Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In this short assay, I will summarize, explain and criticize Marxist theories from a
realist/liberalist perspective, and use Globalization as an alternative notion for dependency theory.
Realists and liberals criticize Marxist theories, especially dependency theory, for being outdated and
that their theorists are incapable of adapting new approaches and liberal reforms that can elevate their
Periphery status into the semi-Periphery and then Core status, particularly after the dissolution of the
Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War and the increasing transnational influence of capital due to
the increasing expansion of globalization. But, feeling victimized by the superiority of the developed
capitalist “North”, theorists like Immanuel Wallerstein argue that the capitalist globalization will
ultimately lead to a socialist system because of its multiple crises in exploiting of the Periphery states.
Such radical view has a lot to do with the psychological effects of Marxism as a political
ideology which can rationalize one’s extreme position to be left outside of the critical thinking vis-à-
vis the evolving changes in global economic conditions. Thus, Marxist theories of IR are not only
proved to be unpractical, but also tend to create unstable and extortionist climates.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference:
Kaufman, Daniel, Jay Parker, Patrick Howell, and Grant Doty. Understanding International
Relations: The Value of Alternative Lenses. 5th. Boston: Custom Publishing - McGraw-Hill,
2004.