Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Elections
Major Irony; As the franchise expanded the percentage who vote declined
Why?
Progressive reforms
The progressives had 2 goals
1. Remove corruption from politics
2. Eliminate lower classes from politics
The Progressives instituted
Secret ballots
Voter registration
Primary election system
Denial of voting rights for aliens
After Progressive reforms
Political parties weakened
Voting became more difficult
1840-1896 77% voter turnout
1920-1932 54% voter turnout
Since 1964 turnout in presidential elections has almost continually declined
1996 – lowest turnout since 1924
Even lower in off-year congressional elections – average 37% turnout
US has the lowest voter turnout of any western democracy
Difference between states
Northern plains & mountain states – high turnout / south – low turnout
Why do people vote?
People vote when they think that the benefits are greater than the costs
1. If people see a difference between candidates they have reason to voe & can expect a benefit
If they see no difference – no reason to vote
2. Some will vote even if they see no difference out of a sense of civic duty
3. A rational person considers the effect of the vote
More likely to vote in a close election
Costs of Voting
1. Voter registration
#1 impediment to voting
15 states make it easy to register & they have much higher voter turnout
Registration up to election day
Registration in precinct or neighborhood
Registration by mail
Registration offices open weekends & evening
No purging from voter registration lists for failure to vote
Other ways of changing voter registration
Register on election day
1
Gov Final Exam (Test 3)
B. Canadian plan
Door to door registration
C. Motor Voter registration
Agency registration
2. Polling hours
Elections are held on weekdays
Most nations have election on weekends or national holidays
Should we implement universal polling hours?
East coast: 10am – 10pm
West coast: 7am – 7pm
3. Frequency and length of elections
Do we not vote because?
Elections are so frequent
Too many offices are elected (500,000 elected posts)
Elections last too long
Is non-voting simply a result of voter satisfaction?
Probably not, because those with the least reasons to be satisfied are the ones not voting
Characteristics of non-voters:
Young people
Hispanics (Sleeping Giant)
Manual laborers
Those with little education and low income
Voters
Those with more education and income
College educated 124x more likely to vote
Why?
College equips you to deal with bureaucracy
College may still instill knowledge about government
Government responds to people who participate
Republicans vote the most
Democrats vote less than republicans
Independents are least likely to vote
Political Participation
Political participation is class based
Rich participate more than poor
Better educated participate more than less educated
Participation requires time and money
2
Gov Final Exam (Test 3)
3
Gov Final Exam (Test 3)
1. Party loyalty
Most important factor
This has weakened since the 1950’s
2. Candidate evaluation
Candidates’ personality & style have become more important because of TV
Character
Competence
3. Issues
Prospective – looking ahead
4
Gov Final Exam (Test 3)
FDR put together new deal coalition (urban, labor, poor, Catholics, Jews, Blacks, and rural south)
3. Realigning elections
Permanent shift in popular support
Rarely happens – usually follows a crisis
Minority party become majority party
Last realignment 1932
FDR put together new deal coalition (urban, labor, poor, Catholics, Jews, Blacks, and rural
south)
1932 – D
1936 – D
1940 – D
1944 – D
48’ – D
52’ – R
56’ – R
60’ – D
64’ – D
5
Gov Final Exam (Test 3)
68’ – R
72’ – R
76’ – D
80’ – R
84’ – R
88’ – R
92’ – D
96’ – D
2000 – R
2004 – R
2008 – D
Are we approaching de-alignment?
De-alignment – rather than support a new party system, citizens may chose to be independent
More call themselves independents
More cast a split-ticket voting – voting for candidates from different parties in the same election
Why a two party system?
1. Historical Dualism of US political conflict
2. Because of the moderate (centrist) views of the US public
3. Structure of our electoral system (winner take all)
In congress members are elected from single member districts
Only one person gets elected (the loser gets nothing)
Minor party candidates don’t win (these parties die off or merge)
Compare our system to proportional representation
Proportional Representation – seats in the legislature are allocated according to the % of
votes received
37% of votes = 37% of seats
Since minor parties have a change of winning, they have a reason to exist
4. The two parties we have are flexible not ideological
They can adopt programs suggested by 3 rd parties
Political Party Functions
1. Organize power in order to control the government
Recruit people to work in political campaigns
Provide people with a basis for casting their vote
Serve to educate voters
2. Organize public opinion
Parties serve as channels of communication
3. Serve to aggregate interests
4. Incorporate changes suggested by 3 rd parties & social protest movements
Adopted in a more moderate form
Social Characteristics of party members
Democrats:
Race: Minorities
6
Gov Final Exam (Test 3)
Religion: Jews
Sex: Women
Income – Working class
Education: less, except at highest level
Geography: northeast, urban
Republicans:
Race: White
Religion: Protestant
Sex: Men
Income: Middle to Upper
Education: Almost All College
Geography: West, growing in sunbelt
Ideological Differences:
Republicans are more conservative
Conservative – minimize the domestic role of government
Philosophic Basis:
Laissez faire – (leave it alone)
Government should limit its participation in economic and social affairs
Individuals are responsible for their own well being
Support the status quo
Republican Policies:
Stress an unregulated economy
Reduce government spending/cut taxes
Avoid government intervention
Support big business
In Foreign Policy:
Republicans spend more on “guns than butter”
Harder line in foreign policy
Believe peace comes from strength
Democrats
Democrats are more liberal
Liberal – federal government more active in domestic affairs
Philosophic Basis
Changed with FDR
FDR challenged the notion of laissez fair
FDR said we can’t improve social and economic conditions without government Intervention
FDR changed from laissez faire to social welfare