Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How do the characteristics of coconut shell-based carbons compare to those for coal-
based carbons?
Activated carbons produced from coconut shells typically have a tighter, more microporous pore
structure than their coal-based counterparts. This is due to the inherent pore structure of the raw
material coconut shell as compared to raw material coals. This microporosity lends itself towards
certain applications where activated carbon is used.
Also, coconut shell-based carbons tend to be harder, more resistant to abrasion, and lower in ash
than similar grades of coal-based carbons. A quick comparison of standard specification
measures on coconut shell carbons versus coal carbons is as follows:
Not every application is a good fit for coconut-shell based carbons; applications such as surface
water treatment with high background TOC levels, wastewater treatment, decolorization, and the
removal of bulky, high molecular weight organics from liquid or air streams tend to favor coal-
based carbons.
Page 2 of 3
Why should I consider coconut shell-based carbon for my application?
There are both technical and economic reasons to consider coconut shell-based carbons. The
technical reasons are outlined above – simply put, in many applications coconut-based carbons
have a higher capacity and thus longer life than coal-based carbons.
In recent years, a number of factors have driven up the cost of coal-based activated carbons,
including:
• Imposition of an import tariff on coal-based carbons imported from China by the US
Department of Commerce. This tariff ranges from 70% to 228% and will remain in place
for the next several years.
• The overall demand for coal has increased globally, due to higher energy demands. This
has led to a scarcity of supply of suitable grades of coal to produce activated carbon, and
has increased the cost of the raw material coal as well.
• China has been pressured by the U. S. Treasury Department to float the Yuan (or
Chinese RMB) according to global exchange rates, resulting in a devaluation of the US
Dollar by approximately 14% over the past 2 years. This again impacts the cost of coal-
based carbons imported from China.
All of these factors have led to recent instability in the cost of coal-based carbons. Coconut shell-
based alternatives have been much more stable and predictable in cost, making these carbons a
viable economic alternative as well.
If you have traditionally used coal-based carbon in your application, Siemens Water Technologies
can assist you in evaluating whether coconut shell-based carbons may be a viable alternative.
Page 3 of 3