Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PERCEPTION OF
COLOR AND DEPTH
An Empirical View
Slide 2
Questions
How do we see?
Why is context important?
How do we see color?
How do we see depth?
How does this all relate?
How do we see?
Why is context important?
How do we see color?
How do we see depth?
How does this all relate/why should I care tie to purves, or should
this be done at the beginning?
Slide 3
How do we see?
Jacob talks about brain mechanisms
of seeing color
But I don’t know Jacob, that might be good description of some of the
mecahanisms behind vision, but I want to know how we really see.
Everyone think back to when you were a little kid, and try to remember
the first idea you had about our eyes, and how they see. What do you
remember?
Gestalt Theory
The first theory that recognized the
importance of context
This theory was developed in the 1920’s, and these guys were the first
group of psychologists to systematcially study perceptual organisation
. I think they were a bunch of German guys :P
So we’ll just run through these principles quickly because they serve as
a good starting base to show how important context is in deciphering
what we see, and then connecting this idea to color and depth. And I
think thee are fun. There are six principles
Slide 6
Principle 1: Proximity
1 and 2
3 and 4
3 groups dots in three lines
What happens with the evenly spaced dots?
So on the left we see horizontal groups, and on the right we see
vertical groups.
So the first principle of proximity or contiguity says that things that are
closer together are seen as belonging together.
Slide 7
Principle 2: Similarity
Principle three is basically combining the first two, it’s called common
fate. This is a subtle illusion, but cool nonetheless. When both the
principles of proximity and similarity are used, then we actually see a
little bit of movement/. Do you guys see that?
Why do you think that is?
I think it’s because we jump back and forth from grouping based on
proximity, and grouping based on similarity. So I want to group the
ones on the top based on proximity, but not this guy down here, but
then my mind shifts to wanting to group based on similarity, which
includes them all.
Slide 9
The fourth principle relates to the idea that we prefer to see things as
unified. So in this picture we actually have 4 lines, but instead of
seeing A to O and O to D, we just see A to D, and the same with
instead of seeing C to O and O to B we see C to B
lines.
Principle 5: Closure
Principle five is related to the last one in the idea that not only to we
want continuity, we want to see closed, simple figures. So our visual
system fills in the gaps.
So the circle at the top its easy to see this, especially if you look
slightly away. In the second figure we see two overlapping rectangles
as opposed to two rectangles with chunks cut out touching corners, or
you could just see three shapes touching, which I actually had a hard
time seeing.
The third can be looked at like a curve with three squares, or just as
three random, irregular shapes touching. What do you guys see?
Slide 11
The sixth and last principle, the principle of area and symmetry, says
that the smaller of two overlapping figures is perceived as a figure
while the bigger one is seen as ground.
And with symmetrical figures we tend to see closed figure, and the
Symmetrical contours tend to separate the defined figure from the
ground. And we will be looking at some cool examples of this a bit
later.
Slide 12
Color Perception
An Empirical View
HUE
SATURATION
BRIGHTNESS
EMPIRICAL STRATEGY OF
PERCEPTION
Context is important!
So first I want to try and convince you that context is important. This
picture answered that really well for me. So these stimuli, pointed out
in the diagram at the bottom, appear to differ in respect to distance
from the viewer, luminesence, surface reflectivity, and obviously, color.
But guess what… we use a little photoshop magic to get rid of the rest
of the stuff and… they really are the same
Slide 16
Color Contrast
Color Constancy
That’s right, so you saw a lack of green in the picture on the left and a
lack of red in the picture on the right, and then it took you a bit a
staring to realize that they are actually exactly the same. The idea is
that our visual system adapted to the red and the green at the input
stages.
(show counterexample picture with t t)
So great, Land say that we adapt, but this idea doesn’t provide a good
explanation, or biological rationale really.
Slide 19
Phylogenetic
So let’s bring a cool guy named Purves into the picture, and give an
explanation in empirical terms for color constancy and color contrast.
Now the idea behind the empirical strategy of vision is that everything
that we see is dependent on the historical success or failure of the
interactions between what I see and me. So when I look at a scene the
way that I see it is dependent on my past perceptions. So you can
think about it as your brain seeing what probabilistically makes most
sense in the environment. So it isn’t that my mind breaks it up into
little pieces and shoots everything out like a camera, but that what we
see is literally and figuratively colored by what we’ve percevied in the
past.
So if this is true, then when we put targets of the same color on two
contexts, two different colors, we might experience them differently
based on their context.
Here we have the exact same surfaces BUT they are seen under
different illuminants, the left one a blue light, and the right one a
purple light. What do you guys see now? Yeah I see purple on the left
and more of a blue on the right.
Depth Perception
How do we see depth?
Slide 23
-complexity deals with not only matching visual stimuli, but also
making sense of that stimuli
Slide 26
Neural Correlates
• Absolute vs. relative disparity
• Binocular anti-correlation
• Ambiguity in stereomatching
Slide 27
AbsoluteDisparity
• Suppose two eyes looking at one point
• The angular difference in the projections of that
point onto the left and right eyes with reference
to each eye’s fovea
Slide 28
Relative Disparity
• Takes into account two points
• Difference in the absolute disparity of both eyes
with respect to both points
– Eliminates fovea as areference point
– Differencebetween the angle subtended by the two
points on the left eye and the angle between those
point on theright eye
Slide 29
-MT shows sensitivity to rel. disp. When a single plane is tiled to the
observer and has a relative disparity between the nearer and further
edges of the plane; in same region, neurons show no snesitivity to
relative disparity when center-surround configuration is used
-also highly responsive to introduction of a relative disparity in a
rotating transparent cylinder stimulus
-it is impossible to apply such a label as ‘relative disparity’ to a
particular brain region without being more specific about the kinds of
relative disparity referred to
Slide 31
Slide 32
Binocular anti-correlation
• Stimuli presented visual features of opposite
contrast to the left and right eyes
• Random dot stereogram:
• Pair of pictures, one for each eye; randomly composed of
black and white elements
• Stereopsisreveals previously hidden figure (think: magic
eyebooks)
Magic Eye
-supposed to be a locomotive
Slide 35
Ambiguity in Stereomatching
• When looking at two or more vertical bars,
subjects report seeing the expected number of
bars in the same depth field
– Each bar has same zero disparity
– Correctly appear in same picture plane
• So what is the problem?
Slide 36
Amblyopia
• Poor vision as a result of a healthy eye having
faulty connection with the rest of the brain
• Disrupted transmission of the visual image
• Not corrected by lenses
• Incorrect linage of one eye cause loss of
binocular disparity
Slide 43
GREG’S SHIT…
• Here!
Slide 44
• Gestalt Theory
• Mechanics of Vision
• Color Perception
• Depth Perception
So what we’ve covered today is a little bit of the history of the study of
vision, related to Gestalt theory and the first theory that recognized
that context is important, and then some mechanics of vision, and tied
that to color and depth perception. So before we get into a break and
then the next activity, I’d like to reveal to you that next week, the big
man, Purves himself, is actually coming to our class to have a
conversation with us. And I have no authority to make an assignment,
but I’ve heard he loves challenges, he loves questions, and just getting
people talking, so I thought it would be cool for everyone to come up
with maybe a question for him.
----------------------------------
EXTRA STUFF
But when we look at a scene there is always always more than one
thing, so our visual system has to decide soo am I looking at
reflectances under the same illuminant (Fig.
4B), in which case they should appear similarly colored, or different
reflectances
under different illuminants
If
perceptions of color are indeed generated in a wholly empirical way,
then identical
targets presented on differently chromatic backgrounds should give
rise to different
chromatic sensations, as indeed they do.
the chromatic appearance of two identical targets will always follow
the
probability distribution of the possible sources of the target spectra,
given the
constellation spectral returns from the rest of the scene.