Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a) Nuclear family
b) Conjugal family
c) Consanguineal family
f) Dysfunctional family
VI. Conclusions
Without family the society might be uncontrolled and disorganized as well. Family
impersonates affinity and the social trends. It is a kind of bond between people that cannot be
dissolute. The family unit became a symbol of security and a return to traditional gender
roles. It does not matter if the family members are live together or divorced, either in co-
habitation without any commitment, all of these types represent the meaning of a family and
human relationships.
a) A nuclear family is a family group consisting of a father and mother and their
children, who share living quarters. This can be contrasted with an extended
family. Nuclear families can have any number of children.
b) A conjugal family includes only the husband, the wife, and unmarried children
who are not of age. The most common form of this family is regularly referred
to in sociology as a nuclear family
c) A consanguineal family consists of a parent and his or her children, and other
people. Although the concept of consanguinity originally referred to relations
by "blood", Cultural anthropologists[who?] have argued that one must understand
the idea of "blood" metaphorically and that many societies understand family
through other concepts rather than through genetic distance.
1
d) The term "extended family" is also common, especially in the United States
and Europe. This term has two distinct meanings. First, it serves as a synonym
of "consanguinal family". The term extended family has several distinct
meanings. First, it is used synonymously with consanguineous family or joint
family. Second, in societies dominated by the conjugal family or nuclear
family, it is used to refer to kindred who does not belong to the conjugal
family. Often there could be many generations living under the same roof,
depending on the circumstances.People living together as an extended family
occasionally feel a greater security and belonging. This is an advantage of
extended type of family because this family contains more people to serve as
resources during crisis and provides more role models for behavior of values.
The disadvantage of living in an extended type of family is shouldering more
expenses for their basic needs.
Some couples prefer cohabitation because it does not legally commit them for
an extended period, and because it is easier to establish and dissolve without
the legal costs often associated with a divorce. In some jurisdictions
cohabitation can be viewed legally as common-law marriages, either after the
duration of a specified period, or the birth of the couple's child, or if the couple
3
consider and behave accordingly as husband and wife. (This helps provide the
surviving partner a legal basis for inheriting the deceased's belongings in the
event of the death of their cohabiting partner.) In Saskatchewan, Canada, a
married person may cohabit with other married or single persons and become
the spouses of all of them under the Saskatchewan Family Property Act.
Consent of the "subsequent spouse" is not required. Although Canada has a
federal criminal code law prohibiting polygamy, which includes anyone who
authorizes more than one conjugal union at a time, Saskatchewan judicial
authorities that unilaterally authorize multiple conjugal unions have not yet
been charged under this federal law.
In most Western countries, a divorce does not declare a marriage null and void,
as in an annulment, but it does cancel the married status of the parties. Where
monogamy is law, this allows each former partner to marry another. Where
polygyny is legal, divorce allows the woman to marry another. Divorce laws
vary considerably around the world. Divorce is not permitted in some
countries, such as in Malta and in the Philippines, though an annulment is
permitted. From 1971 to 1996, four European countries legalised divorce:
Spain, Italy, Portugal and the Republic of Ireland.
In some Western jurisdictions, divorce does not require a party to claim fault of
their partner that leads to the breakdown of marriage. But even in jurisdictions
which have adopted the "no fault" principle in divorce proceedings, a court
may still take into account the behaviour of the parties when dividing property,
debts, evaluating custody, and support; facts which almost always have
considerable weight in fault proceedings.
4
Though divorce laws vary between jurisdiction, there are two basic approaches
to divorce: fault based and no-fault based. However, even in some jurisdictions
that do not require a party to claim fault of their partner, a court may still take
into account the behaviour of the parties when dividing property, debts,
evaluating custody, and support.
Uncontested divorce when the two parties are able to come to an agreement
(either with or without lawyers/mediators/collaborative counsel) about the
property, children and support issues. When the parties can agree and present
the court with a fair and equitable agreement, approval of the divorce is almost
guaranteed. If the two parties cannot come to an agreement, they may ask the
court to decide how to split property and deal with the custody of their
children.
Electronic divorce is a means that allows two persons married under certain
jurisdictions, such as Portugal, to file an electronic request for no-fault
collaborative divorce in a non judiciary administrative entity. Specific cases,
with no children, real property, alimony, or common address, can be decreed as
summary within one hour.
5
The main causes of divorce in 2004 were:
VI. Conclusions