Kepler’s 1619 third law historical mistake

Is: There is no planetary motion around the Sun

All objects move in an absolute circular orbit and objects in the same
neighborhood cause a “planetary system” ellipsis Illusions

Mercury

r
θ

Sun

Figure - 1
Kepler Third law is: F = a/T2 = k/a2 and said there is planetary motion around the Sun
And it is an ellipse with the Sun at the focus of the ellipse?
Since Kepler was a German
Newton changed the letter a to the letter r for an English brand!
Newton Second law is: F = r/ t2 = k/r2 and said there is planetary motion around the Sun?
Astronomers found that planetary motion around the Sun is not an ellipse but a rotating
ellipse
Einstein rigged physics with time travel law r/t2 = k/ r2 + k1/r4 to describe a rotating ellipse

7 billion people were/are told by Alfred Nobel prize winner physicists that Planets rotate
around the Sun in a rotating ellipse
What if I can prove them all wrong?
That there is no Suns Planets and Moons! But there are objects with absolute motion of a
circle and the relative motion is an visual ellipse and match experimental data
I am Joe Nahhas
And I am after Alfred Nobel Institution head

Mercur
y

θ
ψ

Sun
Newton gave the equation of the ellipse:
As: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)]
Einstein said he corrected Newton and wrote the new equation:
Is: r (θ, t) = a (1-ε²)/ [1+ε cosine (θ - Ψ)]

Page 2
It is a fact that Astronomers see this axis tilt and Einstein got a formula for
it: ψ = {6 π G M/a c² (1 - ε²)} [180/ π] [36526/T (days)][3600]
G = 6.673 x 10-11= gravitational acceleration constant
M =2x1030kg = mass of the Sun
Eccentricity of Mercury’s orbit = ε = 0.206
T= 88 days = period of Planet mercury’s rotation around the Sun
And c = 299792.458 km/sec =light speed/sec
And a = 58.2 x 106 km/sec = semi major axis of planet Mercury orbit

ψ = {6 (π) 6.673 x 10-11 (2 x 1030)/58.2 x 106 (299792.458) ² [1– (0.206)²]} x

[180/ π] [36526/88] [3600] = 43 seconds of an arc per century

Newton used magical powers or action at a distance

force F = G m M/r2
Einstein said if Newton can add magical power then I
can do magic powers of Newton and add Einstein’s
own magical powers of time travel force and the force
Is F = G m M/r2 (space force) + k/r4 (time force)
These two Magicians claim that what we see is due to
magic where the Sun is pulling on the planets to keep
them around? Did anyone see the Sun Pulling?
Did anyone see a robe from the Sun pulling on planets
to keep them around?
Page 3

What is modern physics?

Did anyone hear the big bang? Did anyone saw a black hole? Did anyone find Einstein’s
gravity waves? Did anyone hook up a hose to the sky and funnel dark energy to verify E
= mc2? Does anyone have a proof of Newton’s action at a distance? Does anyone have a
proof of Einstein time travel? Does anyone figure out why humans have to accept Alfred
Nobel prize winners nuclear claims that the universe is made up of particles that dies and
rebirth billion billion times a second? Hey dude I am a redneck one grandfather was a
damn farmer and my other grandfather was a damn Carpenter and my father was a much
damn redneck I sometimes feel reluctant to claim him but I never knew what a dumb ass
really is till I met my science teacher talking about the greatest idiots of physics starting
With the seven idiots in order Copernicus Galileo Newton and Einstein!

Newton’s space force: F = G m M/r2

Einstein’s – Newton space - time:
F = G m M/r2 (Newton’s space force) + k/r4
(Einstein’s time force)
The force is with Joe Nahhas and in real time space F = 0
Nahhas said the only magic is an act of kindness of a human to all others!
My act of kindness to humanity is to make humanity aware that there is nothing Nobel
about Alfred Nobel Institution that changed physics to stupidity

What I am saying is that there is no Newton’s

gravitational force and Einstein’s space – time force is
silly to say the least and I can prove that there is no
gravitational force between the Sun and the Planets
force, or, F = o solution is a rotating ellipse Illusion.
To start with let me solve this equation F = 0. The
solution of F = 0 is the equation of a real time circle
Is r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at
a location
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed
as the product
S = m r; State = mass x location:
P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment
= change of location + change of mass
= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate
F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force
= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r
= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate
Page 4

In polar coordinates system

r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r θ' θ(1) ; γ = (r" - rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ")θ(1)
r = location; v = velocity; γ = acceleration
F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r

F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)]

+ (m" r) r (1)
= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/m r) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)
= [-G m M/r²] r (1) -------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law

Proof:
First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1)
Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ
Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t
= r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ]
= r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)
Define θ (1) = -sine θ î +cosine θ Ĵ;
And with r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ
Then d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1)
And d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ (1)
Define γ = d [r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] /d t
= r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' θ' r (1) + r θ" r (1) +r θ'd [θ (1)]/d t
γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)
With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = F (r)
And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0
With m = constant, then
With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = F (r) Eq-1
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2
With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2
From Eq-2: d (r²θ')/d t = 0
Then r²θ' = h = constant
Differentiate with respect to time
 Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ" = 0
Divide by r²θ'
Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0
And 2(r'/r) = - θ"/θ' = 2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]
Also, r = r0 (θ, 0) e [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
For a fixed orbit: λ r = 0
Also, r = r 0 (θ, 0) e ỉ ω t
Page 5
-2ỉ ω t
And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e
With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0
Let u = 1/r; r = 1/u; r²θ' = h = θ’ /u²
And d r/d t = (d r/ d u) (d u /d θ) (d θ/ d t) = (- 1/u ²) (θ’) (d u/ d θ)
= - h (d u/ d θ)

And d² r/ d t² = - h (θ’) (d² u/ d θ ²)

= [- h²/r²] (d² u/ d θ ²)
= - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²)

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1

And - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) – (1/u) (h u²) ² = 0
Then (d² u/ d θ ²) + u = 0

Then u = A e - í θ
Then r 0 (θ, 0) = (1/A) e í θ
And r 0 (θ, 0) = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ
And r = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ e ỉ ω t

í (θ + ω t)
Or, r = r 0 e
What I am saying Dear Pope is this is the equation of
motion of any planet!
It is also the equation of motion of the smallest
particle light!
Now Planet Mercury motion is r m = r m 0 e í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]
The Sun Motion is r s = r s 0 e í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

Sun r
r s Mercury
 r1 r0 r m
X1 r2
X2
Earth

Page 6
In mathematical form: r1 = x1 + r s
And r2 = x2 + r m

Then r2 - r1 = x2 - x1 + r m – r s
Or, r = r0 + (r m – r s)
To find the extreme values of r,
Then: d r/d t = d r0/d t+ (d r m/d t – d r s/ d t) = 0

And (d r m/d t – d r s/ d t) = 0; d r0/d t = 0

And d r m/d t = d r s/ d t
í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]
Now Planet Mercury motion is r m = r m 0 e
The Sun Motion is r s = r s 0 e í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]
And d r m/d t = r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] e
í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]
And d r s/ d t = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] e

With r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] Cosine [θ (m) + ω (m) t]

= r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] Cosine [θ (s) + ω (s) t]
And r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] sine [θ (m) + ω (m) t]
= r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] sine [θ (s) + ω (s) t]
Then dividing we get: tan [θ (n) + ω (n) t] = tan [θ (s) + ω (s) t]
Or, [θ (m) + ω (m) t] = [θ (s) + ω (s) t] + [n π = 0; n =0]

And θ (m) - θ (s) = space Illusion = [ω (s) - ω (m)] t = real time delay
This is the time delay Illusion
And, r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)]
And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] = (r m 0 /r s 0) [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]
And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = [(r m 0/ r s 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]

In arc second per century:

Is: [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)
= [(r m 0/ r s 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)

Page 7

And, r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)]

And r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = r e 0 [θ’ (e) + ω (e)]

And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (e) + ω (e)] = [(r m 0/ r e 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]

In arc second per century:

Is: [θ’ (e) + ω (e)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)
= [(r m 0/ r e 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600) = 43

r m 0

r s 0
M M M Mercury S Sun
r m 0 r 0

Is: r 0 = distance between centers

Is: r = r 0 + (r m 0 + r s 0)
max
And r min = r 0 - (r m 0 + r s 0)
And c = (r max - r min)/2 = r m 0 + r s 0
And a = (r max + r min)/2 = r 0

With c = (r max -r min )/2 = r m 0 +r s 0

And a = (r max + r min)/2 = r 0
This establishes visual ellipse of semi major axis a and a semi minor
axis b = √ (a² - c²) = a √ [1 – (c/a) ²] = a √ (1 – ε ²)
And h = 2 π a b = 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)
Areal Velocity is: 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)/T

Page 8
 Mercury

r
θ

Sun

Figure - 1

Page 9

And Farthest distance = r max = r 0 + (r m 0 +r s 0 )=a+c

And closest distance = r min = r 0 - (r m 0 +r )=a-c

s 0
At closest approach: h =2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)/T
And dividing h / (a – c) ² = 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)/T a² (1 – ε) ²
Or r²θ' = h will give θ' (a) = 2 π √ (1 – ε ²)/T (1 – ε) ²

And for any motion θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2ỉ ω t

And θ’ = {[cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] – 1} θ' 0 (θ, 0)
And θ’ = θ’ (x) + í θ’ (y)
= [cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] θ' 0 (θ, 0)
And θ’ (x) = [cosine 2 ω t] θ' 0 (θ, 0)
= [1 – 2 sine² ω t] θ' 0 (θ, 0)

And θ’ (x) - θ' (0) = - 2 θ' 0 (θ, 0) sine² ω t

= -2(2π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t
= - 4 π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t

Page 10

If this apsidal motion is to be found as visual effects, then

 Mercur
y

θ
Ψ

Sun

With, v ° = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity

And v/c = (v* + v°)/c = tan ω t

= -4 π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} radians

Multiplication by 180/π to change to degrees

Ψ ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]}

Degrees
And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days

Ψ’’ (calculated) = (-720x36526/T days) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x

sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years

And in arc seconds per century:

Ψ’’ (calculated) = (-720x36526x3600/T days) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x
sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years = 43
Page 11
 Pluto 5906.4 90730 4.74

Is: [θ’ (e) + ω (e)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)
= [(r m 0/r e 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600) = 43

And in arc seconds per century:

Ψ’’ (calculated) = (-720x36526x3600/T days) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x
sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years = 43

All rights reserved

Planet Distance r Planet Orbit Less Spin Angular velocity;

X 106km Orbit T speed v Earth speed v/r
in speed km/sec arc sec/ century
km/sec
Mercury 58.2 88 47.9 18.1 .002 70.75
Venus 108.2 224.7 35.05 5.7 6.52 10.86
Earth 149.6 365.26 29.8 .46511 4.1
Mars 227.936 687 24.14 0.2411
Jupiter 778.412 4333 13.06 12.6
Saturn 1,426.725 10760 9.65 9.87
Uranus 2,870.97 30690 6.80 2.59
Neptune 4,498 60180 5.43 2.68
Pluto 5906.4 90730 4.74

Is: [θ’ (e) + ω (e)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)
= [(r m 0/r e 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600) = 43

And in arc seconds per century:

Ψ’’ (calculated) = (-720x36526x3600/T days) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x
sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years = 43

All rights reserved

Page 12