Professional Documents
Culture Documents
versus
Motorola 5 1 3 5 0 7 7 9 3 5 8 2 1 4 9 9
Microsoft 1
7
3
3
5
2
6
6
5
4
4
6
6
2
1
0
7
6
3
6
5
3
1
4
3
0
6
0
0
4
0
1
The patent R
A 7 12 5
battlefield N
D
as of
23 Dec 10 9 7
The next 6
pages show
how this
conflict has
escalated.
Move by
W S W
Trade Commission
move. I
Western District
US International
Western District
of Washington
Southern District
of Wisconsin
D D D
of Florida
T
W F W
C
version 10.12.23.101 A L I
© 2010 by Florian Mueller
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com
Twitter: @FOSSpatents 12
6
9 3
7 3 5
9 9 7
+RAND 8 8 0 3 1 5 3 3 3 3 5 7 5 9 5 0 8 5 3
Motorola 3
9
9
9
0
1
3
3
7
6
4
4
7
0
7
4
7
5
7
6
1
6
1
2
7
1
3
1
9
6
9
4
9
6
8
0
5
8
Move #1
01 Oct 10 5 1 3 5 0 7 7 9 3
Microsoft 1
7
3
3
5
2
6
6
5
4
4
6
6
2
1
0
7
6
Microsoft
files two
Move #1:
complaints Microsoft files two complaints
against 9
against Motorola: one in the
Motorola Western District of Washington,
another with the ITC. Both relate
(with a to the same 9 patents.
federal
court and
the ITC)
W
Trade Commission
I
US International
Western District
of Washington
D
T
W
C
A
© 2010 by Florian Mueller
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com
Twitter: @FOSSpatents
9 9
Motorola
Move #2
09 Nov 10 5 1 3 5 0 7 7 9 3
Microsoft 1
7
3
3
5
2
6
6
5
4
4
6
6
2
1
0
7
6 Move #2, step 1/2:
Microsoft R
A
In a second complaint against Motorola
in the Western District of Washington,
files N
Microsoft alleges Motorola's failure to comply
D
another with RAND (reasonable and non-discriminatory)
complaint 9 licensing commitments Motorola made to
certain standard-setting organizations
against (IEEE-SA and ITU) and their members.
Motorola,
over
RAND
licensing
obligations
W
Trade Commission
-- I
US International
Western District
of Washington
motion to D
stay first T Move #2, step 2/2:
W Since Microsoft asserted the same patents
suit C in its original infringement suit in Washington
A as in its ITC complaint, the parties jointly
move to stay the original infringement suit
© 2010 by Florian Mueller for the duration of the ITC investigation.
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com
Twitter: @FOSSpatents
9 9
+RAND
Motorola
Move #3
10 Nov 10 5 1 3 5 0 7 7 9 3
Microsoft 1
7
3
3
5
2
6
6
5
4
4
6
6
2
1
0
7
6
Motorola R
A 7 9
files N
D
three
complaints 9
against
Microsoft
in two
federal
courts
W S W
Trade Commission
I
US International
Western District
Western District
of Washington
Southern District
of Wisconsin
D D D
of Florida
T
W F W
C
A L I
© 2010 by Florian Mueller
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com
Twitter: @FOSSpatents
Move #3:
Motorola files three complaints
9 against Microsoft:
one over 7 patents in the
7 3 6
Southern District of Florida,
and two suits in the
Western District of Wisconsin
9 9 (one over 3 patents, another
+RAND 8 8 0 3 1 5 3 3 3 3 5 7 5 9 5 0 over 6 patents).
Motorola 3
9
9
9
0
1
3
3
7
6
4
4
7
0
7
4
7
5
7
6
1
6
1
2
7
1
3
1
9
6
9
4
Move #4
22 Nov 10 5 1 3 5 0 7 7 9 3
Microsoft 1
7
3
3
5
2
6
6
5
4
4
6
6
2
1
0
7
6
Motorola R
A 7 9 10 5
files N
D
ITC
complaint, 9
amends
one
Wisconsin
complaint
W S W
Trade Commission
I
US International
Western District
Western District
of Washington
Southern District
of Wisconsin
D D D
of Florida
T
W F W
C
A L I
© 2010 by Florian Mueller
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com
Twitter: @FOSSpatents
Move #4:
Motorola files an ITC complaint
9
67 against Microsoft over 5 patents
10 that the Xbox 360 allegedly
7 3 5 infringes: 4 of those patents
Nothing changed were previously asserted
about the '516 in one of the two suits in the
and '931 patents Western District of Wisconsin,
9 9 at this stage. the 5th one is new and it's
+RAND 8 8 The0 3new 1 lines
5 3 3 3 3 5 7 5 9 5 0 8
simultaneously added to that
Motorola 3
9
9just0 separate
9from
3 7 4them
1 those
3 6 patents
7 7 7 7 1 1 7 3 9 9 9
4 0 4 5 6 6 2 1 1 6 4 6 Wisconsin suit by way of an
amended complaint.
that are asserted in At this point, only the '516 and '931
the ITC complaint patents are part of that Wisconsin
as well. suit but not of the ITC complaint.
Move #5
23 Dec 10 5 1 3 5 0 7 7 9 3
Microsoft 1
7
3
3
5
2
6
6
5
4
4
6
6
2
1
0
7
6
Motorola R
A 7 10 12 5
files N
D
a third
Wisconsin 9
complaint
W S W
Trade Commission
I
Western District
US International
Western District
of Washington
Southern District
of Wisconsin
D D D
of Florida
T
W F W
C
A L I
© 2010 by Florian Mueller
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com
Twitter: @FOSSpatents 12
Move #5:
Motorola files a third Wisconsin
76 complaint, asserting three patents
10 3 against Kinect and Xbox.
9
7 3 5 Those three patents include
two new ones and the '931 patent
previously asserted in another
Wisconsin suit. Motorola says it will
9 9 "seek dismissal without prejudice
+RAND 8 8 0 3 1 5 3 3 3 3 5 7 5 9 5 0 8 5 3 relating to" the '931 patent in that other
Motorola 3
9
9
9
0
1
3
3
7
6
4
4
7
0
7
4
7
5
7
6
1
6
1
2
7
1
3
1
9
6
9
4
9
6
8
0
5
8
suit. This chart reflects Motorola's
intentions, which are, however,
subject to court decisions.
On that basis, only 1 of the 6 patents
remaining in that other suit (the '516
patent) would not be simultaneously
part of Motorola's ITC complaint.
Move #6
23 Dec 10 5 1 3 5 0 7 7 9 3 5 8 2 1 4 9 9
Microsoft 1
7
3
3
5
2
6
6
5
4
4
6
6
2
1
0
7
6
3
6
5
3
1
4
3
0
6
0
0
4
0
1
Microsoft R
A 7 12 5
Move #6:
makes N
On the same day on which Motorola
D
counter- filed its third Wisconsin suit,
claims in 9 7 Microsoft makes counterclaims
in the Southern Florida case,
Southern asserting 7 patents:
Florida, 5 of them against Motorola's
Android smartphones, and 2
asserting against Motorola set-top boxes
7 patents with DVR functionality.
W S W
Trade Commission
I
US International
Western District
Western District
of Washington
Southern District
of Wisconsin
D D D
of Florida
T
W F W
C
A L I
© 2010 by Florian Mueller
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com
Twitter: @FOSSpatents 12
6
9 3
7 3 5
9 9 7
+RAND 8 8 0 3 1 5 3 3 3 3 5 7 5 9 5 0 8 5 3
Motorola 3
9
9
9
0
1
3
3
7
6
4
4
7
0
7
4
7
5
7
6
1
6
1
2
7
1
3
1
9
6
9
4
9
6
8
0
5
8
Reference United States International Trade Commission
material Investigation no. 337-TA-744 on "certain mobile devices, associated software, and components thereof"
-- complaint filed on 01 October 2010
as per
Microsoft Corporation (of Redmond, WA 98052)
23 Dec 10 vs. Motorola, Inc. (of Schaumburg, IL 60196)
page R-1 Microsoft simultaneously filed a suit against Motorola over the same matter in the Western District of Washington (case 2:10-cv-01577).
FOSS Patents reacted to this ITC complaint and the equivalent suit on the same day and two days later discussed the patents-in-suit.
Asserted patents (in order of appearance in documents filed with the ITC)
This suit relates to the same matter as the ITC complaint Microsoft filed on the same day. After the ITC instituted an investigation based
on that complaint, the parties filed a joint stipulation on 09 November 2010 to stay the case for the duration of the ITC investigation.
FOSS Patents reacted to this suit and the equivalent ITC complaint on the same day and two days later discussed the patents-in-suit.
Reference United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
material Case no. 2:10-cv-01823 -- complaint filed on 09 November 2010
FOSS Patents commented on this RAND enforcement suit on the following day.
On the same day, Motorola also filed two complaints against Microsoft with the US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
© 2010 by Florian Mueller (cases 3:10-cv-00699 and 3:10-cv-00700). FOSS Patents commented on Motorola's expected countersuits on the following day.
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com
Twitter: @FOSSpatents Allegedly infringing products
For each of the patents, Motorola broadly accuses "operating systems, office software, server software, and/or communications and
messaging software", but the specifically accused products then tend to be more limited in scope. A matrix on the next page shows the
relationship between the patents-in-suit and the accused products.
Asserted patents (in order of appearance in documents filed with the court)
asserted by Microsoft in counterclaims (part of answer to original complaint, dated 23 December 2010)
6,791,536 ("536") Simulating gestures of a pointing device using a stylus and providing feedback thereto
6,897,853 ("853") Highlevel active pen matrix
7,024,214 ("214") Synchronizing over a number of synchronization mechanisms using flexible rules
7,493,130 ("130") Synchronizing over a number of synchronization mechanisms using flexible rules
7,383,460 ("460") Method and system for configuring a timer
6,897,904 ("904") Method and system for selecting among multiple tuners
6,785,901 ("901") Altering locks on programming content
Reference United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
material Case no. 3:10-cv-00699 -- complaint filed on 10 November 2010
as per Motorola Mobility, Inc. (of Libertyville, IL 60048) and General Instrument Corporation (of Horsham, PE 19044)
vs. Microsoft Corporation (of Redmond, WA 98052)
23 Dec 10
On the same day, Motorola also filed another complaint against Microsoft with the US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
(case 3:10-cv-00700) and one with the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (case 1:10-cv-24063). FOSS Patents
page R-4 commented on Motorola's expected countersuits on the following day.
Asserted patents (in order of appearance in documents filed with the court)
as per Asserted patents (in order of appearance in documents filed with the court)
In the list above, an asterisk (*) denotes patents also asserted by Motorola in an ITC complaint (investigation no. 337-TA-752).
FOSS Patents reacted to this ITC complaint on the following day and later mentioned the ITC's decision to launch an investigation.
Asserted patents (in order of appearance in documents filed with the ITC)
The asserted patents were also asserted by Motorola in a complaint in the Western District of Wisconsin (case no. 3:10-cv-00700).
Reference United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
material Case no. 3:10-cv-00826 -- complaint filed on 23 December 2010
Asserted patents (in order of appearance in documents filed with the court)