Professional Documents
Culture Documents
cost-volume-
profit relevant to acca qualification paper F5
In any business, or, indeed, in life CVP analysis looks primarily at the effects of
in general, hindsight is a beautiful
thing. If only we could look into a differing levels of activity on the financial
crystal ball and find out exactly how results of a business. The reason for the
many customers were going to buy
our product, we would be able to particular focus on sales volume is because,
make perfect business decisions and in the short-run, sales price, and the cost of
maximise profits.
Take a restaurant, for example. If materials and labour, are usually known with
the owners knew exactly how many a degree of accuracy.
customers would come in each evening
and the number and type of meals that
they would order, they could ensure that This type of analysis is known as It can, therefore, say with some
staffing levels were exactly accurate and ‘cost-volume-profit analysis’ (CVP degree of certainty that the
no waste occurred in the kitchen. The analysis) and the purpose of this article contribution per unit (sales price less
reality is, of course, that decisions such is to cover some of the straight forward variable costs) is $20. Company A may
as staffing and food purchases have calculations and graphs required for also have fixed costs of $200,000 per
to be made on the basis of estimates, this part of the Paper F5 syllabus, while annum, which again, are fairly easy
with these estimates being based on also considering the assumptions which to predict. However, when we ask the
past experience. underlie any such analysis. question: ‘Will the company make a
While management accounting profit in that year?’, the answer is ‘We
information can’t really help much THE OBJECTIVE OF CVP ANALYSIS don’t know’. We don’t know because
with the crystal ball, it can be of use CVP analysis looks primarily at the we don’t know the sales volume for
in providing the answers to questions effects of differing levels of activity the year.
about the consequences of different on the financial results of a business. However, we can work out how many
courses of action. One of the most The reason for the particular focus sales the business needs to make in
important decisions that needs to be on sales volume is because, in the order to make a profit and this is where
made before any business even starts short-run, sales price, and the cost CVP analysis begins.
is ‘how much do we need to sell in of materials and labour, are usually
order to break‑even?’ By ‘break‑even’ known with a degree of accuracy. Methods for calculating the
we mean simply covering all our costs Sales volume, however, is not usually break‑even point
without making a profit. so predictable and therefore, in the The break-even point is when total
short-run, profitability often hinges revenues and total costs are equal,
upon it. For example, Company A may that is, there is no profit but also no
know that the sales price for product loss made. There are three methods for
x in a particular year is going to be ascertaining this break-even point:
in the region of $50 and its variable
costs are approximately $30.
student accountant issue 14/2010
02
Studying Paper F5?
Performance objectives 12, 13 and 14 are relevant to this exam
analysis
1 The equation method It would, therefore, be 2 The contribution margin method
A little bit of simple maths can inappropriate to use a unit fixed This second approach uses a
help us answer numerous different cost since this would vary depending little bit of algebra to rewrite our
cost‑volume-profit questions. on output. Sales price and variable equation above, concentrating
We know that total revenues are costs, on the other hand, are on the use of the ‘contribution
found by multiplying unit selling price assumed to remain constant for all margin’. The contribution margin
(USP) by quantity sold (Q). Also, levels of output in the short-run, and, is equal to total revenue less total
total costs are made up firstly of therefore, unit costs are appropriate. variable costs. Alternatively, the
total fixed costs (FC) and secondly Continuing with our equation, we unit contribution margin (UCM)
by variable costs (VC). Total variable now set P to zero in order to find out is the unit selling price (USP) less
costs are found by multiplying unit how many items we need to sell the unit variable cost (UVC). Hence,
variable cost (UVC) by total quantity in order to make no profit, ie to the formula from our mathematical
(Q). Any excess of total revenue over break even: method above is manipulated in
total costs will give rise to profit the following way:
(P). By putting this information (50Q) – (30Q) – 200,000 = 0
into a simple equation, we come up 20Q – 200,000 = 0 (USP x Q) – (UVC x Q) – FC = P
with a method of answering CVP 20Q = 200,000 (USP – UVC) x Q = FC + P
type questions. This is done below Q = 10,000 units. UCM x Q = FC + P
continuing with the example of Q = FC + P
Company A above. The equation has given us our UCM
answer. If Company A sells less than
Total revenue – total variable costs – 10,000 units, it will make a loss; if So, if P=0 (because we want to find
total fixed costs = Profit it sells exactly 10,000 units, it will the break-even point), then we would
(USP x Q) – (UVC x Q) – FC = P break-even, and if it sells more than simply take our fixed costs and
(50Q) – (30Q) – 200,000 = P 10,000 units, it will make a profit. divide them by our unit contribution
margin. We often see the unit
Note: total fixed costs are used rather contribution margin referred to as the
than unit fixed costs since unit fixed ‘contribution per unit’.
costs will vary depending on the level Applying this approach to
of output. Company A again:
Example 1
Contribution
Company A wants to achieve a target
800,000 Total costs profit of $300,000. The sales volume
necessary in order to achieve this
profit can be ascertained using any of
Break-even point the three methods outlined above. If
600,000 Variable costs the equation method is used, the profit
of $300,000 is put into the equation
rather than the profit of $0:
This is not a quick enough For Company A: $20/$50 = 0.4 The C/S ratio is useful in its own right
method to use in an exam so it is as it tells us what percentage each $ of
not recommended. In multi-product situations, a weighted sales revenue contributes towards fixed
average C/S ratio is calculated by using costs; it is also invaluable in helping
Margin of safety the formula: us to quickly calculate the break-even
The margin of safety indicates by how point in $ sales revenue, or the sales
much sales can decrease before a loss Total contribution/total sales revenue revenue required to generate a target
occurs, ie it is the excess of budgeted profit. The break-even point can now be
revenues over break-even revenues. This weighted average C/S ratio can calculated this way for Company A:
Using Company A as an example, let’s then be used to find CVP information
assume that budgeted sales are 20,000 such as break-even point, margin of Fixed costs / contribution to sales ratio
units. The margin of safety can be safety etc. = $200,000/0.34375 = $581,819 of
found, in units, as follows: sales revenue.
Example 2
Budgeted sales – break-even sales = As well as producing product x To achieve a target profit of $300,000:
20,000 – 10,000 = 10,000 units. described above, Company A also
begins producing product y. The Fixed costs + required profit /
Alternatively, as is often the case, it following information is available for contribution to sales ratio = $200,000
may be calculated as a percentage: both products: + $300,000/0.34375 = $1,454,546.
Budgeted sales – break-even sales/ Product x Product y Of course, such calculations provide
budgeted sales. only estimated information because
In Company A’s case, it will be Sales price $50 $60 they assume that products x and y are
10,000/20,000 x 100 = 50%. Variable cost $30 $45 sold in a constant mix of 2x to 1y. In
Contribution per unit $20 $15 reality, this constant mix is unlikely
Finally, it could be calculated in terms Budgeted sales to exist and, at times, more y may be
of $ sales revenue as follows: (units) 20,000 10,000 sold than x. Such changes in the mix
Budgeted sales – break-even sales throughout a period, even if the overall
x selling price = 10,000 x $50 = The weighted average C/S ratio can be mix for the period is 2:1, will lead to the
$500,000. once again calculated by dividing the actual break-even point being different
total expected contribution by the total than anticipated. This point is touched
Contribution to sales ratio expected sales: upon again later in this article.
It is often useful in single product (20,000 x $20) + (10,000 x $15) /
situations, and essential in (20,000 x $50) + (10,000 x $60) =
multi‑product situations, to ascertain 34.375%
how much each $ sold actually
contributes towards the fixed costs. This
calculation is known as the contribution
to sales or C/S ratio. It is found in contribution to sales ratio is often useful
single product situations by either
simply dividing the total contribution by
in single product situations, and essential
the total sales revenue, or by dividing in multi‑product situations, to ascertain
the unit contribution margin (otherwise
known as contribution per unit) by the
how much each $ sold actually contributes
selling price: towards the fixed costs.
student accountant issue 14/2010
06
Multi-product
profit–volume charts Table 3: figure 3 continued
When discussing graphical methods
for establishing the break-even point, Product x Product y
we considered break-even charts and Sales price $50 $60
contribution graphs. These could also Variable cost $30 $45
be drawn for a company selling multiple Contribution per unit $20 $15
products, such as Company A in our Budgeted sales (units) 20,000 10,000
example. The one type of graph that C/S ratios 0.4 0.25
hasn’t yet been discussed is a Weighted average C/S ratio 0.34375
profit–volume graph. This is slightly Product ranking 1 2
different from the others in that it (most profitable first)
focuses purely on showing a profit/
loss line and doesn’t separately
show the cost and revenue lines. In Product Contribution Cumulative Revenue Cumulative
a multi‑product environment, it is profit/loss revenue
common to actually show two lines on $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
the graph: one straight line, where a (Fixed costs) 0 (200) 0 0
constant mix between the products is X 400 200 1,000,000 1,000,000
assumed; and one bow-shaped line, Y 150 350 650,000 1,650,000
where it is assumed that the company
sells its most profitable product first
and then its next most profitable
product, and so on. In order to draw the In order to draw a multi-product/volume
graph, it is therefore necessary to work
out the C/S ratio of each product being
graph it is necessary to work out the C/S ratio
sold before ranking the products in of each product being sold.
order of profitability. It is easy here for
Company A, since only two products are
being produced, and so it is useful to Limitations of ¤ All other variables, apart from
draw a quick table (prevents mistakes in cost-volume‑profit analysis volume, remain constant, ie volume
the exam hall) in order to ascertain each ¤ Cost-volume-profit analysis is is the only factor that causes
of the points that need to be plotted on invaluable in demonstrating the revenues and costs to change.
the graph in order to show the profit/ effect on an organisation that In reality, this assumption may
loss lines. See Table 3 on the right. changes in volume (in particular), not hold true as, for example,
The graph can then be drawn costs and selling prices, have on economies of scale may be achieved
(Figure 3 on page 7), showing profit. However, its use is limited as volumes increase. Similarly,
cumulative sales on the x axis and because it is based on the following if there is a change in sales mix,
cumulative profit/loss on the y axis. assumptions: Either a single product revenues will change. Furthermore,
It can be observed from the graph is being sold or, if there are multiple it is often found that if sales
that, when the company sells its most products, these are sold in a constant volumes are to increase, sales
profitable product first (x) it breaks even mix. We have considered this above price must fall. These are only a
earlier than when it sells products in a in Figure 3 and seen that if the few reasons why the assumption
constant mix. The break-even point is constant mix assumption changes, may not hold true; there are
the point where each line cuts the x axis. so does the break-even point. many others.
07 technical
¤ The total cost and total revenue FIGURE 3: COMPANY A: multi-product–volume chart
functions are linear. This is only
likely to hold true within a short-run, $
restricted level of activity.
¤ Costs can be divided into a 400,000
component that is fixed and a
component that is variable. In reality, Product y
some costs may be semi-fixed,
such as telephone charges, whereby
there may be a fixed monthly rental 300,000
charge and a variable charge for
calls made.
¤ Fixed costs remain constant over the
‘relevant range’ – levels of activity in
which the business has experience 200,000
and can therefore perform a degree
st
of accurate analysis. It will either
fir
have operated at those activity levels
le
tab
that range.
Mo
–200,000
–300,000