Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Early
Journal
Content
on
JSTOR,
Free
to
Anyone
in
the
World
This
article
is
one
of
nearly
500,000
scholarly
works
digitized
and
made
freely
available
to
everyone
in
the
world
by
JSTOR.
Known
as
the
Early
Journal
Content,
this
set
of
works
include
research
articles,
news,
letters,
and
other
writings
published
in
more
than
200
of
the
oldest
leading
academic
journals.
The
works
date
from
the
mid-‐seventeenth
to
the
early
twentieth
centuries.
We
encourage
people
to
read
and
share
the
Early
Journal
Content
openly
and
to
tell
others
that
this
resource
exists.
People
may
post
this
content
online
or
redistribute
in
any
way
for
non-‐commercial
purposes.
JSTOR
is
a
digital
library
of
academic
journals,
books,
and
primary
source
objects.
JSTOR
helps
people
discover,
use,
and
build
upon
a
wide
range
of
content
through
a
powerful
research
and
teaching
platform,
and
preserves
this
content
for
future
generations.
JSTOR
is
part
of
ITHAKA,
a
not-‐for-‐profit
organization
that
also
includes
Ithaka
S+R
and
Portico.
For
more
information
about
JSTOR,
please
contact
support@jstor.org.
NOTES AND DISCUSSIONS
tion of dppuovta, which according to the fragments was the active, creating,
regulating force in nature (frags. 1, 2, 7, 10). In the next phrase, however,
it is similarly linked with (CTT@. EaYTZO TWV rpa,yuaTwv is an emendation of
Boeckh's, on the basis of TraV &rTTw)TwV 7rpay,uaTWV Archytas ap. Stobaeus i. 714.
EOTO) is a Doric form from the root es (d,E'), but does not appear to be a
dialect equivalent for o' Ca as Doric has also 'xJ"M. In the fragment of
Archytas, ia-TO is defined as vA- substance, and as such is distinguished from
0oE6 creative artist and from uop4ow creative art or model. An examination
of the fragments of Philolaus tends to establish a similar significance for
Ca-m; thus at the end of the passage quoted above, the author speaks of the
To-7)of things, out of which (things) the ordered universe arose, and this
ETTr is described as underlying (i7rapXov'caa) the world that we see and know.
This can hardly mean anything but the basic stuff or matter. Now Pro-
fessor Burnet on other evidence has shown that "what distinguished the
Pythagoreanism of this period from its earlier form was that it sought to
adapt itself to the new theory of 'elements,"' of which Empedocles was the
chief exponent.' The twelfth Philolaic fragment of Diels expressly mentions
the four Empedoclean elements and joins them with the " hull of the sphere,"
a phrase which even Professor Burnet, though holding the fragments to be
spurious, acknowledges as "a genuine Pythagorean expression."2 If then
Philolaus took over the elements, 'o a7 in the present passage would signify
the material substance of the world, existing as earth, air, fire, and water.
And the author would thus imply that nature n'XYss had two aspects-the
one active apuovia, the other material E7TW.
Since then carrois one side of 4wFstg,the two notions linked together in the
phrase 'a i'Ev iaTr . . . . Ka't avTa iA'Ev 'a 4vats express only one idea in the
author's mind and are thus used with a singular verb. The second pu&v is
resumptive and confirmative of the first; together they introduce the dis-
tinction between the material OV'OT;or &-rT0, treated in the present sentence,
and the active V'COLSor ap/ovia, treated in the next sentence beginning CrdE 8.
The expression 7rXc'ovya v OTL, read by Boeckh and Diels, is not as difficult
as it first appears; and it is far better than 7rXeovTa ', which occurs in one
manuscript, and than 7rnaXvya r5,which Wachsmuth gives. 7rXE`ov must be
taken as an adverb modifying iv&xcrat, though it may be better translated
with yvcrtv. Professor A. A. Bowman has suggested to me that the OT' clause
be taken closely with yvcratv, or that rTv yVW0Lv be supplied after X from the
preceding. The phrase would then be rendered: "no more at any rate
than the knowledge that."
It is in this OTn clause that the greatest difficulty of the whole passage
lies. The manuscripts are read as follows: 0T&?V OOLOV T-rv OVOEVL T(V EOVTWV
Ka/L yyVrKoLEVO v4' apmVafEVE`(TaoL (Vat. yEvECO-q). Everyone is agreed that
otov TrV should be corrected to oLO' Tv (or the Doric 's). Boeckh keeps
1 Burnet, Early Greek Phil.2, p. 339. 2 Ibid., p. 341.
NOTES AND DISCUSSIONS 355
yLYVWaK0,uEVWV but writes yvwa 0jFev for ycyvE`'oa&, and this is accepted by
Meineke. Diels andWachsmuthemendthus: YLYVWOTKOIEVOV . . yevOat.
. .
of all Greek cosmology: ex nihilo nihil ft. Hence yevEaOaL must refer to
the formationof individualthings out of the eternal stuff, and its subject
ovO?v Triv "vrTV is in line with this interpretation. In the latter part of the
passagethe authoruses the expression o KocT/LOS
avvETTa by which he means
that the ordereduniversewhich we see is a construction. The actionwhich
brought it about is spoken of in different fragments under the terms o,pu6X09,m
avvap,.ow'xOvTV)KEKLoaL. Hence yEve'OaLhere is the genericwordfor the
process of fitting together or harmonizingthe differentprimaryelements
(apXat')into particularobjectswhich can be known.
The significanceof the wholepassagewouldthen be this: we reallyknow
only things that have number, that is, measurableform; and hence we
cannot know the underlyingsubstance of these things, for that does not
admit of humanmeasurement. But, thoughwe do not know it, we may be
said to know about it, and we may be theoreticallycertainthat it formsthe
basis of existingknowableobjects,since these objectscouldnot exist without
substance. The subjectof the wholefragmentis natureor the conditionsof
existence, and Philolaus is trying to show how the ordereduniverse that
we know came into its present condition. It arose, he says, by the action
of harmonyon a basic substance, which we do not know but must infer.
This substanceconsistedof differentprimaryelements,and harmonyfitted
these together in such a way that nature AV'nLSturns out to be an ordered
world KocT/Los.
ROBERT SCOON
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY