Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Panelist Paper
1 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM
Paper by Silvio Waisbord http://www.jamco.or.jp/2002_symposium/en/paper/silvio_waisbord...
In the late 1950s and early 1960s, within the general thinking on
economic and political development in the region, some of the earlier
ideas about national or public service broadcasting resurfaced.
Development communication focused on the use broadcasting to
provide education, information, and modern values to the
"traditional" masses." International development programs like
UNESCO, the Alliance for Progress and the Organization of American
States made funds available for communication equipment and
2 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM
Paper by Silvio Waisbord http://www.jamco.or.jp/2002_symposium/en/paper/silvio_waisbord...
3 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM
Paper by Silvio Waisbord http://www.jamco.or.jp/2002_symposium/en/paper/silvio_waisbord...
was first and foremost the result of the good relationship between
broadcasters and Brazil's authoritarian rulers. The Brazilian media
eventually proved the stronger partner in this relationship; outlasting
the military and successfully rolling their loyalties over to the civilian
governments that followed.
4 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM
Paper by Silvio Waisbord http://www.jamco.or.jp/2002_symposium/en/paper/silvio_waisbord...
5 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM
Paper by Silvio Waisbord http://www.jamco.or.jp/2002_symposium/en/paper/silvio_waisbord...
6 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM
Paper by Silvio Waisbord http://www.jamco.or.jp/2002_symposium/en/paper/silvio_waisbord...
7 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM
Paper by Silvio Waisbord http://www.jamco.or.jp/2002_symposium/en/paper/silvio_waisbord...
Cable and satellite television also entered into the fold of dominant
companies. Firms that already controlled open television branched
into cable as it happened in Uruguay. In countries such as Argentina
and Brazil, where cable development was originally fragmented in
numerous mom-and-pop companies, leading companies swallowed
local companies and subscribers, leading an intense and rapid
process of concentration. The result was the formation of duopolies in
8 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM
Paper by Silvio Waisbord http://www.jamco.or.jp/2002_symposium/en/paper/silvio_waisbord...
cable markets: the Clarin group and Telefónica have the large
majority of Argentine subscribers, and Globo and TVA control the
Brazilian market.
9 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM
Paper by Silvio Waisbord http://www.jamco.or.jp/2002_symposium/en/paper/silvio_waisbord...
10 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM
Paper by Silvio Waisbord http://www.jamco.or.jp/2002_symposium/en/paper/silvio_waisbord...
11 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM
Paper by Silvio Waisbord http://www.jamco.or.jp/2002_symposium/en/paper/silvio_waisbord...
12 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM
Paper by Silvio Waisbord http://www.jamco.or.jp/2002_symposium/en/paper/silvio_waisbord...
Second, the fact that networks and stations prefer to schedule local
shows encourages local production. Local content is attractive for a
very simple reason: it consistently performs better than regional or
US productions in audience ratings. Telenovelas, sitcoms, dramas,
sports, and news programs consistently top popular preferences,
confirming that when available, local television outperforms imports.
For an industry organized around commercial principles, rating
numbers determine programming decisions. The prices for foreign
shows are lower than the production costs of drama or comedy. Local
productions, however, regularly draw higher ratings and,
consequently, bring higher advertising revenues. Only in small
countries, where the market is too small to cover costs and one-hour
episodes of foreign productions command between $500 and $800,
do imported shows tend to predominate. Cultural proximity accounts
for why imported programming (particularly in prime time) tends to
be regional productions, particularly from neighboring countries.
Imported programming tends to be Mexican in Central America,
Colombian and Venezuelan in Ecuador, and Argentine in Paraguay
and Uruguay. Programming crosses borders more easily and suffers
less "cultural discount" where audiences have already been
accustomed to stories, actors, and accents.
13 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM
Paper by Silvio Waisbord http://www.jamco.or.jp/2002_symposium/en/paper/silvio_waisbord...
14 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM
Paper by Silvio Waisbord http://www.jamco.or.jp/2002_symposium/en/paper/silvio_waisbord...
Conclusions
15 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM
Paper by Silvio Waisbord http://www.jamco.or.jp/2002_symposium/en/paper/silvio_waisbord...
16 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM
Paper by Silvio Waisbord http://www.jamco.or.jp/2002_symposium/en/paper/silvio_waisbord...
Globalization does not affect all television markets in the same way.
The strength of local companies, the size of the audience and
advertising revenues, and the existence of protectionist policies
mitigate or favor the entry of regional and global interests. Global
capital and programming moves easily into weaker and smaller
markets with low production, and aggressively in partnerships with
local powerhouses into advertising-rich countries with large, actual or
potential, audiences. Nor are all regional media companies on equal
footing vis-a-vis globalization. To some, globalization has been a boost
to their business; to others, globalization has facilitated the entry of
powerful competitors and thereby introduced powerful challenges to
domestic companies. The trajectories of Globo and Televisa show that
securing a dominant position at home through extensive horizontal
and vertical integration and close contacts with political powers is
fundamental for plans of regional and global expansion.
17 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM
Paper by Silvio Waisbord http://www.jamco.or.jp/2002_symposium/en/paper/silvio_waisbord...
18 of 18 8/24/07 11:00 PM