect the company’s EBIDTA margin to improve to 35.4% in FY11E over Absolute Rating REDUCE
CMP : INR 50
FCF likely to be negative till FY11; high leverage a concern 52-week range (INR) : 52 / 18
Adjusted for the revaluation reserve, we expect HLV’s debt/equity to be at 3.5x in Share in issue (mn) : 377.8
FY11E, highest in the industry. We expect FCF to be negative till FY11 as the M cap (INR bn/USD mn) : 18.8 / 416.0
Avg. Daily Vol. BSE/NSE (‘000) : 2,396.4
company continues to remain in heavy capex mode. With INR 5 bn of likely capex
in FY10E and FY11E for the upcoming Delhi and Chennai properties, considering
the high existing leverage, equity raising is the likely option as operations continue
SHARE HOLDING PATTERN (%)
to remain weak due to business slowdown. Likely redemption of EUR 39.2 mn
Promoters* : 52.7
FCCB at 125.5% of the principal amount will also keep liquidity pressure on the MFs, FIs & Banks : 7.2
company. We are not factoring in any FCCB buyback or equity dilution, although FIIs : 3.2
HLV has already passed a resolution to raise equity of up to INR 7.5 bn. Others : 37.0
* Promoters pledged shares : 24.6
(% of share in issue)
15.2% in FY11E and FY12E, respectively, compared to 28.9% in FY08. 3 months 0.8 (1.1) (1.9)
Financials
Year to March FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Revenues (INR mn) 4,522 4,041 6,223 8,571
Growth (%) (12.1) (10.6) 54.0 37.7
EBIDTA (INR mn) 1,557 1,203 2,205 3,038 Manoj Bahety, CFA
Edelweiss Research is also available on www.edelresearch.com, Bloomberg EDEL <GO>, Thomson First Call, Reuters and Factset. Edelweiss Securities
Edelweiss Limited 67
Securities Limited
Hotels & Tourism
Investment Rationale
Era of super normal profits a thing of past; 35% margin likely in FY11E
Slowdown in IT, ample supply of new rooms, and shifting of the airport to the outskirts
of the city are expected to limit upside on ARRs for HLV’s Bengaluru property. We expect
this property’s ARRs to decline by 25% in FY10E. During H1FY10, ARRs dipped 35% over
Era of abnormal ARRs in H1FY09. Although we expect the company’s EBIDTA margin to improve to 35.4% in
Bengaluru is over
FY11E over 29.8% in FY10E, it is low compared to the over 44.6% margin posted in
FY08.
IT boom along with limited supply of rooms had led to unprecedented increase in ARRs in
Bengaluru with an almost 127% jump between FY04 and FY07. The location advantage
of Leela Bangalore worked in its favor as the company was able to charge much higher
ARRs than prevalent in the city. HLV was able to charge on an average 25% more than
its peers in the city with almost same ORs. We believe with the doubling of rooms
between FY09 and FY14 in Bengaluru, growth in the company’s ARRs is likely to be
muted. Taking an optimistic view, we expect 10% increase in ARRs in both FY11E and
FY12E with 65% and 70% ORs during the same period.
Chart 1: HLV has enjoyed better than average ARRs in the past
20,000 80.0
18,000 74.0
16,000 68.0
(INR)
(%)
14,000 62.0
12,000 56.0
10,000 50.0
FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
Leela ARRs City ARRs Leela ORs City ORs
Source: Company, CRISIL, Edelweiss research
With severe decline in ARRs, we expect Bengaluru property’s overall contribution to dip
to ~35% and ~26% in FY10E and FY11E, respectively, as new properties like Udaipur
and Delhi also start contributing to sales. Even with new properties we do not expect the
company to report all time high EBIDTA margin of 45-46% reported during FY06 and
FY08 as the new properties will become operational in highly competitive areas.
While Bengaluru is expected to add 2,000 premium category rooms in the next five
years, the city is expected to add 6,300 rooms including four star hotels (Source: HVS).
Though we expect a reasonable growth in demand, ARRs are likely to remain under
pressure till FY12 because of major upcoming supply.
4,000
(No. of rooms)
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E FY13E
Rooms availability Rooms demand
Source: CRISIL, Edelweiss research
1. Delhi hotel: The 290-rooms hotel in Delhi is expected to become operational in July
2010, before the start of the Commonwealth Games in October 2010. Apart from
the land cost of INR 6.5 bn, the company is expected to spend INR 4.0-4.5 bn on
construction. We expect capex of INR 2 bn in FY10 and FY11 on this property.
With the addition of properties mentioned above, the company is doubling its total rooms
to almost 2,247 in FY12E from 1,119 in FY09.
2,500
2,000
(No. of rooms)
1,500
1,000
500
0
FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Rooms availability
44.0
38.0
(%)
32.0
26.0
20.0
FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
EBITDA margins
As Leela Bangalore has lost its locational advantage, it would be difficult for the property
to charge above average ARRs. In this light, we expect the hotel to generate normal
industry EBIDTA of 30-35% and PAT margins of 15-18%.
With the opening of the Delhi property in July 2010 and Chennai property in December
2010, we expect the revenue contribution of the Bengaluru property to dip to
approximately 35% and 25% in FY10E and FY11E, respectively.
Investment of approximately INR 11 bn for 290 rooms in New Delhi is one of the largest
investments ever done by the company. HLV plans to pitch the hotel as an alternative to
the Imperial Hotel. We believe given the latter’s rich heritage, it would be difficult for
HLV to draw a comparison.
Valuation
We have used valuation parameters like EV/EBIDTA, EV/sales, P/B, and DCF to value HLV.
The stock is currently available at 23.6x and 17.4x consolidated FY11E and FY12E
EV/EBIDTA, respectively, while its global peers are trading at 12.0x and 10.0x their FY11E
and FY12E EV/EBIDTA, respectively. At a target price of INR 25, with the hotel likely to
generate normal profits going ahead, there is no reason for it to trade at substantial premium
to other listed players.
At CMP of INR 50, HLV is currently trading at 3.4x FY11E P/B. Although it is less than its
historical P/B of 4.0x over FY06-09, we believe there is significant downside in the stock
considering the high leverage and absence of above average industry profits going forward.
We initiate coverage on the stock with a ‘REDUCE’ recommendation.
Key Risks
Company Description
Hotel Leela Venture (HLV), a chain of luxury resorts and business hotels, operates 1,617
rooms, across six locations in India. Five properties with 1,205 rooms are owned by the
company and 409 rooms are under management contract. Compared to other hotel chains in
the country, HLV is small, but it has prominent presence in cities where it operates.
HLV has a marketing alliance with Kempinski for its properties in India. The company caters
to both business and leisure travelers. With rapid growth in room demand, the company
plans to increase presence, both through ownership and management contract routes. In
2009, HLV added its first property in Delhi through the management contract route. It also
holds land parcels in Agra, Hyderabad, and Pune, where it plans to build hotels in the future.
It is the flagship company of the Leela Group, where promoters’ holding is 55%.
Financial Outlook
40.0
30.0
(%)
20.0
10.0
0.0
FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Net profit margins EBITDA margins
Source: Company, Edelweiss research
20.0
15.0
(%)
10.0
5.0
0.0
FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
ROAE ROACE
Source: Company, Edelweiss research
• Exchange loss aggregating INR 1.8 bn are added to fixed assets and would be
depreciated over the life of related assets.
• Exchange gains, recognised in earlier years, aggregating INR 227.4 mn and INR
112.0 mn were adjusted in fixed assets and “foreign currency monetary
translation difference account” respectively.
As a result, PAT for the year is higher by INR 2.8 bn, ~ 1.5x of reported PBT.
• Post March 2009, INR appreciated ~ 11.8% vis-à-vis the USD and a substantial
portion of the MTM losses on outstanding derivative positions and the unrealized
exchange loss on foreign currency denominated borrowings could be recouped.
• Losses on derivative positions recognised during the year aggregate INR 29.4 mn.
Provision for losses on derivative positions aggregate INE 81.5 mn (FY08: INR 78.5
mn). Derivative exposure on March 31, 2009 is not disclosed.
• Borrowings increased by INR 4.1 bn (20.0%) to INR 24.5 bn (FY08: INR 20.4 bn).
Fresh borrowings (net) aggregate INR 1.2 bn and restatement of borrowings at
depreciated INR aggregate INR 2.9 bn. ~ 59.0% of total borrowings are
denominated in foreign currency. However, debt equity ratio decreased moderated
by 90bps to 1.3x (FY08: 2.2x) due to higher equity base, courtesy revaluation of
land.
• Freehold and leasehold land rights on properties situated in Mumbai, Bangalore, Goa
and Kovalam were revalued during the year by INR 10.3 bn. Revaluation reserves
aggregate INE 12.4 bn, ~ 63.9% of net worth.
• Interest expenditure decreased 29.0% to INR 237.9 mn (FY08: INR 335.0 mn).
Borrowing cost (ex FCCB) decreased 290bps to 1.5% (FY08: 3.5%).
• Exchange gains recognised during the year aggregate INR 87.0 mn, 4.5% of
reported PBT.
• Sundry creditors increased 1.6x to INR 703.7 mn (FY08: INR 275.1 mn) due to 5.9x
increase in project related creditors aggregating INR 427.8 mn (FY08: INR 62.0
mn).
Financial Statements
Ratios
Year to March FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
ROAE 21.2 12.8 5.7 5.0 4.5
ROACE 8.0 3.3 1.5 3.8 5.3
Inventory days 26.0 32.5 34.0 24.7 25.9
Debtors days 29.1 28.3 28.2 23.1 24.2
Payable days 131.2 162.8 220.2 148.5 130.3
Cash conversion cycle (76.1) (102.0) (158.0) (100.7) (80.2)
Current ratio 3.1 1.2 1.3 1.9 1.9
Debt/EBITDA 8.9 15.7 21.2 13.1 10.0
Interest coverage 5.2 3.8 1.1 0.9 0.9
Fixed assets t/o (x) 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2
Debt/equity 2.8 3.5 3.4 3.8 4.0
Du pont analysis
Year to March FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
NP margin (%) 28.9 20.1 10.3 6.1 4.1
Total assets turnover 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
Leverage multiplier 3.6 5.3 6.3 6.4 6.6
ROAE (%) 21.2 12.8 5.7 5.0 4.5
Valuation parameters
Year to March FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Diluted EPS (INR) 3.1 2.0 0.9 0.8 0.8
Y-o-Y growth (%) 53.1 (36.1) (54.2) (8.4) (8.7)
CEPS 5.1 3.9 2.9 3.2 3.6
Diluted P/E (x) 16.3 25.5 55.6 60.7 66.5
Price/BV (x) 3.6 3.7 3.4 3.4 3.3
EV/Sales (x) 7.9 10.5 11.9 8.4 6.2
EV/EBITDA (X) 17.6 30.4 40.1 23.6 17.4
EV/EBIDTA (x)+1 yr forward 26.0 39.3 21.8 17.1
Dividend yield (%) 1.0 0.8 0.2 0.6 1.0
In Q3FY10, the Indian Hotels Company (IHCL) posted its highest ORs of 70% in
Reuters : IHTL.BO Bloomberg : IH IN
the past eight quarters, signaling a healthy turnaround in the industry. ARRs
registered a healthy increase of 28% Q-o-Q and we expect them to firm up from
EDELWEISS RATING
these levels going forward. We expect ORs of 67% and 70% in FY11E and FY12E,
Absolute Rating BUY
respectively.
Sea Rock restructuring akin to REPO; interest cost to skirt P&L MARKET DATA
IHCL shifted the ownership of Sea Rock to an SPV where it holds 20% (the CMP : INR 103
52-week range (INR) : 109 / 39
balance is held by other TATA Group companies and third parties). The SPV has
Share in issue (mn) : 723.5
raised INR 6.8 bn and paid that money back to IHCL. IHCL has the option to take
M cap (INR bn/USD mn) : 74.2 / 1,643.6
the asset back after 37 months which we believe will happen at principal +
Avg. Daily Vol. BSE/NSE (‘000) : 2,756.1
interest.
Financials (Consolidated)
Year to March FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Revenues (INR mn) 26,800 24,728 31,769 39,574
Growth (%) (8.2) (7.7) 28.5 24.6
EBIDTA (INR mn) 5,056 5,051 8,547 12,549 Manoj Bahety, CFA
Net profit (INR mn) 51 318 2,155 4,648 +91-22- 6623 3362
Edelweiss Research is also available on www.edelresearch.com, Bloomberg EDEL <GO>, Thomson First Call, Reuters and Factset. Edelweiss Securities Limited
Edelweiss Securities 81
Limited
Hotels & Tourism
Company Description
IHCL is the largest hotel operator in India with presence in luxury, business and leisure
hotel segments. The company manages 12,243 (103 properties) across India and
international locations. It has also entered into the budget hotel segment with a new
brand, ‘Ginger’ and has also gone into the adventure business with wildlife lodges. IHCL
also runs airline catering business under the brand of Taj SATS, which contributes 6-7%
to total sales. The company has aggressive expansion plans, both in India and abroad by
using ownership and asset light model of management contract.
Investment Theme
With the revival of ARRs and ORs across India, the hotel industry is looking for better
times ahead. With India emerging as one of the fastest growing economy, FTAs of both
business and leisure are expected to pick up. Domestic tourism is also on a great revival
path and with more Indians ready to take holidays, the segment is expected to perform
well in the years to come. We expect IHCL’s Indian portfolio (almost 80% of total sales)
to post healthy growth with the revival of domestic ARRs and ORs. We also expect
international operations to turnaround and start contributing significantly to overall
margins.
Key Risks
Economic slowdown is the biggest risk for the company as travel and tourism takes the
first knock in uncertain times. Unexpected events like terrorist attack or swine flu also
affect the industry badly as many countries advise their citizens against traveling to
affected regions. The company can continue to earn negative returns on its international
investments due to longer-than-expected turnaround of international operations and the
stake of Orient Express.
Financial Statements
Ratios
Year to March FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
ROAE (%) 17.1 0.2 1.0 6.7 13.7
ROACE (%) 16.7 6.0 4.6 9.0 14.2
Inventory (days) 6 8 9 7 6
Debtors (days) 26 26 26 22 23
Payable (days) 93 95 97 83 84
Cash conversion cycle (61) (60) (62) (54) (55)
Current ratio 1.3 1.9 2.8 2.5 2.3
Debt/EBITDA 3.9 9.2 10.0 6.1 3.9
Interest cover (x) 3.3 1.2 0.8 1.7 2.8
Fixed assets turnover (x) 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.8
Total asset turnover (x) 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4
Equity turnover(x) 1.3 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.2
Debt/Equity (x) 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.3
Adjusted debt/Equity 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.3
Du pont analysis
Year to March FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
NP margin (%) 12.7 0.2 1.3 6.8 11.7
Total assets turnover 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4
Leverage multiplier 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6
ROAE (%) 17.1 0.2 1.0 6.7 13.7
Valuation parameters
Year to March FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Diluted EPS (INR) 6.9 0.2 0.6 3.1 6.6
Y-o-Y growth (%) 11.5 (97.0) 179.7 442.2 110.7
CEPS (INR) 8.0 2.8 3.6 6.6 10.3
Diluted P/E (x) 15.0 499.6 178.6 32.9 15.6
Price/BV(x) 3.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1
EV/Sales (x) 2.7 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.5
EV/EBITDA (x) 8.8 18.4 19.7 12.1 8.0
EV/EBITDA (x)+1 yr forward 15.5 18.5 11.6 8.3 6.6
Dividend yield (%) 1.9 1.2 0.5 1.5 1.7
We expect the repairs & maintenance (RM) expenses to rise substantially in the
Reuters : MAHH.BO Bloomberg : MHRL IN
future as properties come of age. With an expected capex of INR 2-3 bn every
year for the next 3-4 years, we expect Mahindra Holidays & Resorts (MHRIL) to
EDELWEISS RATING
incur ~INR 300-350 mn on RM expenses in FY14-15E. Since we have explicit
Absolute Rating REDUCE
assumptions only till FY12 and we had valued the company on DCF basis
assuming 20% growth rate of FCF for the next 10 years beyond FY12, we are
now revising our numbers down 2.0-2.5% as the scope and scale of future
MARKET DATA
liabilities is still not clear.
CMP : INR 540
52-week range (INR) : 574 / 306
Share in issue (mn) : 84.2
Addition of star properties and more rooms a must
M cap (INR bn/USD mn) : 45.4 / 1,006.7
We expect MHRIL to aggressively add a few star properties to resume the sale of
Avg. Daily Vol. BSE/NSE (‘000) : 404.5
its ‘purple’ membership which was stopped a few quarters ago. The primary
reason behind stopping this membership was the heavy demand for some
properties like Goa, Coorg, and Munnar which were running at almost peak SHARE HOLDING PATTERN (%)
capacity. MHRIL needs to be aggressive in adding rooms, because the company Promoters* : 83.1
knows in advance how many new members will have to be serviced in the next MFs, FIs & Banks : 4.5
12 months. We expect the company to add minimum 500 rooms every year. FIIs : 4.1
Others : 8.3
* Promoters pledged shares : Nil
(% of share in issue)
Outlook and valuations: Positives priced in; downgrade to ‘REDUCE’
At CMP of INR 540, we believe the price fully factors in all the good news flow.
Post the disappointing Q3FY10 results, severe decline in the stock shows that
RELATIVE PERFORMANCE (%)
expectations are high from the company. Although we are positive on the
Sensex Stock Stock over
business model and concept, we are concerned about the rich valuations. Sensex
1 month 5.5 21.9 16.4
Considering the future liability of its expenses to serve current members, we
3 months 0.8 15.6 14.8
arrive at a fair price of INR 420 using the DCF approach. We downgrade our
recommendation on the stock to ‘REDUCE’ from ‘HOLD’.
Financials
Year to March FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Revenues (INR mn) 4,421 5,762 8,168 10,975
Growth (%) 17.2 30.3 41.8 34.4
EBIDTA (INR mn) 1,522 2,097 3,066 4,320 Manoj Bahety, CFA
Net profit (INR mn) 798 1,209 1,855 2,662 +91-22- 6623 3362
Edelweiss Research is also available on www.edelresearch.com, Bloomberg EDEL <GO>, Thomson First Call, Reuters and Factset. Edelweiss Securities
Edelweiss Limited 87
Securities Limited
Hotels & Tourism
In FY09, on total GFA of INR 4.3 bn, the company incurred INR 100 mn on RM, which we
believe is not the correct representation of future as we expect expenses to rise as old
properties start needing more maintenance work. We believe rise in back-end expenses
to serve the existing members, together with higher maintenance expenditure, will
reduce FCFF growth assumption by ~3%.
Based on the reasons mentioned above, we are reducing our FCF growth rate to 17%
from 20% earlier beyond FY12E for 10 years. The current cash flow fully recognizes the
company’s cash collection procedure without putting due emphasis on expenses which
are back ended.
Our revised DCF assumption considers 25% growth in membership and 7% increase in
membership fee for FY11 and FY12, followed by 17% growth in FCFF for the next 10
years beyond FY12E and 5% terminal growth rate. We have considered WACC of 12.7%.
We believe there is little scope for positive surprise to the above assumptions.
Owing to the heavy rush at the most popular properties, members often complain of
non-availability of rooms during the desired period. We believe the company, in its
attempt to sell memberships, has actually oversold higher class memberships. As almost
33% of its members come from referrals, we believe this number could be at a serious
risk if this problem is not addressed early.
No Sec 35 AD benefit
The Union Budget 2010 has extended the benefit of Sec 35AD of the Income Tax Act to
all new hotels coming anywhere in India post 1.4.2010. As MHRIL is not classified as a
hotel company, we expect the company to continue to pay full corporate tax rate of
33%. This is not strictly disadvantageous for the company. However, if the company
makes a case before the IT department to get classified as a hotel company, it may lose
its ongoing tax dispute of INR 900 mn with the department.
Company Description
MHRIL was started in 1997 and offers a unique vacation ownership model to Indian
consumers with resorts spread across India. The company has different schemes for
families, singles and corporates. With almost 100,000 members spread across different
membership schemes, the company uses the upfront membership fee charged from
members to build resorts. With its resorts located across India, the company plans to
aggressively expand its reach both in terms of members and new resorts.
Investment Theme
With its unique business model, although MHRIL is in a sweet spot to exploit the growth
in the Indian travel & tourism sector, but we are concerned with the accounting
treatment of the income and expenditure done by the company. We believe with its
aggressive income recognition principle, the future expenses to serve the existing
members is not getting properly accounted. Due to the limited history of its operations,
we believe only 5-10 years down the line we will have the visibility of its full scale
expenses.
We are not assigning any value to the change in valuations once the cycle of 25 years of
membership ends as the same resorts can again be re-used for new members
considering the resorts would also be attracting lumpy capex which we have not taken in
our assumptions.
Key Risks
Launching new schemes, restart to sell the Purple membership, increase in overall
average membership fee are some of the factors that could provide risk to our estimates.
Settlement of ongoing Munnar property and IT dispute can also provide upside risk to
our estimates.
Financial Statements
Ratios
Year to March FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
ROAE (%) 76.9 47.1 37.2 35.6 38.5
ROACE (%) 94.0 62.0 60.3 68.4 78.6
Inventory (days) 4 5 6 6 6
Debtors (days) 301 366 320 277 276
Payable (days) 79 90 92 88 90
Cash conversion cycle 226 281 235 195 191
Current ratio 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8
Debt/EBITDA 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
Interest cover (x) 40.3 19.3 29.7 44.3 63.1
Fixed assets turnover (x) 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.3 1.4
Total asset turnover (x) 2.6 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.5
Equity turnover(x) 3.5 2.6 1.8 1.6 1.6
Debt/Equity (x) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
Adjusted debt/Equity 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
Du pont analysis
Year to March FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
NP margin (%) 22.3 18.0 21.0 22.7 24.3
Total assets turnover 2.6 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.5
Leverage multiplier 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1
ROAE (%) 76.9 47.1 37.2 35.6 38.5
Valuation parameters
Year to March FY08 FY09 FY10E FY11E FY12E
Diluted EPS (INR) 10.7 10.2 14.4 22.0 31.6
Y-o-Y growth (%) 97.6 (5.0) 40.9 53.4 43.5
CEPS (INR) 12.6 13.1 17.5 26.0 36.6
Diluted P/E (x) 50.3 53.0 37.6 24.5 17.1
Price/BV(x) 29.6 21.6 10.0 7.7 5.7
EV/Sales (x) 11.2 9.5 7.5 5.2 3.7
EV/EBITDA (x) 29.4 27.7 20.7 13.7 9.3
Dividend yield (%) 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
ASIAN HOTELS
Waiting for clarity
Company Description
April 1, 2010
Asian Hotels (AHL) was established in 1980 and is the fourth largest listed 5-star
hotel company in India. It has over 1,100 rooms across three properties in the
Reuters : ASHT.BO Bloomberg : AHOT IN
country viz., Delhi, Mumbai, and Kolkata. While the Delhi property is owned by
AHL, Hyatt International operates the hotel and provides marketing, branding,
EDELWEISS RATING
and management services. Delhi accounts for 44% of total rooms and almost
Absolute Rating NOT RATED
48% of total revenue. Mumbai accounts for 34% and Kolkata for 22% of the total
1,150 rooms.
MARKET DATA
be renamed Asian Hotels. The Saraf Group will take over the Kolkata property Avg. Daily Vol. BSE/NSE (‘000) : 21.0
Key Risks
With the Delhi property accounting for close to 50% of AHL’s total revenue, the
company is heavily dependent on a single market for its performance.
Financials
Year to March FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
Revenues (INR mn) 3,290 4,134 5,135 6,415
Rev. growth (%) 25.7 24.2 24.9
EBITDA (INR mn) 1,258 1,830 2,275 2,173
Net profit (INR mn) 567 915 1,326 942
Shares outstanding (mn) 23 23 23 34 Manoj Bahety, CFA
+91-22- 6623 3362
Diluted EPS (INR) 24.9 40.1 58.1 27.5
manoj.bahety@edelcap.com
EPS growth (%) 61.3 44.9 (52.7)
Diluted P/E (x) 22.5 14.0 9.6 20.4
Manav Vijay
EV/EBITDA (x) 11.7 7.8 5.9 6.7
+91-22- 4063 5413
ROAE (%) 18.5 12.2 9.8 NA
manav.vijay@edelcap.com
Edelweiss Research is also available on www.edelresearch.com, Bloomberg EDEL <GO>, Thomson First Call, Reuters and Factset. Edelweiss Securities Limited
Edelweiss Securities 95
Limited
Hotels & Tourism
Financial Statements
Ratios
Year to March FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
ROAE 18.5 12.2 9.8 NA
ROACE 18.9 16.2 13.1 NA
Debtor days 11 10 10 NA
Inventory days 9 7 7 NA
Payable days 85 119 150 NA
Current ratio 0.9 1.1 2.0 NA
Debt/EBITDA 1.6 1.1 0.6 NA
Cash conversion cycle days (65) (101) (132) NA
Debt/Equity 0.7 0.2 0.1 NA
Adjusted debt/equity 0.7 0.2 0.1 NA
Interest coverage (x) 5.5 9.3 9.5 NA
Operating ratios
Year to March FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
Total asset turnover 0.6 0.4 0.3 NA
Fixed asset turnover 0.6 0.4 0.4 NA
Equity turnover 1.1 0.6 0.4 NA
Du pont analysis
Year to March FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
NP margin (%) 17.2 22.1 25.8 NA
Total assets turnover 0.6 0.4 0.3 NA
Leverage multiplier 1.8 1.3 1.2 NA
ROAE (%) 18.5 12.2 9.8 NA
Valuation parameters
Year to March FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
Diluted EPS (INR) 24.9 40.1 58.1 27.5
Y-o-Y growth (%) 61.3 44.9 (52.7)
CEPS (INR) 40.2 51.0 73.5 NA
Diluted P/E (x) 22.5 14.0 9.6 20.4
Price/BV (x) 4.2 1.1 0.9 1.1
EV/Sales (x) 4.5 3.5 2.6 2.3
EV/EBITDA (x) 11.7 7.8 5.9 6.7
Basic EPS (INR) 24.9 40.1 58.1 27.5
Basic P/E (x) 22.5 14.0 9.6 20.4
Incorporated in 1999, Taj GVK Hotels & Resorts is a joint venture of the Taj and
Reuters : TAJG.BO Bloomberg : TAJG IN
GVK groups. The Tata Group company, Indian Hotels Company (IHCL), holds
25.52% and other promoters hold 49.47% of the company. IHCL is a strategic
EDELWEISS RATING
investor in the company. The company currently operates five premium properties
Absolute Rating NOT RATED
totaling 900 rooms. These locations include Hyderabad, Chennai, and Chandigarh
with Hyderabad accounting for majority of the rooms and revenue.
MARKET DATA
Deccan, a block of 43 room service apartments at Taj Krishna, and addition of Avg. Daily Vol. BSE/NSE (‘000) : 294.6
nearly 190 rooms at Begumpet. The company is also planning a 12,000 sq ft retail
expansion at its Taj Krishna property which is expected to be operational by
SHARE HOLDING PATTERN (%)
Q1FY11. It has also acquired a 6.5 acre plot in Bengaluru for future expansion. It
Promoters* : 75.0
is also contemplating Jaipur, Kodaikanal, and Amritsar for expansion.
MFs, FIs & Banks : 7.8
FIIs : 1.4
Others : 15.8
Key Risks * Promoters pledged shares : Nil
(% of share in issue)
Taj GVK receives more than 75% of its revenue from three hotels located in
Hyderabad. Although the company has diversified by opening hotels in Chennai
and Chandigarh, the dependence on a single city is high.
RELATIVE PERFORMANCE (%)
rooms in Hyderabad are the main concerns for the company. 1 month 5.5 2.1 (3.3)
Financials
Year to March FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
Revenues (INR mn) 1,894 2,442 2,584 2,382
Rev. growth (%) 29.0 5.8 (7.8)
EBITDA (INR mn) 848 1,152 1,221 1,026
Net profit (INR mn) 463 643 704 528 Manoj Bahety, CFA
Edelweiss Research is also available on www.edelresearch.com, Bloomberg EDEL <GO>, Thomson First Call, Reuters and Factset. Edelweiss Securities Limited
Edelweiss Securities 99
Limited
Hotels & Tourism
Ratios
Year to March FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
ROAE 31.3 38.9 34.0 21.1
ROACE 32.2 41.8 37.2 23.7
Debtor days 14 10 8 9
Inventory days 5 5 6 7
Payable days 98 100 79 83
Current ratio 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.6
Debt/EBITDA 1.0 0.6 0.6 1.4
Cash conversion cycle days (79) (85) (65) (68)
Debt/Equity 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.5
Adjusted debt/equity 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.5
Interest coverage (x) 18.7 33.2 51.9 14.4
Operating ratios
Year to March FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
Total asset turnover 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.6
Fixed asset turnover 1.0 1.3 1.3 0.8
Equity turnover 1.2 1.4 1.2 0.9
Du pont analysis
Year to March FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
NP margin (%) 24.4 26.3 27.2 22.1
Total assets turnover 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.6
Leverage multiplier 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.5
ROAE (%) 31.3 38.9 34.0 21.1
Valuation parameters
Year to March FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
Diluted EPS (INR) 7.4 10.3 11.2 8.4
Y-o-Y growth (%) 39.0 9.4 (25.0)
CEPS (INR) 9.4 12.3 13.2 11.1
Diluted P/E (x) 21.3 15.3 14.0 18.6
Price/BV (x) 6.7 5.4 4.3 3.7
EV/Sales (x) 5.5 4.2 4.1 4.7
EV/EBITDA (x) 12.3 9.0 8.6 10.9
Basic EPS (INR) 7.4 10.3 11.2 8.4
Basic P/E (x) 21.3 15.3 14.0 18.6
300
360
420
480
540
600
0
14
28
42
56
70
300
340
380
420
460
500
Jul-09 Apr-09 Cox & Kings
May-09
Dec-09
Aug-09
Jun-09
Sep-09
Hotels & Tourism
Jul-09
Hotel Leelaventure
Oct-09
Jan-10
Aug-09
Buy
Nov-09 Sep-09
Buy
Dec-09 Oct-09
Nov-09
Jan-10
Dec-09
Hold
Feb-10 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10
Mar-10 Feb-10
Mar-10
(INR) (INR)
EIH
35
65
95
125
155
185
30
48
66
84
102
120
Apr-09
Apr-09
May-09
Indian Hotels
May-09
Jun-09
Jun-09
Jul-09 Jul-09
Aug-09 Aug-09
Sep-09 Sep-09
Oct-09
Oct-09
Nov-09
Dec-09 Nov-09
Jan-10 Dec-09
Buy
Feb-10 Jan-10
Mar-10 Feb-10
Buy
Apr-10
Mar-10
Edelweiss Securities Limited, 14th Floor, Express Towers, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021,
Board: (91-22) 2286 4400, Email: research@edelcap.com
Recent Research
Nov-08
Dec-08
Oct-08
Jan-09
Jun-09
Jul-08
Jul-09
Feb-09
May-09
Mar-09
Apr-09
Rating Distribution* 101 56 9 169 Buy appreciate more than 15% over a 12-month period
Rating Distribution* 53 43 29 128
* 3 stocks under review
* 3 stocks under review
> 50bn Between 10bn and 50 bn < 10bn Hold depreciate up to 15% over a 12-month period
> 50bn Between 10bn and 50 bn < 10bn
Reduce depreciate more than 5% over a 12-month period
Market Cap (INR) 103 53 13
Market Cap (INR) 72 41 15
This document has been prepared by Edelweiss Securities Limited (Edelweiss). Edelweiss, its holding company and associate companies are a full service, integrated
investment banking, portfolio management and brokerage group. Our research analysts and sales persons provide important input into our investment banking
activities. This document does not constitute an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any
transaction. The information contained herein is from publicly available data or other sources believed to be reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or
complete and it should not be relied on as such. Edelweiss or any of its affiliates/ group companies shall not be in any way responsible for any loss or damage that
may arise to any person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this report. This document is provided for assistance only and is not intended to
be and must not alone be taken as the basis for an investment decision. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Each recipient of this
document should make such investigation as it deems necessary to arrive at an independent evaluation of an investment in the securities of companies referred to in
this document (including the merits and risks involved), and should consult his own advisors to determine the merits and risks of such investment. The investment
discussed or views expressed may not be suitable for all investors. We and our affiliates, group companies, officers, directors, and employees may: (a) from time to
time, have long or short positions in, and buy or sell the securities thereof, of company (ies) mentioned herein or (b) be engaged in any other transaction involving
such securities and earn brokerage or other compensation or act as advisor or lender/borrower to such company (ies) or have other potential conflict of interest with
respect to any recommendation and related information and opinions. This information is strictly confidential and is being furnished to you solely for your
information. This information should not be reproduced or redistributed or passed on directly or indirectly in any form to any other person or published, copied, in
whole or in part, for any purpose. This report is not directed or intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in
any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction, where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law, regulation or which would subject
Edelweiss and affiliates/ group companies to any registration or licensing requirements within such jurisdiction. The distribution of this document in certain
jurisdictions may be restricted by law, and persons in whose possession this document comes, should inform themselves about and observe, any such restrictions.
The information given in this document is as of the date of this report and there can be no assurance that future results or events will be consistent with this
information. This information is subject to change without any prior notice. Edelweiss reserves the right to make modifications and alterations to this statement as
may be required from time to time. However, Edelweiss is under no obligation to update or keep the information current. Nevertheless, Edelweiss is committed to
providing independent and transparent recommendation to its client and would be happy to provide any information in response to specific client queries. Neither
Edelweiss nor any of its affiliates, group companies, directors, employees, agents or representatives shall be liable for any damages whether direct, indirect, special
or consequential including lost revenue or lost profits that may arise from or in connection with the use of the information. Past performance is not necessarily a
guide to future performance. The disclosures of interest statements incorporated in this document are provided solely to enhance the transparency and should not be
treated as endorsement of the views expressed in the report. Edelweiss Securities Limited generally prohibits its analysts, persons reporting to analysts and their
family members from maintaining a financial interest in the securities or derivatives of any companies that the analysts cover. The analyst for this report certifies
that all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect his or her personal views about the subject company or companies and its or their securities, and no
part of his or her compensation was, is or will be, directly or indirectly related to specific recommendations or views expressed in this report. Analyst holding in the
stock: no.
Copyright 2009 Edelweiss Research (Edelweiss Securities Ltd). All rights reserved
104 Edelweiss
Edelweiss ResearchSecurities Limited
is also available on www.edelresearch.com ,Bloomberg EDEL <GO>, Thomson First Call, Reuters and Factset. Edelweiss Securities Limited
Edelweiss Value Scanner